「question」の検索結果

Use when the user explicitly asks to use the informed-patient skill to prepare for a medical appointment, organize symptoms before seeing a doctor, or evaluate the evidence behind a diagnosis or treatment. Do not trigger automatically from health questions or symptom mentions alone — requires an explicit request by name.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Chooses the right FORMAT for instructions on Claude.ai — project instructions, a skill, or a standalone prompt — and gives the format-specific structure once chosen. Use when the question is which container an instruction belongs in ("should this be a skill or project instructions", "where do I put this", "how do I set up this project", "is this worth a skill"), or when someone has instructions and does not know how to package them. For the writing principles that apply inside any of the three formats, use writing-instructions. For building, testing and packaging a complete skill directory, use creating-skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Exploratory spike on a throwaway branch — answer a named question with disposable code. Never merges; exits to a findings note or /ca-feature.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Show the project's current state at a glance — stage, open tasks, open questions, overrides since the last checkpoint, current branch. Read-only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate an unexplained defect or unexpected behavior without changing application code. Use for root-cause diagnosis and an evidence-backed handoff, including a bounded unresolved result. Not for implementing a known fix, new features, or explanation-only questions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Restructure code without changing observable behavior: rename, extract, inline, move, deduplicate, or replace an internal implementation with an equivalent one. Prove parity through unchanged pre-existing tests. Not for new behavior, bug fixes, explanation-only questions, or committing finished work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Exploratory spike on a throwaway branch — answer a named question with disposable code. Never merges; exits to a findings note or $ca-feature.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assemble the governance record for a range — commits, overrides, ADRs, sprint auto-decisions, open questions, checkpoint findings — into one dated audit packet. Read-only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate an unexplained defect or unexpected behavior without changing application code. Use for root-cause diagnosis and an evidence-backed handoff, including a bounded unresolved result. Not for implementing a known fix, new features, or explanation-only questions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Restructure code without changing observable behavior: rename, extract, inline, move, deduplicate, or replace an internal implementation with an equivalent one. Prove parity through unchanged pre-existing tests. Not for new behavior, bug fixes, explanation-only questions, or committing finished work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mandatory pre-code gate and definition-of-done for ANY Odoo change (add field, override method, inherit view/xpath, OWL/JS patch, wizard, cron, controller, report, security, migration, bug fix, refactor, "optimize", "clean code", "stick to base"), Odoo 16-19. Also when the user pastes an Odoo traceback or install/upgrade error (ParseError "cannot be located in parent view", "Field ... does not exist", missing xmlid) or asks where an Odoo model, field, method, view or xmlid is defined. Run BEFORE brainstorming or planning: Odoo design questions are answered by tracing the real source into a Context Brief (file:line), not by open-ended Q&A or memory. Resolves the Odoo runtime and version, loads the matching odoo-<major> pack, and closes with install, test, upgrade, i18n, security and hygiene checks before commit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when receiving code review feedback (especially if unclear or technically questionable), when completing tasks or major features requiring review before proceeding, or before making any completion/success claims. Covers three practices - receiving feedback with technical rigor over performative agreement, requesting reviews via code-reviewer subagent, and verification gates requiring evidence before any status claims. Essential for subagent-driven development, pull requests, and preventing false completion claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Route HugeGraph MCP structured graph query tasks to stable read-only tools. Use when the user asks graph questions, asks to generate Gremlin, provides Gremlin to explain, or needs read-only graph exploration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a throwaway prototype to answer a design question. Use when the user wants to sanity-check whether a state model or logic feels right, or explore what a UI should look like.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate a question against high-trust primary sources and capture the findings as a Markdown file in the repo. Use when the user wants a topic researched, docs or API facts gathered, or reading legwork delegated to a background agent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Watch a video from YouTube, Instagram, X/Twitter, Vimeo, TikTok or any of ~1800 yt-dlp sites (or a local path). Downloads with yt-dlp, extracts auto-scaled frames with ffmpeg, pulls the transcript from captions (or local mlx-whisper fallback, no API key), and hands the result to Claude so it can answer questions about what's in the video.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when starting any conversation - establishes how to find and use skills, requiring skill invocation before ANY response including clarifying questions

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Choose the right prototyping fidelity and method for the design question.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Email triage system that handles both one-time setup and recurring triage in a single skill. Auto-detects state: if no knowledge base exists at ${WORKSPACE}/Email/, runs an 8-section onboarding interview (grill-me discipline, one question at a time) to build a 7-file personalized KB, then offers to run triage immediately. If the KB already exists, skips setup and goes straight to triage — searches recent emails, classifies them via the user's taxonomy, researches new senders, generates TAKE IT/WORTH/PASS/FLAG recommendations, drafts replies (NEVER sends), delivers a report, and updates the KB. Use with 'update' argument to refresh preferences. Setup triggers: 'set up my inbox', 'configure inbox triage', 'set up my email system', 'configure email triage', 'build my email knowledge base', 'initialize email management'. Triage triggers: 'triage my inbox', 'inbox triage', 'check my email', 'run email triage', 'process my inbox', 'what's new in my email', 'handle my email', 'email triage'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate STAR stories, practice questions, and talking points from resume

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates a fully structured, project-specific CLAUDE.md by scanning the repo for signal files (package.json, Makefile, .github/workflows/, .env.example, etc.), inferring stack, commands, architecture, and conventions, then asking at most 3 targeted questions for what cannot be inferred. Use whenever the user says 'create a CLAUDE.md', 'my CLAUDE.md is blank', 'generate project context', 'initialize CLAUDE.md', 'set up Claude context for this repo', 'fill in my CLAUDE.md', or any variation where someone needs their project context documented for Claude. If a CLAUDE.md already exists with content, runs a diff-and-merge flow before writing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SERP-informed outline generation with H2/H3 heading hierarchy, competitive content gap analysis, section-by-section word count targets, chart and image placement markers, FAQ question planning, and internal linking zones. Skeleton only: structure, H2/H3 hierarchy, word counts, FAQ slots. Use blog-brief instead if you need full competitive analysis, statistics research, and image suggestions. Lighter than a full content brief, generates article skeleton and structure only, ready for /blog write to consume. Use when user says "outline", "blog outline", "content outline", "structure blog", "plan sections", "article skeleton", "heading structure", "SERP analysis", "competitive outline", "plan article".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user's task involves Ant Design (antd) — writing antd components, debugging antd issues, querying antd APIs/props/tokens/demos, migrating between antd versions, or analyzing antd usage in a project. Triggers on antd-related code, imports from 'antd', or explicit antd questions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs evidence-aware, multi-provider research with the Librarium v2 CLI. Use for deep research, competitive research, answer-engine visibility checks, or questions needing grounded multi-source coverage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。