「sam」の検索結果

Schools of historical thought, methodology debates, and the philosophy of history. Covers the major historiographical traditions (Annales, Marxist, feminist, postcolonial, subaltern, world-systems), their methodological commitments, their contributions and limitations, and the enduring debates about objectivity, narrative, and the nature of historical knowledge. Use when evaluating how different historians approach the same subject, understanding why historical interpretations change over time, or assessing the theoretical framework underlying a historical argument.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Field observation, data collection, and research methods for geographic inquiry. Covers site selection and sampling strategies, field observation techniques (landscape reading, transects, quadrats), survey and interview methods for human geography, GPS and field mapping, environmental monitoring and instrumentation, data recording and field notebooks, ethical considerations in fieldwork, and the integration of field data with GIS analysis. Use when planning geographic field research, designing data collection protocols, evaluating field evidence, or connecting field observations to broader geographic analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluating the quality, provenance, and relevance of evidence that supports or undermines a claim. Covers source credibility, sampling quality, study design, levels of evidence (anecdote to meta-analysis), base rate integration, distinguishing primary from secondary sources, and calibrating belief to evidence strength. Use when the question is not whether an argument is valid but whether its premises are actually supported by the available data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identity, authentication, authorization, and token management for cloud platforms. Covers Keystone-style scoped tokens, OAuth 2.0 flows, OpenID Connect, JWT structure and pitfalls, federation with SAML/OIDC, service-to-service auth with mTLS and SPIFFE, principle of least privilege, IAM role design, and the service catalog pattern (public/internal/admin endpoints). Use when designing authn/authz for a multi-tenant cloud service, integrating with an identity provider, or reviewing IAM policies for over-privilege.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a skill by running a paired probe — the same task once with the skill loaded and once without — segment both traces into goal-directed phases, align phases, and emit a SIP report (surface anchoring, template copy, excess planning, task recovery, off-task artifact). Use whenever a skill is created, modified, or proposed for retirement. Pass-rate is BLIND to most skill effects: CTA (arxiv 2605.11946v1) shows a single skill can produce 522 measurable behavioural changes across 49 tasks while pass-rate moves only +0.3%. Triggers: "audit this skill", "is this skill helping", "retire skill", "before shipping skill", "behavioural impact of skill X", or any skill review event.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use the moment a request is underspecified and you are about to act on an ASSUMED goal. Enumerate the candidate goals the request could mean, project the action or artifact each one implies, and check whether they diverge: if two or more plausible goals lead to materially different actions or artifacts, ask exactly ONE targeted clarifying question; otherwise proceed on the most-likely goal and state the assumption in one line. Clarification is an evidence-producing action, not a delay — but one question, never an interrogation. Distinct from gsd-spec-phase (GSD-phase-bound, emits a heavy SPEC.md) and intent-router (fetch strategy, not goal disambiguation). Backed by agent goal-state inference (arxiv 2606.16813v1). Triggers on acting under an assumed goal when the request admits more than one materially different reading.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

OpenStack Keystone identity service skill for deploying, configuring, operating, and troubleshooting the authentication and authorization backbone of an OpenStack cloud. Covers identity management, token lifecycle (Fernet provider with rotation), service catalog registration, RBAC policy customization, domain/project/user hierarchy, federation basics (SAML/OIDC), credential encryption, and endpoint management. Use when deploying Keystone via Kolla-Ansible, managing users and projects, debugging 401 errors, rotating Fernet keys, configuring RBAC policies, or integrating services through the service catalog.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

多模型镜头提示词适配：把一份分镜表改写成适合不同视频生成模型的提示词（中/英、首帧/首尾帧/纯文生视频、运镜词表、负面约束），模型中立、不编造价格或参数。Use when the user wants the same shot list adapted for Seedance, 可灵 Kling, Veo, Runway, Hailuo/海螺, Wan/通义万相, Sora, Pika or 'any video model', asks 怎么写视频提示词, camera movement terms, or a model returns deformed products.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Constraint-based metabolic modeling (COBRA). FBA, FVA, gene knockouts, flux sampling, SBML models, for systems biology and metabolic engineering analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ensemble SOLID review — fans the ruleset across overlapping focused workers over the same code, then reduces by corroboration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configures and runs git hooks with prek (or the pre-commit it replaces — same `.pre-commit-config.yaml`). Use when adding or troubleshooting git hooks, writing a `prepare-commit-msg` or `commit-msg` stage hook, or authoring `.pre-commit-hooks.yaml` for hook distribution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when independently assessing how bounded Python code could accomplish the same behavior with less maintained code, more Pythonic design, newer language/stdlib capabilities, or well-maintained ecosystem libraries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze, improve, or represent processes across a file or directory by delegating to process-siren. Uses the same semantic model and validation loop as single-process work; Mermaid is produced when it is the useful concise representation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Store instructional prose once and reference it from multiple skills or agents instead of duplicating it. Use when the same steps, rules, or reference material appear in two or more SKILL.md or agent files in one plugin, when deciding whether a shared doc belongs in the plugin-root docs directory or a single skill's references directory, or when tempted to use a symlink or a ../ path to share a file between components.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Same reverse-thinking method as dh:rt-ica (see dh:rt-ica or dh-glossary for the definition), but localizes any MISSING input to the affected task only, as a non-blocking information-completeness pre-pass before task decomposition and plan generation. Use when grooming backlog items, generating plans, decomposing tasks under uncertainty, or working in brownfield and refactor scenarios. Produces completeness summary (APPROVED-FOR-PLANNING, APPROVED-WITH-GAPS, or BLOCKED-FOR-PLANNING), missing input report with dependency mapping, required unblock actions, and planning annotations for downstream tasks. Use dh:rt-ica instead at the S2 implementation gate where missing inputs must halt execution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decomposes a contextualized plan into atomic, independently executable tasks with complete embedded context, registered through the plan API. Use after SAM Stage 3 Context Integration produces the contextualized plan artifact — when the plan is ready for task generation with CLEAR ordering, CoVe checks, and dependency graphs for parallel execution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a diff needs four parallel perspective reviewers (Security, Performance, Quality, Accessibility). Creates an ephemeral SAM plan, collects structured verdicts, synthesizes them into one deduplicated cross-referenced punch list, prints one summary line per perspective, and exits non-zero if any perspective returns REJECT. SKIP is a passing outcome.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Certifies that a feature achieves its original objectives via goal-backward verification (SAM Stage 7). Use when all tasks pass forensic review — starts from expected outcomes, works backwards to verify each was achieved, and returns CERTIFIED or NOT_CERTIFIED with specific gaps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Development harness plugin documentation index. Use when looking up SAM pipeline, backlog lifecycle, SDLC layers, task/plan schema, plan artifacts, quality gates, impact analysis, or dispatch schema documentation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews LLM integration, prompt templates, model selection, token/cost budgets, evaluation harnesses, structured outputs, retries, and streaming. Checks trust boundaries and task evidence against the selected provider/model contract rather than prescribing universal model tiers or sampling settings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Executes SAM Stage 5 — opens an attempt on a single ARTIFACT:TASK, dispatches it to a fresh stateless agent session, runs quality gates, and records an ARTIFACT:EXECUTION with implementation results and verification output on the task. Use when Stage 4 Task Decomposition is complete and tasks are ready for execution, when re-executing a task after Stage 6 returns NEEDS_WORK, or when dispatching a task to a language-appropriate specialist agent via the development harness pipeline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

One-line definitions of development-harness (dh) plugin terminology — RT-ICA, ARL, SAM, the S1-S7 pipeline stage names, Impact Radius — each with a pointer to its canonical source file. Use when a dh skill, agent, or workflow step references a term without defining it, before guessing what the term means from its observed outputs, or when asked what a dh concept or acronym stands for.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when starting a new feature, gathering requirements for an unfamiliar domain, refining a vague idea into actionable scope, or when a user request is ambiguous or underspecified. Conducts SAM Stage 1 discovery — structured requirements gathering through user discussion, asking WHO/WHAT/WHEN/WHY and never HOW. Produces the ARTIFACT:DISCOVERY document containing feature requirements, NFRs, goals, anti-goals, references, and resolved questions. Supports backlog item self-initialization via a

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the PLAN artifact from SAM Stage 2 needs contextualization against actual codebase state — grounds the design plan in reality by performing scope analysis (NEW/MODIFY/COMPLETE classification), conflict detection between plan assumptions and codebase patterns, and resource mapping to concrete file paths and integration points. Produces an updated ARTIFACT:PLAN registered via MCP with a Contextualization section appended.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。