8,372 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use before committing, opening a PR, or reporting a task done — when you want ground-truth confirmation there are no conflict markers, live-looking credentials, debug leftovers, untracked TODOs, or oversized files, without spending a model turn re-reading every file yourself.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates Remotion composition structure focusing ONLY on Sequence ordering, scene transitions, and duration mapping. Input is scene list with durations. Output is COMPOSITION_STRUCTURE.md with Sequence layout and timing calculations. Use when organizing scenes or when asked to "structure composition", "layout scenes", "calculate timing".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Remove the AI tells readers react to in a Threads post: 2026 vocabulary by density, reveal bridges, staccato stacks, stacked triads, performed sincerity. Also --mode audit (500-char fit, hook, hashtag cap), --mode profile (learns how you write) and --mode interview (fills your Story Bank: the numbers, turning points and stories posts are made of). Not for writing from scratch (use threads-post-writer). Keywords: humanize, de-AI Threads post, interview me, audit before posting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Read your Threads (Meta) audience and niche from real data. Scan a niche query or hashtag for the top posts right now with likes, replies, reposts, and quotes, and pull a profile (yours or a competitor) for follower count, bio, verified status, and recent posts with engagement. Powered by Apify, no login. Triggers on "analyze Threads", "what is working on Threads", "top posts for", "competitor Threads profile", "niche scan", "follower count". Not for writing posts (use threads-post-writer).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Draft a reply or a value-add quote post for a specific Threads (Meta) post from its URL. Use to reply in a conversation, answer a creator, or quote-post with added value. Parses the post URL, reads pasted context, decides reply vs quote post, and drafts 1-3 warm variants in your voice. A reply to another user is a separate post and Publora cannot target it, so the draft is returned as a copy-paste block to post yourself. Not for top-level posts (use threads-post-writer).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Derive the binding properties your why/how/what impose on everything below them, so no solution can silently contradict your own product definition. Retrofit entry point for projects that started before v0.120.0; also the re-derive path when why/how/what change and every stance below them goes stale.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Interactive code simulation engine that spawns ghost personas to review your code before it ships. Each ghost walks through your code line-by-line from a different failure perspective: The Adversary (race conditions, double-submit, idempotency), The Enterprise Edge (business logic gaps, multi-currency, B2B tax exemptions, locale), Chaos Monkey (timeouts, partial failures, network partitions, OOM). Produces a chaos timeline, structured bug report with severity ratings, and three resolution tiers (quick fix, robust architecture, generated test suite). Use this skill whenever the user mentions code review, PR review, "find bugs", "what could go wrong", "will this break", "is this safe", "stress test", "edge cases", design review, pre-merge check, dry run, chaos test, or wants a second opinion on any code — even if they don't explicitly ask for "ghost personas" or "simulation". Also trigger when someone pastes a code snippet with any question about its correctness or safety.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when working on imp's quantization formats, loaders, or dequant paths - GGUF Q4_0...Q8_0/Q*_K/IQ4/MXFP4, NVFP4 two-level scaling (Modelopt vs compressed-tensors layouts), FP8 E4M3, StorageTier, decode cache, KV-cache dtypes (auto/fp16/fp8/int8/int4/nvfp4/mxfp4), "which quant should I use", "which KV dtype", scale-factor layout, dequant kernel wiring, imp-quantize / AWQ, judging quant quality (PPL). Do NOT use for writing/optimizing GEMM/GEMV kernels (sm120-cuda-expert) or measuring quant perf (benchmark-cuda).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Send feedback about founder-skills — report a bug, suggest an idea, ask for help, or share a win. Drafts your message and gives you a link to submit; nothing is sent automatically.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Visual vocabulary, design terminology, and prompt engineering strategy for Stitch. Reference this when you need layout pattern names, aesthetic style terms, color structure formulas, or device guidelines.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Constructs LBO models with sources/uses, debt schedules, operating projections, and returns analysis across entry/exit scenarios. Use when modeling leveraged buyouts, calculating sponsor returns, or analyzing leverage capacity.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluates dividend policy with payout sustainability, peer comparison, and investor preference analysis across growth and value contexts. Use when analyzing dividend policy, evaluating payout ratios, or designing dividend programs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Watch the PRs of one or more repos in this workspace — open a review session on an "/open-pr" comment, and a fix session on your own PRs' new findings when you say "Fix now" — then relay questions, drafts and results here. Use when asked to watch, auto-review or auto-fix a repo's PRs; optional `review`/`fix` and PR URLs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create distinctive, production-grade web interfaces with intentional aesthetic direction. Avoids generic AI aesthetics (centered layouts, Inter/Arial, purple gradients, uniform corners). Use for UI components, dashboards, landing pages, React/HTML/CSS layouts where design quality matters.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Exposes Claude's reasoning chain as an auditable, decomposable artifact. Quick mode (default) gives assumption inventory + weakest-link in 2 stages. Full mode (--full) adds decision branching, confidence decomposition, and falsification conditions. Triggers on "왜 그렇게 생각해", "reasoning", "근거", "show your work", "어떻게 그 결론이", "trace", "판단 근거", "why do you think that".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Used when the user asks to "create slides", "make a presentation", "build a deck", "design slides", "generate a pitch deck", "create a conference talk", "make a keynote", "presentation design", "slide layout", "slide template", "presentation structure", or mentions slides, presentations, decks, or talks in any context. Also triggers when the user wants to plan the content and visual direction of a presentation before generating it. This is the entry-point orchestrator that drives the full slide creation workflow across both HTML and PPTX formats. Examples: "I need to create slides for my conference talk about AI adoption", "can you turn this markdown into a presentation?", "I have a product demo tomorrow and need visual materials", "convert my existing PowerPoint to interactive HTML slides".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drive a GitHub Copilot (or any bot reviewer) pull-request review to a clean pass without babysitting it: fix each finding in its own commit, reply to the review thread with the fix sha, resolve the thread, re-request the bot, and poll for the async re-review. Covers the thread node-id (PRRT_...) vs comment databaseId distinction, the resolveReviewThread GraphQL mutation, the copilot-pull-request-reviewer[bot] slug, and how to read the bot's verdict (COMMENTED plus a "human review recommended" banner is not a blocking finding). Use when Copilot has left review comments on your PR, when bot review threads must be closed out with an auditable fix-reply-resolve trail before merge, or when you need to verify that a re-review actually landed on the new HEAD rather than the old one.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review web design for layout quality, typography, colour usage, spacing, responsive behaviour, brand consistency, and visual hierarchy. Covers design principles evaluation and improvement recommendations. Use when reviewing a design mockup before development, assessing an implemented site for design quality, providing feedback during a design review session, evaluating brand consistency, or checking responsive behaviour across breakpoints.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Log a bias-log / vipassana observation to the memex store the moment a reasoning pattern surfaces, mid-session or at close. Use when you catch a bias in your own reasoning (anchoring, confirmation, trust-the-summary), when a pace tell or verification gap appears, or when meditate/observe produces a reflection worth persisting across sessions. Primary path pipes the body to `memex add` over stdin (`--title` required) then runs the `meditate-vipassana` extractor to make it queryable; secondary path appends a numbered bullet to `docs/OBSERVATIONS.md`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Organize, track, and value a trading card game collection. Covers inventory methods, storage best practices, grade-based valuation, want-list management, and collection analytics for Pokemon, MTG, Flesh and Blood, and Kayou cards. Use when starting a new collection and setting up inventory tracking, cataloging an existing collection that has grown beyond casual knowledge, valuing a collection for insurance or sale, or deciding which cards to submit for professional grading based on value potential.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Close out a finished memex milestone slice by writing the handoff trail: update `docs/CONTINUE_HERE.md` §1 current-state and §3 next-slice, tick the `docs/ROADMAP.md` scoreboard (milestone header ✅ + version, `- [x]` items), confirm any new observation is logged (deferring to memex-observe), and propose the git tag plus a `MN Slice X:` commit subject. Use after you finish a milestone slice in the memex repo and before you commit/tag it, when handing the next slice to a fresh session, or whenever CONTINUE_HERE and ROADMAP have drifted behind what actually shipped.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Grade a trading card using PSA, BGS, or CGC standards. Covers observation-first assessment (adapted from meditate's unbiased observation), centering measurement, surface analysis, edge and corner evaluation, and final grade assignment with confidence interval. Supports Pokemon, MTG, Flesh and Blood, and Kayou cards. Use when evaluating a card before professional grading submission, pre-screening a collection for high-grade candidates, settling condition disputes between buyers and sellers, or estimating the grade-dependent value spread for a card.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deep cross-domain synthesis engine for the vault. Triggers on "synthesize X", "what do I know about X", "connect ideas about X", "cross-domain analysis of X", "map everything in the vault about X". Searches comprehensively, surfaces non-obvious patterns and tensions, then challenges the user to generate original thought. The vault should surprise you — if synthesis only confirms what you already think, it failed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Self-configuring content creation pipeline with geo-lint validation. On first use, scans your project to learn its framework, content schema, categories, and authors, then creates SEO & GEO-optimized content matched to your brand voice. Validates every piece with geo-lint's 92 rules until zero violations. Triggers on: "content-creator", "create content", "write blog", "new post", "content calendar", "brand voice", "content strategy".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。