2,425 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Conversational design ideation agent that researches trends, explores visual directions, and refines ideas through adaptive questioning — then produces a rich PRD document and auto-generates Stitch screens. Your design buddy that thinks deeply before designing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ALIGN for paper figures — draw a method-overview figure as an executable p5.js program that replays its own construction in named stages, exports SVG, and improves through pixel-only cross-model review whose gate is 'explain the method back from the figure alone, and is it worth looking at'. The method sets the relationships the figure must show, the chosen visual identity sets how its marks look, a composition source lends arrangements; the method may be the source's own (意临) or yours in its arrangement (风格迁移). Not for one-shot raster image generation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ALIGN for paper figures — draw a method-overview figure as an executable p5.js program that replays its own construction in named stages, exports SVG, and improves through pixel-only independent Codex subagent review whose gate is 'explain the method back from the figure alone, and is it worth looking at'. The method sets the relationships the figure must show, the chosen visual identity sets how its marks look, a composition source lends arrangements; the method may be the source's own (意临) or yours in its arrangement (风格迁移). Not for one-shot raster image generation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This rule enforces the Don't Repeat Yourself principle to avoid code duplication and improve maintainability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Interact with your Public.com brokerage account using the Public.com API. Able to view portfolio, get stock quotes, place trades, and get account updates. To create a Public.com account head to public.com/signup.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Rewrite text so it reads like a real person wrote it, not an AI. Auto-detects Russian vs English and applies the matching rule set. Use when the user asks to humanize text, remove the "AI smell", de-AI, or make AI output sound natural - especially for Russian. Russian requests count too - очеловечь, перепиши как человек, оживи текст, убери запах ИИ, сделай живее, звучит как робот, убери канцелярит. Also use when asked whether a text was written by AI - нейросеть писала?, похоже на ChatGPT?, видно ли, что это ИИ, человек или бот писал, did AI write this? - then check and report findings without rewriting. While installed, also keep your own Russian and English writing free of the quick-list stock phrases, silently; never edit the user's text unless asked.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Exposes Claude's reasoning chain as an auditable, decomposable artifact. Quick mode (default) gives assumption inventory + weakest-link in 2 stages. Full mode (--full) adds decision branching, confidence decomposition, and falsification conditions. Triggers on "왜 그렇게 생각해", "reasoning", "근거", "show your work", "어떻게 그 결론이", "trace", "판단 근거", "why do you think that".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Adversarial, security-first review of a pull request from an EXTERNAL or untrusted contributor — a fork PR, a first-time or unknown author, anyone without write access — before a maintainer merges it. Use this whenever you're reviewing, triaging, or deciding whether to merge a PR opened against tbh-meter by someone outside the maintainer team: 'review PR #123', 'someone opened a PR — is it safe to merge?', 'check this contributor's changes', 'can we take this fork PR?', 'is this contribution legit?'. This is supply-chain DEFENSE, not ordinary code review: every merged PR auto-updates onto every user's machine and ships a memory-reading .exe plus an unsandboxed Electron app, so the author and the PR description are UNTRUSTED and the diff is the only evidence. It posts its verdict as a real GitHub review — an inline comment pinned to each problematic line (via the pulls/reviews API), not just one summary comment. NOT for your own or a fellow maintainer's branch (use self-review for that), and prefer this over the generic review flow for anything coming from outside the team.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Post-implementation self-review. Use AFTER finishing ANY code implementation or change — before declaring it done, committing, or opening a PR — to critique your own work: re-read the diff adversarially, confirm unit tests cover every branch/edge, kill duplication, follow clean-code/SOLID and the repo's own docs & invariants, decide if something should become documentation, update/prune memory, and strip outdated comments. Trigger it whenever you've just written or modified code and are about to wrap up, even if the user didn't explicitly ask for a review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drive a GitHub Copilot (or any bot reviewer) pull-request review to a clean pass without babysitting it: fix each finding in its own commit, reply to the review thread with the fix sha, resolve the thread, re-request the bot, and poll for the async re-review. Covers the thread node-id (PRRT_...) vs comment databaseId distinction, the resolveReviewThread GraphQL mutation, the copilot-pull-request-reviewer[bot] slug, and how to read the bot's verdict (COMMENTED plus a "human review recommended" banner is not a blocking finding). Use when Copilot has left review comments on your PR, when bot review threads must be closed out with an auditable fix-reply-resolve trail before merge, or when you need to verify that a re-review actually landed on the new HEAD rather than the old one.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Step-by-step guidance for DACH-specific governmental procedures including Anmeldung, Finanzamt registration, health insurance enrollment, and social security coordination. Use after arriving in a DACH country and needing to complete mandatory registrations, before a specific appointment to understand what to expect, when an initial registration attempt was rejected, when transitioning between DACH countries, or when handling registrations for dependents alongside your own.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Log a bias-log / vipassana observation to the memex store the moment a reasoning pattern surfaces, mid-session or at close. Use when you catch a bias in your own reasoning (anchoring, confirmation, trust-the-summary), when a pace tell or verification gap appears, or when meditate/observe produces a reflection worth persisting across sessions. Primary path pipes the body to `memex add` over stdin (`--title` required) then runs the `meditate-vipassana` extractor to make it queryable; secondary path appends a numbered bullet to `docs/OBSERVATIONS.md`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Add an external probabilistic classifier to a decision path without letting it take the path over. Covers finding the externally-graded rows you are already logging, measuring the confidence separation between the overrides it got right and the ones it got wrong, choosing an operating point your data licenses, failing open at the call site, and proving the whole arrangement offline with no API key. Applies to any service returning a score you can order — TypeSafe AI's System One models (Jev) are the worked example. Most of the method transfers to a local model or a second heuristic, with the parts that do not called out where they arise. Use when a rule-based path is wrong often enough to hurt, when someone proposes replacing a heuristic with a model, when a confidence threshold needs a defensible value, or when an oracle already in production has never been graded.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Select an OCR/HTR engine by benchmarking candidates on the same labelled samples — source ground truth from open datasets (e.g. Hugging Face PAGE-XML corpora) or hand-transcription, wrap every engine behind a transcribe(image_path) -> str adapter (vision-LLMs via any OpenAI-compatible endpoint, dedicated HTR REST APIs, cloud OCR), and score with zero-dependency raw CER, lenient CER, WER, and a critical name/date token diff. Use when choosing an engine for handwriting or historical-document transcription, when published accuracy claims need honest verification on your own material, or when a records workflow must surface confident-but-wrong names and dates that a low aggregate CER hides.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Self-improve AI Factory skills based on project context, accumulated patches, and codebase patterns. Analyzes what went wrong, what works, and enhances skills to prevent future issues. Use when you want to make AI smarter for your project.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verify which process actually owns a TCP port before assuming your fresh restart succeeded. Use when: (1) you killed an old server and started a new one but behaviour matches the OLD code/data, (2) `pkill -f pattern` returned 0 but old behaviour persists, (3) you embedded a new asset/binary but the served version is stale, (4) any "I just restarted X but I'm getting old results" situation. `pkill -f` matches against the process command line — if the live old process was started with `--port 0` (auto-assigned) and got the port you now want, the pattern won't match it. Always verify with `lsof -i :PORT` before debugging deeper.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Decide what to PERSIST in your data structures (graph nodes, DB tables, cache layouts) based on the QUERIES you must answer, not the DEFINITIONS that justify the data. Definitions tell you logical identity; storage strategy is independent. Materializing every definitional component leads to O(N×M) blow-ups that masquerade as memory leaks. Use when: (1) designing a new graph-node type, edge type, DB table, or cache layout; (2) about to name a `subgraph` / `comprises` / `members` / `contains` collection on a parent entity; (3) memory growth proportional to (entities × per-entity-elements); (4) "memory leak" debugging that survives multiple targeted patches — the leak may be storage shape, not retention; (5) pre-implementation sketch includes "for each X, store all reached nodes"; (6) research/spec doc says "X = ⟨A, B, C⟩" and you're tempted to make it three storage edges per X.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find company & contact data. Turn your agent into a prospecting platform. Get contact information, roles, tech stack, business events, website changes, intent data. Build lead lists, research prospects, identify talent. 150M+ companies, 800M+ professionals, 50+ data sources.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Skills to interact with your Dataproc clusters and jobs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use these skills when you need to explore the database structure, discover schema objects like tables and graphs, and execute custom SQL queries to interact with your data.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use these skills when you need to discover and explore data assets in the Knowledge Catalog. It allows you to search for entries, lookup specific metadata, and explore aspect types to understand your data platform's assets.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply the Minimum Sufficient Language (MSL) principle through the MSL Kernel to write anything a reader must act on. Bind the reader and what they already know, partition facts from the machinery that produced them, emit each admitted fact as an action, a verification, a judgment, or a state, and stop when every claim is checkable and the reader can act. Use for status updates, work-in-progress reports to your own user, closeout and convergence comments, tickets, pull request and review write-ups, incident and postmortem notes, emails, memos, and any draft for readers outside the work. Also use when the user says MSL, Minimum Sufficient Language, write this for stakeholders, drop the jargon, make this readable, or asks for a paste-ready draft.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Self-improve AI Factory skills based on project context, accumulated patches, and codebase patterns. Analyzes what went wrong, what works, and enhances skills to prevent future issues. Use when you want to make AI smarter for your project.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Before any material decision — code chunk, plan, strategy, design, scope cut, push to GitHub — convene a war-room. The session driver takes the CEO seat: frame the tradeoff, summon specialist seats from whatever agent roster the user has built, dispatch a cross-family voice via `ato dispatch` so priors actually disagree, decide. A failure-mode filter (wrong assumptions / overcomplexity / orthogonal edits / imperative-over-declarative — Karpathy's four are one good default, swap in your own) runs on every dispatch. Place in the v2.16 stack: war-rooms DECIDE before code starts; `ato-mission` EXECUTES the work between decisions (multi-step, goal-driven, persisted across days); `ato-review` VERIFIES the resulting commits. Use a war-room for the design verdict, hand the verdict to a Mission, review the merged result. Fires before: sending a code draft to the user as final, opening a PR, pushing to a remote-tracking branch, committing >50 LOC of behavior change, or delivering a plan or strategic recommendation as the final answer.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。