4,018 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when executing and reporting the analysis/interpretation for an American Anthropologist (AA) manuscript so it survives expert anonymous review — disciplined ethnographic/qualitative inference, honest interpretation, and (for biological/archaeological work) sound quantitative analysis. Guides analysis and interpretation norms; it does not fabricate evidence or quotations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when defending the research design of an American Educational Research Journal (AERJ) manuscript — quantitative (multilevel, IRT, quasi-experimental, RCT), qualitative (case study, ethnography, interview), or mixed methods. AERJ judges each tradition on its own terms against the AERA reporting standards. Strengthens the design; it does not write code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when anticipating referee objections or calibrating review expectations for an American Economic Journal: Microeconomics (AEJ: Micro) manuscript before submission. Pre-empts the objections theory referees raise and reads the editorial process; it does not draft the response letter (see aejmic-rebuttal).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the quantitative model is the bottleneck for an American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics (AEJ: Macro) manuscript — DSGE, New Keynesian, heterogeneous-agent (HANK / Aiyagari-Bewley), or structural estimation — and calibration, parameter identification, solution accuracy, or counterfactual validity need discipline. For empirical shock identification see aejmac-identification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when anticipating how AEJ: Economic Policy referees and editors will read a manuscript, before submission or before an R&R, to pre-empt the objections that sink policy-evaluation papers. Maps likely pushback to fixes and calibrates expectations; it does not write the response letter (see aejpol-rebuttal) or fix the identification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when building and refining exhibits for an Administrative Science Quarterly (ASQ) manuscript — qualitative data structures and data-to-theory tables, process models, and quantitative tables. Designs exhibits; it does not run the analysis behind them.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when anticipating the objections a sophisticated American Economic Journal: Applied Economics (AEJ: Applied) referee will raise, so a manuscript pre-empts them before submission or addresses them in revision. Plans the defense; it does not draft the response letter (aeja-rebuttal) or run the submission preflight (aeja-submission).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the contribution of an American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics (AEJ: Macro) manuscript relative to the macro frontier is fuzzy, contested, or undersold. Frames the marginal contribution against quantitative-theory and identified-empirical literatures; it does not fix the identification or the model itself.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when anticipating the objections referees and coeditors will raise on an American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics (AEJ: Macro) manuscript, and calibrating desk-reject and revision odds, before submission. Pre-empts pushback and plans the review; it does not draft the post-decision response letter (use aejmac-rebuttal).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the empirical identification of a macro shock or dynamic causal effect is the bottleneck for an American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics (AEJ: Macro) manuscript — SVAR, local projections, narrative, high-frequency/proxy-VAR, or micro-data macro designs. Stress-tests the identification to the AEJ: Macro broad-interest quantitative bar; for model-parameter identification see aejmac-theory-model.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when executing and reporting the analysis for an Administrative Science Quarterly (ASQ) manuscript — qualitative coding and data-to-theory construction, or quantitative estimation and robustness. Makes the evidence-to-theory link transparent; it does not design the study (see asq-methods).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when choosing and justifying the research design for an Administrative Science Quarterly (ASQ) manuscript — qualitative (grounded-theory, ethnographic, historical) or quantitative — and setting the rigor bar. Designs the study; it does not run the analysis (see asq-data-analysis).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when revising an ACL paper for computational-linguistics house style, covering task-first framing, linguistic examples tied to quantitative error analysis, scoping language claims to tested languages, LLM-era claim discipline, anonymous self-reference, Limitations prose, and compressing into the 8-page or 4-page ACL format.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
管理本地 Markdown/Obsidian 知识库：素材入库、健康检查、增量索引、关键词与 semantic-lite 检索、逐字原文资料包、归档和 MCP 连接。用于搜索知识库、整理资料及为 Agent 准备可定位的引用。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Email campaign/sequence performance review composite. Pulls campaign data (sends, opens, replies, bounces), reads actual email copy and subject lines, analyzes reply content (objections, positive interest, questions), and produces a diagnostic report covering quantitative metrics, copy quality, lead quality, and actionable recommendations. Tool-agnostic — works with Smartlead (MCP), Instantly, Outreach, Lemlist, Apollo, or CSV data.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Maintain a brand kit — the canonical brand context an ad or content pipeline reads (positioning, audience, voice, standing instructions, brand-type, value-props, colors), plus manage the product list and attach product photos. Use when someone says "update my brand kit", "set my brand voice/audience", "add a product to my brand", or hands you a folder of product shots to attach. Platform-agnostic: it teaches the field model, partial-update/clear semantics, override behavior, caps and validation, and the hero-image and product-matching rules — independent of any specific backend.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assemble a 3D-CGI app sizzle — nano-banana CGI plates (blank-glow floating phone + a CGI studio with rim-light + placeholder burst shapes; studio look and phone finish come from the recipe choices) plus PIL compositing of the REAL App Store screenshots onto the bezel + burst-out overlays, driven by Kling 3.0 i2v steady-float per beat with a per-beat Ken-Burns FFmpeg push-in fallback when Kling garbles the UI, then VO/music mix (sidechain duck, loudnorm) + 1.15x speed + anti-AI grain finalize. The on-screen UI, any faces in it, and the wordmark are ALWAYS real assets composited via PIL — never AI-rendered. The paid steps (plates, i2v clips, VO, music) are separate capabilities; this ships the config + PIPELINE + FREE assembly and the recipe orchestrates the spend. Use for the cgi-app-sizzle video format.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assemble a wordless macro-tabletop food-product sizzle ad from a config — normalize fps and SAR across ~4 photorealistic macro clips (hands tearing, flat lay, bite, box hero), concat them, apply a global anti-AI grain pass (eq plus hqdn3d plus noise), composite the audio (a non-diegetic instrumental music bed plus a couple of short diegetic SFX like a snap and a tear placed at measured cue points, loudnorm), composite a STATIC end card entirely in PIL (real logo PNG plus real product PNG plus a serif heritage headline plus a CTA — never AI-rendered text), and burn optional serif stat-callout pills at beats. This is the FREE deterministic assembly stage (normalized concat plus grain plus music and SFX mix plus PIL end card plus callouts); the macro keyframes, i2v clips, and music bed come from create-image-fal, create-video-fal, and create-music-elevenlabs. Use for the food-product-sizzle format.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan, design, author, preview, publish, and manage Power BI reports across requirements, page design, local PBIR/PBIP edits, validation, screenshots, Fabric upload/download, and rebinding. Use for report lifecycle work; use semantic-model-authoring for model or DAX changes and fabriciq for data questions. Triggers: plan Power BI report, design report page, edit PBIR, preview PBIP, publish report, rebind report
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Optimizes Simulink models for Embedded Coder generated code. Use when asked to optimize or improve generated code, or reduce code metrics for a Simulink model. Targets: execution time, memory footprint (RAM, ROM, stack, data copies), code size, MISRA compliance, or any semantically similar generated-code metric. Works iteratively — measures baseline, suggests changes, applies, and re-measures to confirm improvement. Triggers can be prompts similar to: optimize generated code runtime, reduce runtime, shrink code size, improve code efficiency, reduce memory usage, speed up generated code, follow MISRA compliance and so on. CAUTION: Do NOT attempt to optimize Simulink models for generated code efficiency without following this skill — the iterative measurement, gating, and rollback workflow is essential for safe optimization.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze code coverage and CRAP (Change Risk Anti-Patterns) scores to identify high-risk code. Use OpenCover format with ReportGenerator for Risk Hotspots showing cyclomatic complexity and untested code paths.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Segment single cells from multiplexed IMC/MIBI tissue images using Mesmer/DeepCell, Cellpose, or ilastik+CellProfiler, covering whole-cell vs nuclear segmentation, the summed-membrane-channel decision, nuclear-expansion bias, lateral spillover, resolution-floor parameters, and downstream-proxy evaluation. Use when delineating cells after preprocessing, choosing a segmentation model, building a cell mask for quantification, diagnosing impossible double-positive populations, or troubleshooting over/under-segmentation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Interactive cell annotation and image QC for IMC/MIBI using napari, napari-imc, Mantis Viewer, and cytomapper, covering the pixels-to-cell-table bridge, overlaying masks to catch segmentation/spillover artifacts, inter-annotator variability as the accuracy ceiling, contrast-as-threshold, and building class-balanced ground-truth label sets. Use when manually labeling cells, generating training data for a classifier, QC-ing segmentation on the image, confirming clusters are spatially real, or choosing an annotation viewer.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detects focal chromatin loops (point interactions / corner-dots) in balanced Hi-C and Micro-C contact maps and aggregates/validates a loop set. Covers de-novo calling with cooltools dots (HiCCUPS-style 4-background local enrichment with lambda-chunked FDR), chromosight (template-correlation), and Mustache (scale-space blob detection); aggregate peak analysis (APA) via cooltools pileup for confirmation; the depth/resolution prerequisite (de-novo needs ~5-10kb resolution = hundreds of millions to billions of valid pairs); consensus across callers and convergent-CTCF support as validation; and differential loops via union anchors plus chromosight quantify. Use when calling chromatin loops or dots from a cooler, deciding whether a map is deep enough to call de-novo vs running APA on known CTCF/cohesin anchors, building an aggregate peak pileup, comparing loops across conditions, or validating loop calls. For HiChIP/PLAC-seq/PCHi-C protein-anchored data use FitHiChIP/MAPS, not dots.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。