「assess」の検索結果

Track and analyze US government shutdown liquidity impacts by monitoring TGA (Treasury General Account), bank reserves, EFFR, and SOFR data from FRED API. Use when user wants to (1) analyze current or past government shutdown effects on financial markets, (2) track liquidity conditions during fiscal policy disruptions, (3) assess "stealth tightening" effects, (4) compare shutdown episodes across different monetary policy regimes (QE vs QT), or (5) generate liquidity stress reports with historical context. Recommended usage frequency is weekly on Wednesdays after TGA/reserve data releases.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reads model uncertainty from token log-probabilities. Covers collecting logprobs and aggregating multi-token labels, confidence tiers and margins for triage, calibration assessment with ECE, Brier scores, and reliability diagrams against human labels, responsible downstream use of confidence, and reproducibility archives. Use when the user asks about classifier confidence by item, logprobs, top-k tokens, calibration, ECE, Brier, reliability diagrams, or routing low-confidence cases to human review. Codebook and validation design go to text-classification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Security audit and code review checklist. Covers 30+ vulnerability types with real-world exploit cases (2021-2026) and EVMbench Code4rena patterns. Use when conducting security audits, code reviews, or pre-deployment security assessments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Score your Claude Code environment on a fun 0-10 ladder (Tourist → Swarm) calibrated to the quickstart's 4 systems — Context, Skills, Integrations, Orchestration. Two front doors - an interactive quiz (zero setup, shareable) or a silent scan of your repo. Outputs a next-level roadmap plus a branded HTML dashboard or a paste-anywhere ASCII card. The default mastery skill of this quickstart. Triggers - "level", "what's my claude code level", "claude code level quiz", "assess my setup", "how good is my setup", "claude code maturity"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Диагностика ступени мастерства (Диагност R28, FORM.089 §6.1 v5.0) прямо в VS Code / claude.ai. До 6 вопросов, ~3 мин. Сохраняет cp-профиль в канонический журнал learning.cp_assessments — через MCP-инструмент (browser) или напрямую в Neon (VS Code). Запускай когда: пилот говорит «пройди диагностику», «какая моя ступень», «/diagnose» — или ПРОАКТИВНО когда видишь пустой cp_profile или нового пользователя без данных.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit codebase for agentic layer coverage and identify gaps. Use when assessing agentic layer maturity, identifying investment opportunities, or evaluating primitive coverage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Track and measure agentic coding KPIs for ZTE progression. Use when measuring workflow effectiveness, tracking Size/Attempts/Streak/Presence metrics, or assessing readiness for autonomous operation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate a codebase for agent-friendliness based on autonomous agent best practices. Use when asked to "evaluate for agents", "check agent readiness", "audit for autonomous execution", "assess agent-friendliness", or when reviewing infrastructure for unattended agent operation. Also use when asked about making a codebase more suitable for AI agents or autonomous workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Track and optimize agent specialization during methodology development. Use when agent specialization emerges (generic agents show >5x performance gap), multi-experiment comparison needed, or methodology transferability analysis required. Captures agent set evolution (Aₙ tracking), meta-agent evolution (Mₙ tracking), specialization decisions (when/why to create specialized agents), and reusability assessment (universal vs domain-specific vs task-specific). Enables systematic cross-experiment learning and optimized M₀ evolution. 2-3 hours overhead per experiment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Testing and benchmarking LLM agents including behavioral testing, capability assessment, reliability metrics, and production monitoring—where even top agents achieve less than 50% on real-world benchmarks Use when: agent testing, agent evaluation, benchmark agents, agent reliability, test agent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when addressing PR review comments from Copilot, Claude, or human reviewers. Critically assesses each comment, recommends action (implement/push-back/discuss), and executes appropriately.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run deep research on a single competitor. Produces a dossier with executive summary, position + messaging, status-quo alternatives, key differentiators, pricing position, where-they-win / where-they-lose, threat assessment, and what to watch. Writes to marketing/competitors/MMYY-{competitor-slug}.md. Triggers - "competitor research", "competitive analysis", "research competitor X", "battlecard prep", "analyze [competitor name]

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Score your Claude Code environment on a fun 0-10 ladder (Tourist → Swarm) calibrated to the quickstart's 4 systems — Context, Skills, Integrations, Orchestration. Two front doors - an interactive quiz (zero setup, shareable) or a silent scan of your repo. Outputs a next-level roadmap plus a branded HTML dashboard or a paste-anywhere ASCII card. The default mastery skill of this quickstart. Triggers - "level", "what's my claude code level", "claude code level quiz", "assess my setup", "how good is my setup", "claude code maturity"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end research workflow skill for investment analysts and policy researchers. Three scope modes the user picks at trigger time — light (4-5 page decision memo, ~15 min, 0 charts), medium (12-15 page topic brief, ~1 h, 6-10 charts), heavy (flagship report 30-40 pages / 15k+ words, ~2-3 h, 25-35+ charts, multi-stage workflow, multi-LLM, PDF + Word + WeChat + HTML derivations). Reports default to English; the AI replies in the user's chat language. Battle-tested on real macro/policy/equity reports (e.g. Saudi Vision 2030 deep-dive). Triggers when user types /analyst-research, /flagship-research, or describes needs like "research report", "topic analysis", "investment research", "做研报", "投研报告", "主题分析", "深度分析", "policy assessment", "industry deep-dive". Not for: pure news commentary (use topic-brief), slide decks (use deckster-slide-generator), one-shot Q&A.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess MotherDuck costs, plan fit, and ROI using current pricing and the workload’s compute and storage needs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess MotherDuck security, permissions, isolation, residency, and compliance requirements against documented controls.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate whether an OSS repo is worth long-term investment before committing time. Assesses project health, governance, community, bus factor, and trajectory. Use when deciding whether to contribute to a specific repo, choosing between multiple repos, or evaluating a project's sustainability. Not for checking if a repo accepts contributions — use oss-find-issue for that.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepare to contribute to an open source repo. Reads all contribution docs, checks eligibility, assesses the user's knowledge gaps, and fills them before coding starts. Use after finding an issue with oss-find-issue, or when starting work on any OSS repo. Not for installing dependencies or getting the build and tests running. Use oss-setup-dev-env for that.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full marketing audit — runs all relevant checklists against your product, site, and marketing in one go. Covers SEO, content, email, ads, social media, CRO, landing pages, technical SEO, and creative production. Produces a "state of your marketing" report with health scores per area and a prioritized fix list. Use when "marketing audit", "full audit", "audit everything", "marketing health check", "what's broken", "state of marketing", or any request to comprehensively assess marketing across all channels.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

60-Second Token Snapshot — fast assessment with signal, key factors, and price levels without launching subagents

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Risk Assessment & Position Sizing — analyzes volatility, drawdown, correlation, liquidity, smart contract, regulatory, concentration, and unlock risks with crypto-specific position sizing calculators and a composite Risk Score (0-100, higher = safer)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute comprehensive client-side injection vulnerability assessments on web applications to identify XSS and HTML injection flaws, demonstrate exploitation techniques for session hijacking and credential theft, and validate input sanitization and output encoding mechanisms.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Odoo-aware idea validation for deciding whether a module, addon, app, or product should exist before implementation. Use when the user wants to validate an Odoo module idea, check whether a solution already exists, assess usefulness or buyer demand, narrow a wedge, or decide whether an addon is worth building.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。