「path」の検索結果

Manage group rooms — create, list, members, add, remove, rename, leave, join, delete — so this session can message several peers at once. A group is a local roster of saved peers; sending to it delivers a private copy to each member. Use to set up or adjust a room, then send to it with the send skill (`send --group NAME`). `<user>` is this session's user directory (absolute path; from init).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Save a contact someone shared with you (a Contact card) as a local peer. agent-talk does NOT auto-import — review staged cards and import only ones from a peer you trust. `<user>` is this session's user directory (absolute path; from init).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill for any work involving a MATLAB Project (.prj file) — creating a new project, tracking files, managing the project path, configuring Simulink cache and code-generation folders, running project health checks, or writing build scripts that keep the project in sync with the file system. Trigger phrases include "set up a MATLAB project", "create a .prj", "track this file in the project", "project health check", "build script conventions". This skill is the generic foundation; domain-specific skills (e.g. `mbse-workflow`) build on it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce a risk matrix or heatmap that quantifies what could break by business impact × probability, runs failure mode analysis on the top items, and maps test coverage to risk zones. Includes stakeholder interview frameworks and continuous reassessment. Run this BEFORE test-strategy or test-planning. Use when: "risk assessment," "risk matrix," "risk heatmap," "what could break," "critical paths," "failure modes," "where to focus testing." Not for: multi-quarter QA direction — use test-strategy. Not for: a single sprint/release test plan — use test-planning. Not for: hands-on session-based bug hunting — use exploratory-testing. Related: test-strategy, test-planning, release-readiness, qa-metrics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test application security against OWASP Top 10 (2025) with automated CI tooling: OWASP ZAP (DAST), dependency/supply-chain scanning (OSV-Scanner, SBOM, provenance), Semgrep SAST, auth/session tests (JWT, OAuth, RBAC), and XSS/CSRF/SQLi/SSRF Playwright patterns. Use when: "security test," "OWASP," "vulnerability," "ZAP," "XSS," "SSRF," "dependency scan," "auth testing," "OWASP LLM Top 10." Scope is automated scanning + negative-path security tests in CI, not manual penetration testing. Not for: mapping security controls to regulations (SOC 2, HIPAA, PCI, GDPR) — use compliance-testing; pipeline stage wiring and deploy gating mechanics — use ci-cd-integration; purely functional API auth/input tests with no attacker model — see api-testing; testing your product's own LLM features or defending the agent itself (prompt-injection detector, indirect injection, jailbreak red-teaming) — use ai-system-testing. Related: ci-cd-integration, compliance-testing, api-testing, shift-left-testing, ai-system-testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compact the current conversation into a portable handoff document, with an optional live clarification path for compatible Codex tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Trim large MetaX model directories for dummy smoke tests or real-checkpoint loading on limited GPUs. Preserve target execution paths while reducing depth; use the real-weight workflow when a loadable checkpoint is requested. Not for accuracy evaluation or model compatibility upgrades.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when turning local, private, or personal Agent Skills into publishable skills for GitHub, marketplaces, teams, or public sharing, especially when private paths, personal habits, credentials, internal hosts, or user-specific context must be removed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Choose and run ACU-only, adaptive PPU in-kernel timeline, or optional bounded joint analysis for a PPU kernel. Use for device-level bottleneck diagnosis, kernel-internal critical-path questions, or evidence that genuinely needs both; do not require all three modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate a structured implementation plan from an evidence draft. Validate paths, obtain configured independent Codex and Qoder reviews, synthesize available advice against repository evidence, preserve the draft, and produce testable acceptance criteria and validation steps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides parallel exploration of multiple implementation approaches using git worktrees. Use when facing decisions with multiple valid paths. Triggers on: explore options, compare approaches, parallel exploration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Connect user journeys to screens, defining the UI structure and navigation paths during PRD v0.4 User Journeys. Triggers on requests to define screens, design screen flows, map UI structure, plan navigation, or when user asks "what screens do we need?", "define screens", "screen flow", "UI structure", "information architecture", "navigation design", "wireframe planning". Consumes UJ- (User Journey Mapping), FEA- (Feature Value Planning), BR- (constraints). Outputs SCR- entries for screens and DES- entries for design system elements. Feeds v0.5 Red Team Review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Map user missions from trigger to value moment, organizing features into coherent paths during PRD v0.4 User Journeys. Triggers on requests to map user journeys, define user flows, describe how users accomplish goals, or when user asks "map user journeys", "define user flows", "user missions", "how do users accomplish X?", "journey mapping", "what steps do users take?", "pain to value flow". Consumes PER- (Persona Definition), FEA- (Feature Value Planning), KPI- (Outcome Definition). Outputs UJ- entries with step flows, pain points, and value moments. Feeds v0.4 Screen Flow Definition.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review code changes for bugs, regressions, convention violations, and high-value cleanup opportunities. Use for diffs, commit ranges, hosted PR/MR URLs, branches, paths, staged changes, or working-tree changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refactor changed code to reduce duplication, complexity, and wasted work. Use for diffs, commit ranges, PRs, paths, staged changes, or working-tree changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Inspect screenshots, photos, diagrams, image paths, and image URLs when the task depends on visible content. Use when the prompt lacks actual image content, native inspection fails, or the user requests inspect_image; prefer the MCP tool, then the installed CLI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Summarize each day's Git activity into a concise daily work log, for a single date or a range. Uses the current repository, optional configured work projects, or paths named in conversation; configuration is never required.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "analyze session", "evaluate skill execution", "check session logs", provides a session ID with a skill path, or wants to verify that a skill executed correctly in a past session. Post-hoc analysis of Claude Code sessions to validate skill/agent/hook behavior against SKILL.md specifications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use only when the user explicitly asks for TDD, a failing test, or a regression test, OR when the bug has an obvious cheap local test target. Skip when the test path is unclear, expensive, integration-heavy, or not requested.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to start or reposition a Xiaohongshu account but is asking "what should I post" before clarifying monetization, timing, personal IP direction, or trust path. Trigger phrases: "小红书定位", "不知道做什么赛道", "怎么变现", "个人IP", "账号方向", "XHS positioning", "monetization first". Do not use for drafting a specific post; use topic or copy skills after positioning is clear.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to start or reposition a Xiaohongshu account but is asking "what should I post" before clarifying monetization, timing, personal IP direction, or trust path. Trigger phrases: "小红书定位", "不知道做什么赛道", "怎么变现", "个人IP", "账号方向", "XHS positioning", "monetization first". Do not use for drafting a specific post; use topic or copy skills after positioning is clear.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CodeRabbit reviews pull requests with AI on GitHub, GitLab, Azure DevOps and Bitbucket, and reviews local changes from a CLI before they are pushed. Use when a user asks to set up automated PR reviews, write or validate a .coderabbit.yaml, add path-specific review instructions, control a review with @coderabbitai commands, or run coderabbit review from the terminal or a coding agent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits and reorganises what an AI coding agent carries in its context window: instruction files, path-scoped rules, skills, subagents, hooks and the running conversation. Use when someone says "the agent ignores our CLAUDE.md", "set this repo up for Claude Code / Codex / Cursor", "my AGENTS.md is too long", "quality drops in long sessions", "it keeps inventing APIs", "what should go in a skill versus the rules file", or asks how to hand work to a subagent. Grounded in the documented loading behaviour of Claude Code, with the equivalents for Codex, Gemini CLI and Cursor.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Finds the cause of a hard bug by running several read-only subagents in parallel, each attacking it from a different angle (change history, code path, data and state, environment, reproduction), then checking their evidence, ranking the hypotheses and naming the one experiment that would confirm the leader. It diagnoses and does not fix. Use when someone says "hunt this bug with multiple agents", "swarm on this regression", "investigate in parallel", "find the root cause", or when a failure is intermittent, crosses components, or has resisted a first look.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。