Build stateful Agents on Cloudflare Workers with current, source-verified SDK APIs. Covers durable state, RPC, chat, schedules, queues, fibers, Workflows, MCP, and channels while keeping authorization and external effects application-owned. NOT for assuming SDK helpers grant application authorization or effect approval.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
curiositech/port-daddy☆ 22026年10月12日 更新
Designs and verifies fail-closed continuation of a living durable agent after its VM, process, provider session, backend, or context window disappears. Use for body leases, generation fencing, cold-birth failure, process GC, native resume, cross-harness rebodiment, resurrection capsules, capability translation, ambiguous-effect reconciliation, and capacity-aware handoff. NOT for reviving an intentionally retired identity, generic disaster recovery, copying credentials or raw transcripts, ordinary process restart, or claiming metaphysical continuity.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
curiositech/port-daddy☆ 22026年10月12日 更新
Safety-case design for always-on agents with episodic memory. Covers data hygiene, privacy and security risk surfaces, cost controls, scope, user dependency concerns, retention, incident containment, and responsible deployment evidence. It identifies hazards and asks for named controls, tests, owners, and residual uncertainty; it does not provide legal, clinical, youth-safety, or jurisdictional determinations. Activate on: "agent safety", "always-on agent privacy", "agent cost control", "persistent agent risks", "AI companion safety", "agent data hygiene", "runaway agent costs", "parasocial AI risk", "/always-on-agent-safety". NOT for: architecture design (use always-on-agent-architecture), input design (use always-on-agent-inputs), application brainstorming (use always-on-agent-applications), healthcare compliance specifically (use hipaa-compliance).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
curiositech/port-daddy☆ 22026年10月12日 更新
Declare an agentic application's interaction disclosure, state, context, capabilities, and effect-control boundaries. Use for a reviewable design specification and static consistency audit before implementation. NOT for proving that controls are deployed or enforced, exposing private chain-of-thought, selecting a model/router, or designing a multi-agent protocol.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
curiositech/port-daddy☆ 22026年10月12日 更新
Architecture and systems design for agents that retain bounded state across sessions. Covers durable event history, owned state, derived memory, retrieval indexes, framework evaluation, recovery, deletion, and rebuild behavior. Uses constructed implementation examples and workload calibration rather than universal vendor, latency, similarity, retention, or cost claims. Activate on: "always-on agent", "persistent agent architecture", "episodic memory system", "agent memory design", "long-running agent", "stateful agent", "agent that remembers", "MemGPT architecture", "Letta deployment", "/always-on-agent-architecture". NOT for: choosing what data to feed the agent (use always-on-agent-inputs), brainstorming applications (use always-on-agent-applications), safety and privacy concerns (use always-on-agent-safety), general agentic patterns (use agentic-patterns).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
curiositech/port-daddy☆ 22026年10月12日 更新
Design a normalized, machine-readable "work receipt" that answers what changed, why, by whom, and with what validation, for any AI-coding-agent task regardless of backend (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Aider, CI, or homegrown). Use when defining a receipt schema, normalizing heterogeneous agent logs into one evidence shape, gating PR merges on artifact-backed proof, or designing an OSS maintainer's fast-reject/fast-merge workflow. NOT for validating a DAG node's output against its own schema (use output-contract-enforcer), continuous runtime monitoring of a live coordination daemon (use runtime-verification-for-agents), or general Port Daddy claims/notes/salvage mechanics (use port-daddy-agent-skill).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
curiositech/port-daddy☆ 22026年10月12日 更新
Implement a structured error class hierarchy with actionable messages, proper exit codes, debug mode via env var, and bug report hints on unexpected errors. Generic pattern for any CLI tool or Node.js application.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
krafteq/infraglue☆ 22026年7月8日 更新
Set up Vitest for a TypeScript project, or migrate from Jest. Use for faster test execution, native ESM/TypeScript support, and Jest-compatible API. Covers config, dependency swaps, and test file updates.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
krafteq/infraglue☆ 22026年7月8日 更新
Supabase Postgres + Storage + Auth operations from FastAPI — service-role client, RLS-aware queries, additive SQL migrations under backend/db/migrations, the create_order RPC, and the product-images bucket. Use when adding tables/columns, writing queries, calling RPCs, or working with Storage.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
shanraisshan/learning-x-claude☆ 22026年5月7日 更新
Show what this NanoClaw instance can do — installed skills, available tools, and system info. Read-only. Use when the user asks what the bot can do, what's installed, or runs /capabilities.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
nanocoai/nanoclaw-gmail☆ 22026年4月3日 更新
X (Twitter) integration for NanoClaw. Post tweets, like, reply, retweet, and quote. Use for setup, testing, or troubleshooting X functionality. Triggers on "setup x", "x integration", "twitter", "post tweet", "tweet".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
nanocoai/nanoclaw-gmail☆ 22026年4月3日 更新
Add Telegram as a channel. Can replace WhatsApp entirely or run alongside it. Also configurable as a control-only channel (triggers actions) or passive channel (receives notifications only).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
nanocoai/nanoclaw-gmail☆ 22026年4月3日 更新
Create polished, validated architecture, workflow, sequence, data-flow, and lifecycle/state diagrams as explorable standalone HTML with inline SVG, dark/light themes, optional trace motion, and PNG/JPEG/WebP/SVG/WebM export. Accept plain-language requirements or pasted Mermaid flowchart, sequenceDiagram, and stateDiagram input; inspect repository evidence when the diagram must reflect real code. Use when the user asks to visualize system architecture, infrastructure, cloud/security/network topology, technical workflows, API call sequences, request lifecycles, data pipelines, ETL/ELT, data lineage, state machines, or to convert/beautify Mermaid.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
tt-a1i/archify-cursor-plugin☆ 22026年10月4日 更新