「from」の検索結果

Track the full Toulmin epistemic ancestry of every claim produced by a multi-agent swarm. Each agent output is tagged with an argument chain (claim / data / warrant / relationship) derived from SwarmTracer spans and LineageEdge records, so operators can zoom into any sub-claim and see precisely which agents asserted it, what triggered each assertion, and how contradictions propagated or were synthesised away. The SwarmTracer pattern — wrapping the SwarmAgentExecutor to capture spans, record messages, and build a lineage graph — is the concrete runtime substrate. Argumentative lineage lifts that graph into the Toulmin vocabulary so reasoning provenance is both machine-queryable and human-interpretable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building content-heavy sites with Astro, deciding between SSG/SSR/hybrid, choosing client directives (idle/visible/load/media), structuring content collections with type-safe schemas, integrating React/Vue/Solid/Svelte components in the same project, or migrating from Next.js for marketing/docs. Triggers: client:idle vs client:load tradeoffs, content collections schema with zod, image optimization via @astrojs/image, view transitions, server islands, MDX layouts. NOT for SPA-style apps that need full interactivity (use Next/Remix), Astro internals/plugin authoring, or non-content sites where islands provide no benefit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design an individual agent's belief, goal, intention, and reconsideration model. Use when specifying autonomous decision state, commitment policy, or recovery from failed plans. NOT for AgentSpeak interpreter mechanics, organization modeling, normative conflicts, or multi-agent execution waves.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic methodology for eliciting, representing, and operationalizing expert cognitive skills—pattern recognition, situation assessment, mental simulation—from practitioners without requiring research training. Bridges academic rigor and practical usability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Frame multi-agent designs through explicit environment, autonomy, information, coordination, commitment, incentive, and verification assumptions. NOT for endorsing multi-agent architecture without need or claiming runtime correctness from conceptual methods.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Install Port Daddy's bounded interactive coordination hooks ("tentacles", from the Giant Squid Harness) into the INTERACTIVE sessions of agentic coding CLIs (Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, Antigravity/agy) by auto-detecting which CLIs are installed and writing PER-PROJECT hook config behind a runtime gate, so coordination fires only inside a Port Daddy project while the daemon is running — never machine- wide-always-on. Use when the user says "install port daddy hooks", "agent CLI hooks", "interactive session hooks", "make coordination hooks fire in interactive sessions", "codex/gemini/agy hooks", or "auto-detect agent CLIs". NOT for generic software/package installation; NOT for installing the Port Daddy daemon or `pd` CLI itself (delegate to the `port-daddy` skill / `pd setup`); NOT for MCP server setup (delegate to `pd mcp install`); NOT for authoring new skills (delegate to `skill-architect` / `skill-creator`); NOT for editing the tentacle scripts themselves (owned by the Giant Squid Harness program; this installer layer is pd-adr-090).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design discovery, directories, and guilds for agent swarms at scale. Use when agents need to find each other on a shared surface: capability indices, yellow-pages directories, whois/phonebook routing, reputation-aware discovery, and guild structures that scope trust. Covers the canonical prior art (FIPA Directory Facilitator, Contract Net, Chord/DHT, DNS-SD/Consul, EigenTrust, Greif's merchant guilds) and the failure modes (read-poverty, Sybil reset, Goodhart on rank, directory staleness, cold-start). Triggers: "agents can't find each other", "who owns this file/skill", "route a question to the right agent", "capability registry", "agent reputation", "guild / federation of fleets". NOT for issuing identities, granting authority, or automatically assigning work from a directory entry.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design or review a declared control-command profile and its verb/backend lifecycle matrix. Distinguish policy denial, unsupported capability, delivery acknowledgement, independently observed effect, and unknown outcome; bind authorization to principal, target, scope, current policy, expiry, and fencing epoch. NOT for claiming runtime correctness, proving an adapter from declarations, or approving a control-panel button without independent runtime evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a compact Coval test set from product requirements, observed conversation failures or a coverage gap. Design realistic scenarios with separate expected behaviors, provenance and controlled voice/persona variation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Download audio recordings from Coval voice simulations. Use when user wants to listen to or analyze call recordings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze a Coval adversarial / red-team testing report and turn it into an agent-hardening plan. Use when a user provides a Coval report URL, report export, run IDs, screenshots, or a per-scenario scorecard from an adversarial sweep and wants evidence-backed next steps such as prompt/guardrail changes, refusal hardening, verification fixes, escalation routing, or expanded attack coverage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Recommend, create, preview, and attach Coval trace-based metrics from OpenTelemetry spans. Use when a user has Coval traces and wants custom trace metrics, trace-aware LLM judge metrics with include_traces, latency, token usage, provider failures, tool behavior, vertical-specific workflow signals, or production monitoring based on trace attributes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Retrieve and analyze simulation results from a Coval run. Use when user wants to review evaluation outcomes or debug agent behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Improve Coval trace quality after basic ingestion works. Use when traces are sparse, missing useful STT/LLM/TTS/tool spans, missing attributes needed for Coval built-in metrics, or when a customer wants maximum debugging and observability value from agent traces.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end Coval accent testing workflow. Creates one persona per accent (each using a distinct accent voice and mirroring your Standard Customer behavior), launches one run per accent against the same voice agent + test set + metrics, polls for completion, builds a per-persona comparison table from the results, and creates the saved multi-run report (grouped by Persona) via the public API. Use when a user wants to follow the Testing Across Accents cookbook (https://docs.coval.dev/guides/testing-across-accents) without doing each step by hand.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze a Coval audio-quality testing report from runs across different voice, speaking-style, volume, interruption, and background-noise scenarios. Use when a user provides a Coval report URL, report export, run IDs, screenshots, or metric summary and wants evidence-backed next steps such as prompt changes, tool handling fixes, STT/TTS adjustments, trace setup, or expanded audio-scenario coverage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze a Coval accent testing report from runs across different speaker accents. Use when a user provides a Coval report URL, report export, run IDs, screenshots, or metric summary and wants evidence-backed next steps such as prompt changes, STT/confirmation adjustments, accent-robust routing, or expanded accent coverage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build or improve a Coval dashboard with metric visualizations backed by real data. Creates new dashboards from scratch or rebuilds existing ones by analyzing usage patterns, metric frequency, and data density. Use when user says "create a dashboard", "build a dashboard", "improve my dashboard", "add widgets", "visualize my metrics", "make a performance dashboard", or "dashboard for my runs".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change. Use when the user wants to start implementing, continue implementation, or work through tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Programmatic SEO planning and analysis for pages generated at scale from data sources. Covers template engines, URL patterns, internal linking automation, thin content safeguards, and index bloat prevention. Use when user says "programmatic SEO", "pages at scale", "dynamic pages", "template pages", "generated pages", or "data-driven SEO".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

FLOW framework integration: evidence-led SEO using the Find → Leverage → Optimize → Win loop. Surfaces stage-specific AI prompts from the FLOW knowledge base (41 prompts, CC BY 4.0). Use when user says "FLOW", "FLOW framework", "seo flow", "evidence-led SEO", "find leverage optimize win", or wants stage-specific SEO prompts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

E-commerce SEO analysis: Google Shopping visibility, Amazon marketplace intelligence, product schema validation, competitor pricing analysis, and marketplace keyword gaps. Combines on-page product SEO with marketplace data from DataForSEO Merchant API. Use when user says "ecommerce SEO", "product SEO", "Google Shopping", "marketplace SEO", "product schema", "Amazon SEO", "product listings", "shopping ads", or "merchant SEO".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reimagine UI posture — bold from-scratch reinvention of a screen. Use when asked to rethink or reinvent a UI, merge screens, change its core interaction model, break the frame rather than polish, or generate surprising new concepts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Doctrine for fixing TypeScript errors against generated types (database.types.ts, api-types.ts). Use when fixing tsc or type-check failures or a type-errors batch, writing supabase .rpc()/.from() calls or DB shape guards, errors mention Json/unknown/Database, or you are tempted to cast or suppress.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。