「behavior」の検索結果

Before any material decision — code chunk, plan, strategy, design, scope cut, push to GitHub — convene a war-room. The session driver takes the CEO seat: frame the tradeoff, summon specialist seats from whatever agent roster the user has built, dispatch a cross-family voice via `ato dispatch` so priors actually disagree, decide. A failure-mode filter (wrong assumptions / overcomplexity / orthogonal edits / imperative-over-declarative — Karpathy's four are one good default, swap in your own) runs on every dispatch. Place in the v2.16 stack: war-rooms DECIDE before code starts; `ato-mission` EXECUTES the work between decisions (multi-step, goal-driven, persisted across days); `ato-review` VERIFIES the resulting commits. Use a war-room for the design verdict, hand the verdict to a Mission, review the merged result. Fires before: sending a code draft to the user as final, opening a PR, pushing to a remote-tracking branch, committing >50 LOC of behavior change, or delivering a plan or strategic recommendation as the final answer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Before committing any non-trivial change, dispatch the diff to a reviewer runtime via ATO (`ato dispatch <reviewer> --session <id>`), parse the numbered/severity-tagged findings, apply or defer each one with a recorded justification, then commit. Fights the "build passes therefore ship it" failure mode — what Garry Tan calls the AI agent complexity ratchet. Place in the v2.16 stack: this skill is the LAST gate. `ato-warroom` decides the design; `ato-mission` runs the multi-step work and produces the diff; `ato-review` checks the diff before commit. When the review is part of a Mission, dispatch the review with `--require-tools read_file,grep,git_diff,git_log` so the reviewer can walk the source itself instead of reasoning from a paraphrase (PR-1.5 tool surface). Receipts land in `execution_logs` and the Mission narrative. Fires automatically before commits touching public surface (CLI subcommands, Tauri commands, MCP tools, schema migrations, security boundaries) or whenever a diff exceeds ~50 LOC of behavior change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review or polish a product UI for accessibility, brand fidelity, hierarchy, rhythm, responsive behavior, themes, interaction states, and generic AI-template patterns. Use for visual audits, accessibility checks, UX polish, UI critique, or pre-ship design review. Do not use for generic code review, backend review, or API design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply product-grounded visual quality constraints during user-visible UI changes. Use for layout, styling, content hierarchy, theming, responsive behavior, or interaction affordances. Stay inactive for logic-only changes that preserve the rendered interface.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interview Question Generator — produces 40-60 questions across behavioral (STAR), technical, culture, situational categories with scoring rubrics and recommended loop structure

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze Ascend NPU schedule, operator dispatch, operator launch, and Host Bound profiling issues in Ascend profiling data. Use when need to diagnose device Free time, framework/operator dispatch latency, launch latency, PYTORCH_API/CANN_API launch gaps, aclrtSynchronizeStream stalls, task queue behavior, CPU scheduling interference, GC/lock pauses, CPU affinity, or schedule-side optimization actions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement masked modal routes in NowStack Mobile web-app. Use for TanStack Start route masks, shareable detail URLs, back-to-close, and refresh-to-page behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn an electronic product idea, behavior description, reverse-engineering note, or incomplete circuit concept into a decision-ready engineering brief and architecture. Use before schematic design or audit when functions, operating states, power, interfaces, mechanics, production quantity, cost, or measurable requirements are missing or ambiguous.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply StyleKit visual styles and public assets when building, restyling, or reviewing UI. Use for named StyleKit styles, visual direction, mobile interface patterns, and component-library selection; preserve the target platform and existing product behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Lightweight refactor: audit → plan → approve → implement in a single Opus context, no sub-agent fan-out. Behavior preservation is the goal — verifies tests still pass, optionally commits, and offers a separate /code-review pass at the end. Use by default; reach for /refactor only when the cleanup needs parallel fan-out or exceeds one context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Lightweight refactor: audit → plan → approve → implement in a single Opus context, no sub-agent fan-out. Behavior preservation is the goal — verifies tests still pass, optionally commits, and offers a separate /code-review pass at the end. Use by default; reach for /claude-setup:refactor only when the cleanup needs parallel fan-out or exceeds one context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Initialize project-level Claude setup (gitignore entries, settings.local.json) without copying agent/skill files. Use this in projects where agents were installed globally (default setup.sh behavior).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

RED-GREEN-MUTATE-KILL MUTANTS-REFACTOR workflow for writing production code. Use before ANY production code change - new features, bug fixes, or behavior changes. Triggers on starting implementation work of any kind. Covers the cycle itself - failing test first, minimum code to pass, mutation verification, refactor assessment. For how to write good tests, see testing. For the refactoring step in detail, see refactoring. TDD is non-negotiable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when developing in packages/agent-core-v2 (the DI × Scope agent engine) — adding or modifying a domain Service, choosing a LifecycleScope, wiring DI dependencies, splitting a domain across scopes, owning or migrating a config section, gating behavior behind an experimental flag, raising coded errors, working on the permission system, writing DI/Scope tests, porting business logic from agent-core (v1) to v2, triaging a main-branch commit against v2, or exposing a v2 domain over server-v2 while keeping the /api/v1 wire contract compatible with released clients. Self-contained guide organized by development stage (orient → design → implement → test → verify) plus align workflows for v1→v2 migration, main-branch commit triage, and server-v2 wire exposure; each file carries the rules, examples, and red lines for its step.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Update Pythinker Code CLI user documentation after meaningful code changes that affect product behavior or user experience.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when creating or updating a pull request in this repository — how to fill in each section of the PR template with concise, reviewer-friendly content, including the behavior-change table.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when adding cross-cutting concerns to durable functions — structured logging or tracing across all functions, error tracking with Sentry, payload encryption for sensitive data, dependency injection of clients (DB, Stripe, etc.) into function handlers, custom telemetry, or behavior that should apply uniformly across many functions. Covers Inngest middleware lifecycle, creating custom middleware, dependencyInjectionMiddleware, @inngest/middleware-encryption, @inngest/middleware-sentry, and custom middleware patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building, migrating, or debugging Agent Evals on Inngest: scoring AI agent or workflow outcomes, deferred scorers, sessions, traces, step experiments, experiment variant attribution, Insights queries, or production eval loops for prompts, models, tools, providers, and agent behavior. Covers TypeScript SDK v4 scoring beta APIs, `scoreMiddleware`, `step.score`, `inngest.score`, `createScorer`, `defer`, `group.experiment`, `experimentRef`, `meta.sessions`, and when to use durable workflow primitives for outcome-based evaluation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes. Derived from Andrej Karpathy's observations. Use ALWAYS when writing, reviewing, or refactoring code. Covers assumption surfacing, simplicity, surgical edits, and goal-driven execution with verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You MUST use this before any creative work — creating features, building components, drafting documents, designing workflows, or modifying behavior. Explores your human partner's intent, requirements, and design before any implementation begins.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decomposition playbook and anti-temptation rules for an orchestrator agent that routes work through the Surogates subagent task layer. Pair this skill with an AgentDef whose tool filter strips the implementation tools (terminal, file, web, code) — that's how 'don't do the work yourself' is enforced structurally, not just behaviorally.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Debug LangChain and LangGraph agents by fetching execution traces from LangSmith Studio. Use when debugging agent behavior, investigating errors, analyzing tool calls, checking memory operations, or examining agent performance. Automatically fetches recent traces and analyzes execution patterns. Requires langsmith-fetch CLI installed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to design, redesign, shape, critique, audit, polish, clarify, distill, harden, optimize, adapt, animate, colorize, extract, or otherwise improve a frontend interface. Covers websites, landing pages, dashboards, product UI, app shells, components, forms, settings, onboarding, and empty states. Handles UX review, visual hierarchy, information architecture, cognitive load, accessibility, performance, responsive behavior, theming, anti-patterns, typography, fonts, spacing, layout, alignment, color, motion, micro-interactions, UX copy, error states, edge cases, i18n, and reusable design systems or tokens. Also use for bland designs that need to become bolder or more delightful, loud designs that should become quieter, live browser iteration on UI elements, or ambitious visual effects that should feel technically extraordinary. Not for backend-only or non-UI tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。