「build」の検索結果

Builds and queries multi-language source and binary code graphs for security analysis. Includes pre-analysis passes for blast radius, taint propagation, privilege boundaries, entry point enumeration, proxy/unresolved-call tracking, type/reference queries, structural traversal, graph diffs, audit augmentation, declared cross-language/FFI/external links via `.trailmark/links.toml`, and SQL schema graphs. Use when analyzing call paths, mapping attack surface, finding complexity hotspots, enumerating entry points, tracing taint propagation, measuring blast radius, importing SARIF/weAudit/binary findings, linking source graphs across language or RPC boundaries, or building a code graph for audit prioritization. Feature-gate version-specific Trailmark APIs before using them; prefer `trailmark.parse.detect_languages()` or `--language auto` when the target language is unknown or polyglot.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds and runs code under AddressSanitizer to catch buffer overflows, use-after-free, and other memory errors during fuzzing or tests. Covers -fsanitize=address builds, ASAN_OPTIONS, reading the crash report, LeakSanitizer, and the overhead and platform trade-offs. Use when fuzzing C/C++ or Rust that has unsafe blocks or FFI, when debugging a memory corruption crash, or when reading an ASan stack trace.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scans a codebase for security vulnerabilities using CodeQL's interprocedural data flow and taint tracking analysis. Triggers on "run codeql", "codeql scan", "build codeql database", "SAST scan", "taint analysis", "dataflow analysis", or "find vulnerabilities in this repo". Covers Python, JavaScript/TypeScript, Go, Java/Kotlin, C/C++, C#, Ruby, and Swift. Supports "run all" (security-and-quality + security-experimental) and "important only" (high-precision) scan modes, and creates data extension models for project-specific sources and sinks. For fast single-file pattern matching, or when no build is available for a compiled language, use the semgrep skill; to parse SARIF that already exists rather than produce it, use the sarif-parsing skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a threat model for a target codebase. Three modes: "interview" walks an application owner through the four-question framework and produces a threat model from their answers; "bootstrap" derives a threat model from the code plus past vulnerabilities (CVEs, git history, pentest reports) when no owner is available; "bootstrap-then-interview" chains the two when both owner and codebase are present. All write THREAT_MODEL.md in a shared schema. Use when asked to "threat model", "build a threat model", "map the attack surface", or "what should we be worried about in this codebase".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive offensive methodology for software supply chain attacks covering the full kill chain from reconnaissance through exploitation. Addresses dependency confusion across npm, PyPI, and NuGet ecosystems where internal registry override allows an attacker to inject malicious packages that shadow private dependencies. Covers typosquatting techniques for popular packages, compromised package injection via maintainer account takeover or social engineering, and build system attacks through Makefile injection, setup.py install hooks, and npm postinstall scripts. Extends into CI/CD artifact tampering where build outputs are replaced or modified in transit, code signing abuse through stolen or self-signed certificates, upstream repository compromise via commit injection or force-push to trusted repos, and container image supply chain attacks including base image trojaning and registry confusion. Maps to MITRE ATT&CK T1195.001 (Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Dependencies and Development Tools) and T1195.002 (Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Supply Chain). Integrates tooling such as confused for dependency confusion scanning and dependency-check for known vulnerable component detection. Each technique section provides reproducible proof-of-concept patterns, detection guidance for defenders, and engagement-safe execution notes for authorized red team operations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building PM-facing Public Equity Investing trade pitches, including sparse-context or partial-section requests. Do not use for formal memos; use memo-builder.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build, run, deploy, and evaluate OpenAI Agents SDK apps from Codex. Use when the user asks to create or adapt an Agents SDK app, build from a prompt or Codex thread, prepare a runnable agent prototype, add a focused eval harness, or deploy locally through the Agents SDK Deployment Manager.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Internal prototype QA helper. Use only after a Product Design prototype, URL-to-code build, or image-to-code build has a source visual target and a rendered implementation to compare before handoff. Do not use for broad UX critique, design critique, product audits, or flow reviews; route those user-facing requests to audit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build, scaffold, refactor, and troubleshoot ChatGPT Apps SDK applications that combine an MCP server and widget UI. Use when Codex needs to design tools, register UI resources, wire the MCP Apps bridge or ChatGPT compatibility APIs, apply Apps SDK metadata or CSP or domain settings, or produce a docs-aligned project scaffold. Prefer a docs-first workflow by invoking the openai-docs skill or OpenAI developer docs MCP tools before generating code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full CRUD and analysis for Mixpanel dashboards. Use when the user asks to build, create, analyze, read, understand, explain, modify, update, enhance, or manage dashboards, or asks about dashboard layout, text cards, or report arrangement. Covers dashboard analysis (read + understand existing), creation (new builds), modification (update existing), and explanation (data-driven annotation).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build source-backed dashboards for monitoring performance, exploring drivers, or acting on product and business metrics. Use when the task needs a dashboard, scorecard, or monitoring view with clear metrics, filters, source definitions, and QA.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Complete guide for building beautiful apps with Expo Router. Covers fundamentals, styling, components, navigation, animations, patterns, and native tabs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

**MANDATORY prerequisite** — you MUST invoke this skill BEFORE calling the `get_design_context` Figma MCP tool. You MUST trigger this skill whenever the user wants to implement, build, port, or code up a Figma design as code. Example prompts (not exhaustive) are 'implement this Figma design', 'build this screen from Figma', 'turn this Figma into code', 'design to code'. This skill provides critical instructions and steps to the agent on how to correctly implement Figma designs in code and must NOT be skipped.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build polished analytical reports for executive, product, business, or technical audiences. Use when the task needs a durable answer-first narrative with evidence-backed findings, visuals or tables, caveats, and source context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use CircleCI Chunk for AI-assisted CI/CD work through either the Chunk web UI or the chunk-cli. Trigger this skill when users ask to set up Chunk, troubleshoot or fix failing builds with Chunk, configure Chunk environments, schedule/proactively run Chunk tasks, or use chunk-cli commands such as init, validate, build-prompt, auth, sandbox, task, and skill install.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build sandboxed applications for secure code execution. Load when building AI code execution, code interpreters, CI/CD systems, interactive dev environments, or executing untrusted code. Covers Sandbox SDK lifecycle, commands, files, code interpreter, and preview URLs. Biases towards retrieval from Cloudflare docs over pre-trained knowledge.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for new frontend applications, dashboards, games, creative websites, hero sections, and visually driven UI from scratch, or when the user explicitly asks for a redesign/restyle/modernization. Builds from clean, airy, high-taste, readable image-generated concept design with section-specific references, faithful implementation, and browser testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build, run, and debug iOS apps on Simulator with XcodeBuildMCP. Use when launching an app, inspecting simulator UI or logs, or diagnosing runtime behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides Stripe integration decisions — API selection (Checkout Sessions vs PaymentIntents), Connect platform setup (Accounts v2, controller properties), billing/subscriptions, Treasury financial accounts, integration surfaces (Checkout, Payment Element), and migrating from deprecated Stripe APIs. Use when building, modifying, or reviewing any Stripe integration — including accepting payments, building marketplaces, integrating Stripe, processing payments, setting up subscriptions, or creating connected accounts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build an Opportunity Solution Tree from outcomes to opportunities, solutions, and tests. Use when a stakeholder request needs problem framing before you decide what to build.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute build, test, lint, serve, and other tasks in an Nx workspace using single runs, run-many, and affected commands. Use when user says "run tests", "build my app", "lint affected", "serve the project", "run all tasks", or "nx affected". Do NOT use for code generation (use nx-generate) or workspace configuration (use nx-workspace).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Spec-driven feature work that freezes obligations instead of the plan: one human-reviewed plan with EARS criteria, path, entities, interface and one-way doors, then proof-backed checks, then build, then an independent Verifier. Use when the user says "tlc-spec-lean", "plan feature", "specify feature", "write the checks", "build this plan", or "verify work". Do NOT use for standalone design documents unattached to a feature, architecture decomposition analysis, or work that already has a task list or checklist to execute.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a question, decision, plan, tradeoff, or claim needs a rigorous verdict and one perspective is not enough. Spawns a panel of 3 to 5 subagent jurors that form independent blind opinions, deliberate anonymously under an anti-anchoring and anti-sycophancy protocol, and return one committed verdict with confidence, preserved dissent, and a concrete next action. Domain-agnostic across engineering, architecture, data, product, hiring, strategy, vendor choice, build-vs-buy, and research design. Trigger phrases include "convene a jury", "have agents debate and decide", "get a panel to decide", "multi-agent decision", "stress-test this and decide", "monte um juri", "tribunal de agentes", "painel para decidir". Do NOT use to only critique without deciding (use the-fool for that), to build a plan or write the solution itself, or for simple factual lookups.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert guide for designing and building high-quality skills from scratch through structured conversation. Use when someone wants to create a new skill, build a skill, design a skill, or asks for help making Agents do something consistently. Also use when someone says "turn this into a skill", "I want to automate this workflow", "how do I teach my Agent to do X", or mentions creating SKILL.md files. Covers standalone skills and MCP-enhanced workflows. Do NOT use for creating subagents (use subagent-creator) or technical design documents (use create-technical-design-doc).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。