2,679 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Review the model establishment, numerical solution, result analysis, model validation, and sensitivity or robustness sections of a mathematical-modeling paper against the complete problem. Use for core-model-section diagnosis, not automatic full-paper scoring or unsupported recomputation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Screen a Medicare/Medicaid claims corpus for fraud, waste, and abuse and produce ranked, fully-cited investigation referrals for an SIU / program-integrity team. Use when asked to run a fraud sweep, screen claims for FWA, find billing anomalies, or generate investigation referrals over a claims dataset.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Translate technical security work into the language of non-security audiences — board, executives, engineering, customer success, customers, legal, procurement, sales. Covers incident communication, post-mortem narrative, audit-findings-for-stakeholders, risk justification, security spend justification, and customer-facing breach disclosure. Use when the user mentions 'security comms,' 'communicate this finding,' 'explain to my boss,' 'board update,' 'executive summary,' 'incident communication,' 'breach notification,' 'customer disclosure,' 'security memo,' 'post-mortem narrative,' 'risk justification,' 'why this matters to the business,' 'translate this finding,' 'stakeholder update,' or has technical security work that needs to land with a non-security audience.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Learn from public breach disclosures — extract the audit question each one implies and check your own stack. Capital One IMDS abuse, LastPass vault exfiltration, Okta Lapsus$, Snowflake credential reuse, MOVEit, SolarWinds, Equifax, Target POS, Codecov, Uber, Twilio — what would you check now if your boss said 'could that happen to us?' Use when the user mentions 'breach analysis,' 'lessons learned,' 'security postmortem,' 'breach patterns,' 'breach lessons,' 'has this happened to us,' 'apply breach lessons,' 'preempt breaches,' 'security retrospective,' 'real-world security incidents,' or wants to harden against known attacker playbooks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply the NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) and adjacent guidance to AI / ML systems — model lifecycle governance, fairness and bias evaluation, robustness, transparency, accountability, third-party model risk, monitoring for drift, and AI incident response. Broader than prompt-injection (which is the security slice). Use when the user mentions 'AI risk,' 'AI governance,' 'NIST AI RMF,' 'AI compliance,' 'ML governance,' 'model risk management,' 'AI fairness,' 'AI bias,' 'algorithmic accountability,' 'AI Bill of Rights,' 'EU AI Act,' 'AI transparency,' 'model card,' 'AI red team,' 'AI safety,' 'responsible AI,' 'model drift,' 'concept drift,' 'AI monitoring,' 'AI incident,' or needs to assess or govern an AI / ML system.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Model-guided autonomous root-cause analysis over a UModel object-graph semantic layer. Use with `umodel-query` when diagnosing service degradation, SLO breach, latency/error spikes, incidents, outages, or questions like why a service is slow, degraded, erroring, or timing out. The skill guides evidence collection across object graph, metrics, logs, topology, runbooks, deployments, config changes, business traffic, and runtime capacity; it is especially useful for ruling out red herrings such as recent but unrelated deployments. Triggers: root cause, RCA, incident, SLO breach, outage, postmortem, latency spike, error spike, timeout, 根因分析, 故障排查, 告警定位, 为什么慢, SLO 击穿.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate before-and-after transformation video prompts for Seedance 2.0 on Higgsfield. Use for transformation reveals, glow-ups, makeovers, renovation reveals, fitness transformations, design before-after, business growth visuals, or any content showing dramatic change. Triggers on before after, transformation, reveal, glow up, makeover, renovation, redesign, progress, results.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Bring an existing codebase into Dryforge, once. Reads the code, asks what code cannot show — business rules, security policy, what is intentional — and writes the project docs at the entry points agents already read. Use when the user invokes the `migration` skill on an existing project. Requires git.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Production-ready PDF processing with forms, tables, OCR, validation, and batch operations. Use when working with complex PDF workflows in production environments, processing large volumes of PDFs, or requiring robust error handling and validation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Draft professional emails for various contexts including business, technical, and customer communication. Use when the user needs help writing emails or composing professional messages.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Enterprise-grade compliance architecture for SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR, PCI-DSS. Provides compliance checklists, security controls, audit guidance, and regulatory requirements for serverless and cloud architectures. Activates for compliance, HIPAA, SOC2, SOC 2, GDPR, PCI-DSS, PCI DSS, regulatory, healthcare data, payment card, data protection, audit, security standards, regulated industry, BAA, business associate agreement, DPIA, data protection impact assessment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Master defensive Bash programming techniques for production-grade scripts. Use when writing robust shell scripts, CI/CD pipelines, or system utilities requiring fault tolerance and safety.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when responding to or forensically investigating an incident — triage acquisition (Velociraptor/KAPE), Volatility 3 memory forensics, Chainsaw/Hayabusa EVTX timelining, anti-forensics detection, cloud IR, ransomware/ESXi response
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when pentesting a web application or API — injection, XSS/CSP, SSRF/cloud-metadata, HTTP desync & cache poisoning, SSTI/prototype-pollution/deserialization, JWT/OAuth/GraphQL/IDOR, business logic & single-packet race
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when pentesting an Android/iOS app — Frida 17 instrumentation, SSL-pinning & root/jailbreak bypass, Android 14/15 CA injection, exported-component/content-provider abuse, deep-link/WebView chains, biometric bypass, Flutter/React-Native RE
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when attacking AWS/Azure/GCP cloud — IAM/identity privilege escalation, IMDS/metadata SSRF, Entra device-code & PRT theft, GCP impersonation chains, Kubernetes/container escape, IaC/CI-CD federation abuse
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when attacking or auditing a CI/CD pipeline or software supply chain — pwn requests, poisoned pipeline execution, compromised/mutable-tag actions, dependency confusion, registry worms, runner backdoors, OIDC trust abuse, SLSA/provenance
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when red-teaming an agentic AI / LLM application — indirect & zero-click prompt injection, MCP tool poisoning, persistent memory poisoning, excessive-agency tool abuse, multi-turn jailbreaks, PyRIT/Garak/Promptfoo harnesses
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when breaking out of a container or escalating inside Kubernetes — runc/BuildKit CVEs, privileged/capability/cgroup misconfig escapes, NVIDIA GPU toolkit escape, K8s RBAC abuse, kubelet RCE, ingress/admission-controller RCE, node-to-cluster pivot
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when building a client-side browser exploit — V8/JSC JIT type confusion to renderer R/W, V8 heap-sandbox escape, renderer-to-browser sandbox escape (Mojo IPC, GPU/Dawn/ANGLE), Electron/webview IPC abuse, 1-click RCE chains
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when escalating privileges on a Windows host — SeImpersonate Potato chains (GodPotato/PrintNotifyPotato), service & DLL hijacking, UAC bypass (fodhelper/ICMLuaUtil), kernel EoP + BYOVD (CVE-2025-29824), token-rights abuse, LSASS/SAM/DPAPI credential harvesting
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reduction pass — cuts content, structure, visuals, and dead code that doesn't answer a user question or drive an action, respecting CRAFT_LEVEL. Use when the UI feels cluttered, has too many CTAs, walls of text, or decorative noise, or when the user says "simplify this" / "it feels too busy". Invoke when the user asks for distill on their UI, or mentions 'distill' alongside design / UI / frontend work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Tone down visual noise — lowers variance and motion, simplifies layout and color weight, keeps hierarchy clear. Use when the UI feels loud, busy, or over-designed, or when the user says "quieter", "more restrained", "simpler", or "tone it down". Invoke when the user asks for quieter on their UI, or mentions 'quieter' alongside design / UI / frontend work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design, audit, and strengthen experimental validation for IEEE manuscripts using routed claim-evidence checks. Use when planning experiments, selecting baselines, designing ablations, choosing metrics, checking fairness, adding robustness tests, explaining results, analyzing complexity, building claim-to-evidence matrices, or responding to reviewer concerns about insufficient experiments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。