「cis」の検索結果

Convert Markdown files to Word documents (.docx) with proper formatting, Chinese font support (FangSong for all text including headings), black font color, 1.5x line spacing, precise first-line indent (24pt), heading spacing after (1 line), no italic headings, and automatic superscript conversion for citation numbers. Use when converting .md files to .docx, creating Word documents from markdown, or when user mentions Word, DOCX, or document conversion. Requires pandoc.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct rigorous thematic analysis (TA) of qualitative data following Braun and Clarke's (2006) six-phase framework. Use whenever the user mentions 'thematic analysis', 'TA', 'Braun and Clarke', 'qualitative coding', 'identifying themes', or asks for help analysing interviews, focus groups, open-ended survey responses, or transcripts to identify patterns. Also trigger for questions about inductive vs theoretical coding, semantic vs latent themes, essentialist vs constructionist epistemology, building a thematic map, or writing up a qualitative findings section. Covers all six phases, the four upfront analytic decisions, the 15-point quality checklist, and the five common pitfalls. Produces a Word document write-up and an annotated thematic map. Does NOT cover IPA, grounded theory, discourse analysis, conversation analysis, or narrative analysis — use a different method for those.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Thoroughly verify all code, tables, figures, modeling decisions, and quantitative claims in an academic paper against its source R scripts and output files. Use this skill whenever you need to audit, replicate, or verify an academic research paper - including cross-checking LaTeX tables against R output, validating econometric modeling choices, ensuring sample sizes are consistent, building a verification manifest, and running automated replication tests. Trigger this skill for any mention of: paper verification, replication check, table audit, code-paper consistency, reproducing results, verifying estimates, checking coefficients, or any variant of "does the paper match the code."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user explicitly wants autonomous progress without routine clarification stops: "plow ahead", "do not stop", "use your best judgment", "keep going until done", "finish while I am away", "do not ask questions unless truly blocked", or similar. Convert ordinary ambiguity into stated assumptions, proceed through implementation and validation, stop only for true blockers, and end with a clear recap of decisions, changes, verification, and residual risk.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Experimental workflow for summarizing work that still needs human judgment across configured pull requests, issues, feedback, errors, and delivery signals. Use for a human decision queue or bounded review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Experimental workflow for reviewing configured repositories' pull requests. Use for manual or scheduled PR triage, approval, or merge decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate a topic against preserved sources and write a draft-status research article under `research/` in a Knowledge Base project (the `knowledge-base` starter pack). Read when asked to research a topic, compare options, synthesize sources, gather evidence, or extend an existing research doc. Carries the full procedure: scan existing coverage, agree a research rubric, capture every source verbatim before analyzing, write the article incrementally so a crash never loses work, cite every claim, and link it back into the graph. Does not promote findings to canonical knowledge — that is the sibling `consolidate-notes` skill, after a decision lands.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement ReasoningBank adaptive learning with AgentDB's 150x faster vector database. Includes trajectory tracking, verdict judgment, memory distillation, and pattern recognition. Use when building self-learning agents, optimizing decision-making, or implementing experience replay systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create and train AI learning plugins with AgentDB's 9 reinforcement learning algorithms. Includes Decision Transformer, Q-Learning, SARSA, Actor-Critic, and more. Use when building self-learning agents, implementing RL, or optimizing agent behavior through experience.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Administers Observal users, settings, diagnostics, review queues, security events, audit logs, SAML, SCIM, the local Observal server, its upgrades and rollback, and its own PostgreSQL and ClickHouse schema migrations. Use when the user needs privileged governance, submission decisions, identity configuration, security investigation, or Observal server operations. Not for querying a database or any work outside Observal administration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Parallel divergent ideation for coding agents. Spawns N isolated branches under different cognitive frames (regulator, biology, speedrunner, 10-year-old, $0 budget), scores, clusters, prunes traps, and deepens top survivors. Use on /adhd, "ADHD mode", brainstorm/ideate intents, or open-ended design, architecture, naming, API/SDK surface, and fuzzy-debugging decisions. Skip for syntax, lookups, bugs with known root cause, or closed phrasing ("quick", "standard", "canonical", "textbook"). Full pre-flight gate is in the skill body.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-AI research using available external providers (Double Diamond Discover phase) - Questions about best practices, patterns, or ecosystem research PRIORITY TRIGGERS (always invoke): "octo research", "octo discover", "co-research", "co-discover" DO NOT use for: simple file searches (use Read/Grep), questions Claude can answer directly, debugging issues (use skill-debug), or "what are my options" for decision support.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Starter: frame a decision as a multi-model debate — picks sides, seats providers, and launches /octo:debate with a well-formed motion

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interrogate a plan, decision, or design one question at a time until it holds — use to stress-test your own thinking before committing to it

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured multi-provider AI debates between Claude and available advisors — use for critical decisions

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read every ADR markdown file in the project's docs/adr/ folder so you have full context on past decisions. Use only when the user explicitly calls it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manually-invoked skill that stops overthinking and forces a short, practical decision. Use only when the user explicitly invokes stop-overthinking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ask the agent to list all choices it made during the current work that it is not confident of. Manual-only; the user must ask for it by name.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Keep track of open topics and decisions. Use when the user says "keep-track" or asks to keep a running list of remaining items.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research a topic across the web, GitHub, and X/Twitter with DeepAPI and produce a concise Markdown report. Use for varied-search or requests to compare web coverage, relevant repositories, and social discussion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill to cut an APM release from the current worktree: assess whether the cycle since the last tag warrants a patch or minor bump (semver discipline against the merged-since-last-tag diff), sanitize the [Unreleased] CHANGELOG block into a dated version block with one concise "so what" entry per merged PR (drop internal-only churn, consolidate duplicates), bump pyproject.toml + uv.lock, run the CI-mirror lint chain, and open the release PR. Activate on "ship a release", "cut v0.x", "release prep", "bump and PR", "open release PR", "what kind of release do we need", or any phrasing that ends in opening a release PR -- even when the user does not say "skill". Stops BEFORE tagging; tagging stays a human gate that triggers the release workflow. Refuses to bump to a major (>= 1.0.0) version without explicit operator confirmation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill to translate a classifier's in-place verdict into a precise, page-by-page work plan for the docs-sync panel. Activate after docs-impact-classifier returns verdict in_place; reads the candidate page list, fetches the actual page contents, narrows scope to specific sections within each page, and emits the per-page task brief the panel fans out against.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Activate for changes to project positioning, release communication, community-facing artifacts, or breaking-change decisions in microsoft/apm. Triggers on README, MANIFESTO, PRD, CHANGELOG, release workflows, and issue templates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill to run a four-panel adversarial advisory review on any pull request that touches the OpenAPM specification artifact (docs/src/content/docs/specs/openapm-*.md), its inline / sidecar JSON Schemas (docs/src/content/docs/specs/schemas/*.schema.json), or the conformance fixture seed (tests/fixtures/spec-conformance/**). The panel fans out to four spec-ecosystem reviewers (swagger-openapi-editor, oci-distribution-editor, pkgmgr-registry-contract-editor, w3c-tag-architect), each running in its own agent thread, and a spec-editor synthesizer that produces a fold-now / defer-v0.1.1 / defer-v0.2 / reject list plus a ship decision keyed off a 1..10 shocked_meter scale. The orchestrator is the sole writer to the PR: ONE consolidated comment, no verdict labels, no merge gating. The panel is advisory -- it surfaces findings, prioritizes folds, and renders a ship recommendation that the maintainer weighs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。