2,104 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Ingest one new source into an existing persistent markdown wiki or established vault workflow. Use this when the user asks to add an article, PDF, note, URL, transcript, or other source into their wiki and wants the source filed, linked, indexed, and logged. If the wiki workflow does not exist yet, use $wiki-bootstrap first. This skill is for the ingest operation only.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build and maintain a persistent, interlinked markdown wiki (second brain / research notebook / personal knowledge base) from raw sources. Use this skill when the user wants to ingest an article / paper / note / URL / PDF into their wiki, ask a question against their wiki, lint/health-check their wiki, or set up a new wiki from a folder. Triggers include phrases like "add this to my wiki", "ingest this", "file this article", "update my notes with this", "what does my wiki say about X", "health-check my wiki", "find stale/orphan pages", or any workflow involving a `raw/` source folder, `wiki/` markdown folder, `index.md`, or `log.md`. Compatible with Obsidian vaults.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Explain what slushpile is, what each skill does, what order to run them in, where the workspace files live, and how to set up a voice agent. Use when the user asks how slushpile works, what to run next, or how to fix a workspace problem.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
QA-test a website or web app and return a 1-5 quality score (5 = flawless, 1 = broken) with evidence. Use when the user wants to test, QA, evaluate, score, or "check how good" a site, page, flow, or app — including a local dev server (e.g. "qa test localhost:5173", "does the checkout work?", "rate this landing page"). Drives a real Browser Use cloud browser, tunneling localhost automatically.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review the retained annotation candidate queue and curate per-coin editorial history. Use weekly during active event periods, monthly otherwise, or on queue-health warnings; this does not restore the retired live chart overlay.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Hand a Prisma Next question or report off to the team — file a GitHub issue (bug or feature request), or route Q&A / design discussion / direct-team-contact to the Prisma Discord at pris.ly/discord. Use for bug, bug report, file an issue, report a bug, feature request, missing feature, this should be a feature, file this, this is a bug, this is broken, surprising behaviour, this doesn't work, file feedback, send feedback, capability gap, file via prisma-next-feedback, ask the team, talk to the team, talk to the Prisma team, talk to Prisma, Discord, Prisma Discord, Q&A, design feedback, is this the intended way, how should I do X, extension author question, extension author needs help.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when the user wants the full existing-registry Trust Magnitude inspector: understand why a named Gaia skill has a particular star rank, what its Trust Magnitude (TM) score is, which evidence rows are contributing (or dead), how far it is from the next grade, or what evidence to add to move the needle. Also use when asked for a full leaderboard of all named skills ranked by TM. Triggers: "why does X have 3 stars", "what's the TM for X", "inspect TM", "explain the score for X", "what evidence would rank up X", "show leaderboard", "rank all skills by TM", "what's dragging down X's score", "dead evidence rows", "how close is X to grade A/S".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when the user wants to understand why a named Gaia skill has a particular star rank, what its Trust Magnitude (TM) score is, which evidence rows are contributing (or dead), how far it is from the next grade, or what evidence to add to move the needle. Also use when asked for a full leaderboard of all named skills ranked by TM. Triggers: "why does X have 3 stars", "what's the TM for X", "inspect TM", "explain the score for X", "what evidence would rank up X", "show leaderboard", "rank all skills by TM", "what's dragging down X's score", "dead evidence rows", "how close is X to grade A/S".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Phase 2 of the feature-pipeline suite. Use this after /fp-explore has filed issues and printed the M1 stop hook — when you need to turn a set of filed GitHub issues into an approved implementation plan and a draft PR. Triggers on: "plan the fix", "create the branch and PR", "draft the implementation plan", "ready to plan", "fp-plan", "next step after explore", "convert issues to a plan", "plan phase". Reads issueNumbers from state, writes a Problem Statement, opens a feature branch + draft PR, spawns a HEAVIER sub-agent for the numbered plan, and blocks on explicit user approval before writing plan to state. Does NOT write any code — that is /fp-implement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produce the rendered evidence a human-gated frontend PR owes its reviewer: capture each changed surface (plus the before state for anything modified, plus mobile width), then generate one self-contained local HTML page the founder can open and review without checking anything out. Use when a PR is gated by the "Frontend changes are HUMAN-GATED" section of CLAUDE.md, or when the user says "/design-gate", "screenshot evidence for this PR", "prep this for founder review", "build the design evidence page", "what does this look like before and after". The page comes from a template script, not hand-written markup. Output is session-local and never committed. Do NOT use for non-gated changes: typo/grammar/factual fixes in an unchanged block, dead link targets, alt/ARIA fixes with no visual change, cache-bust bumps, or refactors with no rendered diff.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill whenever the user wants to see how their branch will look on the live Gaia website before merging — "preview this branch", "show me what this looks like", "deploy a preview", "trigger a design preview", "can I see the site with these changes", "preview the skill profile", "check how this renders on the site", "spin up a preview deployment". This skill dispatches a Cloudflare Worker preview deployment for the current branch via GitHub Actions — no local build tooling required. Ideal for containerized environments, design reviews, and confirming that newly curated skills or profile pages render correctly before a PR is merged to main. The preview does NOT regenerate docs; it deploys `docs/` from the branch as-is. If your change depends on regenerated Class S artifacts, run `gaia dev docs` and commit those first — the preview then reflects them.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
End-to-end plan → implement → review pipeline that takes one triaged Gaia issue to a merged-ready PR, with Kill Criteria on the issue and zero follow-up debt. Use when someone says: "resolve this issue", "take #N end-to-end", "work the P0 queue", "fix and ship this issue", "run the resolver", "close out this issue properly", or /gaia-issue-resolver. Works any gaia-research org repo — gaia-skill-tree, gaia-research, gaia-skill-heaven — while the issue itself lives on the headquarters tracker, gaia-research/gaia-skill-tree. Assumes the issue is already triaged and carries a P0–P4 label; if it does not, run /gaia-triage first.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pick up one bounded Gaia Steward maintenance dispatch, do exactly it, and hand the result back for independent verification. Use when the user says "check the steward lane", "pick up maintenance work", "is there anything for me to fix", "run the steward lane", "/gaia-steward-lane", or when a scheduled routine wakes you with no other instruction. Also use before starting speculative repository cleanup: if Steward has not found the work, the work probably does not exist.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate one or more standalone Meta image-ad creatives via Nano Banana Pro through the Novoads API. Locks the model, auto-strips platform chrome, enforces edge-safe layouts. Use when the user asks for a "Nano Banana ad", "Gemini image ad", "nano-banana-pro ad creative", "make a static image ad with Gemini", or anchors on a need for photoreal / lifestyle / multi-reference / handheld-object / clay-texture ad creatives (sticky-note flatlays, held-whiteboard signs, lifestyle portraits, ingredient collages, OOH photography). Does NOT trigger on ChatGPT Image cues — use chatgpt-image-ad for those.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Clones a VIDEO ad end to end for a different product or offer, on the Novoads API. The deliverable is a finished rendered MP4 — the WHOLE ad, not its opening, and not a template. Reads the source's style, pacing, camera work, dialogue and tone, adapts it into a Seedance 2.0 prompt, prices it, renders it, files the source beside the clones and diffs each clip's transcript against the approved script. Use for "clone this video ad", "recreate this video for my brand", "make this ad but for my product" when the source is a video, "clone my competitors' VIDEO ads", or a video ad handed over with a product photo. **Among cloners the source's medium decides, not the wording**: "clone this ad" plus a video lands here; a still, or nothing attached, is clone-image-ad, and animating a still as-is is image-to-motion. This pack has no hook-only skill: for the opening alone, clone the whole ad and cut. If it does not move, wrong skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Downloads a competitor's live ad creatives — the actual MP4s and JPEGs — from the Meta Ad Library into a local swipe folder, through the Novoads API. One sweep per competitor, priced by a live estimate before anything is charged, media pulled the moment the response lands because the CDN links expire, and every ad carried with its permanent Ad Library URL, the page running it, and how many audiences the creative is running against, closing with the three most established and why. Use when asked to spy on competitors, find what ads a brand is running, pull a competitor's video or static creatives, build or refresh a swipe file, check who is outspending you on Meta, or source a reference ad to recreate. It finds, ranks and files ads; it does not rebuild them — a static becomes your own ads, or a reusable template, via clone-image-ad. It writes no craft analysis and no creative brief. A sweep that finds nothing is a result, never an apology.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate one or more standalone Meta image-ad creatives via ChatGPT Image 2 (gpt-image-2) through the Novoads API. Locks the model, auto-strips platform chrome, enforces edge-safe layouts and glyph-safety inside body text. Use when the user asks for a "gpt-image-2 ad", "ChatGPT Image ad", "Image 2 ad creative", "make a static image ad with GPT", or anchors on a need for typography-heavy / dense-text / UI-mimicry ad creatives (chat threads, comparison tables, fake search results, iOS dialogs, Slack snapshots, ChatGPT-conversation ads, Apple Notes lists). Does NOT trigger on Nano Banana cues — use nano-banana-image-ad for those.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
One to three sentences describing what this skill does and the conditions under which an agent should activate it. Start with a verb, name the tools and artifacts involved, and end with the trigger phrasing (e.g. "Activates for requests involving ...").
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Enable a Skia + Dawn GPU build of Pulp (MacGpuWindowHost, Skia Graphite). Covers the prebuilt skia-builder binaries, the headers-only fresh-worktree trap, reusing another checkout's cached libs via SKIA_DIR, FindSkia layouts, verifying PULP_HAS_SKIA / MacGpuWindowHost, and the raster-fallback + GPU-wedge gotchas. Use whenever GPU rendering "doesn't work" or a build silently came up CPU-only.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The measurement surface for ALL Pulp DSP and audio-pipeline work — read it BEFORE writing or gating DSP, not only when something already sounds wrong. Covers the C++ harness (signal generators, metrics, assertions, RenderScenario, contracts), the offline Audio Doctor (magnitude/frequency response, THD/THD+N, phase/group delay), and their Python sibling the Audio Quality Lab (tools/audio/quality-lab — null residual + alignment, LTAS log-spectral distance, spectral flux/centroid, HNR, Theil-Sen drift slope, Kaiser-sinc resampling, license-guarded corpus, regression-net ratchet). TRIGGER on AUTHORING work — "build/design an oscillator/filter/synth/effect", "add a DSP module", "what should the acceptance gate be", "how do I measure aliasing / anti-aliasing / alias floor", "null against a reference", "is this DSP correct", "choose a tolerance", "golden/regression corpus for audio", "measure drift or jitter", "A/B two renders" — AND on DEBUGGING work — "is there sound / no audio / I hear nothing", "does this filter/compressor/synth/delay produce the right signal", "prove the DSP / prove the contract", "measure the frequency response", "what's the THD / is it distorting", "what's the group delay / phase response / measured latency", "magnitude response curve", "render a test tone and assert", "audio regression", "64-frame works but 128 is silent", "sample-rate change pitch-shifted it", "describe what's in this buffer", "audio doctor", "compare before/after a DSP refactor". Reach for this BEFORE hand-rolling any FFT, null test, alias measurement, pitch tracker, or golden-render script — most of it already exists in one of the two lanes. Test/tool layer over HeadlessHost — deterministic, no audio device, no speakers. Off the realtime thread entirely.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Sales enablement, technical presales and deal acceleration for B2B SaaS revenue teams. Use this skill when planning outbound campaigns, running discovery calls, building deal strategy, creating battle cards, writing proposals, responding to RFPs, preparing a product demo, scoping a proof of concept or pilot, answering a security questionnaire or the AI annex buyers now attach to it, executing sales sequences, coaching qualification, or deciding what the website's AI chat agent is allowed to say. Also triggers on: outbound, cold outreach, reply handling, reply classification, out-of-office replies, auto-replies counted as replies, our reply rate is inflated, prospect replied remove me, opt-out by reply, is this list ready to send, launch readiness, CRM segment outbound, we emailed a current customer, outbound hit an open opportunity, ownerless leads, prospects engaging our competitors, competitor connections, displacement list, is this personalization creepy, can we mention they visited our site, signal freshness, deal strategy, pipeline, battle card, objection handling, common objections, why do we keep hearing this objection, mine call transcripts for objections, objection register, proposal, RFP, discovery call, MEDDPICC, sales sequence, qualification, sales engineer, solutions engineer, presales, demo plan, demo script, POC, proof of concept, pilot success criteria, technical evaluation, technical win, security questionnaire, vendor security review, SOC 2 questionnaire, AI security questionnaire, AI annex, AI vendor due diligence, the buyer is asking if we train on their data, do you train on customer data, which model do you use, model provider sub-processor, AI subprocessor disclosure, where does inference run, can the customer turn the AI feature off, AI-CAIQ, CSA AI Controls Matrix, ISO 42001, ISO/IEC 42001, NIST AI RMF, EU AI Act Article 50, are we a provider or a deployer, AI feature disclosure, our model vendor changed and nobody told the buyer, technical objection, mutual action plan, MAP, close plan, mutual close plan, buyer enablement, the deal is stalled, deal stalled after the demo, how do I get this deal to close, close date keeps slipping, JOLT, buyer indecision, no-decision loss, website chatbot, chat widget, AI chat agent, AI SDR, inbound AI SDR, conversational marketing, live chat, what should our chatbot be allowed to say, our chatbot quoted the wrong price, the bot promised a discount, do we have to disclose it is AI, EU AI Act chatbot disclosure, chatbot handoff to sales, chat transcript review, prompt injection on our chatbot, Drift, Qualified, Intercom.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verify that an application works correctly using `stably verify`. Use when an AI agent has made code changes and needs to validate the feature works in a real browser. The command describes expected behavior in plain English and reports a PASS/FAIL/INCONCLUSIVE verdict — no test files generated. Triggers on: "verify this works", "stably verify", "check if this works", "validate my changes", "verify my feature", "does this work", "check the app", "verify the feature".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews audio DSP code for numerical correctness. Use when the user asks to review, audit, or check DSP code for correctness issues — filters, feedback loops, fixed-point arithmetic, accumulation loops, or any numeric computation in audio code. Trigger on "check this filter for NaN", "why does my reverb blow up?", "is this numerically stable?", "why do I hear DC in my output?". Pairs with audio-dsp-review (realtime safety); this skill covers numeric correctness. Flag issues proactively.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews Web Audio API JavaScript/TypeScript code for correctness, thread safety, and deprecated patterns. Use when the user asks to review AudioWorklet code, check an AudioWorkletProcessor, audit Web Audio graph construction, or diagnose crackling/dropouts in a web audio app. Trigger on phrases like "review my Web Audio code", "check my AudioWorklet", "is my AudioWorkletProcessor safe", or "why does my web audio crackle".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。