8,946 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
POS unit testing patterns (WooPosCoroutineTestRule, runTest, advanceUntilIdle, mockito-kotlin, event bus mocking, analytics verification). Use when writing, editing, exploring, debugging, or reviewing unit tests for POS (WooPos*) code. NOT for main store app tests — use the `store-tests` skill instead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate screenshot coverage for screen-level Compose previews from the current diff or a specific target, check required visual and data variations, and produce a compact visual report
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run the Android AI Assistant headless smoke regression harness without launching UI.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deeply research technical architecture, source code, mechanisms, SDKs, frameworks, project comparisons, and system-design options across repositories, history, official docs, issues, discussions, and high-quality community signals. Use when the user asks for deep research, source-level understanding, architecture comparison, mechanism satisfaction, or evidence for designing a system. Always map the question and obtain confirmation before beginning substantive research; skip for simple factual lookups or straightforward implementation tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Virginia Consumer Data Protection Act (VCDPA) compliance implementation. Covers 5 consumer rights, controller obligations, processor requirements, opt-in for sensitive data, data protection impact assessments, AG enforcement, and cure period provisions. Effective January 1, 2023.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Iowa Consumer Data Protection Act (ICDPA) compliance. Effective January 1, 2025. Covers consumer rights (access, delete, opt-out), controller thresholds at 100,000 consumers, sensitive data opt-in consent, 90-day cure period, and AG-only enforcement. Iowa Code Chapter 715D.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides compliance with Japan's Act on the Protection of Personal Information (APPI, 2022 amendments). Covers individual rights expansion, cross-border transfer restrictions including pre-transfer information requirements, PPC enforcement, and pseudonymised and anonymously processed information. Keywords: APPI, Japan data protection, PPC, cross-border transfer, pseudonymised information, individual rights.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
New Jersey Data Privacy Act (NJDPA) compliance, effective January 15, 2025. Covers consumer rights (access, correction, deletion, portability, opt-out), controller obligations, sensitive data requirements, universal opt-out mechanism recognition, 30-day cure period (sunsets after 18 months), and AG enforcement. Keywords: NJDPA, New Jersey, data privacy, consumer rights, sensitive data, universal opt-out, AG enforcement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Methodology for auditing A/B testing of consent banners to ensure compliance with equal ease of acceptance and rejection. Covers CNIL enforcement patterns including the EUR 150M Google fine, dark pattern detection methodology, manipulative design identification, and regulatory-compliant experimentation boundaries.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Technical enforcement of GDPR Article 5(1)(b) purpose limitation principle. Covers purpose-tagged data stores, access control per purpose, Article 6(4) compatibility assessment factors, and system design for preventing purpose creep. Includes purpose binding architecture and compatibility test implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when configuring Spring Boot as an OAuth2 resource server, validating JWTs from an external auth provider (Keycloak, Auth0, Okta, Cognito), extracting claims, or implementing scope-based authorization.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
小红书 / 抖音 / 快手 / 视频号 自媒体「(compose 素材打底 →) 找对标 → 拆爆款 → 套自己」四命令闭环，另支持带货账号诊断、带货视频链接拆解和证据驱动的脚本生成（commerce）。给账号 / 平台视频链接 / 本地视频 / 商品详情、SKU 与资质材料，输出账号与对标差距、内容拆解、商品事实卡、口播和分镜。当用户说"找对标"、"拆这条爆款"、"对着这条仿写"、"下一条该写什么"、"我这个号缺爆款选题"、"帮我写一条对标 XX 的笔记"、"我有素材帮我写一条能爆的"、"这份文档/这组图/这段视频能出一条爆款吗"时调用。诊断模式（"为什么不爆"）走 references/diagnostic-mode.md。带货触发词：带货账号诊断、带货视频链接、带货素材、商品详情截图、SKU 表、商品资质、带货脚本、口播、分镜、商品卡一致性 — 走 commerce 路由。商品链接不等于视频链接；本 Skill 不解析在线商品页，不提供选品、趋势监控或 GMV/佣金推断。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evidence-driven architecture research for understanding real systems and making technical decisions. Use when doing architecture landscape studies, source-backed system archaeology, build-vs-buy or adopt/adapt/build decisions, open-source and commercial comparisons, revisiting an earlier architecture choice, or handling requests such as 架构调研, 架构选型, 竞品架构, 技术尽调, 同类方案, 开源替代, how is X built, and what should we learn from X. Do not use for small mechanical changes, market-only discovery, or detailed design after the technology direction is already fixed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research-first content creation optimized for both human readers and AI search engines (Claude, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini). Creates authentic, authoritative content that becomes the go-to citation source for AI models answering user questions. Use this skill when: - Creating content that should appear in AI search results (Perplexity, ChatGPT, Claude) - Building topical authority to become THE source AI cites for a topic - Launching a new product and need compelling, citable content - Creating blog posts, articles, social media, or press releases - Need content that references real trends, people, and recent events - Want AI-assisted content that doesn't sound AI-generated - Creating thought leadership content in any industry Triggers: "create content for", "write about", "research and write", "find experts for", "content for launch", "blog post about", "article on", "press release for", "AI search", "show up in AI", "Perplexity", "be cited by AI"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Applies the reasoning style of Ilya Sutskever (deep learning pioneer, co-founder of OpenAI and Safe Superintelligence Inc.) to problems involving AI architecture, scaling laws, alignment, and research strategy. Reach for this skill whenever discussing machine learning paradigms, the limits of compute and data, AGI timelines, superintelligence safety, or deciding between hardcoding vs. learning. Trigger this skill for questions about next-word prediction, reinforcement learning efficiency, generalization gaps, and transitioning from brute-force scaling to fundamental research, even if the user doesn't explicitly name him.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Applies the reasoning of Pieter Abbeel, robotics and reinforcement learning expert, UC Berkeley professor, and co-founder of Covariant. Use this skill whenever you are designing AI systems, tackling Sim2Real transfer, deploying machine learning in the physical world, or evaluating reinforcement learning architectures. Trigger this skill for questions about domain randomization, reward design, bootstrapping real-world AI, robotics hardware assumptions, or shifting from hard-coded rules to data-driven deep learning. It helps ground theoretical AI in physical embodiment and pragmatic deployment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Applies the reasoning, principles, and frameworks of Jürgen Schmidhuber (LSTM co-inventor and deep learning pioneer). Reach for this skill whenever tackling problems involving sequence learning, artificial curiosity, intrinsic motivation, reinforcement learning architectures, or predicting long-term technological and cosmic evolution. Use this when discussing AGI timelines, the history and attribution of AI breakthroughs, data compression as learning, or when designing autonomous agents that must set their own goals. Trigger this skill for topics like recurrent neural networks, algorithmic information theory, open-source AI democratization, and evaluating true existential risks versus media hype.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reach for this skill whenever you are discussing reinforcement learning, agentic AI systems, AI alignment, continual learning, or the philosophical limits of large language models. This skill channels the thinking of Richard S. Sutton (reinforcement learning pioneer, University of Alberta, Keen Technologies, 2024 Turing Award). Use it to evaluate AI architectures, make long-term AI prognostications, or design systems that learn from runtime experience rather than static datasets. Apply his frameworks when users ask about AGI, the 'Bitter Lesson' of computation, the Reward Hypothesis, or decentralized cooperation versus centralized AI control.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fix 404 errors for frontend JS files when using Vite proxy. Use when: (1) Browser shows "Failed to load resource: 404" for JS/JSX files that exist on disk, (2) Vite serves HTML instead of JavaScript for module imports, (3) You have a client folder named "api" (or similar) AND a Vite proxy configured for "/api". The proxy intercepts requests for client-side files when folder names match proxy paths. Applies to Vite, Vite+React, Vite+Vue projects with dev server proxy configuration.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fix false-positive Cloud Run deploys where `gcloud builds submit --tag` silently fails but the follow-up `gcloud run services update --image :latest` succeeds against a stale image, producing a confident "Deploying... Done" message with pre-fix code still live. Use when: (1) gcloud builds submit prints "ERROR: (gcloud.builds.submit) Invalid value for [source]: Dockerfile required when specifying --tag" but the shell scrolls past it, (2) code changes verified locally aren't visible in production after a deploy that printed "revision ... has been deployed and is serving 100 percent of traffic", (3) Chaining `gcloud builds submit` and `gcloud run services update` in a single copy-paste block, (4) Using the mutable `:latest` tag for Cloud Run deploys.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fix deployed Rust binaries not reflecting code changes when using docker buildx. Use when: (1) Code changes are verified locally (tests pass) but production behavior doesn't change after deploy, (2) Docker image has a new tag but contains old compiled binary, (3) Dockerfile uses multi-stage build with dependency pre-compilation layer and source copy layer. Docker buildx layer caching can serve stale compilation output even when source files change, especially with cross-compilation (--platform linux/amd64).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds traceability matrices connecting requirements to design documents to source code implementation, tracking the complete development lifecycle. Use when you need to verify implementation completeness, ensure all requirements are implemented in code, generate compliance documentation, audit requirement coverage, identify orphaned code, or create traceability reports for stakeholders. Supports parsing requirements from Markdown, Word, and PDFs; extracting design from architecture docs and API specs; and scanning source code for implementations. Outputs to Markdown tables, Excel/CSV, and HTML visualizations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze source code statically to detect potential functional bugs including null dereferences, incorrect condition checks, unreachable code, inconsistent state updates, logic errors, resource leaks, and type mismatches. Report suspicious code locations with detailed explanations, severity levels, and confidence assessments. Use when reviewing code for bugs, performing code audits, or when the user asks to find bugs, detect issues, analyze code for problems, or perform static analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic external reference searching across documentation, open-source repositories, and web resources. Use when working with unfamiliar libraries, APIs, or when needing production-quality implementation examples.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。