2,271 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Review existing tests against the software and contracts they actually exercise. Use to assess whether a test has justified unique protection, detects consequential faults, tolerates valid refactors, earns its lifecycle cost, or deserves strengthening, replacement, consolidation, or removal consideration. Reviews are read-only and evidence-backed, including TDD and regression tests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ACCESS-GATED beta. Deepline Monitors are provider event feeds (job posts, email replies, funding, intent) that stream into your warehouse and trigger plays. Only use if you have monitor access: run `deepline monitors status` first; if it reports no access, do NOT use this recipe — tell the user to contact the Deepline team.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Launches and configures the standalone presubmit CLI, an API-driven adversarial peer-review pipeline with 30-plus stages, including Red Team finders, Blue Team defence, verification cascade, legal pass, and copyedit, producing one consolidated report on disk. Verifies installation and API key, chooses the output location and smoke, standard, or custom mode, launches the run, and reports the result path. Use when the user asks to run presubmit, wants a deep unattended pre-submission audit, or needs a math or replication-code audit. Everyday self-audits go to paper-review-lite, and external refereeing to journal-review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Runs end-stage QA on a finished figure and table set. Checks callouts, numbering, and cross-references, whether numbers in the text match the exhibits, self-contained captions and statistical notes, accessibility and production quality, and links to the SI and replication package. Values that could only be read off an image are marked for author verification rather than estimated. Use when preparing a submission. Design guidance during drafting belongs to figures and tables.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Provides a pre-submission manuscript audit covering argument, numerical consistency, references and DOIs, writing, figures, CONSORT flow, pre-registration, and the replication archive. Use before paper submission or when a draft needs an adversarial, quote-grounded review with a journal-readiness checklist. Add `--codex` to run the specification independently on Claude and Codex, GPT-6 Astra, and cross-check findings.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits a methods section against a 45-item reporting checklist synthesized from the APSA Experimental Section rubric, JARS-Quant, CONSORT, and DA-RT, covering pre-registration, recruitment, randomization and treatments, sample flow and attrition, sample-size justification, three-tier results labeling, conjoint reporting, validity, and open-science infrastructure. Use when checking whether a methods section reports enough, preparing a submission or replication archive, asking what CONSORT, JARS, or DA-RT require, or documenting a deviation from a pre-analysis plan. Writing that plan before data collection goes to pre-registration-writing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a pre-submission manuscript audit covering argument, numerics, references, writing, figures, methods, preregistration, and replication readiness. Add --codex for a cross-model pass in which Codex and Claude review independently and verify each other's findings.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
End-stage QA for a finished figure and table set (callouts, numbering, cross-references, text-to-exhibit consistency, captions and notes, accessibility, SI and replication linkage). Use when preparing a submission.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scaffold or audit a research-project repository organized around its source library (PDFs, Markdown conversions, bibliography, intake pipeline) plus the analysis, manuscript, and review folders it needs. Use when starting or auditing a research repo. Not for one-PDF intake or publication replication packages.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Delegates coding/research tasks to the Google Antigravity CLI (`agy`) for external-model execution (Gemini 3.x, Claude Sonnet/Opus 4.6, GPT-OSS). Replaces the broken `collaborating-with-gemini` skill. Use when: (1) External-model delegation via Antigravity, (2) Multi-model prototyping (switch model per call), (3) Backend/logic implementation, (4) Algorithm design and optimization, (5) Bug analysis and debugging, (6) API/database code generation, (7) Code review. Triggers: "delegate to agy", "use Antigravity", "external model", "agy", "Gemini 3.5", "Claude Sonnet 4.6", "GPT-OSS". IMPORTANT: Always request unified diff patches only. Supports multi-turn sessions via SESSION_ID.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Enhanced web search and real-time content retrieval via Grok API with forced tool routing. Use when: (1) Web search / information retrieval / fact-checking, (2) Webpage content extraction / URL parsing, (3) Breaking knowledge cutoff limits for current information, (4) Real-time news and technical documentation, (5) Multi-source information aggregation. Triggers: "search for", "find information about", "latest news", "current", "fetch webpage", "get content from URL". IMPORTANT: This skill REPLACES built-in WebSearch/WebFetch with Grok Search tools.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Replace with description of the skill and when Claude should use it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write reliable prompts for Agentica/REPL agents that avoid LLM instruction ambiguity
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive guide for the agent permissions and approval system. Use when an agent needs to request user approval for sensitive operations, when implementing new approval policies, when integrating platform-specific approval UIs (Slack buttons, WhatsApp replies, Dashboard modals), or when troubleshooting approval flows. Covers policy definition, platform adapters, and the complete approval lifecycle.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Initialize or improve AGENTS.md files that define how coding agents operate in a repo. Use when asked to set up or replace an agent init command (Codex, Claude), standardize multi-agent behavior, or audit an existing AGENTS.md for clarity, commands, boundaries, and repo-specific context. For Claude Code, also create CLAUDE.md as a symlink to AGENTS.md.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
End-to-end research workflow skill for investment analysts and policy researchers. Three scope modes the user picks at trigger time — light (4-5 page decision memo, ~15 min, 0 charts), medium (12-15 page topic brief, ~1 h, 6-10 charts), heavy (flagship report 30-40 pages / 15k+ words, ~2-3 h, 25-35+ charts, multi-stage workflow, multi-LLM, PDF + Word + WeChat + HTML derivations). Reports default to English; the AI replies in the user's chat language. Battle-tested on real macro/policy/equity reports (e.g. Saudi Vision 2030 deep-dive). Triggers when user types /analyst-research, /flagship-research, or describes needs like "research report", "topic analysis", "investment research", "做研报", "投研报告", "主题分析", "深度分析", "policy assessment", "industry deep-dive". Not for: pure news commentary (use topic-brief), slide decks (use deckster-slide-generator), one-shot Q&A.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when verifying information (fact, number, quote, event, statement) against authoritative primary sources, or cross-checking a number via one-level metric decomposition (Z = P × Q). Triggers: "verify X", "is this true", "find the original source", "where is this number from", "two sources disagree", "is it true X never did Y". Covers five scenarios: (1) basic truthfulness check, (2) completeness / out-of-context quoting, (3) one-level reasoning verification, (4) negative-statement handling, (5) multi-source conflict side-by-side output. Dig into whitelisted primary sources only (user-supplied files, official websites & databases, authoritative industry sources); cited reports / charts / datasets must be downloaded and read locally to count as verified — if download is blocked, hand the link to the user. If nothing can be found, plainly state "cannot verify" rather than guessing, patching, or citing secondary paraphrases. Always reply in the user's question language.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Test an uncertain Anabasis v2 path at the smallest real layer that can decide it, before a paid round is asked to: one fact from a log or a dry run, a walk of one value across the layers a change touches, a replay of every recorded log through this tree's readers, a whole round rehearsed on a seeded copy of a campaign with a script in each model seat (`bun run runs seed`, `bun run runs rehearse`), or one live seat from a seed. Use when the operator asks whether a change will work in the real system, to simulate or rehearse a round, to stand again in a position a past run stood in, what a campaign of a given size can read, or what a kill or a stop leaves behind. Not for reading a finished run (whole-run-investigation) or starting a paid one (run-management).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
VNX feature-execution kickoff preflight. USE THIS when starting or resuming a feature or track from its plan: checking worktree/queue/staging health, finding the first promoteable dispatch, and handing off to @t0-orchestrator. Reads the feature's track + plan doc from Horizon's tracks DB (`vnx horizon`, alias `vnx objective`); the repo FEATURE_PLAN.md/PR_QUEUE.md are generic examples, not the source.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scout a topic on YouTube. Searches YouTube Data API v3 for the most relevant videos, ranks them by views (or engagement, likes, recency, momentum, breakout), and writes a research workbook in the OWT-Social-Ads layout with Videos, Channels, and Summary sheets, plus optional Comments and Transcripts (hooks, replay hotspots) sheets. Can also append into an existing sheet. Use when the user says "scout <topic>", wants a spreadsheet of top YouTube videos on a topic, wants creator or hook research, or wants YouTube rows added to their social ads sheet.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Maintain host-independent persistent runtime state, its reusable directory parser, encrypted records and generated keys, portal and portal-free OAuth sessions, refresh/OIDC replay history, local identity epochs, restart E2E tests, and embedding lifecycle contracts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Maintain portal TOTP and WebAuthn login checkpoints and enrollment, server-side challenges, factor-specific verification, replay prevention, and real TLS MFA journeys.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement or change AuthCrunch portal refresh configuration, opaque token families, atomic rotation, replay revocation, issuance claims, store adapters, and portal lifecycle. Use for portal refresh tokens, not upstream OAuth token renewal.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Maintain local identity database transactions, file locking and atomic persistence, cross-instance credential revocation, authenticated self-service operations, and TOTP replay/lockout state.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。