「risk」の検索結果

Expert Quarterly Business Review facilitation for maximizing customer value and strategic alignment. Use when designing QBR programs, preparing executive presentations, demonstrating ROI and value realization, conducting strategic account planning, aligning product roadmaps, identifying risks and opportunities, facilitating business reviews, or automating QBR processes. Use for EBR preparation, success metrics presentation, renewal preparation, and stakeholder engagement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The Mileva Method (CRISP) — Phase 4: Spec. Full implementation readiness package including solution design, UX direction, tech stack, backlog, MVP prioritization, risk assessment, and AI architecture for Claude Code projects — CLAUDE.md, skill mapping, AI specs, sprint planning, quality gates. Triggers on "spec", "phase 4", "build ready", "implementation plan", "CLAUDE.md", "sprint planning", "backlog", "AI spec", or after Phase I exit checklist is complete.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review, harden, and test the safety policy for AI-Controlled Party mixer/Soundcraft Ui24R scene arming. Use for approval gates, blocked mixer operations, hazardous request handling, venue validation, bypass attempts, QA, risk review, or follow-up safety changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design a tdmcp feature into an implementable spec before any code is written — choose the layer, define the Zod input schema, lay out the TD network topology, plan the bridge/Python approach, sketch a UI wireframe when relevant, and list probe-first risks + the test plan. Use whenever a tdmcp feature idea needs a design/wireframe/spec, or when someone asks to plan/scope/architect a new tool, generator, effect, control, or AI prompt for the TouchDesigner MCP server.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Go-to-market engineering for the Yupcha portfolio (OmniVoice-Studio, the Clay-alternative in this repo, ResuBird). A closed set of executable verbs — research, audit, draft, measure, prepare, publish, escalate — each with a typed contract, required sources, and a risk tier. Use when: (1) researching ICP/competitors/channels/prior art, (2) auditing our own properties for what's actually broken (dead pricing pages, 404ing clone URLs, unfilled demos, licence detection, watermark coverage), (3) drafting docs/comparison pages/release notes/launch copy, (4) measuring real numbers against GOAL.md, (5) preparing a Show HN or a listing up to the send button, (6) any question about whether a GTM action is allowed. Triggers: 'gtm', 'go to market', 'launch', 'show hn', 'growth', 'marketing', 'positioning', 'icp', 'competitors', 'outreach', 'cold email', 'audit our', 'is it ok to', 'can we post', 'promote'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Excellence-first strategic decision support. This skill should be used when users need to choose between options, pressure-test a plan, evaluate risk, or make a specific decision — across security, product, growth, operations, org design, and finance. Use when there is a decision with tradeoffs to score and a recommendation to make. For pure research ("what does the best in the world do about X?"), use best-in-world-research instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user has a meeting, call, 1:1, a person to meet, or a decision coming up and needs to walk in prepared. Assembles a one-page brief from context/, wiki/, connections, open loops, and the knowledge graph — who · what · goal · history · open loops · the ask · risks. Trigger on "/prep", "prep me for", "brief me on <person/meeting>", "what do I need to know before", "get me ready for".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes a project description and outputs a structured bid: scope, effort, tech risks, and optional pricing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Breaks down complex tasks into ordered, verifiable sub-tasks with dependencies, milestones, and risks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates open-source packages: health, suitability, dependency risk, and in-house alternatives.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explainability (XAI) audit for products containing AI components. Five-stage tier-scaled check: risk classification, stakeholder×question matrix, fidelity audit, system card, recourse path. Honest about what was validated functionally vs what needs user testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply MCAF human-review-planning guidance for a large AI-generated code drop by reading the target area, tracing the natural user and system flows, identifying the riskiest boundaries, and prioritizing the files a human should inspect first. Use when the codebase is too large to review line-by-line and you need a practical review sequence plus a prioritized file list.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use SonarJS-derived rules in .NET repositories that ship JavaScript or TypeScript frontends and need deeper bug-risk, code-smell, or cognitive-complexity checks than a minimal ESLint baseline. Use when the repo wants `eslint-plugin-sonarjs` locally or already runs SonarQube or SonarCloud in CI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when Codex must make a high-quality judgment on any complex problem, not only technical problems. Trigger when a question has high complexity, uncertainty, cost of being wrong, long-term impact, value tradeoffs, possible structural causes, or when the user asks for 全面思考, 深度理解, 系统性分析, 帮我想清楚, 从根上看, 这件事到底怎么看, 方法论, 复杂问题拆解, 系统方案, 架构判断, 策略判断, or 根因分析. Also trigger for project and engineering high-risk scenarios such as multi-module, multi-environment, multi-data-source, multi-state, financial truth, live trading, ledger, revenue, customer assets, order governance, broker interfaces, online availability, major solution selection, and system closure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates environmental liability exposure with remediation cost estimation, regulatory compliance requirements, and insurance coverage assessment. Use when analyzing environmental liabilities, estimating cleanup costs, or assessing environmental risk.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates structured plans from requirements. Generates comprehensive plans with steps, dependencies, risks, and success criteria. Coordinates with specialist agents for planning input and validates plan completeness. Uses template-renderer for formatted output.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verifies implementation plan quality across 8 dimensions (requirement-coverage, task-completeness, dependency-validity, scope-sanity, artifact-wiring, risk-assessment, testability, estimation-quality) and returns pass/fail with per-dimension scores.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Socratic design refinement before implementation — challenges assumptions, surfaces alternatives, identifies risks before code is written

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research-backed workflow to refresh existing agent prompts/frontmatter with diff-based risk scoring, TDD gates, and ecosystem validation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate tabulated subcontractor bids against specs and drawings — scope gap analysis, exclusion risk scoring, award recommendation. Triggers: 'evaluate bids', 'bid evaluation', 'lowest responsible bidder'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when stress-testing a proposal, plan, architecture or decision before committing to it, such as pre-mortems, assumption audits, "should we even do this?" questions, or when everyone agrees too easily. Not for code review; it challenges strategy, approach and hidden risks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find and score legitimate external authority and backlink opportunities as a dry-run register, using relevance, platform rules, risk, target-page fit, and explicit user approval gates. Use this skill when the user asks where links to a target site could be placed effectively, but never post, submit, DM, email, open PRs, or edit external accounts without separate explicit approval.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Map user journeys, onboarding paths, entry points, first actions, trust points, accessibility risks, and SEO/LLM handoffs for public websites without redesigning the visual system. Use this skill when the user asks how new readers, returning users, project reviewers, community members, buyers, or AI agents should move through a site and what each page must make clear before layout implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate proposed or existing backlinks for relevance, editorial legitimacy, link attributes, spam/toxicity risk, platform compliance, anchor quality, target-page fit, and monitoring evidence. Use this skill when the user asks whether an external link opportunity or placed backlink is safe and useful, and reject toxic, irrelevant, paid-undisclosed, fake, or spam placements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。