1,852 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Diagnose and fix CJK (Korean, Japanese, Chinese) text-wrapping issues in web UIs. Systematically traces mid-syllable breaks, orphaned glyphs, and awkward line splits through a layered fix strategy covering global CSS cascade, component-library overrides, headline balancing, and translation-level phrase binding. Produces an evidence-based diagnosis and verification report before any code change is applied.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when governing a worktree across its whole life — scope-lock declaration, merge-readiness status, scoped verification, and safe cleanup that refuses while unique unmerged commits exist.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use to run a depth-bounded self-correction loop (attempt → critic verdict → re-attempt) as a tunable test-time compute knob — a do-and-judge specialisation, default off, capability-gated.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when designing production-LLM prompts — few-shot, chain-of-thought, system prompts, templates, self-verification — distinct from prompt-optimizer and refine-prompt.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user has merge conflicts or says "resolve conflicts". Understands conflict markers, resolution strategies, and verification workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when upgrading dependencies — 'update framework X', 'bump runtime version', or 'upgrade packages'. Covers changelog review, breaking-change detection, and verification. Stack-agnostic.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this Canvas-owned clean-room skill for PDF work where layout, extraction, generation, forms, page operations, or visual verification matter. Trigger for reading PDFs beyond plain text, creating PDFs, merging, splitting, rotating, watermarking, extracting tables or images, filling forms, OCR handoff, and final PDF QA.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Workflow] Use when activating the Write Integration Tests workflow for spec-first integration test authoring. Also covers converting existing test specs into integration test code and verifying integration test stability (repeat-run verification).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Workflow] Use when activating the Bug Fix workflow for systematic debugging with root cause investigation, fix, and verification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[AI & Tools] Use when you need to apply structured, reflective problem-solving for complex tasks requiring multi-step analysis, revision capability, and hypothesis verification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when creating or editing raster images, visual concepts, product graphics, launch assets, diagrams, posters, thumbnails, reference sheets, UI mock images, or image prompts that need source-grounded claims, readable text, brand direction, and post-generation verification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
中国药品权威数据库查询 — NMPA(国家药监局) + CDE(药品审评中心) + DrugBank(英文名/ATC) + PubChem(化学结构) 多源融合,提供(通用名 ↔ 商品名 ↔ 英文名 ↔ 适应症 ↔ NMPA 批文号 ↔ 上市日期)精确映射。Make sure to use this skill whenever the user mentions 药品名 / 通用名 / 商品名 / NMPA / 国药准字 / 药监局 / CDE / drug brand name / generic name / drug registry / pharmaceutical lookup / drug verification / 药物核验 / 商品名对应 / drug cross-check / drug authority lookup. 在任何 medical / market-sizing / clinical / disease-research 报告生成阶段,**所有药品提及必须先调 lookup_drug() 验证**,严禁 LLM 凭训练记忆拼凑通用名↔商品名↔英文名对应关系。LLM 训练截止后药企会更换商品名、新药持续上市,记忆完全不可信。Iron Law:lookup 返回 None → 调用方必须 raise UnverifiedDrugError,不允许 fallback 到记忆。免费公开数据源,跨平台:Claude Code / Codex / Gemini CLI 三端均可 auto-trigger,实现仅依赖 httpx + beautifulsoup4 标准生态,不绑定任何厂商 SDK。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Manually run the extended DeepSeek Harness bilingual-document workflow, including generated briefings, delegated prose translation, whole-document translation, and scoped pairing verification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cite-or-Block 架构的基石原子 skill。把报告里的 citation 锚点 (例如 [guideline:CSCO-2024-NSCLC:§5.5.2] / [pmid:12345678:abstract]) 解析为源文件片段,并核对事实声明里的关键词是否在引用源原文里出现。 Foundation atomic skill for the Cite-or-Block architecture. Resolves citation anchors (e.g. [guideline:CSCO-2024-NSCLC:§5.5.2] / [pmid:12345678:abstract]) to raw source text fragments, and verifies whether claim keywords actually appear in the cited source. 使用场景 / Use when: 1. 报告生成后要做 fact-check (resolve_citation + verify_claim_against_source) 2. content-verification-layer 要扫全报告锚点 (parse_citations_in_text) 3. drug-citation-verifier / 任何 cross-check skill 需要"锚点 → 源原文" P0 守护:本 skill **绝不维护任何已知字典**。源里没有 = verified=False, 无例外、无 fallback、无"已知答案兜底"。 P0 guard: this skill **never maintains any built-in dictionary**. Not in source = verified=False. No fallback, no built-in answers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Phase 4 Turn 1 of disease-market-sizing-orchestration. Generates report HTML with mandatory citation anchors per fact claim. Reads contract + staging + sources/. Every drug/treatment/stat/recommendation MUST carry [pmid:.../guideline:.../nct:...] anchor that resolves to an actual file in sources/. NEVER hardcode drug names or numerical claims. Use AFTER evidence recall (phase 3), BEFORE content-verification-layer (Turn 2).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Phase 4 Turn 2 of disease-market-sizing-orchestration (A6' upgrade). Audits compose output via Cite-or-Block strict — every anchor must reverse-resolve to an actual file in sources/, every fact claim must have an anchor. Returns verdict (ok/blocked) + violations list. Use AFTER cite-bound-content-generator (Turn 1), BEFORE report-bundle-builder (phase 5).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Phase 5 part of disease-market-sizing-orchestration. Injects consulting palette (navy/gold/blue) + base CSS + floating TOC + section dividers into raw report HTML. Validates token coverage ≥60% (warn) and floating TOC li ≥5 (block). Use AFTER content-verification passes, BEFORE report-bundle-builder build_all_deliverables.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-agent adversarial verification with convergence loop. Two independent review agents must both pass before output ships. Use when output must clear two independent adversarial reviewers before it ships.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
GStack unfreeze method for safely resuming a previously frozen task with explicit resume criteria, allowed changes, and verification gates.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
GStack deployment setup method for planning environment, config, secrets, build, deploy, and verification gates before release operations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
GStack QA method for web/UI behavior verification and narrow fix loops when the user explicitly allows QA to repair issues.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design and implement unit, conformance, integration, timing, boot, trace, video, audio, and regression tests for EMULATORS processors, chips, peripherals, and complete machines. Use when creating a verification strategy for a new emulator, converting hardware documentation into tests, adding diagnostic programs or golden artifacts, measuring behavioral coverage, or proving that components interact correctly.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guidelines and strategies for constructing meaningful test suites, property-based tests, metamorphic relations, and fuzzing harnesses. Trigger when: - Designing verification bounds, writing tests, creating test invariants, or implementing validation gates. - Prompt contains: testing, test design, property-based testing, PBT, metamorphic testing, fuzzing, integration tests, E2E.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。