「writing」の検索結果

Use conference poster pitch for academic writing workflows that need structured execution, explicit assumptions, and clear output boundaries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use medical cv resume builder for academic writing workflows that need structured execution, explicit assumptions, and clear output boundaries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use blind-review-sanitizer for academic writing workflows that need structured anonymization, explicit assumptions, and clear output boundaries for double-blind submission.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when interpreting scientific graphs and charts, explaining data visualizations for research presentations, writing figure captions for publications, or analyzing trends in clinical research data. Converts complex visual data into clear, accurate explanations for academic papers, clinical reports, and public presentations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structures and writes discussion sections for academic papers and research reports. Use when writing a discussion section, interpreting research results, connecting findings to existing literature, addressing study limitations, synthesizing conclusions, or drafting any part of...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use biotech-pitch-deck-narrative for academic writing workflows that need structured investor-facing storytelling, explicit assumptions, and clear output boundaries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use medical translation for academic writing workflows that need structured execution, explicit assumptions, and clear output boundaries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates structured biomedical outlines for review articles, discussion sections, and thesis proposals. Use when a user provides biomedical keywords, results/discussion text, or a proposal title plus background and needs a directly usable academic writing scaffold.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use grant budget justification for academic writing workflows that need structured execution, explicit assumptions, and clear output boundaries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates academic-poster writing packages for LaTeX using beamerposter, tikzposter, or baposter. Use when a user needs poster-ready section copy, figure plans, captions, and package-specific layout decisions for conference or thesis posters.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use anki-card-creator for academic writing workflows that need structured execution, explicit assumptions, and clear output boundaries for study-card generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writes complete, publication-grade figure legends that can stand on their own. Use when writing or revising figure legends for any scientific figure — bar charts, line graphs, scatter plots, box plots, heatmaps, survival curves, flow cytometry plots, western blots, microscopy images, or schematic diagrams. Also triggers on "write a figure legend for", "help me describe this figure", "my figure needs a legend", "write Figure 1 legend", or "what should a figure legend include".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rewrites technical research content into a structured lay summary that cross-disciplinary teams can quickly understand and act on. Use when the user wants to explain research to colleagues outside their specialty — clinicians, wet-lab scientists, bioinformaticians, product managers, or leadership. Trigger on: "lay summary", "explain my research to the team", "non-technical summary", "cross-disciplinary summary", "translate my findings", "align our team on the study", or any request to communicate research goals, findings, or next steps to a mixed or non-specialist audience. Part of the AIPOCH Academic Writing skill hub. Sits midstream: after research content is clarified, before downstream deliverables like slide decks or graphical abstracts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A comprehensive auditor for any agent skill — including Manus, OpenClaw/ClawHub, Claude, LobeHub, or custom SKILL.md-based skills. Use this skill whenever a user wants to evaluate, audit, review, score, or quality-check an agent skill before publishing, updating, or deploying. Covers two hard veto gates (structural redlines + research integrity redlines), static quality scoring across 25 criteria (ISO 25010 + OpenSSF + Agent), dynamic test input generation, multi-mode execution testing, multi-layer output evaluation with five specialized category rubrics (Evidence Insight / Protocol Design / Data Analysis / Academic Writing / Other), a Research Veto that applies to all four research categories, human eval viewer generation, actionable P0/P1/P2 optimization recommendations, and automatic skill improvement that outputs a polished, production-ready SKILL.md. Also use whenever a user says "audit my skill", "evaluate my skill", "improve my skill", or wants a corrected version after evaluation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns your protocol and analysis workflow into publication-ready Methods text. Use when writing or revising the Methods section of a biomedical manuscript, ensuring it complies with reporting guidelines (CONSORT, STROBE, PRISMA, TRIPOD), matches what is in the Results section, and satisfies journal-specific word limits and declarations. Also triggers on "write my methods", "revise my methods section", "how to report my statistics", "what do I need to include in methods for [study type]", or "make my methods CONSORT-compliant".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Optimizes manuscript titles and abstracts for information density, factual accuracy, and submission fit in biomedical research writing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scrum-inspired paper review, revision, and R&R workflow. Handles docx/tex/md/PDF in English or Chinese. Auto-detects manuscript stage, estimates sprint count, runs multi-lens review (Contribution/Rigor/Writing/Editor), generates prioritized revision backlog, exports MD/DOCX/PDF/HTML reports. Use when asked to review a paper, revise based on reviewer comments, handle R&R, respond to peer review, plan paper revision sprints, or when user types /ps or /papersprint.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Acknowledges limitations in sample, design, measurement, and validation in a professional way that improves credibility without undermining the whole paper. Use when writing the limitations paragraph of a Discussion section, preparing a grant risk assessment, responding to reviewers about study weaknesses, or framing scope boundaries for a paper. Also triggers on "write my limitations", "how should I address the limitation of", "reviewer said my sample is too small", or "help me word this limitation".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatically creates user-facing changelogs from git commits by analyzing commit history, categorizing changes, and transforming technical commits into clear, customer-friendly release notes. Turns hours of manual changelog writing into minutes of automated generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user is designing, prototyping, or rewriting a desktop app that must run on multiple OSes (macOS + Windows, optionally Linux) AND feel indistinguishable from a native app to its users — fast launch, native windowing, native input handling, native materials. Trigger words include "cross-platform desktop", "Electron alternative", "Tauri vs native", "WebView wrapper", "near-native performance", "Raycast architecture", "WebKit/WebView2 quirks", "WKWebView", "system tray app", "global hotkey app", "launcher app". Do NOT trigger this skill for pure web apps, pure mobile apps, or for greenfield projects that have no native-feel requirement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepare and run XQUIC local compilation. Use when asked to compile, build, configure, or diagnose the local build environment for XQUIC, especially across macOS/Linux. Detect intent and platform, then delegate actual compilation to scripts/validate.sh instead of hand-writing CMake commands.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

React and Next.js performance optimization guidelines from Vercel Engineering. This skill should be used when writing, reviewing, or refactoring React/Next.js code to ensure optimal performance patterns. Triggers on tasks involving React components, Next.js pages, data fetching, bundle optimization, or performance improvements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when writing analytical SQL over time-series data with the TimescaleDB Toolkit (timescaledb_toolkit extension) hyperfunctions: approximate percentiles, statistical summaries, time-weighted averages, counter/gauge rates, uptime/heartbeat tracking, state durations, OHLC candlesticks, approximate distinct counts, top-N, and downsampling. **Trigger when user asks to:** - Compute percentiles/medians/p95/p99 over large or rolled-up time-series data - Compute rates or deltas from monotonic counters (Prometheus-style) or gauges - Compute time-weighted averages or integrals over irregularly sampled data - Track uptime/downtime from heartbeats, or time spent in each state - Build OHLC/candlestick or VWAP data for financial ticks - Store re-aggregatable summaries in continuous aggregates (two-step aggregation, rollup) - Approximate COUNT DISTINCT, find top-N / most frequent values, or downsample for charts **Keywords:** timescaledb_toolkit, hyperfunctions, percentile_agg, uddsketch, tdigest, approx_percentile, stats_agg, time_weight, counter_agg, gauge_agg, heartbeat_agg, state_agg, candlestick_agg, hyperloglog, approx_count_distinct, min_n, max_n, mcv_agg, lttb, asap_smooth, rollup, two-step aggregation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explore an existing PostgreSQL database before answering questions about its data or writing SQL. Use this skill whenever a user asks for a query or a data-backed answer against an unfamiliar schema (counts, missing or failed records, recent changes), asks where a business concept lives, or asks how tables, joins, views, routines, triggers, RLS, or extensions work. Find the relevant objects with read-only pg_catalog queries, then request approval before inspecting data-derived statistics or rows. Not a schema-design or migration guide.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。