「evidence」の検索結果

Semi-automated fact-checking, source credibility evaluation, misinformation detection, prebunking, and evidence-ledger based claim verification. Use when a user asks to verify a claim, article, social post, screenshot, URL, quote, data point, compare sources, detect manipulation, evaluate source reliability, or generate an HTML fact-check card/share-safe correction. Supports text, URLs, screenshots/images, two-source comparison, and topic-level prebunking in Bulgarian, English, Russian, EU policy, health, science, and geopolitical contexts. Trigger phrases: "is this true?", "is this fake?", "fact check this", "compare these sources", "проверка на факти", "истина ли е", "дезинформация ли е", "сравни тези източници".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

DyNote: systematically and efficiently extract raw Douyin/DY video data and analyze videos, comments, accounts, hashtags, and short-video scenes into evidence-graded learning notes, summaries, research briefs, scripts, and knowledge-base material. Use when the user asks to 抓取/提取/整理 抖音视频字幕、视频文案、ASR 转写、Qwen3-ASR 中文转写、原始材料归档、学习笔记、analysis plan、note budget、避免返工、复用已有素材、评论洞察、账号分析、赛道/话题研究、竞品拆解、电商/本地生活视频分析、事实核查、自动搜索素材, save Douyin content as Markdown/TXT, or use subtitle/local ASR as the factual spine with logged-in Douyin Web built-in AI / Doubao fallback as visual or quick-reading supplements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants a research-paper figure Skill Factory: build, patch, package, or use reusable specialized paper-figure-making skills from lawful literature/corpus evidence. Generated skills must use a specialized-skill-first workflow, full-feasible local PDF coverage where available, startup-plan-only first replies, target-paper candidate/final image isolation, mandatory image-embedded visual-structure explanation, mandatory non-target concept/modeling example display for abstract visual decisions, saved subtype/style illustration atlases, ChatGPT web Create image / ChatGPT Images 2.0 rendering, Codex $imagegen-first rendering, sample-image transfer rules, all-step/current-position state footers, and a mandatory first-round diverse candidate board followed by P6b/P6c paper-local best-practice optimization before final prompt construction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill whenever the user wants to create or improve a presentation for an academic context — conference papers, seminar talks, thesis defenses, grant briefings, lab meetings, invited lectures, or any presentation where the audience will evaluate reasoning and evidence. Triggers include: 'conference talk', 'seminar slides', 'thesis defense', 'research presentation', 'academic deck', 'academic presentation'. Also triggers when the user asks to 'make slides' in combination with academic content (e.g., 'make slides for my paper on X', 'create a presentation for my dissertation defense', 'build a deck for my grant proposal'). This skill governs CONTENT and STRUCTURE decisions. For the technical work of creating or editing the .pptx file itself, also read the pptx SKILL.md.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Repo-local workflow skill for large coding tasks. Initializes .agent/tasks/TASK_ID artifacts, installs project-scoped Codex and Claude subagents, updates AGENTS.md plus the repo's Claude guide file with the workflow, and runs a spec-freeze → build → evidence → verify → fix loop with fresh-session verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide a visible, verified code walkthrough in Neovim with Terminal Control and Navi, optionally recording the presentation with OBS or retaining terminal evidence. Use when the user wants an agent-led code tour, code-along, live source explanation, or recorded terminal walkthrough.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review factory evidence and propose tighter or looser constraints without editing the charter. Use for a periodic constraint review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Inspect factory health, stale work, CI, security advisories, and recent run evidence without implementing fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user is closing an ISO week, reviewing planned outcomes against evidence, interviewing work Areas, resolving unfinished commitments, or asking for "ретро", "weekly retro", "week review", or lessons from the week.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate an alert or incident in this channel: classify the symptom, load the matching triage reference, check lessons.md for known causes, and post a grounded first-pass diagnosis with evidence links and a proposed (never executed) fix. Use when an alert fires, a routine detects a new anomaly, or someone reports something broken ("tests aren't running", "deploys look stuck", "is CI down?").

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a cumulative daily or retrospective sweep of research papers on a chosen topic, audit their claims, methods, integrity signals, and independent support, then identify overlooked but feasible project or business opportunities in a detailed source-grounded report. Use when asked to monitor papers every day, mine buried research, evaluate whether a paper is credible or reproducible, find unimplemented research ideas, or separate promising work from hype, weak evidence, and retracted or contradicted results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create truthful, human-centered marketing campaigns for an app or product, including positioning, channel copy, original artwork, editable layouts, README banners, and selective website integration. Use when asked to make launch materials, promotional artwork, social assets, campaign kits, ads, or marketing content from an existing product; to adapt a visual reference without copying it; or to add approved campaign art to product surfaces. Do not invent claims, fake UI, publish, deploy, or replace product proof without explicit evidence and authorization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Teach any topic deeply from first principles and build evidence-based paths toward exceptional capability. Use when a user asks to understand, explain, learn, or deep-dive into a topic; asks why or how something works, why it matters, how alternatives compare, or what different perspectives reveal; requests current paradigms, a complete roadmap or curriculum, deliberate practice and feedback, or a top-1%-level mastery plan. Answer explanation questions completely before offering a curriculum; route explicit mastery goals to an adaptive practice and proof-of-capability system.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Dead code and dependency cleanup, repo-wide: unused deps, unreferenced exports, unreachable code, orphaned files — removed only with tool evidence, in reversible waves. Runs on green main. For diff-scoped cleanup use absolute-simplify. Triggers on "absolute prune", "remove dead code", "find unused deps/exports", "what can we delete", "clean up orphaned files".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when drafting or revising internal technical design docs, review notes, architecture writeups, or sharing posts in Chinese, especially when the tone should stay evidence-backed, calm, and suitable for peers or leaders rather than marketing or literary writing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build evidence-oriented readiness checklists for frameworks such as SOC 2, HIPAA, PCI DSS, and GDPR, with gaps and remediation priorities. Use when the user needs an internal readiness assessment or control-mapping plan; do not use it to certify compliance or replace an auditor or counsel.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a preliminary, evidence-based EU AI Act readiness assessment across AI-system inventory, territorial scope, operator roles, prohibited-practice screening, risk classification, transparency, high-risk controls, general-purpose AI obligations, governance, and implementation milestones. Use when an organization needs to triage an AI use case, vendor, model, product, or portfolio for Regulation (EU) 2024/1689; prepare an AI inventory, gap register, implementation roadmap, or counsel briefing; assess provider, deployer, importer, distributor, product-manufacturer, authorised-representative, or GPAI-provider responsibilities; or re-check readiness after regulatory or product changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify the accuracy of claims and statements by extracting individual assertions, identifying authoritative sources, cross-referencing evidence, and assigning confidence-scored verdicts. Use when the user requests fact checking or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan, execute, document, and retest authorized security assessments of AI agents and multi-agent workflows using safe adversarial cases, synthetic identities, canaries, and evidence-based findings. Use when defining red-team rules of engagement, assessing prompt injection or excessive agency, testing tool and identity boundaries, evaluating memory or cross-agent attacks, scoring a campaign, or verifying remediation in an approved environment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compress selected context to a target token budget while preserving decisions, evidence, constraints, and unresolved questions. Use when relevant material is already selected but too long; use context-optimization when selection, deduplication, and ordering are also required.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze datasets to answer defined questions through statistical methods, trend identification, hypothesis testing, and correlation analysis. Use when the user needs evidence-backed findings or decisions from data; use exploratory-data-analysis instead for open-ended first-pass profiling before questions are defined.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Mineralogist. Use when a task calls for Mineralogist judgment. Reasons from crystal chemistry, Pauling coordination, and converging optics–XRD/Raman–EPMA evidence; uses RRUFF/Mindat/AMCSD and CNMNC Checklist 2025 while treating preferred orientation, clay EG/heat triads, metamict amorphization, and QEMSCAN library bias as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Geneticist. Use when a task calls for Geneticist judgment. Reasons from particulate inheritance, segregation, recombination, allele frequency, and genotype-phenotype evidence through ACMG/AMP-ClinGen classification, gnomAD/ClinVar/OMIM, HPO phenotyping, and PLINK/GATK/VEP QC while treating sample swaps, cryptic relatedness, population stratification, LD tagging, phenocopies, winner's curse, and build/transcript mismatch as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。