「frame」の検索結果

Turn one approved master still into a character's whole animated sprite set - one image-to-video clip per action (idle, walk, run, attack, jump, hurt, cast and so on), all from that still, generated through generate2dmedia route_media.py (the xAI API when a key is configured, else the local Grok CLI) - then gate each take, key it with a soft matte, register it to the master, pick loops or retime actions, finish (HD by default, pixel on request) and package fixed-canvas frames, alpha WebM, packed MP4 for iPhone and a PNG fallback with engine metadata and a JS runtime. Also processes a supplied clip. Use for character and creature animation, fluid motion and any video-to-sprite work. Not for FX, icon or prop sheets (generate2dsprite), maps or plate loops (generate2dmap), code-drawn animation (codeart2d, only on request) or calling a video API by itself (generate2dmedia).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The art-route layer of the Forge skills. route_media.py is the one command that generates an image or an image-to-video clip - through the paid API of any provider whose key is configured (OpenAI, Google Gemini, xAI, BytePlus ModelArk, fal.ai; the configured key is the owner's consent), else through the user's own signed-in Codex or Grok CLI - and prints one JSON line with the route, artifact, sha256 and cost estimate; with no route it answers no-route (codeart2d is then the last resort). Also the capability check (forge_doctor), API key configuration, the spend ledger, resume and Codex image adoption. Use when a Forge skill sends a generation here, for the capability check, or when the user asks about keys, routes or spend. Not for planning, processing or QA of sprites, video frames or maps (generate2dsprite, video2dsprite, generate2dmap) or for code-drawn art (codeart2d).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Parallel divergent ideation for coding agents. Spawns N isolated branches under different cognitive frames (regulator, biology, speedrunner, 10-year-old, $0 budget), scores, clusters, prunes traps, and deepens top survivors. Use on /adhd, "ADHD mode", brainstorm/ideate intents, or open-ended design, architecture, naming, API/SDK surface, and fuzzy-debugging decisions. Skip for syntax, lookups, bugs with known root cause, or closed phrasing ("quick", "standard", "canonical", "textbook"). Full pre-flight gate is in the skill body.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Starter: frame a decision as a multi-model debate — picks sides, seats providers, and launches /octo:debate with a well-formed motion

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when styling UI for framer.com — references the extracted design system tokens instead of inventing colors, spacing, or typography.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides React Native performance optimization guidelines for FPS, TTI, bundle size, memory leaks, re-renders, and animations. Applies to tasks involving Hermes optimization, JS thread blocking, bridge overhead, FlashList, native modules, or debugging jank and frame drops.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured hypothesis formulation from observations. Use when you have experimental observations or data and need to formulate testable hypotheses with predictions, propose mechanisms, and design experiments to test them. Follows scientific method framework. For open-ended ideation use scientific-brainstorming; for automated LLM-driven hypothesis testing on datasets use hypogenic.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation. Use when writing formal peer reviews with specific criteria methodology assessment, statistical validity, reporting standards compliance (CONSORT/STROBE), and constructive feedback. Best for actual review writing, manuscript revision. For evaluating claims/evidence quality use scientific-critical-thinking; for quantitative scoring frameworks use scholar-evaluation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate scientific claims and evidence quality. Use for assessing experimental design validity, identifying biases and confounders, applying evidence grading frameworks (GRADE, Cochrane Risk of Bias), or teaching critical analysis. Best for understanding evidence quality, identifying flaws. For formal peer review writing use peer-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically evaluate scholarly work using the ScholarEval framework, providing structured assessment across research quality dimensions including problem formulation, methodology, analysis, and writing with quantitative scoring and actionable feedback.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Single-page SEO audit: content quality under Google's E-E-A-T framework and Helpful Content guidelines, on-page factors, search intent, technical signals and readability. Pulls GSC data for the page, crawls the live HTML, checks metadata, schema, internal linking and depth, and produces a scored report with fixes. Use whenever the user wants to analyze a specific page or URL, not the whole site. Trigger on: "analyze this page", "audit this URL", "how is this page doing", "evaluate my blog post", "check this landing page", "page SEO", "content quality check", "is this page good enough", "review this page's SEO", "what's wrong with this page", "how can I improve this page", "page analysis", "single page audit", "content audit for [URL]", or any request naming a specific URL/page for SEO evaluation. If the user provides a specific URL (not just a domain), this is likely the right skill; use /seo-analysis for full-site audits instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Routes problems to appropriate mathematical frameworks using expert heuristics

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze Chrome, Chromium, Electron, React DevTools, or Perfetto-compatible JSON traces and audit user-reported profiling findings without loading large artifacts into context; prove trigger-to-render/layout chains, separate measured facts from source inference, find exact code choke points, classify forced layout and render fanout, implement semantically safe fixes, and verify behavior plus repository budgets. Use for trace files, reported profiling durations or call chains, dropped frames, long tasks, resize or scroll jank, render storms, layout thrashing, selector hot paths, interaction latency, or requests to locate exact source-level bottlenecks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

用自然语言指令剪辑视频：裁剪、拼接、变速、跳切去静音、文字覆盖、横竖比转换、抽帧封面、转 GIF、压缩、加 BGM/水印，基于 ffmpeg。 当用户说"剪视频""裁剪视频""拼接视频""视频变速""去静音""视频加文字""视频转GIF""压缩视频""加BGM/水印"时使用。 本 SKILL 做单条视频的通用剪辑；智能画幅转换用 video-reframe，长视频切片用 clipify/video-highlights，从 0 生成用 ai-video-gen。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

智能转换视频画幅，支持 9:16/16:9/1:1、模糊背景填充、焦点裁切和人脸居中裁切。当用户说“横竖版互转、改成 9:16、转竖屏、去黑边、适配平台尺寸、人脸居中裁”时使用。通用简单裁切用 video-editing；逐段动态人脸跟随切片用 clipify。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill for processing and analyzing large tabular datasets (billions of rows) that exceed available RAM. Vaex excels at out-of-core DataFrame operations, lazy evaluation, fast aggregations, efficient visualization of big data, and machine learning on large datasets. Apply when users need to work with large CSV/HDF5/Arrow/Parquet files, perform fast statistics on massive datasets, create visualizations of big data, or build ML pipelines that do not fit in memory.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate concise (3-4 page), focused medical treatment plans in LaTeX/PDF format for all clinical specialties. Supports general medical treatment, rehabilitation therapy, mental health care, chronic disease management, perioperative care, and pain management. Includes SMART goal frameworks, evidence-based interventions with minimal text citations, regulatory compliance (HIPAA), and professional formatting. Prioritizes brevity and clinical actionability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Zero-shot time series forecasting with Google's TimesFM foundation model. Use this skill when forecasting ANY univariate time series — sales, sensor readings, stock prices, energy demand, patient vitals, weather, or scientific measurements — without training a custom model. Automatically checks system RAM/GPU before loading the model, supports CSV/DataFrame/array inputs, and returns point forecasts with calibrated prediction intervals. Includes a preflight system checker script that MUST be run before first use to verify the machine can load the model. For classical statistical time series models (ARIMA, SARIMAX, VAR) use statsmodels; for time series classification/clustering use aeon.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

UX research and design toolkit for Senior UX Designer/Researcher including data-driven persona generation, journey mapping, usability testing frameworks, and research synthesis. Use for user research, persona creation, journey mapping, and design validation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically evaluate scholarly work using the ScholarEval framework, providing structured assessment across research quality dimensions including problem formulation, methodology, analysis, and writing with quantitative scoring and actionable feedback.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Process-based discrete-event simulation framework in Python. Use this skill when building simulations of systems with processes, queues, resources, and time-based events such as manufacturing systems, service operations, network traffic, logistics, or any system where entities interact with shared resources over time.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep learning framework (PyTorch Lightning). Organize PyTorch code into LightningModules, configure Trainers for multi-GPU/TPU, implement data pipelines, callbacks, logging (W&B, TensorBoard), distributed training (DDP, FSDP, DeepSpeed), for scalable neural network training.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform language and framework specific security best-practice reviews and suggest improvements. Trigger only when the user explicitly requests security best practices guidance, a security review/report, or secure-by-default coding help. Trigger only for supported languages (python, javascript/typescript, go). Do not trigger for general code review, debugging, or non-security tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate scientific claims and evidence quality. Use for assessing experimental design validity, identifying biases and confounders, applying evidence grading frameworks (GRADE, Cochrane Risk of Bias), or teaching critical analysis. Best for understanding evidence quality, identifying flaws. For formal peer review writing use peer-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。