「planning」の検索結果

Import a GSD-2 (.gsd/) project back to GSD v1 (.planning/) format

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create an isolated workspace with repo copies and independent .planning/

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query, inspect, or refresh codebase intelligence files in .planning/intel/

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build, query, and inspect the project knowledge graph in .planning/graphs/

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Gather phase context through adaptive questioning before planning. Use --all to skip area selection and discuss all gray areas interactively. Use --auto to skip interactive questions (Claude picks recommended defaults). Use --chain for interactive discuss followed by automatic plan+execute. Use --power for bulk question generation into a file-based UI (answer at your own pace).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose planning directory health and optionally repair issues

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test a half-formed idea in a questioning conversation, with different personas probing its weak points, until the user can act on it or drop it with confidence. Optionally writes a short brief for planning skills to build on. Use when the user says 'forge an idea', 'pressure-test this idea', 'stress-test my thinking', or 'harden this idea'

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform a read-only, evidence-first intake of an existing mini-program repository before planning or modifying code. Use when users ask to take over, understand, audit, resume, scope, or continue a WeChat or other mini-program project; when project facts may conflict with historical documents; or when an agent needs the framework, rules, Git state, build path, risks, unknowns, protected behavior, and change boundary. Produces a project fact map and handoff without changing code, installing dependencies, building artifacts, or claiming runtime, device, cloud, upload, acceptance, or release status.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits and optimizes websites for search engine visibility (SEO) and AI search citation (GEO), covering technical health, E-E-A-T content scoring, domain authority, structured data, rich results, and entity signals. Use when running SEO audits, diagnosing traffic drops or ranking losses, generating Schema.org JSON-LD, checking Core Web Vitals, crawlability, robots.txt, sitemaps, hreflang, backlinks, planning content strategy or site migrations, fixing indexing issues, or optimizing for AI Overviews, ChatGPT, and Perplexity. NOT for paid ads (PPC/SEM), social media strategy, email marketing, or general web development unrelated to search.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build, revise, audit, or rebut a research manuscript from Harness Research evidence. Use for paper intake, related-work research, claim and citation control, section architecture, LaTeX patching, figure planning, reviewer response, or final manuscript hardening when the workspace contains Harness research artifacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Video content planning. Writes narration scripts, storyboards, shot lists, and asset checklists. Saves plan to marketing/video-plan.md.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build and grow developer and user communities from scratch — covering ambassador programs, community-led growth (CLG), event operations, content strategy, and health metrics. Grounded in real playbooks from Notion, Lovable, AFFiNE, ClickUp, Asana, and Lark. Use when: building a community for an open-source project, SaaS product, or brand; recruiting and managing ambassadors or community leaders; planning community events (online/offline meetups, AMAs, hackathons); designing ambassador tier/points systems; setting community health KPIs; launching a Build-in-Public strategy; setting up Discord, Slack, or Lark communities; running developer relations (DevRel); or when the user asks about community operations, ambassador programs, CLG, user advocacy, KOC/KOL cultivation, UGC flywheels, community monetization, or any variation of "how do I grow my community".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Route broad or ambiguous VitaeContext work to the right module while keeping context scoped. Use when a request spans the Career Context file and VitaeGraph, involves provider or install architecture, needs agent-context planning, or the correct VitaeContext skill is unclear.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user has a fuzzy idea and wants to shape it into a concrete project spec before planning or building. Triggers on: "brainstorm this", "I have an idea for...", "help me think through this project", "what should I build", "spec this out". Also catches vague feature descriptions needing structured questioning to clarify scope. Does NOT write code, plan implementation, review strategy docs, or run strategy interviews — produces a WHAT/WHY spec through dialogue, not a HOW plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to build or think through a strategy via guided conversation — for a company, product, team, career, or initiative. Triggers on "help me figure out our direction", "what should we focus on", strategic planning, competitive positioning, go-to-market strategy. Also catches indirect requests like prioritization struggles or "we have too many priorities". Does NOT review existing strategy documents (use strategy-review) or brainstorm project features (use brainstorm-beagle).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when auditing an agent codebase against the 12-Factor Agents methodology, reviewing LLM-powered system architecture, or assessing agentic app compliance. Triggers on "analyze agent architecture", "12-factor audit", "how compliant is this agent", or "evaluate this LLM app". Also applies when comparing frameworks or planning agent improvements. Not for quick checklists — this performs deep per-factor codebase analysis with file-level evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to mine a conversation, session transcript, or design discussion for architectural decisions before writing ADRs. Identifies problem-solution pairs, trade-off debates, technology choices, and explicit "[ADR]" tags. Triggers on "what decisions did we make", "extract decisions from this chat", "find the choices in our discussion", or "summarize architectural decisions". Also useful after long planning sessions to capture decisions that were made implicitly. Does NOT write ADR documents — use adr-writing or write-adr for that.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Update an OpenSpec change by revising its existing planning artifacts and keeping them coherent with one another. Use when the user wants to revise a change's plan, fold new decisions into it, or reconcile its artifacts after an edit. Never edits code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suggest whether Claude Code, Codex CLI, or Grok Build is a useful next collaborator, without launching a CLI or changing controls. Use when comparing the three CLIs, planning a handoff, or deciding whether an independent implementation or review would help.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Direct substantial repository work across Claude Code, Codex CLI, or Grok Build with a concise brief, parallel agents, evidence-based completion, and optional cross-CLI continuation. Use for project onboarding, multi-step implementation, agent coordination, verification planning, low-interruption setup, or deciding how another CLI should take over. Do not use it as a permission gate or mandatory workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deeply scope a problem before coding: parallel Explore agents map related files, similar implementations, and test patterns, producing a problem definition, boundaries, and minimal implementation plan. Use when planning a feature, investigating a bug, or entering an unfamiliar codebase area.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Skill for developing AI agent engine components in internal/agent/. Covers the ReAct loop, swarm delegation, planning, verification, memory reflection, and cron automation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ein evidenzbasiertes, tragfähiges Content-Portfolio für Zielgruppen, Geschäftsziele, Distribution und die real vorhandene Produktionskapazität planen. Nutze diesen Skill für Content-Strategien, Themenfelder, Redaktionspläne und Backlogs, für die Diagnose eines bestehenden Contentbestands, für die Abbildung von Kauf- und Nutzungswegen und für Entscheidungen zu CMS und Governance. Priorisiert offen nach Nachfrage, Aufwand und Evidenz, schützt vor dünnen Massenseiten und benennt Belegklassen. Einzelne Texte schreibt copywriting, die technische Prüfung macht seo-audit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when upgrading an existing Spring Boot application to Boot 4 — dependency transitions, starter renames, test-annotation migration (e.g. @MockBean → @MockitoBean), Jackson 3 issues, related Spring Modulith 2 or Testcontainers 2 upgrade work, or planning a phased migration. Not for greenfield project creation or isolated repository design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。