1,659 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Crawl and validate all internal and external links across an AEM Edge Delivery Services site. Uses the query index or sitemap to discover pages, extracts links from .plain.html renditions, checks HTTP status codes, and produces a prioritized report of broken, redirecting, and insecure links. Use when auditing link health before launch, after a migration, or as a periodic maintenance check.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Preview and verify imported content in local AEM Edge Delivery Services dev server. Validates rendering, compares with original page, and troubleshoots common issues.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze content sequences and determine authoring approach (default content vs blocks). Validates block selection and section styling for import/migration to AEM Edge Delivery Services.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit an AEM Edge Delivery Services page for content quality, SEO, accessibility, performance, and EDS best practices. Produces a prioritized fix list with specific remediation steps. Use when reviewing page quality, preparing for launch, or optimizing existing content.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reference for producing Adobe Document Authoring (DA, da.live) and Edge Delivery Services (EDS, aka aem.live/Helix) compatible content. Use whenever generating HTML for DA upload, uploading media binaries to DA, publishing to aem.live, or driving the DA admin API (auth, source PUT, preview/publish). Covers block HTML format (canonical div-class form and accepted table alternate), section structure, page/section metadata, icons, links, images, default content, document skeleton constraints, block cell content normalization, the DA Source API contract, IMS auth, media storage, supported formats, Media Bus vs Content Bus delivery, and silent-failure rules that corrupt content.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes development requirements and generates structured acceptance criteria for AEM Edge Delivery Services (EDS) tasks. Use when the user needs to define acceptance criteria, write requirements, scope work, or create a definition of done for EDS blocks, components, variants, bug fixes, or styling changes. Produces task breakdowns, identifies edge cases, and documents analysis for new blocks, variants, behavior modifications, CSS-only changes, and bug fixes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit and update metadata across multiple AEM Edge Delivery Services pages. Scans pages via the query index, identifies missing or inconsistent metadata (titles, descriptions, og tags, robots), and generates a corrected bulk metadata spreadsheet. Use when standardizing metadata across a site, preparing for launch, or fixing SEO issues at scale.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide for implementing code changes in AEM Edge Delivery Services. Handles block development (new or modified), core functionality changes (scripts.js, styles, delayed.js, etc.), or both. Use this skill for all implementation work guided by the content-driven-development workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[BETA] Detect, review, and fix code-quality and correctness issues in an AEM as a Cloud Service project — locally, with no external services or network calls. Use whenever a user wants to check, review, assess, audit, scan, modernize, upgrade, or fix AEM Java, Sling Models, OSGi, or Maven code — for example: "check my Sling Models are implemented correctly", "review my @Inject usage", "are my Maven dependencies up to date", "scan this AEM project for issues", "modernize my Sling Models", or "fix code-quality problems". Name the files to assess, or ask it to scan the repo; it detects issues, plans, and — only when you ask — applies surgical edits on a branch or in place, then verifies with mvn compile. It recognises the intent and handles each issue type itself, reporting anything it cannot yet fix. This skill is in beta. Verify all outputs before applying them to production projects.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Authenticate with AEM Edge Delivery Services. Opens browser for login and captures token. Works for admin.hlx.page and Config Service APIs regardless of content source (Document Authoring, SharePoint, or Google Drive).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review code for AEM Edge Delivery Services projects. Use at the end of development (before PR) for self-review, or to review pull requests. Validates code quality, performance, accessibility, and adherence to EDS best practices.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Survey available blocks from local AEM Edge Delivery Services project and Block Collection to understand the block palette available for authoring. Returns block inventory with purposes to inform content modeling decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scan an AEM Edge Delivery Services page for WCAG 2.1 AA accessibility violations and generate specific fixes. Identifies missing alt text, heading hierarchy issues, link text problems, color contrast concerns, and EDS-specific accessibility patterns. Use when fixing accessibility issues, preparing for compliance audits, or remediating WCAG violations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compare two versions of an AEM Edge Delivery Services page to identify what changed. Fetches preview vs live, or two different URLs, and produces a detailed content diff showing added, removed, and modified content, metadata, and blocks. Use when reviewing changes before publishing, auditing content modifications, or tracking content evolution.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply a Content Driven Development process to AEM Edge Delivery Services development. Use for ALL code changes - new blocks, block modifications, CSS styling, bug fixes, core functionality (scripts.js, styles, etc.), or any JavaScript/CSS work that needs validation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates Kubernetes manifests including Deployments, Services, ConfigMaps, Secrets, Ingress, and HPA with best practices. Use when users request "Kubernetes setup", "K8s manifests", "deploy to Kubernetes", "container orchestration", or "K8s configuration".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates stable mocks for APIs, services, and UI components using MSW (Mock Service Worker), fixture conventions, and example patterns. Use for "API mocking", "MSW", "test mocks", or "service mocking".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Hunt Host Header Injection — password reset poisoning → ATO, web cache poisoning via unkeyed Host/X-Forwarded-Host, routing-based SSRF (Host picks upstream → cloud metadata/internal services), path-override SSRF/ACL-bypass (X-Original-URL/X-Rewrite-URL), OAuth redirect_uri/issuer poisoning, and absolute-URL link poisoning in emails. High to Critical when it reaches ATO or mass cache poisoning. Built on public Host-header research (PortSwigger 'Practical web cache poisoning' + James Kettle, and the classic password-reset-poisoning class). Use on any forgot-password flow, CDN/reverse-proxy-fronted app, OAuth/OIDC endpoint, or absolute-URL-in-email feature.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Hunt Microsoft SharePoint Server (2013/2016/2019/Subscription Edition) on-prem farms — anonymous endpoint enumeration, version disclosure, legacy SOAP login bypass (Authentication.asmx), ToolShell precondition chain (CVE-2025-53770), SafeControl reflection enumeration via Picker.aspx, NTLM Type-2 AD topology disclosure, custom-branding module discovery, EoL farm permanent-CVE-window exploitation, FormDigest anonymous issuance, file-extension blocklist NOT-an-oracle pattern, custom-zone Forms auth bridging on-prem AD. Use when target has SharePoint headers (SPRequestGuid, X-MS-InvokeApp, X-SharePointHealthScore, MicrosoftSharePointTeamServices) or paths (/_layouts/15/, /_vti_bin/, /_api/, /_catalogs/).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Hunt gRPC vulnerabilities — server reflection enabled (enumerate all services/methods), missing authentication / metadata-stripping on internal endpoints, plaintext gRPC over HTTP/2, internal endpoint disclosure, proto file leakage, gRPC-Web/grpc-gateway transcoding injection, and HTTP/2 Rapid Reset DoS (CVE-2023-44487). Use when target exposes port 50051 / 443 / 8443 / 9090 with HTTP/2, when grpcurl/grpcui detects reflection, when an Envoy or grpc-gateway proxy is fronting a microservice, or when recon reveals a microservice architecture.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
You are helping a penetration tester exploit scheduled tasks, services, and inter-process
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive persistence tradecraft for authorized red team engagements covering Windows and Linux mechanisms. Windows techniques include registry Run/RunOnce keys, scheduled tasks, WMI event subscriptions, DLL search order hijacking, COM object hijacking, Startup folder drops, service creation, Security Support Provider (SSP) DLL injection, and Active Directory persistence (AdminSDHolder abuse, DCShadow, Golden Ticket, Silver Ticket, Skeleton Key, SID History injection). Linux techniques include cron and at jobs, systemd timers and services, SSH authorized_keys injection, shell profile backdoors (.bashrc/.bash_profile), PAM module backdoors, LD_PRELOAD hijacking, kernel module rootkits, web shells, and Git hook abuse. Provides operator-ready command sequences for SharPersist, Impacket ticketer, schtasks, sc.exe, crontab, and systemctl with OPSEC considerations for each method. Maps to MITRE ATT&CK T1547 (Boot or Logon Autostart), T1053 (Scheduled Task/Job), T1546 (Event Triggered Execution), T1556 (Modi...
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive lateral movement tradecraft for authorized red team engagements covering credential-based movement (pass-the-hash, pass-the-ticket, overpass-the-hash), NTLM relay attacks (ntlmrelayx with PetitPotam, DFSCoerce, PrinterBug coercion), remote execution protocols (WMI, WinRM, DCOM, PsExec and alternatives), RDP session hijacking, and network pivoting through tunneling tools (chisel, ligolo-ng, SSH tunnels, SOCKS proxies). Provides operator-ready command sequences for mimikatz, crackmapexec/netexec, impacket suite, and evil-winrm with emphasis on OPSEC considerations, SMB signing bypass, and detection evasion. Maps to MITRE ATT&CK T1021 (Remote Services), T1550 (Use Alternate Authentication Material), and sub-techniques. Includes defender-perspective detection guidance for blue team awareness and a rapid engagement cheatsheet for common lateral movement scenarios encountered during internal penetration tests and assumed-breach exercises.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
You are helping a penetration tester enumerate database services and check for
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。