2,247 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Decrypts statically embedded malware configuration blobs by trying common schemes (single-byte and multi-byte XOR, RC4, base64 layers) and scoring decoded output for config-like content. Activates for requests to decrypt an embedded config, recover hardcoded settings from a blob, or brute-force a configuration encryption scheme.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
VST3 format adapter for Pulp — SingleComponentEffect wiring, bus arrangement negotiation, parameter / MIDI event routing, state round-trip, and the pitfalls discovered while wiring the adapter against Steinberg's SDK.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Master clipboard history management: multi-item history, pinning, transformations, and search. Use when you copy-paste constantly and the single-slot clipboard keeps losing things.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build autonomous task-driven agents with the BabyAGI loop — task creation, prioritization, and execution from a single objective.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnose whether an LLM classifier's validation-gate failure is GOLD-BOUND before spending on prompt revision or model changes. Use when: (1) a scoring pipeline over-predicts a label (precision low, recall high) and a prompt clarification is proposed to tighten it, (2) a pilot/validation gate fails and the fix candidates are prompt edits, (3) inter-rater agreement on the weak label was already low (κ < ~0.6). Core check: if gold POSITIVES share the exact feature the revision would exclude, no prompt can pass a gold-scored gate — recall craters while precision barely moves. Also documents the verified surgical-pilot design (single-section diff, tune/holdout split, pre-registered gate, perturbation check on untouched sections).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build Flutter UI from Figma MCP or image input. Scans src for design tokens (colors, sizes, text styles), existing components, and naming conventions before writing a single line of code. Never hard-codes values.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build throwaway code to validate an uncertain approach before committing to a plan. Two branches — Logic (terminal state machine) or UI (multiple designs on one route with URL-param switcher). No persistence, no tests, single-command start. Use between analyze and plan when the approach itself is uncertain.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Break a single epic into implementable story files. Reads the epic, its GDD, governing ADRs, and control manifest. Each story embeds its GDD requirement TR-ID, ADR guidance, acceptance criteria, story type, and test evidence path. Run after /create-epics for each epic.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guided, section-by-section GDD authoring for a single game system. Gathers context from existing docs, walks through each required section collaboratively, cross-references dependencies, and writes incrementally to file.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Unity game architecture decision patterns. Service Locator vs Singleton vs DI, Event Bus vs ScriptableObject channels, MonoBehaviour vs plain C#, component composition, manager bootstrap sequences. DECISION format: WHEN/DECISION/SCAFFOLD/GOTCHA. Based on Unity 6.3 LTS.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scaffolds a structured investigation in scratch/ for empirical research and documentation. Use when the user says "start an investigation" or wants to: trace code paths or data flow ("trace from X to Y", "what touches X", "follow the wiring"), document system architecture comprehensively ("document how the system works", "archeology"), investigate bugs ("figure out why X happens"), explore technical feasibility ("can we do X?"), or explore design options ("explore the API", "gather context", "design alternatives"). Creates dated folder with README. NOT for simple code questions or single-file searches.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of an Electrical Engineer working in power systems — sizing a service or feeder from NEC demand factors, running a short-circuit study and checking breaker interrupting ratings, computing arc-flash incident energy and assigning a PPE category, checking protective-device coordination (selectivity), or reviewing a single-line diagram before construction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of an Electrical and Electronic Equipment Assembler — inspecting a solder joint against the specific IPC/J-STD workmanship standard criteria rather than personal visual judgment, following ESD precautions for every component handled since damage is invisible at the time it occurs, verifying a crimped connection with a pull test rather than visual inspection alone, or treating a single suspected cold joint as a potential complete failure point rather than a minor defect.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Credit Analyst — spreading financial statements and computing leverage/coverage ratios, writing a commercial credit memo, assigning or recommending an internal risk rating, structuring covenants on a term loan or revolver, or stress-testing a borrower's debt service under a downside case. Narrower than loan-officer (originates and manages the client relationship; the analyst underwrites the credit that officer brings in) and financial-risk-specialist (owns portfolio-level risk and concentration limits, not single-borrower underwriting).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Business Teacher, Postsecondary — grading case analysis on the rigor of business reasoning rather than matching a single "correct" answer, updating stale textbook examples against current market conditions rather than teaching them as still-current, distinguishing taught analytical frameworks from personal business opinion presented as universal fact, and preserving the incomplete-information trade-offs of real business decisions rather than simplifying problems into false certainty.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Business Continuity Planner — running a business impact analysis (BIA) to derive recovery time objectives, mapping process dependencies to find single points of failure, evaluating whether current recovery capability meets a process's maximum tolerable downtime, designing or debriefing a tabletop exercise, or building the cost-benefit case for a continuity investment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Chemical Plant and System Operator — reconciling a batch's mass balance to catch a leak or unaccounted reaction that individually normal readings would miss, responding to an early exotherm temperature trend before it accelerates, prioritizing simultaneous alarms by consequence severity rather than order of occurrence, or flagging a combination of near-limit variables that no single-variable check would catch.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Install Tilt and scaffold or audit Tiltfile + tilt/ configurations with ecosystem-aware templates. Auto-detects Java/Gradle (Spring Boot), Next.js, Python/uv, and external infrastructure; recommends single-file or modular tilt/*.star + service-config.yaml + environments.yaml patterns based on project complexity. Bakes in production-context safety guards, PVC persistence toggles, JDWP debug ports, and optional Prometheus/Grafana/Traefik scaffolds. Use when user runs /devtools:tilt-setup, mentions "tilt setup", "setup tilt", "scaffold tiltfile", "audit tiltfile", "tilt configure", "tilt project setup", "Tiltfile", "local kubernetes dev", or "kubernetes development environment".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scaffold or migrate a repository onto release-please. Generates release-please-config.json, .release-please-manifest.json, and a release-please.yml workflow, plus an opt-in menu of tag-keyed deploy/publish templates (Docker/ECR matrix, frontend host deploy, npm OIDC publish, GitHub Release asset, Fly.io deploy, generic). Supports monorepo (mutual exclude-paths matrix), single-package, and mixed-language (node/simple/python) repos. Use when user runs /release-please-setup, mentions "release please", "set up release please", "automate releases", "conventional-commit releases", "monorepo release automation", or "migrate to release-please".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Install Taskfile (task) and scaffold or audit Taskfile.yml configurations with ecosystem-aware templates. Auto-detects Node.js/pnpm, JVM/Gradle, Python/uv, Docker, and recommends single-file or multi-file (includes) patterns based on project complexity. Use when user runs /devtools:taskfile-setup, mentions "taskfile setup", "setup task runner", "audit taskfile", "scaffold taskfile", "add taskfile", "taskfile.yml", or "developer tasks".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate SEO preservation during site migrations. Checks redirect chains (301 vs 302, hop count), canonical consistency, title/meta preservation, HTTP status codes, content similarity, and schema preservation. Accepts single URL pair or CSV file of URL pairs. Use when user says "migration check", "site migration", "redirect audit", "URL mapping", "domain change", "relaunch", "site move".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deploy a local project directory or Git repository to Volcengine as a running, reachable cloud service. USE WHEN: deploy to Volcengine, deploy to 火山引擎/火山, deploy this repo/project, publish current code, launch the app, run it in the cloud, expose it as a service, deploy to ECS/VKE/veFaaS, run on ECS, push to VKE, deploy as serverless/FaaS, or the user wants the agent to choose a Volcengine hosting target. If the user only asks which Volcengine deployment target to choose, use `volcengine-prepare` skill first. Not for creating a single standalone resource — use `volcengine-cli` skill for that.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes code diffs and files to identify bugs, security vulnerabilities (SQL injection, XSS, insecure deserialization), code smells, N+1 queries, naming issues, and architectural concerns, then produces a structured review report with prioritized, actionable feedback. Use when reviewing pull requests, conducting code quality audits, identifying refactoring opportunities, or checking for security issues. Invoke for PR reviews, code quality checks, refactoring suggestions, review code, code quality. Complements specialized skills (security-reviewer, test-master) by providing broad-scope review across correctness, performance, maintainability, and test coverage in a single pass.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turns a single feature idea, improvement, or bug into ONE well-structured GitHub issue. TRIGGER when: the user wants to file/open/create an issue, turn a feature idea or improvement into a ticket, or capture something missing or broken as a ticket. DO NOT TRIGGER when: breaking work into multiple issues or planning a body of work → a planning skill; writing a full Product Requirements Document → creating-prd; the idea is still fuzzy and unhardened → grilling-ideas first.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。