2,455 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Pre-deployment verification checklist. Use when about to ship a release, deploying a change with database migrations or feature flags, verifying CI status and approvals before going to production, or documenting rollback triggers ahead of time.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verify web apps with browser DevTools—DOM, console, network, performance, and accessibility at runtime. Use with Chrome DevTools MCP or headless browser tools.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate code quality, test coverage, performance, and security. Use when verifying implemented features meet all standards and requirements before marking complete.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verify compliance with OWASP Top 10 2021 security standards. Use when performing OWASP compliance checks and security certification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Claude-native review of code for quality, structure, naming, and maintainability (no external AI). Use when reviewing a file or diff for code quality before committing. Trigger on "review this code", "code review", "is this well-written". For security, use /security-verify; for companion-AI review, use /review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Full validation gate before committing — quality checks, tests, coverage, security scan, changelog, and companion review. Use right before a commit to verify code is ready. Trigger on "pre-commit", "validate before commit", "ready to commit", "run all checks".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Stack-specific security implementation guidance (backend, frontend, database, infrastructure, operations) with auto-detection from your changes. Use when implementing a feature securely or hardening code as you write it. Trigger on "how do I secure this", "security best practices", "is this secure", "harden this". For scanning existing code use /security-verify.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate user stories — INVEST scoring, story-to-test coverage mapping, PRP completeness, and development-readiness assessment. Use after writing stories and before starting implementation. Trigger on "validate the stories", "are these stories ready", "INVEST check", "story coverage", "is this ready to build".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
End-of-session ritual. Close finished beads, file new ones for remaining work, run verify, commit in logical groupings, push. Work is not complete until git push succeeds.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run the full Forge verification suite (format:check + lint + typecheck + build + test). Use this before claiming any task complete or before opening a PR.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run Forge's canonical verification chain (format:check + lint + typecheck + build + test). Use before claiming any task done or opening a PR.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run Forge's canonical verification chain (format:check + lint + typecheck + build + test). Use before claiming any task complete or opening a PR.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
End-of-session ritual — close finished beads, file new ones for remaining work, run verify, commit in logical groupings, push. Work is not complete until git push succeeds.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pre-release checklist for Forge — runs verify, checks version bump, changelog, docs, and docker build. Use before tagging v*.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pre-release checklist for Forge — verify, version bump, changelog, docs, docker build, smoke test. Run before tagging v*.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds and audits a concept-ontology for a regelrecht corpus to decide and verify reference types — cross-law source-binding vs intra-law source-binding vs open-norm leaf vs external-fact leaf — and to catch concept conflation across laws. Core principle: a value's reference type is fixed by WHO derives it, and a binding is sound only when producer and consumer denote the SAME concept; the lexical surface (the word in the text) is not the concept. Detects false friends (one term, different concepts — e.g. a register-based vs a factual "naar de omstandigheden"-based residence/ingezetene concept), orphan plain-params (a value a regulation actually derives, modeled as a brute input), negation/complement re-entry (¬X modeled as an independent leaf next to X), and duplication (one concept re-entered as several independent leafs, losing the single-source-of-truth invariant). Produces a law-level glossary and a stelsel-level concept map with sound same-concept binding edges and flagged lexical-match-but-concept-mismatch edges. Use when deciding whether a value should be cross-law/intra-law/leaf, when the same term means different things across laws, or when a binding might silently conflate concepts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Works through the surviving mutants that cargo-mutants reports for packages/engine — classify each one as a real test gap, a mutant not worth killing, or dead code, then fix it and verify with `just mutants-diff`. Use when picking up the weekly "Mutatietesten" issue, when asked to improve engine test coverage, or when a pull request fails the Mutation Testing (diff) gate.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Finish a development change safely by inspecting the final tree, verifying at the right scope, and performing only the requested Git or PR actions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reproduce, isolate, patch, and verify defects with explicit expected-versus-observed behavior.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a PlayCanvas rendering change is meant to leave the image unchanged, to prove it with deterministic captures and pixel comparison.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze and detect synthetic media, including deepfake videos, AI-generated images, and cloned voice audio. Use this skill when investigating potential disinformation campaigns, verifying the authenticity of digital evidence, or assessing social engineering attacks leveraging synthetic media (e.g., vishing with voice clones, spear-phishing with deepfake video calls). Covers artifact analysis, frequency detection, metadata tracing, and automated detection tools.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when hunting CI/CD bot comment command vulnerabilities where issue_comment or pull_request_review_comment triggers invoke privileged workflows without verifying the commenter's identity or authorization. Trigger on: "bot command injection", "issue_comment trigger", "@github-actions", "slash command CI", "CI bot command", "comment triggered workflow", "unauthenticated bot", "github-actions publish", "comment dispatch", no authorization check on workflow_dispatch from comment, chatops CI/CD, supply chain via PR comment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Writes professional bug bounty reports for HackerOne, Bugcrowd, and Intigriti with CVSS 4.0 scoring, business impact, working exploits, and remediation. Runs 5-check Pre-Report Verification first: hallucination detection, AI writing patterns, PoC reproducibility, duplicate detection, and impact plausibility. Use when user describes a vulnerability, shares HTTP logs, HAR files, recon output, or screenshots; says 'write a bug report', 'format my finding', 'draft a vuln report', 'is this valid', 'rate my vulnerability', 'verify my report', or any variant. Trigger for partial or messy input — raw notes, one-liners, or full writeups all work. Do not wait for perfect input.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。