3,089 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Architecture guide for GDPR-compliant federated learning systems. Covers horizontal and vertical FL, aggregation strategies (FedAvg, FedProx), communication efficiency, secure aggregation, and differential privacy integration. Includes privacy guarantees analysis and deployment patterns for cross-organizational ML without data sharing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide for obtaining explicit consent for international data transfers under GDPR Article 49(1)(a). Covers informed consent requirements including risks of transfers without adequacy decisions or appropriate safeguards, specific destination country disclosure, and the narrow scope of derogation-based transfers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Sharpens and stress-tests an existing plan file through multiple codebase-grounded review passes, editing it in place and recording every finding and iteration in cross-referenced companion files. Use this skill whenever the user wants to iterate on, refine, tighten, or improve a plan. Also use it when the user asks to verify, validate, or confirm feasibility of an approach. Does not implement plan steps, write test plans, review code, or investigate bugs, and does not generate new plans from scratch — use plan-a-feature for a new plan. Runs its review rounds to completion without pausing between them; to review each round as it lands, use pairing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a full pull request review and post review comments directly to the current branch's GitHub PR. Requires the gh CLI to be installed and a PR to already exist for the current branch. Use when you want review feedback posted to GitHub as PR comments. For local code review without posting to GitHub, use code-review instead. Does not write or update PR descriptions — use update-pr-description for that.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs the contract for an API change inside one codebase — a component's props, a function surface, URL or query parameters, an event payload, or a module boundary — through a discovery pass, an options document with one recommendation, a question round, and an adversarial validation round, with every element of the contract justified from one stated goal. Use when you want to design, shape, decide, or nail down an interface, contract, signature, or API change for a capability you can already describe, sized for roughly one pull request. Produces a design document and changes no code. Does not specify what a feature should do — use plan-a-feature. Does not plan delivery or sequencing — use plan-implementation. Does not assess the architecture of existing code — use architectural-analysis. Does not write the code — use tdd. Does not restructure existing code — use refactor. Runs its rounds without pausing for review; to review each round as it lands, use pairing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write code through a disciplined, BDD-framed Test-Driven Development loop: build a behavior test list, then drive each behavior through red-green-refactor with an enforced observed-failure gate. Use when the user wants to implement, build, or write code test-first, "do TDD", follow "red-green-refactor", drive code from tests, choose the next test by the Transformation Priority Premise (TPP) or ZOMBIES ordering, or grow a feature behavior-by-behavior with tests leading. This skill writes and changes code; it does not produce a test plan document (use automated-test-planning, or manual-test-planning for a plan a person runs by hand), review or audit existing code (use code-review), restructure existing code outside a TDD loop (use refactor, or plan-a-change to plan a multi-module restructure), specify what a feature should do (use plan-a-feature), or find the root cause of a bug (use investigate). Runs its loop to completion without pausing for review; to review each behavior as it lands, use pairing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build work collaboratively in reviewable pieces, handing each piece back for review before starting the next, so the person stays in the lead and steers while the work happens instead of reviewing a finished result. Use when someone says to pair with them on something, asks to collaborate rather than direct, wants to review as it goes, or wants to guide the work piece by piece — on code, on a design decision, or on writing. For a test-first build it runs tdd, for restructuring it runs refactor, for an interface contract it runs design-an-api, and for plan work it runs iterative-plan-review or plan-implementation, each collaboratively; invoke any of those directly instead to run it straight through without pausing. Does not pace someone through code that already exists and builds nothing — use code-walkthrough. Does not explain, summarize, or research something instead of producing it — use code-overview or research.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Researches an open-ended question — options, possible solutions, prior art, trade-offs, or how something works — and produces a durable, evidence-backed, adversarially-validated report that recommends an option without committing the team to any artifact. Use when you want to research approaches, weigh options, survey prior art or the state of the art, or understand how something works before committing to a direction. Does not diagnose a bug, failure, or root cause — use investigate. Does not specify a feature — use plan-a-feature. Does not create or update a coding standard — use coding-standard. Does not compare two concrete artifacts for gaps — use gap-analysis. Does not assess an existing module's architecture — use architectural-analysis. Does not capture feedback on Han's own skills — use han-feedback.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Maintenance of the contributor issue pipeline for JSONbored/awesome-claude (HeyClaude) — closing issues that are already done but not marked so, and keeping a small, high-value contributor-available backlog stocked with real website/content/feature/bugfix work. Runs every ~24h via a dedicated scheduled task. Invoke for "run the issue gardening", "audit open issues for stale/complete ones", "generate new contributor issues", or any recurring/scheduled run of this process. `reference.md` (next to this file) has the exhaustive label/milestone/ template detail — read it before doing real work, not just this file. This is the awesome-claude-specific instance; JSONbored/loopover and JSONbored/metagraphed each have their own separate copy with different conventions and a much larger backlog target — do not cross-apply either repo's specifics to this one without being asked.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design natural vertical street-interview and walk-and-talk video prompts for MiniMax H3 or Seedance 2.0. Use when a user wants spontaneous documentary energy, a referenced recurring person, first-person handheld follow, concise dialogue, moving daylight, believable street parallax, or a consent-led interaction that must fit 4–15 seconds without unreachable beats.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Investigate how a concept, code path, application, network flow, system, incident, document, or local artifact actually works, then deliver a two-depth visual HTML explainer with a dead-simple big-picture first layer and source-backed technical depth behind it. Use when the user invokes $xray, asks how something works under the hood, wants a module or app behavior traced across boundaries, requests web, code, network, or safe static artifact research before explanation, or asks for an evidence-backed explainer. Do not use for answer-only definitions, general web design, full codebase audits, or invasive binary reverse engineering without explicit authorization.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Route substantial coding or repository-review work through a two-stage Sol commander/verifier and separate Luna Max CLI worker. Use when the user explicitly asks Sol to direct or supervise Luna, explicitly requests this router, needs an isolated auditable Luna-owned implementation with a Sol review loop, or asks to diagnose or measure the router itself. Do not use merely because a task involves coding, verification, progress reporting, or token saving. For small or straightforward tasks, keep work in Sol unless the user explicitly requests Luna; router configuration, usage, and efficiency questions should use read-only inspection without launching a worker.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Ask Grok or Gemini via opencli (browser-session based, no API cost). Use when the user says "问 grok", "问 gemini", "ask grok", "ask gemini", "用 grok 查", "grok 怎么看", "让 gemini 分析", or wants a second opinion from Grok/Gemini without paying API tokens. Routes to opencli which drives the already-logged-in Chrome session.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan, produce, or diagnose evidence-backed product demo videos and screen-recorded promotional walkthroughs. Use when the user asks to make a product demo, launch video, feature showcase, app walkthrough, demo reel, or polished recording; wants every important capability shown without a slow feature tour; asks to remove dead time or fix narration-to-action pacing; or needs a repeatable script, capture plan, and verified final media. Do not use for fictional commercials with no real product proof, general-purpose video editing, or documentation-only tutorials that do not need a promotional narrative.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when analyzing weekly price charts for stocks, stock indices, cryptocurrencies, or forex pairs. Use this skill when the user provides chart images and requests technical analysis, trend identification, support/resistance levels, scenario planning, or probability assessments based purely on chart data without consideration of news or fundamental factors.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Extract clean article content from URLs (blog posts, articles, tutorials) and save as readable text. Use when user wants to download, extract, or save an article/blog post from a URL without ads, navigation, or clutter.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design, implement, audit, or refactor web and game-adjacent interfaces using an evidence-based Hypergryph visual language with two independent choices: product family and application depth (1 minimal, 2 moderate, 3 complex, 4 maximal). Use for Hypergryph-, Arknights-, Endfield-, Rhodes Island-, industrial sci-fi-, editorial game-UI-, or bilingual technical-interface requests; for landing pages, dashboards, menus, HUD-like panels, design systems, HTML/CSS/JS/React components, and visual QA where the result should carry this family resemblance without copying protected logos or artwork.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Draft, rewrite, or review reader-facing prose so it is specific, useful, and recognizably the author's without inventing facts or performing humanness. Use for essays, articles, newsletters, documentation, talks, launch copy, and other important prose that feels generic, hollow, or AI-shaped. Supports co-write, rewrite, review, and lint modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
60-Second Stock Snapshot — fast assessment with signal, key factors, and levels without launching subagents
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
60-Second Ad Readiness Snapshot — quick assessment without subagents
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fix JSON parse errors when fetching archived API responses from Wayback Machine. Use when: (1) Getting "Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)" JSON decode errors from archived URLs, (2) Wayback returns HTML instead of expected JSON/raw content, (3) Crawling archived REST APIs or JSON endpoints from web.archive.org. The `id_` modifier returns raw content without the Wayback toolbar wrapper.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fix empty results when paginating Wayback Machine CDX API with wildcard URL queries. Use when: (1) CDX query with url=foo/* and page=0 returns empty/0 bytes but works without page parameter, (2) CDX pagination returns no data for wildcard prefix searches, (3) Need to paginate large CDX result sets using wildcard URL matching. Covers showResumeKey, offset, and page parameter incompatibilities.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fix rsky-pds createRecord/putRecord hanging indefinitely with no error logs. Use when: (1) createSession succeeds but createRecord never returns, (2) No error appears in PDS logs despite request hanging for 60+ seconds, (3) PDS health endpoint works but write operations hang, (4) readiness probes intermittently fail on rsky-pds pod. Root cause: PDS_CRAWLERS env var configures crawler notification URLs that are called via reqwest HTTP client WITHOUT any timeout in crawlers.rs. If the crawler URL is unreachable from the cluster, every write hangs forever. Also: setting PDS_CRAWLERS="" produces [""] (one empty string element) which causes a "builder error" instead — must fully unset the env var.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fix iOS AVPlayer "CoreMediaErrorDomain error -12939 - byte range length mismatch" or similar video streaming failures when a proxy/edge/CDN service sits between the client and object storage (GCS, S3, R2). Use when: (1) iOS video fails with -12939 "byte range length mismatch - should be length 2 is length N", (2) curl with Range: bytes=0-1 returns full file instead of 2 bytes, (3) one URL path works with Range but another path to the same storage doesn't, (4) proxy advertises Accept-Ranges: bytes but returns 200 with full file for range requests. The root cause is typically a proxy handler that constructs a new request to the backend without forwarding the client's Range header.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。