「bot」の検索結果

Eilrechtsschutz gegen drohende Abschiebung und Duldungsantrag – § 80 V VwGO (insb. § 36 III AsylG 1-Wochen-Frist), § 123 VwGO, Duldung § 60a AufenthG, krankheitsbedingte Verbote § 60 VII AufenthG mit qualifizierter ärztlicher Bescheinigung § 60a IIc, Familienschutz Art. 6 GG / Art. 8 EMRK, EGMR Rule 39 als ultima ratio. Use when ein BAMF-Bescheid mit Abschiebungsandrohung zugestellt ist, eine Abschiebung unmittelbar droht oder Duldungsgründe entstanden sind.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MATLAB R2026a agentic workflow router. Use this whenever the user asks for MATLAB, Simulink, .m/.mlx/.slx work, toolbox-driven engineering, paper reproduction, simulation, code generation, data analysis, control, robotics, signal/image/AI workflows, or wants an end-to-end automated MATLAB task with validation. For Simulink tasks on this machine, default to a visible workflow: open MATLAB/Simulink windows first so the user can watch modeling, simulation, tuning, and plotting progress.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn the working changes into one or more atomic commits with well-written messages. Use whenever the user runs /git-commit or asks to commit their work, wrap up a feature, or "commit what I have."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Walk through the Designer/Developer wrap-up checklist for offboarding a client engagement — conversationally, one item at a time.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explain what a piece of code does — a specific file, class, or method in close detail, or a user-facing flow as a concise system overview. What it does and why, not whether it's good.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think out loud about a problem, decision, or approach — Socratic friction to help you find clarity, not sympathy

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Strict red-green-refactor TDD workflow for implementing features, fixing bugs, or changing behavior in Rails applications. Enforces the discipline of writing a failing test before any production code. Use whenever you want to implement with TDD — whether a new feature, a bugfix, a refactor, or any behavior change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a feature into well-defined, independently shippable slices — whether it's an epic that needs breaking apart or a single story that needs sharpening into a job story

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Socratic code review and refactoring session — whether it's your own code, a teammate's PR, or something you inherited. Leads you to see the issues through questions, names smells and moves precisely, then closes with a concrete plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pressure-test an assumption, decision, or inherited constraint — Socratic cross-examination that forces you to defend or abandon your position

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepare to deliver difficult technical news to a client — a conversational prep session before the hard conversation happens

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write a client update — identify what was done, what's next, and surface risks before they become surprises. End of day, start of day, or end of week.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Take one new feature slice from idea to reviewed, committed code in a single guided pass — scope it into the smallest shippable slice, build it test-first with strict TDD, review and fix the diff, then commit it. Chains slice → test-driven-development → the built-in /code-review → git-commit. Not for reviewing an existing PR, upgrades, or open-ended design questions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discover how a codebase already handles a specific concern — search broadly, find every instance, and assess consistency. The "how does this app do X?" tool.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply Giddens' structuration theory to analyze the duality of structure — how social structures are both the medium and outcome of the practices they organize. Use this skill when the user needs to bridge agency and structure in organizational or social analysis, explain how routines reproduce or transform institutional patterns, analyze the recursive relationship between action and structure, or when they ask 'do people shape institutions or do institutions shape people', 'how are these routines maintained', or 'where does change come from if structures constrain action'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply sustainability frameworks (triple bottom line, SDGs, ESG, circular economy) to evaluate whether strategies balance economic, social, and environmental dimensions. Use this skill when the user needs to assess ESG performance, design circular economy strategies, align business models with SDGs, or when they ask 'is this strategy truly sustainable', 'how do we measure ESG impact', 'what does a circular business model look like', or 'how do we avoid greenwashing'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Design and conduct mixed methods research using convergent, explanatory sequential, or exploratory sequential strategies with genuine integration of qualitative and quantitative strands. Use this skill when the user needs to choose a mixed methods design, integrate qualitative and quantitative data at design, methods, or interpretation levels, justify mixing on pragmatist grounds, or when they ask 'which mixed methods design should I use', 'how do I integrate qual and quant findings', or 'is running both qual and quant enough to be mixed methods'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply Smith and Lewis's paradox theory to identify and manage organizational tensions across performing, organizing, belonging, and learning dimensions. Use this skill when the user needs to diagnose persistent either/or tensions, design dynamic equilibrium strategies that embrace both poles, or when they ask 'why does solving this problem make it worse', 'how do we pursue exploration AND exploitation simultaneously', or 'why do our strategic tensions keep recurring despite resolution attempts'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply Granovetter's embeddedness theory to analyze how economic behavior is embedded in ongoing social relations, avoiding both over-socialized and under-socialized accounts. Use this skill when the user needs to explain why market transactions deviate from pure economic rationality, analyze how trust and social ties shape business dealings, evaluate structural vs relational embeddedness in inter-firm networks, or when they ask 'why do firms prefer existing partners over cheaper alternatives', 'how do social relationships shape economic outcomes', or 'is this market truly arms-length'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply organizational ambidexterity theory to balance exploration and exploitation activities. Use this skill when the user needs to diagnose whether an organization is over-exploiting or over-exploring, design structures that support both innovation and efficiency, or evaluate the tension between short-term performance and long-term renewal.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill for anything Jx — the Python/Jinja2 component library. Covers BOTH (a) library mechanics and integration AND (b) authoring production-ready UI components. Trigger this skill on any mention of Jx, `.jx` files, "Jinja components" in a Python web app context, or requests to build/create UI components for such an app.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Triage, fix, and pre-flight a PR before merge. Checks mergeability, CI, reviews, and bot comments — fixes issues, runs /pre-commit before pushing, then hands off to /pr-merge.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze Kanban flow metrics to identify bottlenecks and improve team throughput. Covers Cycle Time, Throughput, WIP, and Flow Efficiency using Little's Law and Theory of Constraints. Use when a team wants to optimize delivery flow or improve predictability. Do not use for sprint-based Scrum planning — use sprint-planning-assistant instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review and resolve PR review comments on the current branch's PR in this Flutter repository, from both AI reviewers (CodeRabbit, CodiumAI, CodePilot, Copilot, etc.) and human reviewers. Fetches comments via `gh`, splits them into AI and human groups, verifies each comment against the actual Flutter code, triages them, proposes fixes, and optionally applies fixes, replies to comments, and pushes. Use when the user asks to review PR comments, resolve PR feedback, review AI comments, review human review comments, or handle code review feedback.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。