「cis」の検索結果

Create a concise plan. Use when a user explicitly asks for a plan related to a coding task.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Umbrella skill for document workflows (PDF/DOCX/XLSX/PPTX). Dispatches to the most specific document skill to reduce noise and improve routing precision.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract decisions, lessons, patterns, and surprises from completed phase artifacts

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ingest external plans with conflict detection against project decisions before writing anything.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check whether a website's robots.txt allows the AI crawlers that decide visibility in ChatGPT Search, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, and Microsoft Copilot. Use when someone asks whether AI bots are blocked, whether to allow or block GPTBot, why a site never appears in AI answers, or wants a robots.txt review for AI crawlers. Reads only robots.txt, then returns a per-agent allow/block table, the exact rule responsible for each verdict, and the precise lines to change. Distinguishes training crawlers from the search crawlers that actually control citations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate retrieval and citation behavior for RAG pipelines from deterministic JSONL fixtures. Use when an agent needs offline Recall@K, reciprocal rank, context precision, citation coverage, citation validity, diagnostics, Markdown/JSON reports, or threshold-gated evaluation in CI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Look up official macroeconomic releases, central-bank policy rates, release calendars and FX rates for 22 currencies through the FXMacroData MCP server. Use for questions about CPI, GDP, jobs data, rate decisions, bond yields or what data is due next, when the answer should come from the published number rather than news coverage. Remote server at https://mcp.fxmacrodata.com/mcp; USD works without a key.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Recall past conversations, preferences, project history, and decisions from ReMe in Claude Code, or check the ReMe connection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Recall past facts, preferences, and decisions from ReMe; inspect memory delivery, service health, and the consolidation schedule; or consolidate memory when requested.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run TAO Data Services KPI analysis for object detection, comparing inference annotations against ground truth to compute per-class TP/FP/FN/TN, precision, recall, accuracy, and AP at a fixed IoU. Use when an object detection workflow needs per-class mAP reported after inference, or when the user asks to "run KPI analyze", "compute detection mAP", or "score my OD predictions against ground truth".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when planning, executing, and independently validating Jetson Video Codec SDK or PyNvVideoCodec encode/decode, transcode, segmentation, container decode, AV1, or concise acceptance workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hardware compression offload with DOCA Compress on a BlueField DPU, ConnectX NIC, or host: DEFLATE compress and decompress, plus LZ4 decompress (stream and block; LZ4 encode is NOT supported), instead of CPU zlib / zstd. Trigger on "offload this gzip", "decompress incoming network data on the NIC", "compress task returns INVALID_VALUE on alloc_init", "submitted a task but no completion arrives", or "decompress LZ4 on the BlueField", even without naming DOCA Compress. Covers enabling compress-deflate, decompress-deflate, decompress-lz4-stream and decompress-lz4-block tasks on a doca_compress context, sizing source / destination doca_buf against the per-task cap query, mmap permissions, offload vs CPU decisions, a round-trip smoke, and DOCA_ERROR_* from Compress calls. Refuse and route elsewhere for zstd / Snappy / brotli, LZ4 encode (a CPU LZ4 library), pure mmap-to-mmap copies (doca-dma), or DOCA Core lifecycle internals.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run `doca_bench` (DOCA 2.7.0 or newer) to measure throughput, bulk latency, precision latency, or maximum bandwidth for RDMA, Compress, AES-GCM, SHA, DMA, EC, Ethernet, Comch, or GPUNetIO on a host or BlueField Arm. Use it to discover enabled benchmark libraries, capture a reproducible command/version/device/environment baseline, compare stable runs against a declared tolerance, or diagnose configuration, device-binding, workload-precondition, and measurement failures. Trigger for requests such as measuring BlueField compression speed, NIC RDMA throughput, crypto latency, or a pre-upgrade baseline. Do not use for application end-to-end timing, custom benchmark code, DOCA installation, or binary patches.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

DOCA Rivermax (doca_rmax) receive streams for timing-precise media over IP (SMPTE ST 2110 video / audio, market data, scientific feeds) on a BlueField DPU or ConnectX host, once the Rivermax SDK and its license are installed; getting the SDK or license is doca-setup / doca-public-knowledge-map territory. Trigger on "ST 2110 receive isn't getting frames", "sub-microsecond jitter on my media receiver", "NOT_SUPPORTED from doca_rmax_init", "no recv events after stream start", or "license check failing on a media receiver", even without naming Rivermax. Covers doca_rmax_in_stream sessions, the SDK + license precondition check, doca_rmax_get_*_supported capability queries, pairing with doca-eth queues and doca-flow steering, and DOCA_ERROR_* from Rivermax calls. Refuse and route elsewhere for programming the underlying queue (doca-eth), steering rules (doca-flow), PTP / clock sync (doca-firefly), or best-effort packet I/O.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

LP, MILP, QP — concepts, problem-text parsing, and formulation patterns (parameters, constraints, decisions, objective). Concepts only; no API.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explain and apply the foundational LLM Wiki architecture and knowledge-management strategy. Use for setup, architecture, schema, or organization decisions; operational ingest/query/lint work uses dedicated skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose and repair CCB ask/job/message/reply/artifact/callback lineage. Use for missing replies, incomplete artifacts, pending callbacks, retry/resubmit/ack decisions, reply delivery problems, or work-chain resume advice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Get research-backed architecture advice for your knowledge system. Describe your use case, constraints, and goals — get specific recommendations grounded in TFT research with rationale for each decision. Triggers on "/recommend", "what would you recommend", "architecture advice", "knowledge system for".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Idiomatic Golang design patterns — functional options, constructor APIs, `init()` and global-state avoidance, enums, panic vs error decisions, resource management and lifecycle, graceful shutdown, timeouts and retries, streaming and iterators, and architecture styles (clean, hexagonal, DDD, flat). Apply when choosing between architectural patterns, implementing functional options, designing constructor APIs, setting up graceful shutdown, applying resilience patterns, or asking which idiomatic Go pattern fits a specific problem. Not for wiring a DI container or comparing DI libraries (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-dependency-injection` skill), nor for error wrapping, `errors.Is`/`As`, or logging mechanics (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-error-handling` skill).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Go (Golang) naming conventions — covers packages, constructors, structs, interfaces, constants, enums, errors, booleans, receivers, getters/setters, functional options, acronyms, test functions, and subtest names. Use this skill when writing new Go code, reviewing or refactoring, choosing between naming alternatives (New vs NewTypeName, isConnected vs connected, ErrNotFound vs NotFoundError, StatusReady vs StatusUnknown at iota 0), debating Go package names (utils/helpers anti-patterns), or asking about Go naming best practices. Also trigger when the user mentions MixedCaps vs snake_case, ALL_CAPS constants, Get-prefix on getters, or error string casing. Do NOT use for general Go implementation questions that don't involve naming decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns an answer into a one-page visual HTML explainer: the model writes a short Markdown draft and the bundled CLI builds one page. Use it proactively and liberally, without being asked, whenever a page would help the reader more than plain text, even if plain text would also work: any explanation of how something works or how parts relate (flow, request path, architecture, code or folder structure, state machine, lifecycle, history); any comparison, trade-off or decision with pros and cons; any diagnosis, review or investigation, especially with several causes or findings to rank; any answer with a table, a numbered or ranked list, steps, branches or several sections; or when the user says "I don't get it / draw it / explain visually / 讲讲原理 / 没看懂 / 画个图". When in doubt, use it: a page is quick and cheap to make. Also for explainer videos ("make a video", "做个视频") and for changing its settings. Skip only for small talk, a trivial one-line answer, or when the user asks for plain text.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[omh] Recurring market or topic research: research operations department - coordinate Scout, Analyst, and Briefer work with source-inbox and status boundaries; for one decision brief use research-brief, and for typed candidates before research starts use source-finder. Use when the user says: research-department, research department, research ops department, research operations department, scout analyst briefer, scout analyst brief, daily research department, competitor research department.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[omh] Gathering candidate papers, datasets, or repos: source candidate inventory - prepare typed source candidates and acquisition status before downstream work; use ulw-research to fetch and cite them, or research-brief to turn them into a decision-ready brief. Use when the user says: source-finder, source finder, source acquisition, source intake, find papers and datasets, find datasets and repos, find papers, find arxiv link.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[omh] Churn or weak activation among users: turn an observed onboarding, activation, retention, re-engagement, referral, or monetization problem into one consent-safe in-app journey or growth experiment plan with a bounded readout and an explicit decision. Use when the user says: lifecycle-growth, lifecycle growth, lifecycle marketing, lifecycle messaging, in-app journey, in-app message campaign, onboarding journey, onboarding nudge.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。