2,067 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Chief Technology Officer — deciding build vs buy for a core system, choosing whether an architecture bet is worth a full rewrite, sizing an SLA/uptime commitment against engineering cost, structuring engineering teams around a product roadmap, or writing the technical risk section of a board update.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Farmer, Rancher, or other Agricultural Manager — deciding a planting/breeding mix or acreage shift under price and weather uncertainty, sizing a hedge or crop-insurance coverage level, running break-even and diversification scenarios before a capital or input commitment, or evaluating land/herd management practices against long-term productive capacity.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Lists local and remote git branches that are candidates for cleanup — merged but not deleted, and inactive branches with no commits in a configurable period (default 3 months). Use when user mentions "stale branches", "old branches", "branch cleanup", "prune branches", "dead branches", "unused branches", "inactive branches", "branch hygiene", or asks to "list branches to delete", "find stale branches", or runs /stale-branches command.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scaffold or migrate a repository onto release-please. Generates release-please-config.json, .release-please-manifest.json, and a release-please.yml workflow, plus an opt-in menu of tag-keyed deploy/publish templates (Docker/ECR matrix, frontend host deploy, npm OIDC publish, GitHub Release asset, Fly.io deploy, generic). Supports monorepo (mutual exclude-paths matrix), single-package, and mixed-language (node/simple/python) repos. Use when user runs /release-please-setup, mentions "release please", "set up release please", "automate releases", "conventional-commit releases", "monorepo release automation", or "migrate to release-please".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drive a failing GitHub Actions run to green in as few CI runs as possible, with a bounded fix-critique-commit-push-recheck loop that batches every evidenced fix into each push. Use when the user supplies a GitHub Actions run URL or run ID and wants the failure fixed, or asks to "make CI green", "fix the failing workflow/build/tests", "fix the red build", or to keep iterating on a branch or pull request until its checks pass. Pulls run results and failed-job logs through the gh CLI, and sends every fix plan to the rubber-duck reviewer before any code is touched.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Iterative measurement-driven improvement loop. Measure, profile, mutate, re-measure, commit. Works for performance, bundle size, complexity, test coverage — anything quantifiable. Use when the user wants to systematically improve a metric through repeated cycles of profiling and targeted changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect project linting and validation tools, build an execution pipeline, run all tools to zero errors, and fix issues using an atomic fix protocol. Auto-detects Makefile targets, package.json scripts, Go tools, Python tools, and other common linters. Use when fixing linting errors, running validation pipelines, or ensuring code quality before committing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Initialize a Git repository with an initial commit
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fingerprints unknown binaries using rabin2 — detects architecture (ARM, x86, MIPS), ABI, libc, dependencies, and strings of interest. Use when first encountering an unknown binary, ELF file, or firmware blob, or when you need architecture or ABI information before committing to deeper analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Emergency bug fix pipeline — diagnose, fix, test, commit, push, and PR in 2 iterations max. Speed over perfection.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate or update CHANGELOG.md from git history. Parses conventional commits, groups by version tags, categorizes into Added/Fixed/Changed/Breaking sections using keep-a-changelog format, and creates comparison links. Use when you need to create a changelog, update release notes, document version history, or prepare release documentation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate structured weekly or fortnightly status updates for leadership and stakeholders. Use this skill when: - You need to prepare a weekly or fortnightly status report - You want to summarize recent progress across git commits, tickets, and spec changes - You need a formatted update ready for Slack, email, or a stakeholder meeting - You want multi-project updates in one report
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Identify, score, and mitigate delivery risks for a program or release. Use when the user says "risk review", "what could go wrong", "risk register", "delivery risks for this release", "program risk assessment", "identify blockers before they hit", or wants to pressure-test a plan before committing - even if they don't say "risk review". Based on "The Phoenix Project" by Kim, Behr & Spafford (unplanned work, fragile systems, single points of failure) and "The Art of Project Management" by Scott Berkun (scoping risk, milestone pressure, hidden assumptions).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write a clear pull request description. Use when the user says "write a PR description", "PR template", "pull request description", "how do I describe this change", "commit message for this", "document this change", "open a PR for", or is about to merge code and needs to communicate what changed and why - even if they don't explicitly say "PR description".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assess team health using Patrick Lencioni's Five Dysfunctions of a Team model. Use when a leader says "my team feels off", "we have trust issues", "people aren't speaking up in meetings", "accountability is a problem", "we keep missing commitments", "the team is siloed", "we're not working well together", or "I want to do a team health check". Also trigger when someone describes symptoms like passive agreement in meetings, blame culture, missed deadlines without escalation, or people optimizing for their own metrics over team goals.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design and document a marketing growth experiment. Use when the user says "run a growth experiment", "test this channel", "growth test", "I want to experiment with [channel]", "traction experiment", "acquisition experiment", "let's test if [channel] works for us", "bullseye framework", "which channels should we try", "run a traction test", or wants to systematically test a marketing or acquisition channel before committing budget. For page-level conversion hypotheses, see page-cro. For copy variants to test, see ab-copy-writer. For recording the result, see retro.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structure a consulting findings presentation using the Pyramid Principle storyline. Use when a consultant says "help me structure my presentation", "I have findings and need to present them", "how do I structure the deck", "build me the storyline", "help me tell the story of the findings", "I have data but no narrative", "client presentation is next week", "how do I present recommendations to the steering committee", or "the deck needs a through-line". Also trigger when someone has completed analysis and needs to communicate findings and recommendations to senior client stakeholders in a structured, persuasive format.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Set a repo up to prove engineering-task work actually works before it ships. Investigates the repo, ensures a one-command dev stack (`dev-local`) exists, asks whether verification runs locally or in a sandbox (crabbox), confirms/installs the driver (the `playwright-cli` skill for web by default). Outputs three artifacts: a committed `/verify` skill (per-task verification SOP — spawn a verifier sub-agent → drive the app → screenshot/video proof → open a PR with the proof embedded), the `/dev-local` skill + script, and the installed driver skill. Use when someone says "set up verification", "make this repo verifiable", "scaffold a verify skill", "set up the verifier".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Master skill — set up the full agent harness for any repo so an agent can work it reliably: legible (map-not-manual docs + custom lints), executable (one-command dev stack), verifiable (e2e gate + a verify-before-ship loop), plus commit hygiene and entropy control. Use when onboarding a new/unfamiliar codebase to agent-driven development — "set up the harness", "make this repo agent-ready", "harness this codebase".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create a bounded, extractive, structurally idempotent rollup of recent Obsidian wiki log entries, with dry-run preview by default and one optional transaction apply. Use for manual log compression without modifying child pages. Triggers: fold the log, run a fold, run wiki-fold, log rollup, roll up log entries, commit the fold.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run dialyzer over the Yuzu Erlang gateway. Sources the Erlang toolchain and runs rebar3 dialyzer. Use after any .erl change in gateway/ — AGENTS.md mandates dialyzer be clean before commit because compilation success does not imply type correctness.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run dialyzer over the Yuzu Erlang gateway. Sources the Erlang toolchain and runs rebar3 dialyzer. Use after any .erl change in gateway/ — CLAUDE.md mandates dialyzer be clean before commit because compilation success does not imply type correctness.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run or plan Yuzu's `/test` pre-commit and pre-push validation pipeline with quick, default, full, instructions, and quarantine modes. Use when the user says `/test`, `/test --quick`, `/test --full`, asks for the full test gate, or needs the Yuzu test-runs DB workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Explore and debate solutions before writing code. Use when the user poses a design question, asks "how should I approach X", wants to think through options before committing, or says anything like "let's brainstorm", "what's the best way to...", "I'm not sure how to tackle this", or "should I use X or Y". Always runs before /ck:plan for novel or ambiguous features. No code is written — only: explore → clarify → spec → report.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。