「does」の検索結果

Use this whenever the user asks to "implement", "add", "build", "create", or "modify" a feature, page, view, component, or module in this Vue project. Three phases: Phase 0 scope analysis (flows + edge cases + UI needs + plan validation, STOP for user), Phase 1 implementation (layered UI → Store → API, Vue 3 Composition + Vuetify 4, /ui design rules), Phase 2 Definition-of-Done checklist + /verify + /pull-request. Auto-runs /create-module if the target module doesn't exist.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate code (especially LLM-generated) for structural simplicity using Rich Hickey's "Simple Made Easy" framework. Use this skill whenever reviewing a PR, diff, or code snippet for accidental complexity — particularly when the code was generated by an AI coding assistant and line-by-line review isn't feasible. Also use when the user asks about complecting, simplicity vs. easiness, structural coupling, or concept deduplication. Trigger on phrases like "is this simple", "does this complect", "review for complexity", "structural analysis", or any reference to Hickey, Simple Made Easy, or grey-box review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Synthesises the current conversation context into a Product Requirements Document and publishes it to GitHub (as a comment on a referenced issue, or a new issue). Synthesises from context; does not interview. TRIGGER when: the conversation has produced enough understanding of a feature and the user wants it captured as a PRD. DO NOT TRIGGER when: a single small issue is enough → creating-issues; the idea has not been stress-tested yet → grilling-ideas first; bug reports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search Mouser Electronics for electronic components — secondary source for prototype orders. Find parts, check pricing/stock, download datasheets, analyze specifications. Use with KiCad for BOM creation and part selection. Use this skill when the user specifically mentions Mouser, when DigiKey is out of stock or has worse pricing, when comparing prices across distributors, or when searching for parts that DigiKey doesn't carry. For package cross-reference tables and BOM workflow, see the `bom` skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create, read, edit, or manipulate Word documents (.docx) and Word templates (.dotx). Use whenever a build task's artifact kind is document with the default docx output, or the task mentions a Word doc, .docx, or .dotx, extracts or reorganizes content from one, inserts or replaces images, does find-and-replace in one, or works with tracked changes (redlines) or comments. Covers python-docx generation, raw OOXML editing of existing files, document structure and formatting, and render verification. Not for PDFs, spreadsheets, or Google Docs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides the static system voice catalog used by Jarvis. It does not define a user-facing workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guidance for helping users create and accomplish goals. Read it before you create a goal for the user when no goal-creation contract is in context, and whenever you help with an existing goal. A Goals-tab creation turn already carries that contract and does not need this skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search the web by text query for image URLs and source pages for feeds, artifacts, and visual references. Does not identify a supplied image or person.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for questions about a specific flight’s departure or arrival time, including “when’s my flight?” and confirmation of remembered times, plus flight status, delays, and cancellations. Verify the exact dated flight before answering; memory identifies the itinerary but does not verify its current schedule. Use FlightAware to monitor operational changes for an upcoming booked flight when the user directly asks for ongoing monitoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes ELF binaries, executables, and firmware images to understand behavior without source code; coordinates sub-skills binary-re:triage, binary-re:static-analysis, binary-re:dynamic-analysis, binary-re:synthesis, and binary-re:tool-setup. Use when working with a binary, executable, or ELF file; asked to reverse engineer, disassemble, decompile, or figure out what something does; targeting ARM64, ARMv7, x86_64, or MIPS; or analyzing Python bytecode (.pyc, marshal). For Python bytecode analysis, see docs/python-bytecode-re.md.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compiles binary analysis findings into structured reports — correlates facts from triage, static, and dynamic phases, validates hypotheses against evidence, and produces traceable documentation. Use when ready to summarize findings, generate a report, document what a binary does, or prepare results for handoff or archival.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MVP analysis, product analysis, app teardown, analyze this app, what does this app do, product breakdown, feature analysis

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review custom components and layouts against shadcn design patterns, visual style conventions (Vega, Nova, Maia, Lyra, Mira), composition rules, design token usage, and Radix/Base UI composition patterns. Use PROACTIVELY after writing or modifying any custom UI component, page layout, or variant of a shadcn component. Use when the user says "review this component", "check my spacing", "does this follow shadcn patterns", "audit this layout", "is this shadcn-idiomatic", or shares a component for feedback. Catches spacing drift, hardcoded colors, missing data-slot attributes, inconsistent theme application, and composition anti-patterns that shipping-fast-with-AI tools often miss.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write a literature review. Use when the user says "literature review", "lit review", "review the literature", "summarize prior research", "what does the research say about", "synthesize research on", "background section", "related work section", "what has been studied on this topic", or needs to systematically identify, synthesize, and critically evaluate existing research on a topic - even if they don't explicitly say "literature review".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct a competitive analysis. Use when the user says "competitive analysis", "how do competitors handle X", "market landscape", "blue ocean", "strategy canvas", "what does [competitor] do", "compare us to X", "positioning analysis", "value curve", or wants to understand how a product or feature compares to alternatives - even if they don't explicitly say "competitive analysis".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract UX tasks from a product spec and save as ux-tasks.md in the same spec folder. Use this skill when: - The user wants to generate UX work items from a spec - The user says "UX tasks", "what does UX need to do", "extract UX work", "UX deliverables" - The user wants to hand off a spec to the UX/design team - The user asks "what screens need designing" or "what UX decisions are open"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build QA quality dashboards, calculate defect metrics, analyze escape rates, and produce quality trend reports. Use this skill whenever a QA lead or manager needs to measure and communicate quality outcomes. Trigger on phrases like "quality metrics", "defect density", "escape rate", "bug trends", "quality dashboard", "sprint quality report", "test coverage metrics", "QA KPIs", "how is quality trending", "defect leakage", "production bugs this quarter", "mean time to detect", "quality scorecard", or any request to quantify, visualize, or report on the quality of a product or testing process. Also trigger when a manager asks "how is QA performing?" or an engineering lead asks "what does our defect data tell us?".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write landing page copy for product pages, campaign pages, lead-gen pages, pricing pages, and feature pages. Use when the user asks for landing page copy, product page, lead magnet page, "write the page for X", pricing page copy, feature page, hero section, or web copy that converts. Uses the StoryBrand SB7 framework (Donald Miller) to structure every page. Reads brand voice, positioning, and ICP from knowledge/. For improving an existing page's copy, see copy-review. For diagnosing why a page does not convert, see page-cro. For the ads driving traffic to it, see ad-campaign-writer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate, score, and shortlist brand names through a guided interview. Use when the user says "name my brand", "help me name", "come up with a name", "naming ideas", "what should I call this", "brand name", "product name", "company name", "rename", "rebrand", or is stuck choosing between names. Self-contained and brand-agnostic: it does not read knowledge/, so it works for naming a brand-new venture, product, service, feature, or rebrand from scratch, before any brand context exists. Runs on Alexandra Watkins' SMILE and SCRATCH tests to generate and filter, Marty Neumeier's 7 criteria to score, and the Lexicon Branding method for sound symbolism and strategy. Asks the user questions before generating. For the positioning the name has to carry, see positioning-doc. For the message architecture built on top of it, see messaging-framework.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build psychological safety in your team using Simon Sinek's Leaders Eat Last Circle of Safety model and Amy Edmondson's research. Use when a leader says "my team doesn't speak up", "people are afraid to fail", "nobody challenges bad ideas", "people only tell me what I want to hear", "I want my team to take more risks", "there's a blame culture", "people hide mistakes", or "I want to create a safe environment". Also trigger when someone describes a team where postmortems turn into blame sessions, where people stay quiet in meetings and then vent privately, where mistakes are hidden until they become crises, or where the same person speaks 80% of the time in every meeting. Psychological safety is not about comfort - it is the condition that makes high performance possible.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review and improve marketing copy that already exists - a page, an email, an ad, a post, a deck slide - using a fixed six-pass edit. Produces a marked-up diagnosis, a rewritten version, and a per-pass score so the user can see what changed and why. Use when the user says "review this copy", "improve this", "make this better", "tighten this", "edit this page", "does this copy work", "why is this flat", "punch this up", "proofread", or pastes existing copy and asks for feedback. Also use when copy is on-brand but underperforming. For writing new copy from nothing, see content-writer or landing-page-writer. For diagnosing a page's conversion problem beyond its words, see page-cro. For voice consistency rules, see brand-context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user says "map out our business model", "business model canvas", "how does our business work", "what are our key resources", "define our value proposition", "revenue model design", "cost structure", "who are our key partners", "lean canvas", "business model design", "how do we make money", or wants to document, stress-test, or redesign how [your startup] creates, delivers, and captures value.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Debug a bug or unexpected behavior systematically. Use when the user says "there's a bug", "this isn't working", "I'm getting an error", "help me debug", "why is this failing", "unexpected behavior", "test is failing", "something is broken", or describes behavior that doesn't match expectations - even if they don't say "debug".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fetch transcripts from YouTube videos. Use when user says "get transcript", "fetch transcript", "YouTube transcript", "pull captions", "what does this video say", or pastes a YouTube URL and wants the text content extracted. Also use when user wants to research or summarize a YouTube video.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。