「eac」の検索結果

Produces a DRAFT product requirements document from the discovery notes, interview summaries, support themes, analytics notes and stakeholder messages the user provides: problem statement, target users, goals with measures as stated, numbered requirements each with a testable acceptance criterion, non-goals, constraints, dependencies and open questions, with every statement tagged evidenced, assumed or UNKNOWN so each assumption is visible for the product owner to confirm. Use when the user asks to "write a PRD", "draft the product requirements", "turn these discovery notes into requirements", "document what this feature needs to do" or "build the requirements doc for this epic". Do not use for supplier-facing requirements in a tender, use rfp-requirements-pack instead; for a technical design decision, use architecture-decision-record; for the change ticket that ships the work, use change-request-pack. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maintains four living project files (overview and progress log, decision log, RAID log, links) from the mail, channel posts, documents and meeting notes the user attaches or the agent can reach, returns each touched file complete in the chat for the user to save, and builds a weekly DRAFT status report from those files. Use when the user asks to "set up tracking for project X", "catch the project files up", "log this decision against the project", "add this risk to the RAID log", "save this link to the project" or "write this week's status report". Do not use for reviewing an existing RAID log for stale or ownerless entries, use raid-log-review instead; for an HTML status page, use project-dashboard-builder; for minutes of one meeting, use meeting-minutes-writer. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns a schedule extract (milestone list or planning tool export) and the period's status notes into a DRAFT plain-language slip explanation: which milestones and activities slipped and by how many working days, arithmetic shown, why per the notes as verbatim fragments with source and date, what each slip pushes next per the extract, and the decision each slip needs framed as a question with the options the notes propose and the owner the governance documents name, every missing fact marked UNKNOWN. Use when the user asks to "explain the schedule slip", "what slipped this month and why", "write the schedule commentary for the steering pack", "put the delay in plain language for the sponsor" or "what decisions do these slips need". Do not use for the weekly status report, use project-status-tracker instead; for cost variances, use budget-variance-explainer; for one sprint's carry-over, use sprint-review-summary. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds a DRAFT stakeholder map for one project from the charter, organisation chart, RACI, governance terms, steering minutes, meeting notes and messages the user provides: a stakeholder register, interest and influence ratings each with its stated basis, stance as evidenced by a verbatim fragment with source and date, gaps, and a proposed engagement plan per stakeholder, every line traced to a source and every missing fact marked UNKNOWN. Use when the user asks to "build the stakeholder map", "who are the stakeholders on this project", "map interest and influence", "where does each stakeholder stand", "draft the stakeholder engagement plan" or "refresh the stakeholder register". Do not use for a customer account's stakeholders, use account-plan-builder instead; for a one-page brief before one meeting, use meeting-prep-onepager; for logging decisions and risks against the project, use project-status-tracker. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pre-tests one message (email, announcement, intranet post, town hall script, customer notice or slide) against two to six role personas the user supplies and returns a DRAFT panel report: each persona's likely first reaction, objections, unanswered questions, misreadings and what they would do next, every point tied to the passage that triggers it, plus suggested edits that add no fact the message does not already hold. Use when the user asks to "pre-test this message", "how will the team read this", "run this past the personas", "what objections will this raise", "find the holes before I send" or "check this lands with managers and field staff". Do not use for an in-character review of a proposal or business case by one executive archetype, use the executive-review family (cfo-reviewer, frontline-skeptic-reviewer and siblings) instead; to write the message in the first place, use announcement-drafter. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Best practices for Remotion - Video creation in React

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pull the open Bonemeal action queue (landing pages and blog posts the user has not built yet) via the bonemeal MCP server, let the user pick which ones to build, dispatch each to the spawn-pages or spawn-blogs skill with the action's brief, and mark each completed in Bonemeal once the file is written. Use this whenever the user says "grow", "/grow", "build my Bonemeal queue", "what's in my Bonemeal queue", "build the suggested pages", or wants to act on Bonemeal's content suggestions. Stop and ask the user before marking actions complete the first time, then remember their preference.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interview the user relentlessly about a plan or design until reaching shared understanding, resolving each branch of the decision tree. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan, get grilled on their design, or mentions "grill me".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suite of tools for creating elaborate, multi-component claude.ai HTML artifacts using modern frontend web technologies (React, Tailwind CSS, shadcn/ui). Use for complex artifacts requiring state manag

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Modern Angular (v20+) expert with deep knowledge of Signals, Standalone Components, Zoneless applications, SSR/Hydration, and reactive patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert patterns for Algolia search implementation, indexing strategies, React InstantSearch, and relevance tuning

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building or debugging web 3D scenes, product configurators or portfolios with Three.js, React Three Fiber or Spline; review assets, loading, controls, fallbacks and performance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "build a win-back campaign", "re-engage lapsed subscribers", "run a re-permission / re-consent sweep", or "sunset my dead list"; produces a closed-loop reactivation program — a lapsed-cohort definition, a staged offer ladder, a re-consent (re-permission) capture step, and a sunset-confirm / suppression rule. Owns none of the SEND-N sub-item notes: engagement-decay / sunset is email-sequence-designer's and preference-center / frequency options is preference-frequency-manager's — this skill references those notes, it does not re-emit them. Not for the general lifecycle flows (welcome/cart/post-purchase) — use email-sequence-designer; not for the preference-center / opt-down ladder — use preference-frequency-manager; not for the consent record itself — use consent-registry; not for computing EQS or the N1 veto — use email-quality-auditor. 流失召回/重新授权/沉默用户清理

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "package our proof points", "build reusable stat cards and case snippets", or "put proof where each pillar makes its claim"; turns claims-ledger-approved proofs into reusable proof modules — stat cards, case snippets, testimonial blocks, comparison proofs — each pinned to a message-house pillar and the ledger claim ID it substantiates, and flags any pillar making a claim with no approved proof behind it. Never adjudicates a proof: unverified or ledger-absent proofs are marked '[needs source]' and routed to the claims candidates. Not for adjudicating or substantiating claims — use offer-claims-registry; not for fabricating a benchmark to fill a gap — a missing proof is flagged, not invented; not for scoring narrative quality — use narrative-quality-auditor. 证据模块/证据卡/客户案例/主张对齐

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "triage launch feedback", "cluster reviews, comments, and board posts into themes", or "set up a you asked, we shipped loop"; produces a feedback theme digest (frequency, severity, representative quotes per theme), an open→planned→started→completed/declined status loop with duplicate-merge and notification rules, shipped-change announcement material, and a compliant social-proof harvest protocol (never incentivized store reviews). Not for repurposing or amplifying the harvested proof — use content-amplifier; not for executing testimonial outreach threads — use outreach-manager. 反馈分诊/状态环/社证收割/评测合规

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "build a message house", "write a PR-FAQ for our launch", or "define the launch narrative and value pillars"; derives from the positioning canvas a message house — tagline, one-liner, three value pillars, per-persona proof points (each labeled Measured / User-provided / [needs source]) — plus a working-backwards PR-FAQ narrative spine (launch-day tense, empty-chair test, five external + five internal FAQs) and per-channel message angle packs (angles, not finished copy). Not for the positioning canvas itself — use positioning-mapper; not for finished blog posts or pages — use content-writer; not for ad or email units — use each discipline creative builder; not for claim adjudication — use offer-claims-registry. 消息屋/PR-FAQ/价值支柱/发布叙事

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "score this influencer", "rank these creators for our campaign", or "tell me which influencer is the best fit"; produces the typed STAR Suitability (S) read plus a separately labeled campaign-fit ranking without mixing campaign-specific commercial fit into the Suitability read. Not for finding new influencers — use influencer-discovery; not for sending outreach — use outreach-manager. 达人适配度评分/创作者筛选排名

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "design a welcome flow", "set up an abandoned-cart sequence", "build a light re-engagement branch inside a lifecycle flow", or "plan a cold-outbound sequence"; produces general lifecycle automation flows (welcome, cart, browse-abandon, post-purchase, in-flow re-engagement, B2B cold outbound) with trigger, step timing, branch/exit conditions, goal, frequency governance (send caps, quiet hours, fatigue guardrail), a sunset path, and a SEND N-dimension score. Not for the closed-loop win-back / re-consent (re-permission) program on a lapsed cohort — use reactivation-specialist; not for writing each email's copy — use email-creative-builder; not for computing EQS or the N1 unsubscribe veto — use email-quality-auditor. 邮件自动化流程设计/购物车挽回/流失召回序列

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "map the category narrative", "tear down how competitors tell their story", or "find the language conventions in our market"; produces a category narrative map — the dominant stories and points of view in the category, its language conventions and framing clichés, and a per-competitor narrative teardown (arc, claimed onlyness, proof pattern) plus how each rival's messaging has shifted over time (scraped copy vs archived copy). Not for the positioning canvas itself — use positioning-mapper; not for the beachhead's beliefs and objections — use audience-belief-mapper; not for SERP keyword targeting — use keyword-research; not for claim adjudication — use offer-claims-registry. 品类叙事/竞争叙事拆解/语言惯例/叙事演变

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "draft an influencer contract", "review these agreement terms", or "build a partnership template"; produces a full influencer agreement framework (scope, compensation, usage rights, exclusivity, FTC disclosure), a clause-by-clause review with red flags, and a negotiation cheat sheet. Not for outreach negotiation before a deal exists — use outreach-manager. 达人合同/合作协议条款审查

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate React/Next.js component test skeletons (RTL) from specifications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

フロントエンド観点のレビューエージェント。 アクセシビリティ、デザインシステム準拠、Tailwind クラス衛生、UI 状態設計、 Next.js / React Router のフレームワーク境界を個別スキルへルーティングする。

Provider (v6.x) state management for Flutter using ChangeNotifier and InheritedWidget with MVVM architecture pattern. Use this skill when implementing Provider-based state management, using Consumer/Consumer2 widgets for targeted rebuilds, accessing state with context.read/context.watch/context.select, setting up ChangeNotifierProvider or StateNotifierProvider, configuring MultiProvider for multiple providers, implementing ProxyProvider for dependent state, using Selector for optimized rebuilds, migrating from StatefulWidget to reactive state, maintaining legacy Provider codebases, debugging provider not found errors, preventing memory leaks with proper ChangeNotifier disposal, fixing context access issues in initState, or resolving .value constructor anti-patterns. Essential for apps with shared state across widgets (shopping carts, authentication, global settings, form state, theme management), when teaching state management fundamentals, or when debugging memory leaks and resource cleanup in Provider-based applications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implements type-safe reactive SQL persistence in Flutter using Drift v2.32 (formerly Moor) built on SQLite with automatic code generation. Activates when defining table schemas with Drift DSL, writing type-safe join or subquery operations, handling schema migrations with MigrationStrategy, using reactive watch() streams for live UI updates, implementing ACID transactions, defining foreign key constraints or cascade deletes, enabling WAL mode for write performance, troubleshooting generated .g.dart type mismatches, migrating from sqflite or sqlite3 v2 to v3, using DAOs for query separation, or building offline-first apps requiring strong relational data integrity and compile-time SQL verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。