「fix」の検索結果

Authoring guide for the primary Native SDK app-logic path: TypeScript app cores - Model, Msg, update, and the pure functions they call, written in the closed app-core subset, checked by the @native-sdk/core frontend, and compiled ahead-of-time to native code by the external core compiler. Use for new apps unless the user explicitly chose Zig, when writing or modifying a src/core.ts app core, fixing subset checker errors (NS1001-NS1069), or deciding how to express state, messages, text (bytes and the byte-text string methods), text input, continuous controls (sliders, scroll), effects (Cmd), subscriptions (Sub), the host-event wiring channels (frameMsg, keyMsg, pinchMsg, dropMsg, appearanceMsg, chromeMsg, envMsgs, app manifest assets), derived values, the view_unbound lint opt-out, local mutation of owned arrays, or how to split a core into modules under src/ (relative imports, namespace imports, @native-sdk/core/text, @native-sdk/core/events). Use ts-services alongside this guide for src/services work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Authoring guide for Native SDK TypeScript services under src/services: ordinary scriptc static-tier TypeScript reached through generated typed Cmd clients, shared record shapes, hermetic vendored npm, streaming, deadlines, cancellation, devhost simulation, authority, replay, and the two carriers (in-process thread pool, child subprocess). Use when adding or modifying src/services modules, moving Node/JSON/regex/Map/Date/class work out of a core, or fixing NS1065-NS1067.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic workflow for auditing TypeScript codebases for import hygiene issues (value vs. type imports, duplicates), missing base class extensions, and incomplete barrel file re-exports, with actionable fix patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose and fix Claude in Chrome MCP extension connectivity issues. Use when mcp__claude-in-chrome__* tools fail, return "Browser extension is not connected", or behave erratically.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs a Trailmark structural review gate over a branch, pull request, fix commit, release diff, or git ref range to detect new entrypoints, new tainted paths, removed validation or authorization calls, privilege-boundary drift, blast-radius growth, complexity growth, and newly reachable sensitive sinks. Use when reviewing a PR, branch, remediation commit, or release diff where graph-level security regressions should be checked before merge.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "triage a vulnerability report", "assess a CVE", "evaluate a bug bounty submission", "decide if a finding is valid", "review a security finding", "dismiss a vulnerability", "should we fix this CVE", "prioritize a vulnerability report", or needs to determine whether an incoming vulnerability report warrants investigation. Applies 7 brocards (rules of thumb) to systematically accept, dismiss, or request more information on vulnerability reports, or needs to filter raw findings from agentic vulnerability discovery pipelines before human review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds and applies fuzzing dictionaries so a fuzzer can produce the keywords, magic bytes, and tokens a target expects. Covers extracting tokens from source, headers, binaries, and specifications, dictionary syntax, and wiring one into libFuzzer or AFL++. Use when fuzzing a parser, protocol, or file format, when coverage stalls at input validation, or when a target compares against fixed strings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Triages a repository's open GitHub issues and pull requests via the gh CLI. Optionally reviews and merges ready PRs — incrementally merging passing automated/bot PRs and maintainer-approved ones, and spawning review subagents for never-reviewed ones — then closes already-resolved issues with comments citing the resolving PR or commit, cross-links issues with their pending fix PRs, and assigns local-only priority and change-size estimates for everything outstanding. Use when triaging, grooming, or reviewing a repository's open issues and PRs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs security-focused differential review of code changes. Adapts analysis depth to codebase size, uses git blame for context, calculates blast radius by counting callers, checks test coverage of modified code, and generates a markdown report. Use when reviewing a PR, commit, or diff for security vulnerabilities, checking whether a change re-introduces a previously fixed bug, asking what else a change could break, or finding which modified code has no test covering it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepares codebases for security review using Trail of Bits' checklist. Helps set review goals, runs static analysis tools, increases test coverage, removes dead code, ensures accessibility, and generates documentation (flowcharts, user stories, inline comments). Use when preparing your own codebase to be audited by someone else, getting a repository review-ready before an external security review, deciding what to fix before auditors start, or asking what assessors need from a project. For understanding unfamiliar code you are about to audit, use audit-context-building instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when changing a rig while it is alive — `rig grow` / `rig expand` / `rig shrink` / `rig launch` / `rig remove` / `rig discover` / `rig bind` / `rig adopt` / `rig attach`. Covers the 4 failure modes (newly created seat lacks queue/startup/role; edges and permissions not updated; adopt/bind succeeds at tmux but not OpenRig identity; shrink/remove leaves stale topology references) and the rule that mutation must work while the rig is active, not just in clean fixtures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing, reviewing, or debugging how an agent's context window gets filled, pruned, or shared — choosing what loads at boot versus on demand, sizing an install or an always-loaded file, fixing an agent that drifts, repeats itself, or forgets constraints mid-task, planning compaction or summarization, deciding single-agent versus subagents, engineering handoffs between agents, or picking a tool loadout. NOT for rewording a prompt's tone, choosing which model to pin, or debugging business logic — those are adjacent moments this skill does not serve. Historical 2024–2025 snapshot; not normative for present-day frontier models — see the Status section.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when implementing any feature or bugfix, before writing implementation code

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

LoRaWAN and sub-GHz (433 / 868 / 915 MHz) attack methodology — LoRaWAN ABP/OTAA join attack, network/session key reuse, frame counter replay, downlink injection on TTN/Helium-style networks, sub-GHz protocol replay (KeeLoq garage doors, fixed-code remotes, TPMS spoofing, smart plug telemetry), HackRF / RTL-SDR / Flipper Zero workflows, signal analysis with Inspectrum / Universal Radio Hacker, and reconstruction of proprietary packet formats. Use for LoRaWAN deployments (smart cities, asset tracking, industrial telemetry), or any wireless device using the unlicensed 433/868/915 MHz bands (garage openers, doorbells, IoT sensors, RC equipment).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate a local Codex plugin in engineer-friendly language. Use when the user says "evaluate this plugin", "audit this plugin", "why did this score that way", "what should I fix first", "help me benchmark this plugin", or asks for a plugin-wide report before comparing versions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate a local Codex skill in engineer-friendly terms. Use when the user says "evaluate this skill", "give me an analysis of the game dev skill", "audit this skill", "why did this score that way", "what should I fix first", or asks for a skill-specific report before benchmarking it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn plugin-eval findings into a concrete rewrite brief for a Codex skill. Use when the user already evaluated a skill and now wants Codex to improve it, especially after asking what to fix first.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Activate when the user explicitly names the narrator skill or requests production-ready narration in either case: (1) numbered takes fitted to fixed video windows, or (2) one continuous long-form story read in a locked voice that must be measured and retried for timbre or internal pauses. Collect missing text, voice_id, or voice_type after activation; their absence is not a reason to skip this workflow. Own pacing, speech-duration gates, retries, and ready audio delivery; never time-stretch. Do not use for ordinary TTS, "read this aloud", an unconstrained voiceover, voice browsing, music, SFX, singing, dubbing existing speech, or voice cloning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guidelines for upgrading Expo SDK versions and fixing dependency issues

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use CircleCI Chunk for AI-assisted CI/CD work through either the Chunk web UI or the chunk-cli. Trigger this skill when users ask to set up Chunk, troubleshoot or fix failing builds with Chunk, configure Chunk environments, schedule/proactively run Chunk tasks, or use chunk-cli commands such as init, validate, build-prompt, auth, sandbox, task, and skill install.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Triage supplied or imported security findings against a repository using its security policy and static code evidence. Accepts scanner reports, advisories, GitHub findings, and Jira or Linear tickets. Do not use for discovery, duplicate triage, runtime validation, or fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews code changes using CodeRabbit AI. Use when user asks for code review, PR feedback, code quality checks, security issues, or requests fix-review cycles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。