Run multiple Reforge-guided section-refactor lanes in parallel, each in its own worktree/branch off origin/main, with a score-blind adversarial review panel gating every commit, one draft PR per section. Use when the user wants to reduce Reforge surface/internal score across several sections at once via architecturally-correct deletions (dead surface, entity-leak removal, cross-section read-splits) — not by relocation, parameter bags, or accessibility-dodging. Wraps the per-lane process in .codex/skills/humans-refactor. Triggers: 'refactor swarm', 'parallel section refactors', 'run reforge refactor on Users/Tickets/...', 'burn down surface score across sections'. Has an intensity dial (light|standard|deep) and a workflow|solo execution mode to trade token burn against autonomy per unit of output.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
nobodies-collective/Humans☆ 32026年10月14日 更新
Autonomous tech-debt reduction workflow for the Humans repository. Use when the user wants Codex to improve high-value code quality issues in a dedicated git worktree branched from origin/main, commit each improvement separately, push progress, and continue until diminishing returns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
nobodies-collective/Humans☆ 32026年10月14日 更新
Review code changes against linked GitHub issue specs to catch implementation drift — building something plausible but wrong. Checks each acceptance criterion against actual code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
nobodies-collective/Humans☆ 32026年10月14日 更新
Refresh drift-prone documentation against current code. Reads docs/architecture/freshness-catalog.yml, diffs against the last sweep's upstream/main anchor, regenerates mechanical entries, processes editorial markers, and opens one PR per sweep with a report file.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
nobodies-collective/Humans☆ 32026年10月14日 更新
Triage application logs, open GitHub issues, pending feedback, in-app Issues, and agent conversations. Runs five phases: logs → close shipped issues → feedback → in-app issues → agent FAQ gaps. Use when /whats shows pending feedback, checking app logs, cleaning up shipped issues, or working the in-app Issues backlog.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
nobodies-collective/Humans☆ 32026年10月14日 更新
Autonomous bug-hunt workflow for the Humans repository. Use when the user wants Codex to scan for real bugs, work in a dedicated git worktree branched from origin/main, commit each fix separately, push progress, and continue until diminishing returns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
nobodies-collective/Humans☆ 32026年10月14日 更新
Introduce the cross-section read interface boundary (I<Section>ServiceRead) for one section's service per memory/architecture/section-read-write-split.md. Audits the surface, evaluates which methods belong on the read interface, sets up the workspace, dispatches a subagent that introduces the interface and migrates non-section callers, opens a PR. Use when the user says 'read split for X', 'split <Section>Service', 'add I<Section>ServiceRead boundary', 'apply the section-read-write-split rule to <Section>', or any variation of carving the cross-section read surface out of a section's full service interface. Reference implementation is Teams (PR 678). Operates on one section per invocation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
nobodies-collective/Humans☆ 32026年10月14日 更新
When the user wants to create or optimize popups, modals, overlays, slide-ins, or banners for conversion purposes. Also use when the user mentions "exit intent," "popup conversions," "modal optimization," "lead capture popup," "email popup," "announcement banner," "overlay," "collect emails with a popup," "exit popup," "scroll trigger," "sticky bar," or "notification bar." Use this for any overlay or interrupt-style conversion element. For forms outside of popups, see form-cro. For general page conversion optimization, see page-cro.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
mostafasudo/appilot☆ 32026年9月14日 更新
When the user wants help with revenue operations, lead lifecycle management, or marketing-to-sales handoff processes. Also use when the user mentions 'RevOps,' 'revenue operations,' 'lead scoring,' 'lead routing,' 'MQL,' 'SQL,' 'pipeline stages,' 'deal desk,' 'CRM automation,' 'marketing-to-sales handoff,' 'data hygiene,' 'leads aren't getting to sales,' 'pipeline management,' 'lead qualification,' or 'when should marketing hand off to sales.' Use this for anything involving the systems and processes that connect marketing to revenue. For cold outreach emails, see cold-email. For email drip campaigns, see email-sequence. For pricing decisions, see pricing-strategy.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
mostafasudo/appilot☆ 32026年9月14日 更新
When the user wants to optimize any form that is NOT signup/registration — including lead capture forms, contact forms, demo request forms, application forms, survey forms, or checkout forms. Also use when the user mentions "form optimization," "lead form conversions," "form friction," "form fields," "form completion rate," "contact form," "nobody fills out our form," "form abandonment," "too many fields," "demo request form," or "lead form isn't converting." Use this for any non-signup form that captures information. For signup/registration forms, see signup-flow-cro. For popups containing forms, see popup-cro.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
mostafasudo/appilot☆ 32026年9月14日 更新
Expert guidance for integrating and building applications with shadcn/ui components, including component discovery, installation, customization, and best practices.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
mostafasudo/appilot☆ 32026年9月14日 更新
Eng manager-mode plan review. Lock in the execution plan — architecture, data flow, diagrams, edge cases, test coverage, performance. Walks through issues interactively with opinionated recommendations. Use when asked to "review the architecture", "engineering review", or "lock in the plan". Proactively suggest when the user has a plan or design doc and is about to start coding — to catch architecture issues before implementation. (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "tech review", "technical review", "plan engineering review".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
mostafasudo/appilot☆ 32026年9月14日 更新
Systematically QA test a web application and fix bugs found. Runs QA testing, then iteratively fixes bugs in source code, committing each fix atomically and re-verifying. Use when asked to "qa", "QA", "test this site", "find bugs", "test and fix", or "fix what's broken". Proactively suggest when the user says a feature is ready for testing or asks "does this work?". Three tiers: Quick (critical/high only), Standard (+ medium), Exhaustive (+ cosmetic). Produces before/after health scores, fix evidence, and a ship-readiness summary. For report-only mode, use /qa-only. (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "quality check", "test the app", "run QA".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
mostafasudo/appilot☆ 32026年9月14日 更新
Report-only QA testing. Systematically tests a web application and produces a structured report with health score, screenshots, and repro steps — but never fixes anything. Use when asked to "just report bugs", "qa report only", or "test but don't fix". For the full test-fix-verify loop, use /qa instead. Proactively suggest when the user wants a bug report without any code changes. (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "bug report", "just check for bugs".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
mostafasudo/appilot☆ 32026年9月14日 更新
Chief Security Officer mode. Infrastructure-first security audit: secrets archaeology, dependency supply chain, CI/CD pipeline security, LLM/AI security, skill supply chain scanning, plus OWASP Top 10, STRIDE threat modeling, and active verification. Two modes: daily (zero-noise, 8/10 confidence gate) and comprehensive (monthly deep scan, 2/10 bar). Trend tracking across audit runs. Use when: "security audit", "threat model", "pentest review", "OWASP", "CSO review". (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "see-so", "see so", "security review", "security check", "vulnerability scan", "run security".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
mostafasudo/appilot☆ 32026年9月14日 更新
Turn any markdown file into a publication-quality PDF. Proper 1in margins, intelligent page breaks, page numbers, cover pages, running headers, curly quotes and em dashes, clickable TOC, diagonal DRAFT watermark. Not a draft artifact — a finished artifact. Use when asked to "make a PDF", "export to PDF", "turn this markdown into a PDF", or "generate a document". (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "make this a pdf", "make it a pdf", "export to pdf", "turn this into a pdf", "turn this markdown into a pdf", "generate a pdf", "make a pdf from", "pdf this markdown".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
mostafasudo/appilot☆ 32026年9月14日 更新
Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality. Use this skill when the user asks to build web components, pages, artifacts, posters, or applications (examples include websites, landing pages, dashboards, React components, HTML/CSS layouts, or when styling/beautifying any web UI). Generates creative, polished code and UI design that avoids generic AI aesthetics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
mostafasudo/appilot☆ 32026年9月14日 更新
Start AEM Workflows on AEM as a Cloud Service using all available triggering mechanisms. Use when starting workflows manually via the Timeline UI, programmatically via WorkflowSession.startWorkflow(), via the HTTP Workflow API, through Manage Publication, or passing initial metadata and payload to a workflow instance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
OCIOStateOfNebraska/stateofnebraska-aem☆ 32026年10月14日 更新
One-shot brand-faithful presales redesign of a website page. The user provides only the URL; everything else — extraction, tension identification, three differentiated variants (one fully cinematic), validation — is derived from the captured brand surface. Use when the user asks to "uplift", "refresh", or "redesign a site for presales" without wanting to coordinate the extract / direct / prototype chain themselves.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
OCIOStateOfNebraska/stateofnebraska-aem☆ 32026年10月14日 更新
Provide advisory guidance for the Adobe Dispatcher Apache HTTP Server module and related HTTPD configuration in AEMaaCS cloud workflows only, with public-doc citations and cloud-specific MCP verification plans. Use for conceptual questions such as `statfileslevel`, filter rules, URL decomposition, cache invalidation behavior, rewrite behavior, and security headers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
OCIOStateOfNebraska/stateofnebraska-aem☆ 32026年10月14日 更新
Perform security audits for the Adobe Dispatcher Apache HTTP Server module and Apache HTTPD in AEMaaCS cloud workflows only, with cloud-specific hardening verification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
OCIOStateOfNebraska/stateofnebraska-aem☆ 32026年10月14日 更新
Optimize performance of the Adobe Dispatcher Apache HTTP Server module and related HTTPD configuration for AEMaaCS cloud workflows only, with cloud-specific baseline and runtime verification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
OCIOStateOfNebraska/stateofnebraska-aem☆ 32026年10月14日 更新
Orchestrates legacy AEM (6.x, AMS, on-prem) to AEM as a Cloud Service migration using BPA CSV or cache, CAM/MCP target discovery, and one-pattern-per-session workflow. Use for BPA/CAM findings, Cloud Service blockers, or fixes for scheduler, ResourceChangeListener, replication, EventListener, OSGi EventHandler, DAM AssetManager, HTL data-sly-test lint. OSGi configs → Cloud Manager — scan ui.config, .cfg.json, secrets, $[secret:]/$[env:] — agent follows references/osgi-cfg-json-cloud-manager.md when prompted. Transformation steps live in the best-practices skill—read it and the right references/ modules before editing code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
OCIOStateOfNebraska/stateofnebraska-aem☆ 32026年10月14日 更新
Apply a Content Driven Development process to AEM Edge Delivery Services development. Use for ALL code changes - new blocks, block modifications, CSS styling, bug fixes, core functionality (scripts.js, styles, etc.), or any JavaScript/CSS work that needs validation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
OCIOStateOfNebraska/stateofnebraska-aem☆ 32026年10月14日 更新