本文へ移動
cccskills

「all」の検索結果

1.7万 件 ・ 関連度順

概要と使いどころ

Prepare for Anthropic-specific technical interviews covering Constitutional AI, RLHF, interpretability, scaling laws, MCP, agentic systems, and AI safety. Activate on "anthropic interview", "constitutional AI prep", "alignment interview", "safety interview", "RLHF opinion", "interpretability prep", "anthropic technical". NOT for general ML interview prep, system design interviews, coding challenges, or behavioral interview practice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/port-daddy22026年10月12日 更新

Designs and verifies fail-closed continuation of a living durable agent after its VM, process, provider session, backend, or context window disappears. Use for body leases, generation fencing, cold-birth failure, process GC, native resume, cross-harness rebodiment, resurrection capsules, capability translation, ambiguous-effect reconciliation, and capacity-aware handoff. NOT for reviving an intentionally retired identity, generic disaster recovery, copying credentials or raw transcripts, ordinary process restart, or claiming metaphysical continuity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/port-daddy22026年10月12日 更新

Time-blind friendly planning, executive function support, and daily structure for ADHD brains. Specializes in realistic time estimation, dopamine-aware task design, and building systems that actually work for neurodivergent minds.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/port-daddy22026年10月12日 更新

How to design contextual inputs for an always-on AI agent with episodic memory. Covers what data to feed the agent, how to structure observations and triggers, ambient context capture (screen, audio, calendar), context window budgeting, and retrieval strategies that keep the agent grounded in what's actually happening. Activate on: "what should the agent observe", "context inputs for agent", "ambient context capture", "agent triggers", "agent input design", "screenpipe integration", "context window budget", "what data to feed my agent", "/always-on-agent-inputs". NOT for: memory architecture and storage (use always-on-agent-architecture), application ideas (use always-on-agent-applications), safety concerns (use always-on-agent-safety).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/port-daddy22026年10月12日 更新

Cryptographic security for agentic systems — zero-trust agent networking, signed message envelopes (JWS/JWE), capability-based security (ocaps), Merkle tree audit trails, WASM sandboxing, and formal verification. Covers CLI dev tool security, mTLS between agents, permission boundaries (least privilege for AI agents), and supply chain security for skills/plugins. Activate on: "agent security", "zero trust agents", "secure agent communication", "capability-based security", "ocap", "signed messages between agents", "agent audit trail", "sandbox agent execution", "agent permissions", "mTLS agents", "cryptographic verification", "agent supply chain", "OWASP agentic", "prove agent did X", "tamper-proof agent logs". NOT for: application-level SAST scanning (use security-auditor), network firewall rules (use infrastructure), SOC2/HIPAA compliance (organizational), or prompt injection defense (use prompt-engineer).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/port-daddy22026年10月12日 更新

Temporal interval algebra for reasoning about time relationships in planning and knowledge representation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/port-daddy22026年10月12日 更新

Safety-case design for always-on agents with episodic memory. Covers data hygiene, privacy and security risk surfaces, cost controls, scope, user dependency concerns, retention, incident containment, and responsible deployment evidence. It identifies hazards and asks for named controls, tests, owners, and residual uncertainty; it does not provide legal, clinical, youth-safety, or jurisdictional determinations. Activate on: "agent safety", "always-on agent privacy", "agent cost control", "persistent agent risks", "AI companion safety", "agent data hygiene", "runaway agent costs", "parasocial AI risk", "/always-on-agent-safety". NOT for: architecture design (use always-on-agent-architecture), input design (use always-on-agent-inputs), application brainstorming (use always-on-agent-applications), healthcare compliance specifically (use hipaa-compliance).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/port-daddy22026年10月12日 更新

Design discovery, directories, and guilds for agent swarms at scale. Use when agents need to find each other on a shared surface: capability indices, yellow-pages directories, whois/phonebook routing, reputation-aware discovery, and guild structures that scope trust. Covers the canonical prior art (FIPA Directory Facilitator, Contract Net, Chord/DHT, DNS-SD/Consul, EigenTrust, Greif's merchant guilds) and the failure modes (read-poverty, Sybil reset, Goodhart on rank, directory staleness, cold-start). Triggers: "agents can't find each other", "who owns this file/skill", "route a question to the right agent", "capability registry", "agent reputation", "guild / federation of fleets". NOT for issuing identities, granting authority, or automatically assigning work from a directory entry.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/port-daddy22026年10月12日 更新

Apply AlphaGo-style patterns: learned priors plus search, mixed evaluators, self-play, and asynchronous fast/slow loops. Use for intractable search and compute allocation. NOT for basic supervised learning, tractable optimization, or domains without search bottlenecks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/port-daddy22026年10月12日 更新

Audit a compliance-ladder design (C0-C6) and transcript-fidelity ladder (T0-T5) plus their adapter conformance fixtures — Codex, Claude Code, Cloudflare, Ollama/LM Studio, custom stdio/HTTP agents — for the two failure modes that make a C-badge or T-fidelity label a lie: the ladder disagreeing with itself across doc/schema/ui/probe surfaces, and a level being reachable by self-report because no daemon-witnessed negative probe actually tries to forge it. Use when designing or freezing a compliance ladder, wiring an adapter conformance probe suite, deciding whether a numeric C-badge or T-label is safe to ship, or investigating a self-attestation or observed-to-controlled bypass risk. NOT for auditing a cryptographic protocol or whitepaper for adversarial soundness (`redteam-review`), writing TLA+/formal invariants for a daemon monitor (`runtime-verification-for-agents`), or agent identity, successor linkage, and reputation across restarts (`agent-identity-continuity-reputation`).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/port-daddy22026年10月12日 更新

Author a pull request an AI coding agent can actually get merged: a scoped, coherent diff; a Summary and Test Plan backed by real evidence; correct triage of required-and-blocking CI gates versus external/advisory checks (e.g. a Cloudflare Pages preview build); draft-while-WIP discipline; named fixup commits for real review findings; and a clean landing through a merge queue without force-pushing or bypassing branch protection. Use when opening, updating, triaging red CI on, or landing an agent-authored GitHub PR. NOT for this repo's internal release ceremony, actor embodiments, or contributor mirror-sync mechanics (use port-daddy-internal-dev), tracking backlog/issue lifecycle across a board (use agent-issue-tracker-workflow), or deciding what to build next / sequencing a roadmap (use legible-roadmap-with-sidequests).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/port-daddy22026年10月12日 更新

Use this skill when building applications with Gemini models, Gemini API, working with multimodal content (text, images, audio, video), implementing function calling, using structured outputs, or needing current model specifications. Covers SDK usage (google-genai for Python, @google/genai for JavaScript/TypeScript, com.google.genai:google-genai for Java, google.golang.org/genai for Go), model selection, and API capabilities.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maros112358/scepticagent22026年3月22日 更新

Supabase Postgres + Storage + Auth operations from FastAPI — service-role client, RLS-aware queries, additive SQL migrations under backend/db/migrations, the create_order RPC, and the product-images bucket. Use when adding tables/columns, writing queries, calling RPCs, or working with Storage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

shanraisshan/learning-x-claude22026年5月7日 更新

Orchestrate multi-agent swarms with agentic-flow for parallel task execution, dynamic topology, and intelligent coordination. Use when scaling beyond single agents, implementing complex workflows, or building distributed AI systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ruvnet/mcp-studio22026年10月10日 更新

Router for all Remotion skills

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

remotion-dev/kimi-code-plugin22026年10月12日 更新

Router for all Remotion skills

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

remotion-dev/cursor-plugin22026年10月12日 更新

Router for all Remotion skills

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

remotion-dev/agent-plugin22026年9月1日 更新

haircut

無料

The barber for your coding agents' config. Weighs everything every agent on this machine loads (instruction files, memory, MCP servers, hooks, skills, commands, subagents, plugins, leftovers), prices each item in tokens from your own transcripts, and parks the dead weight with a receipt and an undo. Use this skill whenever the user mentions config bloat, a heavy or slow session start, tokens burned before the first word, too many MCP servers, hooks that are slow or fire on every prompt, skills or commands or plugins nobody invokes, cleaning up or auditing CLAUDE.md or AGENTS.md, Codex config, or asks what does my agent actually load, why is my context full before I type, which of these servers can I turn off, or what is this plugin costing me. Use it even when they only say the session feels bloated or startup got slow, and even when they mention /context, /doctor or /skill-doctor.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

OthmanAdi/haircut22026年9月14日 更新

Efficiently bring upstream NanoClaw updates into a customized install, with preview, selective cherry-pick, and low token usage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

nanocoai/nanoclaw-gmail22026年4月3日 更新

Check for and apply updates to installed skill branches from upstream.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

nanocoai/nanoclaw-gmail22026年4月3日 更新

Replace OneCLI gateway with the built-in credential proxy. For users who want simple .env-based credential management without installing OneCLI. Reads API key or OAuth token from .env and injects into container API requests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

nanocoai/nanoclaw-gmail22026年4月3日 更新

Add voice message transcription to NanoClaw using OpenAI's Whisper API. Automatically transcribes WhatsApp voice notes so the agent can read and respond to them.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

nanocoai/nanoclaw-gmail22026年4月3日 更新

claw

無料

Install the claw CLI tool — run NanoClaw agent containers from the command line without opening a chat app.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

nanocoai/nanoclaw-gmail22026年4月3日 更新

Loads org- and repo-level coding rules from Qodo before code tasks begin, ensuring all generation and modification follows team standards. Use before any code generation or modification task when rules are not already loaded. Invoke when user asks to write, edit, refactor, or review code, or when starting implementation planning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

nanocoai/nanoclaw-gmail22026年4月3日 更新