1.7万 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Identify and counteract cognitive biases in medical decision-making through systematic error analysis and contextual algorithm application. For diagnostic reasoning, treatment decisions, and clinical judgment improvement. NOT for basic medical knowledge, technical procedures, or non-clinical healthcare domains.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert in cluttering -- the lesser-known fluency disorder characterized by rapid/irregular speech rate, excessive disfluencies, and frequent ADHD comorbidity. Covers differential diagnosis from stuttering, assessment protocols, therapy approaches (rate control, self-monitoring, pragmatic awareness), technology-assisted intervention, and AI tools for people who clutter. Activate on 'cluttering', 'rapid speech disorder', 'speech rate too fast', 'speech disfluency not stuttering', 'disorganized speech', 'ADHD speech problems', 'cluttering vs stuttering', 'speech intelligibility', 'mazed speech', 'telescoping words'. NOT for stuttering-only treatment (overlap is common but they are distinct), hearing disorders, or voice disorders (pitch, resonance).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designing HTTP cache headers that work correctly across browsers, CDNs, and shared proxies — `Cache-Control` directives per RFC 9111, `stale-while-revalidate` and `stale-if-error` per RFC 5861, the Vary header for varying responses, and surrogate keys for tag-based purging. Grounded in IETF RFCs and Cloudflare/Fastly docs. NOT for service-worker or browser-only caching, Redis/memcached application caching, or edge-function compute.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Building resilient distributed systems with circuit breakers, retries with full-jitter exponential backoff, retry budgets (per-request 3-attempt + per-client 10% ratio per Google SRE), deadline propagation, and the cascading-failure math (4 layers × 3 retries = 64x amplification). Grounded in Resilience4j, Microsoft Cloud Patterns, AWS Architecture Blog (Marc Brooker), and Google SRE Book. NOT for server-side rate limiting, bulkhead isolation, backpressure protocols, or database-specific retry.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply Conway's homomorphism principle to multi-agent system design, recognizing that agent coordination structure predetermines system architecture and capability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Russell Beale's "Rise up, Revolt!" analysis of why users blame themselves for bad design, and how consciousness-raising (not designer education) is the lever that fixes usability at a market level
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design multi-tier caching architectures for web applications — cache-aside vs write-through vs write-behind, TTL design, cache invalidation, Redis patterns, CDN configuration, browser caching, and stampede prevention. Use when choosing a caching pattern, designing cache invalidation strategies, implementing Redis caching, configuring Cache-Control headers, or preventing cache stampedes. Activate on "cache invalidation", "cache-aside", "write-through", "TTL", "Redis cache", "CDN caching", "cache stampede", "stale data", "browser cache". NOT for database query caching within an ORM, memoization of pure functions, or CPU-level caching.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design decisions for when and what sounds to use in web apps, mobile apps, and desktop native apps — plus how to create them with AI. Covers UI sound vocabulary (confirms, alerts, transitions, errors), platform conventions (iOS, macOS, Material), creating sounds with AI tools (ElevenLabs, AudioCraft, Stable Audio), Web Audio API for procedural sounds, haptic-audio pairing, and the psychology of satisfying vs. annoying UI sounds. Activate on 'app sounds', 'UI sounds', 'notification sound', 'sound design app', 'earcons', 'sonic branding', 'interaction sounds', 'feedback sounds', 'app audio', 'satisfying sounds'. NOT for professional audio engineering (use sound-engineer), Windows 3.1 retro sounds specifically (use win31-audio-design), music composition (use sound-engineer).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert in background job processing with Bull/BullMQ (Redis), Celery, and cloud queues. Implements retries, scheduling, priority queues, and worker management. Use for async task processing, email campaigns, report generation, batch operations. Activate on "background job", "async task", "queue", "worker", "BullMQ", "Celery". NOT for real-time WebSocket communication, synchronous API calls, or simple setTimeout operations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design roadside signs and large-format ads for businesses, especially automotive dealers. Use for pylon signs, monument signs, lot banners, highway billboards, digital roadside boards, service-lane signage, used-car event signs, lease or finance campaign concepts, and other driver-at-speed messaging where legibility, offer hierarchy, and dealer ad compliance matter. Activate on "road sign", "billboard", "dealership sign", "car dealer ad", "pylon sign", "monument sign", "service lane signage", "automotive billboard", "roadside ad", "dealer lease offer", or "drive-by signage". NOT for fabrication drawings, permitting or local sign-code review, web or social ad campaigns, or full brand identity systems.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan, evaluate, and adopt agent infrastructure for a named workload. Use for agent runtime/framework selection, agent evaluation or observability plans, memory and tool boundaries, infrastructure cost controls, and organizational adoption. Covers workload-first comparison, risk and recovery planning, held-out evaluation, cost accounting, and staged rollout. Not a vendor ranking or a production certification. NOT for implementing a specific agent behavior (agentic-patterns), building a specific agent (ai-engineer), prompt optimization (prompt-engineer), or conventional ETL workflow design (jury_rig-architect).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Foundational concurrent computation model where actors communicate exclusively through asynchronous message passing
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply AlphaGo-style patterns: learned priors plus search, mixed evaluators, self-play, and asynchronous fast/slow loops. Use for intractable search and compute allocation. NOT for basic supervised learning, tractable optimization, or domains without search bottlenecks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design low-friction UX, interaction patterns, and comeback loops for AI coding assistant apps, agent consoles, background coding agents, and Port Daddy swarm/operator surfaces. Use when creating flows like prompt-to-diff, context attach, plan/apply/review, checkpoint rollback, background-agent dashboards, visual proof, or multi-agent invocation. NOT for generic landing pages, static dashboards, or implementation-only changes without product flow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Frame multi-agent designs through explicit environment, autonomy, information, coordination, commitment, incentive, and verification assumptions. NOT for endorsing multi-agent architecture without need or claiming runtime correctness from conceptual methods.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit a compliance-ladder design (C0-C6) and transcript-fidelity ladder (T0-T5) plus their adapter conformance fixtures — Codex, Claude Code, Cloudflare, Ollama/LM Studio, custom stdio/HTTP agents — for the two failure modes that make a C-badge or T-fidelity label a lie: the ladder disagreeing with itself across doc/schema/ui/probe surfaces, and a level being reachable by self-report because no daemon-witnessed negative probe actually tries to forge it. Use when designing or freezing a compliance ladder, wiring an adapter conformance probe suite, deciding whether a numeric C-badge or T-label is safe to ship, or investigating a self-attestation or observed-to-controlled bypass risk. NOT for auditing a cryptographic protocol or whitepaper for adversarial soundness (`redteam-review`), writing TLA+/formal invariants for a daemon monitor (`runtime-verification-for-agents`), or agent identity, successor linkage, and reputation across restarts (`agent-identity-continuity-reputation`).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Discipline an AI agent needs to work an issue/task tracker (Jira, Linear, GitHub Issues) as the shared source of truth: pull the right next item instead of inventing work, search before creating to avoid duplicates, write actionable items with checkable acceptance criteria, keep status transitions honest, and link work to items via branches/PRs/commits so progress is legible. Use when an agent picks up tracker work, files a new issue, updates status, or closes an item. NOT for authoring the PR itself (use agent-pr-authoring), roadmap-level planning and prioritization (use legible-roadmap-with-sidequests), or the mechanics of multiple agents coordinating on the same codebase (use multi-agent-coordination).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design a normalized, machine-readable "work receipt" that answers what changed, why, by whom, and with what validation, for any AI-coding-agent task regardless of backend (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Aider, CI, or homegrown). Use when defining a receipt schema, normalizing heterogeneous agent logs into one evidence shape, gating PR merges on artifact-backed proof, or designing an OSS maintainer's fast-reject/fast-merge workflow. NOT for validating a DAG node's output against its own schema (use output-contract-enforcer), continuous runtime monitoring of a live coordination daemon (use runtime-verification-for-agents), or general Port Daddy claims/notes/salvage mechanics (use port-daddy-agent-skill).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn a large dataset (an existing oversized Coval test set, an export of past conversations, or a CSV/JSON of cases) into a small, high-signal Coval test set by removing duplicates, identifying unique scenarios, and selecting a representative, failure-weighted subset — then bulk-loading it with no row cap. Use when the user says "I have thousands of cases", "dedupe my test set", "my test set is too big", "turn this dataset into a test set", "pick representative scenarios", or "my CSV import only kept 10 / uploaded everything".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Troubleshoot Coval OpenTelemetry trace ingestion, missing trace UI, sparse traces, bad simulation or conversation correlation, auth/org errors, oversized payloads, duplicate spans, and production debugging with Trace Search.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze a Coval adversarial / red-team testing report and turn it into an agent-hardening plan. Use when a user provides a Coval report URL, report export, run IDs, screenshots, or a per-scenario scorecard from an adversarial sweep and wants evidence-backed next steps such as prompt/guardrail changes, refusal hardening, verification fixes, escalation routing, or expanded attack coverage.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Maps intelligence for local SEO: geo-grid rank tracking, GBP profile auditing via API, review intelligence across Google/Tripadvisor/Trustpilot, cross-platform NAP verification, competitor radius mapping, and LocalBusiness schema generation. Three tiers: free (Overpass + Geoapify), DataForSEO, and DataForSEO + Google. Use when user says "maps", "geo-grid", "rank tracking", "GBP audit", "review velocity", "competitor radius", or "SoLV".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Technical SEO audit across 9 categories: crawlability, indexability, security, URL structure, mobile, Core Web Vitals, structured data, JavaScript rendering, and IndexNow protocol. Use when user says "technical SEO", "crawl issues", "robots.txt", "Core Web Vitals", "site speed", or "security headers".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Extract exactly what the person typed in a Claude Code session (script, no agent context spent), have a fresh agent write a faithful structured summary under it, and optionally have an adversarial agent judge whether the working agent is still on track. Use at a checkpoint, before a handoff, after a compaction, when a long session may have drifted from what the owner asked, or when told to 'summarize what I said' or 'check we're on track'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。