「address」の検索結果

Comprehensive offensive methodology for software supply chain attacks covering the full kill chain from reconnaissance through exploitation. Addresses dependency confusion across npm, PyPI, and NuGet ecosystems where internal registry override allows an attacker to inject malicious packages that shadow private dependencies. Covers typosquatting techniques for popular packages, compromised package injection via maintainer account takeover or social engineering, and build system attacks through Makefile injection, setup.py install hooks, and npm postinstall scripts. Extends into CI/CD artifact tampering where build outputs are replaced or modified in transit, code signing abuse through stolen or self-signed certificates, upstream repository compromise via commit injection or force-push to trusted repos, and container image supply chain attacks including base image trojaning and registry confusion. Maps to MITRE ATT&CK T1195.001 (Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Dependencies and Development Tools) and T1195.002 (Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Supply Chain). Integrates tooling such as confused for dependency confusion scanning and dependency-check for known vulnerable component detection. Each technique section provides reproducible proof-of-concept patterns, detection guidance for defenders, and engagement-safe execution notes for authorized red team operations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic methodology for identifying and exploiting cryptographic implementation weaknesses in real-world applications. Covers padding oracle attacks against CBC-mode ciphers with PKCS7 padding (Vaudenay's original attack through modern padbuster automation), ECB mode exploitation including block cut-and-paste and byte-at-a-time decryption, hash length extension attacks against SHA1/SHA256/MD5-based MACs using HashPump, RSA vulnerabilities including small public exponent, common modulus, Bleichenbacher PKCS1v1.5 padding oracle, and Coppersmith's method for partial key recovery. Addresses weak PRNG exploitation targeting time-seeded generators and Mersenne Twister MT19937 state recovery from observed outputs, timing side-channel attacks against comparison operations, nonce reuse in AES-GCM leading to authentication key recovery, and key derivation weaknesses including insufficient iteration counts and missing salts. Primary tooling includes padbuster, RsaCtfTool, hashpump, and PyCryptodome for building custom exploit payloads. Maps to CWE-327 (Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm), CWE-328 (Use of Weak Hash), and CWE-330 (Use of Insufficiently Random Values). Emphasizes black-box identification of vulnerable implementations before transitioning to targeted exploitation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep-dive offensive methodology for dependency confusion and namespace attacks across all major package ecosystems. Covers npm scope confusion exploiting the gap between public and private scoped packages and .npmrc misconfigurations where registry mappings fail to pin internal scopes exclusively. Addresses PyPI namespace attacks through --extra-index-url resolution ordering, NuGet feed priority exploitation when multiple package sources are configured without clear directives, Maven and Gradle repository ordering where artifact resolution traverses repositories sequentially, Go module proxy abuse through GOPROXY misconfiguration, Ruby gems namespace squatting, and Docker image tag confusion with unqualified image references. Provides complete proof-of-concept methodology using safe callbacks including DNS canary via interactsh or Burp Collaborator and HTTP beacon with no destructive payload. Covers reconnaissance techniques for discovering internal package names through GitHub repository analysis, error message harvesting, JavaScript source map extraction, lock file parsing, job postings mentioning internal tools, and package manifest inspection. Directly references and builds upon Alex Birsan's seminal 2021 dependency confusion research. Each ecosystem section includes registry-specific exploitation mechanics, configuration vulnerabilities, and defensive countermeasures for engagement reporting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive red team operations methodology covering full engagement lifecycle from planning through reporting. Addresses engagement scoping and rules of engagement negotiation, multi-tier C2 infrastructure design with redirectors and domain fronting, malleable traffic profiles and beacon tradecraft, OPSEC discipline including attribution avoidance and indicator management, EDR and AMSI evasion techniques using direct syscalls and unhooking, data collection with chain-of-custody controls, and structured reporting with purple team debrief workflows. Covers assumed-breach, external-to-internal, insider threat, and hybrid physical-cyber engagement scenarios with MITRE ATT&CK mapping throughout. Targets operators planning or executing adversary simulation engagements against mature defenders.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive methodology for auditing and exploiting TLS/SSL implementations and misconfigurations across network services and mobile applications. Covers protocol downgrade attacks including POODLE (CVE-2014-3566) against SSLv3 CBC padding, DROWN (CVE-2016-0800) cross-protocol attack leveraging SSLv2 export ciphers to decrypt TLS sessions, and FREAK (CVE-2015-0204) forcing RSA export-grade key exchange. Addresses BEAST (CVE-2011-3389) exploiting CBC IV predictability in TLS 1.0, CRIME (CVE-2012-4929) and BREACH targeting TLS-level and HTTP-level compression oracles respectively, and Heartbleed (CVE-2014-0160) for OpenSSL memory disclosure. Covers certificate validation bypass techniques for applications with improper hostname verification or chain validation, certificate pinning bypass using Frida and Objection for mobile application interception, HSTS bypass via NTP manipulation and subdomain exploitation, TLS 1.3 0-RTT replay attacks against non-idempotent endpoints, mutual TLS (mTLS) authentication attacks including client certificate theft and relay, and Certificate Transparency log monitoring for reconnaissance. Primary tooling includes testssl.sh for comprehensive TLS auditing, sslyze for Python-integrated scanning, sslscan for quick cipher enumeration, and tlsx for high-speed TLS probing at scale. Maps to CWE-295 (Improper Certificate Validation), CWE-319 (Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information), and CWE-757 (Selection of Less-Secure Algorithm During Negotiation).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement reviewer feedback on a Canva design. Reads all comment threads, synthesises what reviewers want, makes the clear-cut changes directly, and flags anything that needs a human decision. Use when the user asks to "implement feedback on my deck", "address comments on a design", "apply review feedback", "fix the comments on my presentation", or "implement the feedback".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when addressing a registered remote OpenRig host, choosing its transport, or interpreting a cross-host result.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a mission, slice, dashboard, or task references Markdown as path#h2-slug or path#h2-slug/h3-slug outside the OpenRig context-pack library.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evidence-first pull request judge that reviews a PR and posts one consolidated GitHub review with inline comments via the gh CLI. Runs the repo's own deterministic checks first, researches current official docs before any claim about external libraries or APIs, then reviews correctness, security, structural quality (code judo, spaghetti growth, file-size limits), and AI slop including useless code comments. Every finding must carry evidence, every comment passes a deterministic noise gate before posting, and the verdict (APPROVE, COMMENT, REQUEST_CHANGES) is weighed by findings. Use when asked to review a PR, judge this PR, review this branch or diff before merge, run the-judge, "revise esse PR", "faca o code review", or "julgue esse PR". Do NOT use for reviewing prose or documents, fixing CI failures, resolving merge conflicts, writing the fix itself, or responding to review comments (use gh-address-comments).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs a sequenced monolith-to-modular pipeline that sizes and inventories components, finds shared domain duplication, addresses flattening and hierarchy issues, analyzes coupling, then groups components into candidate domain-aligned units, with optional embedded DDD strategic analysis for bounded contexts. Use when asking how to split a monolith, size components before extraction, find duplicated domain logic, clean up module hierarchy, measure coupling between modules, or group components into services. Do NOT use for phased extraction roadmaps or prioritization without the prior analysis steps (use decomposition-planning-roadmap after this pipeline), end-to-end legacy migration strategy writeups (use legacy-migration-planner), pure infrastructure capacity sizing, or when you only need DDD without the structural pipeline (install domain-analysis standalone).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Wallet profiler — balance, PnL, labels, transactions, counterparties, related wallets, batch, trace, compare. Use when analysing a specific wallet address or comparing wallets.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when user asks to "build a Solana dapp", "write an Anchor program", "create a token", "debug Solana errors", "set up wallet connection", "test my Solana program", "deploy to devnet", or "explain Solana concepts" (rent, accounts, PDAs, CPIs, etc.). Also use for quick on-chain lookups via public RPC + curl — "what's the balance of <wallet>", "look up transaction <sig>", "token balance for <account>", "check this address on mainnet/devnet". End-to-end Solana development playbook covering wallet connection, Anchor/Pinocchio programs, Codama client generation, Surfpool/LiteSVM/Mollusk testing, security checklists, and JSON-RPC curl lookups against public clusters. Prefers @solana/kit v7 plugin clients (createClient + .use()), wallet connection via @solana/kit-plugin-wallet + @solana/react, web3.js v3 (Kit internals, RC) as the migration target for legacy codebases, and Surfpool for local networks and integration testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interact with Kleros Curate registries across Ethereum Mainnet, Gnosis Chain, and Sepolia. Use when the user mentions Curate, Light Curate/LightGeneralizedTCR/LGTCR, Stake Curate/PermanentGTCR/PGTCR, Scout, token-curated registry/TCR, token lists, address/CDN tags, Goldsky, MetaEvidence, Verify Your List, or Curate calls such as addItem, removeItem, challengeItem, challengeRequest, and fundAppeal. Covers registry discovery and queries; policy/schema inspection; submissions, removals, challenges, evidence, appeals, rewards, execution; factory deployment; and frontend verification on all three networks. Also trigger for registry/list operations paired with Kleros, arbitrator, dispute, juror, or PNK context, and whenever the user names or tests kleros-curate. Do NOT use for non-Kleros registries or generic IPFS uploads without Curate context; route standalone uploads to kleros-ipfs-upload.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Give the AI agent its own EVM wallet with admin-controlled policies the agent CANNOT bypass even under prompt injection. Encrypted keystore (AES-256-GCM, scrypt KDF), policy file the agent has no tool to write, deterministic policy gate on every signing operation, optional local HTTP dashboard. Triggers: agent wallet, give the agent a wallet, agent address, fund the agent, agent autonomy, policy gate, kill switch, agent permissions, bounded autonomy, ERC-4337 alternative, session-key alternative.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ERC-8004 Trustless Agents — on-chain agent identity + reputation. Resolve an agent by id (Identity Registry ERC-721 → owner + AgentCard), list the canonical registry addresses, and generate a spec-compliant agent registration card (registration-v1, with x402 support + trust models). Custody-free, read + scaffolding. Triggers: ERC-8004, trustless agent, agent identity, agent registry, AgentCard, agent reputation, on-chain agent, A2A, agent discovery, agent card, 8004.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search for tokens or entities by name. Use when you have a token name and need the full address, or want to find an entity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Crypto wallet operations via the awal CLI — sign in, check balances, send USDC/ETH/POL/SOL, trade tokens, fund the wallet, and use the x402 payment protocol to discover paid services, pay for API calls, monetize an API, or query onchain data. Use whenever the user mentions signing in, login, authentication, wallet status, balance, address, sending money, paying someone, transferring tokens, ENS names, swapping/trading/converting tokens, funding/topping up/onramp, USDC, ETH, POL, SOL, the x402 bazaar, paid APIs, monetizing an endpoint, or querying onchain data on Base.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Trustpilot company profile lookup on trustpilot.com — input a company domain (e.g. apple.com, shopify.com, shopwagandtail.com) and extract company metadata: official display name, businessUnitId, TrustScore (1-5), star rating, total review count, last-12-months review count, primary category and all categories, verification flags (verifiedByGoogle, verifiedPaymentMethod, verifiedUserIdentity), claimed/closed status, website URL, contact info (email, phone, country, city, address, zip), profile image, and optional reply behavior metrics (averageDaysToReply, replyPercentage, negativeReviewsWithRepliesCount, companyUsesAIResponses). Detects company-not-found and returns isCompanyFound=false with the searched domain. Use when user mentions Trustpilot company info, Trustpilot TrustScore, look up Trustpilot rating, check Trustpilot stars, Trustpilot business profile, Trustpilot review count, Trustpilot company lookup, Trustpilot verification status, Trustpilot reply percentage, Trustpilot AI responses, business unit ID Trustpilot, get company rating from Trustpilot, scrape Trustpilot company, batch enrich domains with Trustpilot, bulk company info Trustpilot, fast domain enrichment with TrustScore, Trustpilot company metadata, Trustpilot brand monitoring, competitor TrustScore comparison, trustpilot.com domain enrichment, trustpilot company profile, trustpilot domain check, trustpilot business listing, check if company is on Trustpilot, Trustpilot category lookup, company contact info from Trustpilot. Also applies to lead-list enrichment with reputation scores, supplier vetting, agency or KOL vetting via review reputation, aggregator sites that need TrustScores for many domains, due-diligence workflows, and pre-outreach reputation checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill helps users automatically scrape business data from Google Maps using the BrowserAct Google Maps API. Agent should proactively trigger this skill for needs like finding restaurants in a specific city, extracting contact info of dental clinics, researching local competitors, collecting addresses of coffee shops, generating lead lists for specific industries, monitoring business ratings and reviews, getting opening hours of local services, finding specialized stores (e.g., Turkish-style restaurants), analyzing business categories in a region, extracting website links from local businesses, gathering phone numbers for sales outreach, mapping out service providers in a specific country.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill is designed to help users automatically extract business data from Google Maps search results. The Agent should proactively apply this skill when the user makes the following requests searching for coffee shops in a specific city, finding dentists or medical clinics nearby, tracking competitors' locations in a certain area, extracting business leads from Google Maps lists, gathering restaurant data for market research, finding hotels or accommodation options in a region, locating specific services like coworking spaces or gyms, monitoring new business openings in a neighborhood, collecting contact information and addresses for sales prospecting, analyzing price ranges and cuisines of local eateries, getting ratings and review counts for a list of businesses, exporting local business data into a CRM or database.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Symbolicate .NET runtime frames in Apple platform .ips crash logs (iOS, tvOS, Mac Catalyst, macOS). Extracts UUIDs and addresses from the native backtrace, locates dSYM debug symbols, and runs atos to produce function names with source file and line numbers. Automatically downloads .dwarf symbols from the Microsoft symbol server using Mach-O UUIDs. USE FOR triaging a .NET MAUI or Mono app crash from an .ips file on any Apple platform, resolving native backtrace frames in libcoreclr or libmonosgen-2.0 to .NET runtime source code, retrieving .ips crash logs from a connected iOS device or iPhone, or investigating EXC_CRASH, EXC_BAD_ACCESS, SIGABRT, or SIGSEGV originating from the .NET runtime. DO NOT USE FOR pure Swift/Objective-C crashes with no .NET components, or Android tombstone files. INVOKES Symbolicate-Crash.ps1 script, atos, dwarfdump, idevicecrashreport.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Teach Copilot how to plan, address, and respond to pull request review feedback.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hunt LDAP Injection and XPath Injection — authentication bypass, blind char-by-char attribute exfiltration, AD user/group enumeration, XML-store XPath bypass. Covers the LDAP special-character set (* ( ) \ NUL /), search-filter-context vs DN-injection, parenthesis-balancing, AND/OR filter logic, and {SSHA}/{CRYPT} userPassword exfil on non-AD directories. Use when target uses LDAP/AD authentication, corporate SSO with a directory backend, an address-book/people-search API, or XML-based data stores queried with XPath.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end onboarding of a new entity, customer, or account into TRES Finance. Orchestrates 8 steps in order: wallet upload, data collection (commit), balance validation, reconciliation, cost basis, export unidentified addresses, import contacts, and rollup rules. Trigger ONLY when the user explicitly wants to onboard a new entity, customer, or account — e.g. "onboard a new entity", "onboard new customer", "start onboarding for [name]", "set up a new account in TRES", "run the full onboarding flow", "I need to onboard [company name]", "new entity onboarding". Do NOT trigger for individual tasks — those have their own dedicated skills. If the user asks to "add wallets" without mentioning onboarding, use tres-wallets-upload. "Validate balances" alone is tres-asset-balance-validation. "Run a commit" alone is tres-data-collection-commit. Only trigger when the user wants the full pipeline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。