「boundaries」の検索結果

Use when building Next.js 14+ applications with App Router, server components, or server actions. Invoke to configure route handlers, implement middleware, set up API routes, add streaming SSR, write generateMetadata for SEO, scaffold loading.tsx/error.tsx boundaries, or deploy to Vercel. Triggers on: Next.js, Next.js 14, App Router, RSC, use server, Server Components, Server Actions, React Server Components, generateMetadata, loading.tsx, Next.js deployment, Vercel, Next.js performance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building React 18+ applications in .jsx or .tsx files, Next.js App Router projects, or create-react-app setups. Creates components, implements custom hooks, debugs rendering issues, migrates class components to functional, and implements state management. Invoke for Server Components, Suspense boundaries, useActionState forms, performance optimization, or React 19 features.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs distributed system architectures, decomposes monoliths into bounded-context services, recommends communication patterns, and produces service boundary diagrams and resilience strategies. Use when designing distributed systems, decomposing monoliths, or implementing microservices patterns — including service boundaries, DDD, saga patterns, event sourcing, CQRS, service mesh, or distributed tracing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs incremental migration strategies, identifies service boundaries, produces dependency maps and migration roadmaps, and generates API facade designs for aging codebases. Use when modernizing legacy systems, implementing strangler fig pattern or branch by abstraction, decomposing monoliths, upgrading frameworks or languages, or reducing technical debt without disrupting business operations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

当用户被别人的期望压垮、容易愤怒、或感觉被工作/责任困住、问「怎么说不/怎么不生气/怎么更自由」时调用。 核心理念: 期望不是你的合同(约定才是); 愤怒是自我惩罚; 就业自由来自低生活成本; 自由=免于被迫反应的自由。 不适用于: 违约/欠债等真正的约定责任。 Triggers: 期望/愤怒/自由/取悦别人/说不/就业自由/freedom/anger/expectations

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Shallow (quick) ensemble bug-finding review using 6 specialist agents in parallel. Each specialist reviews the same patch through a different lens: Logic & Types, Boundaries & I/O, Concurrency & State, Resources & Serialization, Absence Analysis, and API Completeness. Findings are merged and deduplicated. Best for: quick first-pass review of patches, triage of diffs, broad surface-level bug scan. For deeper file-focused review with full pattern catalogs and codebase investigation, use the deep-review skill instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs full Trailmark structural analysis by building a graph, running `preanalysis()`, and reporting hotspots, taint, blast radius, privilege boundaries, attack surface, and version-gated Trailmark 0.4+/0.5+ data such as proxy counts, subgraph edges, type/reference summaries, and entrypoint attributes. Use when vivisect needs detailed structural data for a target. Triggers: structural analysis, blast radius, taint analysis, complexity hotspots, proxy nodes, type references.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive CI/CD pipeline exploitation methodology covering GitHub Actions injection vectors (expression injection via PR titles and issue bodies, workflow_run event abuse, GITHUB_TOKEN over-scoping, composite action supply chain compromise), Jenkins attack paths (Groovy sandbox escapes, script console remote code execution, Java remoting deserialization, credential store dumping, shared library injection), GitLab CI exploitation (YAML anchor injection, runner registration token abuse, CI variable extraction, protected branch bypass via merge request pipelines), and Azure DevOps pipeline agent compromise with service connection theft. Includes artifact poisoning techniques across all platforms, tooling guidance for gato and jenkins-attack-framework, and maps to MITRE ATT&CK T1195.002 (Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Supply Chain). Covers enumeration of pipeline configurations, privilege escalation from contributor to code execution, lateral movement through pipeline trust boundaries, and persistence via modified workflow definitions. Each technique section provides working exploitation code, detection indicators, and defensive countermeasures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Business logic vulnerability testing for web/mobile/API engagements. Covers workflow bypass, state machine violations, multi-step process abuse, price/quantity/discount manipulation, currency confusion, coupon stacking, refund/chargeback abuse, race conditions on logic boundaries, parameter tampering for hidden flows, role/tenant boundary violations, time-of-check vs use, anti-automation defeat, fraud-detection evasion, and subscription/quota abuse. Use when scoping an application after surface-level OWASP Top 10 has been covered, or when the asset is a transactional/marketplace/fintech/e-commerce/SaaS app where logic flaws produce direct financial impact.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate Illumina BCL run folders and sample sheets, plan demultiplexing, review index/UMI/lane choices, run BCL-to-FASTQ conversion, and interpret demux metrics while surfacing license/download boundaries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set browser-game architecture before implementation. Use when the user needs engine choice, simulation and render boundaries, input model, asset organization, or save/debug/performance strategy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Integrate data visualizations into React and Next.js applications. Use when the user needs chart components, UML-like or architecture diagram components, React integration patterns, Next.js client or server boundaries, hydration-safe rendering, lazy loading, framework-aware performance, scroll-driven visual stories, or export guidance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when coordinating assignments, selected review boundaries, or blocked work across a rig.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design multi-agent AI workflows with clear boundaries, handoffs, and monitoring. Use when a complex PM task should run as parallel specialized agents instead of one linear process.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Repository-grounded threat modeling that enumerates trust boundaries, assets, attacker capabilities, abuse paths, and mitigations, and writes a concise Markdown threat model. Use when the user asks to threat model a codebase or path, enumerate threats or abuse paths, or perform AppSec threat modeling. Do NOT use for general architecture summaries, code review, security best practices (use security-best-practices), or non-security design work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configure, explore, and optimize Nx monorepo workspaces. Use when setting up Nx, exploring workspace structure, configuring project boundaries, analyzing affected projects, optimizing build caching, or implementing CI/CD with affected commands. Keywords — nx, monorepo, workspace, projects, targets, affected. Do NOT use for running tasks (use nx-run-tasks) or code generation with generators (use nx-generate).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Specialist in designing and implementing scalable modular monolith architectures using NestJS with DDD, Clean Architecture, and CQRS patterns. Use when building modular monolith backends, designing bounded contexts, creating domain modules, implementing event-driven module communication, or when user mentions "modular monolith", "bounded contexts", "module boundaries", "DDD", "CQRS", "clean architecture NestJS", or "monolith to microservices". Do NOT use for simple CRUD APIs, frontend work, general NestJS questions without architectural context, or stack-agnostic evolutionary modular monolith design (use evolutionary-modular-architecture).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect data leakage, missing boundaries, or privilege mismatch in inter-agent communication.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create a gooey blob system using SVG filters where multiple shapes merge into a single fluid form. Use overlapping circles combined with a Gaussian blur and color matrix filter to produce a continuous, organic mass. The forms should visually fuse and separate based on proximity. Focus on filter-driven merging (blur + threshold effect), soft organic boundaries with no hard edges, multiple independent shapes behaving as one system, and smooth continuous motion that feels fluid and cohesive.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or redesign enterprise AI, automation, security, and operations product pages that explain system boundaries, approvals, auditability, exceptions, and rollback. Use for dark cinematic heroes, hairline grids, metric pauses, expandable solution rows, case-study evidence, security proof, and qualified demo or waitlist handoffs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build or refactor reusable, data-driven enemy archetype and moveset systems for Three.js action games. Use for enemy content schemas, model and rig conventions, combat move timing and contact contracts, runtime state boundaries, placeholder fallbacks, deterministic fixtures, or production playthrough validation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review Apache Pinot architecture when module dependencies, SPI boundaries, abstractions, or class placement change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a project or library of skills for metadata, trigger boundaries, workflow completion criteria, local resource closure, instruction economy, tool scope, effort, and routing evidence. Use before shipping skills, after importing a skill collection, or when a skill triggers too often or not at all.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement and maintain Nexent's traditional Python UT for product changes and bugfixes under test/backend, test/sdk, and test/ext_components. Cover unit behavior, boundaries, errors and regression assertions with isolated pytest tests. Formal D1-D5 assets in test-e2e use nexent-test-assets.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。