「branches」の検索結果

Generate targeted test inputs to reach specific code paths and hard-to-reach behaviors in Python code. Use when: (1) Targeting uncovered branches or specific execution paths, (2) Need coverage-guided test generation, (3) Want to leverage LLM understanding of code semantics for meaningful test inputs, (4) Testing boundary conditions and edge cases systematically, (5) Combining symbolic reasoning with fuzzing. Provides path analysis, constraint solving, coverage-guided strategies, and LLM-driven semantic generation for comprehensive test input creation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate abstract Control Flow Graph (CFG) representations of programs showing loops, branches, and function calls for static analysis or verification. Use when users need to: (1) Visualize program control flow structure, (2) Generate CFGs for static analysis tools, (3) Create control flow abstractions for formal verification, (4) Analyze program paths and reachability, (5) Document program structure. Supports both function-level (intraprocedural) and program-level (interprocedural) analysis with multiple output formats (textual, DOT/Graphviz, JSON).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze existing test suites and source code to suggest additional unit tests that improve test coverage. Use this skill when working with test files and source code to identify untested code paths, missing edge cases, uncovered branches, untested error conditions, and gaps in test coverage. Supports major testing frameworks (pytest, Jest, JUnit, Go testing, etc.) and generates targeted test suggestions based on coverage analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end pooled and single-cell CRISPR screen analysis from FASTQ to hit genes. Orchestrates library design QC, guide counting, six-stage screen QC (plasmid Gini, replicate Pearson, CEGv2 PR-AUC, copy-number artifact), method-appropriate hit calling across MAGeCK RRA/MLE, BAGEL2, drugZ, JACKS, and Chronos, cancer-cell-line copy-number correction (CRISPRcleanR / Chronos), batch correction for multi-batch screens, and the specialized branches for combinatorial paralog screens, single-cell Perturb-seq, base-editor variant-function screens, prime-editor screens, and in vivo bottleneck-aware screens. Use when analyzing any pooled CRISPR screen end-to-end, choosing the correct hit-calling method by experimental design, integrating copy-number correction into the pipeline, or branching the workflow for single-cell, combinatorial, base-editor, prime-editor, or in vivo variants.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manages stacked PRs and splits multi-part work into reviewable branches with gh-stack. Use for stack creation, viewing, edits, push, submit, sync, rebase, merge, or checkout; when asked to split or isolate work for review; whenever a user mentions a stack, branch layers, dependent PRs, or gh stack; or when a stack is checked out.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create a changelog-style promotion PR between two branches. Use for release promotions or branch-to-branch merges with a structured changelog.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review code changes for bugs, regressions, convention violations, and high-value cleanup opportunities. Use for diffs, commit ranges, hosted PR/MR URLs, branches, paths, staged changes, or working-tree changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply when writing stateful logic, or when code branches a lot or repeats a shape assumption across files. Encode the domain in a structure instead of scattered conditionals.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs automated email sequences end to end: the trigger, branches and exit rules, the full copy of every message, and the sender setup that keeps them out of spam (SPF, DKIM, DMARC, one-click unsubscribe, consent). Covers onboarding and welcome series, lead nurture, abandoned cart, dunning, win-back and sunset flows. Use when someone asks for a "drip campaign", "welcome sequence", "onboarding emails", "nurture sequence", "win-back emails", "lifecycle emails", "email automation", or says "our emails land in spam" or "nobody clicks our onboarding emails". In-app onboarding belongs to onboarding-cro.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert in LangGraph - the production-grade framework for building stateful, multi-actor AI applications. Covers graph construction, state management, cycles and branches, persistence with checkpointers, human-in-the-loop patterns, and the ReAct agent pattern. Used in production at LinkedIn, Uber, and 400+ companies. This is LangChain's recommended approach for building agents. Use when "langgraph, langchain agent, stateful agent, agent graph, react agent, agent workflow, multi-step agent, langgraph, langchain, agents, state-machine, workflow, graph, ai-agents, orchestration" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs a long swarm of hundreds to thousands of cheap headless coding workers that drive a large failing-test backlog to green. Failures are clustered by signature, each worker fixes one cluster in its own git worktree, a serial no-regression merge gate lands the fixes, the loop resumes across restarts for hours, and it federates across sibling sessions over git branches when one container's CPU is not enough. Use for "fix these thousands of failing tests with a Haiku swarm", "drive the test suite to green with hundreds of agents", "build this compiler or interpreter against a conformance suite", "launch, relaunch or check in on the swarm loop", "the swarm is stuck, idle or rejecting everything", "parallel agents fixing tests keep hitting merge conflicts and regressions", "add sibling containers to the swarm", or "compare models on the tail the swarm could not fix". Ships the harness, a per-project TOML config, a fake-worker selftest, check-in signals and the 2026-10-12 haiku-cc failure catalogue.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enables GitHub repository operations (read/write/commit/PR) for Claude.ai chat environments. Use when users request GitHub commits, repository updates, DEVLOG persistence, or cross-session state management via GitHub branches. Not needed in Claude Code (has native git access).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs a multi-step procedure as a Python DAG, so ordering, branching and retries are enforced by the runner rather than described in prose a model can generate past. Use for "run these steps in order and retry the flaky one until the check passes", "build a pipeline that fetches, validates, then skips the upload when nothing changed", "make sure these steps cannot be skipped", "resume from where it broke instead of redoing the expensive early stages", "run these independent calls at once and merge the results", or any procedure of 3+ steps with branches, input contracts, or side effects that must not block the critical path. Primitives are depends_on, when=, validate=, retry_until=, detached= and journal_path=. Not for a single sequential call, for steps needing reasoning between them that no predicate captures, or for async and distributed work. To audit whether one verification check can actually go red, use gating. To fan work out across many subagents, use a dynamic workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create, manage, and cleanup git worktrees with Claude Code agents across all projects. USE THIS SKILL when user says "create worktree", "spin up worktrees", "new worktree for X", "worktree status", "cleanup worktrees", "sync worktrees", or wants parallel development branches. Also use when creating PRs from a worktree branch (to update registry with PR number). Handles worktree creation, dependency installation, validation, agent launching in Ghostty, and global registry management.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepare a git repo before new work: review uncommitted changes, fix .gitignore, delete merged branches, end on clean main, or inspect one branch before deciding. Don't use for dead code, commit-and-push, releases, LICENSE files, or git how-tos.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate unit tests for untested branches and edge cases. Use when coverage is low, CI flags gaps, or a release needs hardening. Not for integration/E2E suites, framework migrations, or fixing production bugs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to audit what's wrong with a project, "make it right", "看看项目出了什么问题", "为什么用户的需求还没上线", "为什么没提交App Store", "为什么没新build", or wants a holistic state-of-the-project check covering unmerged branches, stalled PRs, failed GitHub Actions, stale builds, plan drift (TODOS.md / ROADMAP), unreleased commits, and log errors. Runs read-only investigation, presents a grouped checklist, fixes only after explicit user confirmation. Aware of the Cathier iOS app workflow (Xcode + fastlane + auto-merge @claude PRs from in-app feedback).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns open-ended requests into things to think WITH instead of answers to accept. Audits the hidden assumptions inside a topic, inverts them into sharp "what if" provocations, branches each one outward, and delivers a mind map plus written wonderings. Portable version, no vendor-specific tools required, works on any conversational assistant. Fire this when the person signals they want to open up a space and think alongside the assistant: "wonder about X", "what are the weird angles on X", "help me think about what this could be", "I want to explore, not decide yet". Do NOT fire when the same topic is attached to a request for concrete, usable, or decided output: a named deliverable, a count ("give me 5 names"), a deadline, or a "which / what should I pick" question. When it is genuinely unclear which they want, this skill opens by asking one line rather than branching. Not for factual lookups or executing a plan already chosen.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns open-ended requests into things to think WITH instead of answers to accept. Audits the hidden assumptions inside a topic, inverts them into sharp "what if" provocations, branches each one outward, and delivers a fully-expanded mind map image plus the written wonderings. Fire this when the person signals they want to open up a space and think alongside you — "wonder about X", "what are the weird angles on X", "help me think about what this could be", "I want to explore, not decide yet" — or when they invoke /wonder or /wonderpill. Do NOT fire when the same topic is attached to a request for concrete, usable, or decided output: a named deliverable, a count ("give me 5 names"), a deadline ("ideas I can ship this week"), or a "which / what should I pick" question — those want straight answers, not a wonder pill. When it is genuinely unclear which they want, this skill opens by asking one line rather than branching. Not for factual lookups or executing a plan already chosen.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate comprehensive status reports for git repositories. Analyzes commits, codebase structure, type errors, branch health, dependency status, GitHub PRs/issues/CI, working tree changes, and optionally integrates with `td` (task management CLI) if a `.todos` folder is present. **TRIGGERS - Use this skill when:** - User asks for the status of a git project or repo - User asks "what's going on in [project]" or "give me an overview of [repo]" - User wants a project summary, progress report, or codebase overview - User asks about recent commits, code structure, or project health - User says "check my project" or "project status" **Output:** A rich, structured text report covering overview, branches, commit history, codebase breakdown, GitHub activity, dependency health, issues/errors, working tree changes, task management, and summary.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Govern mini-program release readiness and evidence across source branches, semantic versions, build artifacts, test flags, debug paths, sensitive data, permissions, privacy declarations, platform uploads, review submissions, staged versions, production releases, and rollback plans. Use when users ask for a release checklist, packaging, export, version bump, upload readiness, submission readiness, launch status, rollback preparation, or a precise judgment of what has and has not shipped. Defaults to read-only preflight, requires separate explicit authorization for every external state change, and never treats a Git push, successful build, platform upload, review submission, approval, or production publication as interchangeable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Dependency vulnerability remediation workflow for this repository. Use when fixing CVE, BDSA, GHSA, OSV, npm, PyPI, Dependabot, Black Duck, Snyk, or other package vulnerability findings, especially when the user asks for minimal package-only updates, validation, commits, branches, or pull requests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deterministic git operations with state verification for skill-creator managed repos. Use when managing repos, branches, worktrees, or contribution workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive gh CLI reference — issues, tasks, PRs, repos, branches, Actions, search, and project board. Use whenever interacting with GitHub.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。