「call graph」の検索結果

Traces and documents signal paths, bus/aux architecture, and sidechain connections in audio systems. Surfaces hidden coupling between audio components. Use when the user asks to trace a signal chain, explain audio routing, understand an audio graph, locate sidechain sources, or describe how audio flows through a plugin or engine. Trigger on phrases like "trace this signal chain", "explain this audio routing", "what calls what in this audio graph", "where does the sidechain come from", "how does audio flow through this plugin".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Diagnostic Medical Sonographer — deciding whether a duplex, compression, or graded-compression ultrasound study is diagnostic versus technically limited, choosing when to interrupt a scanning protocol to escalate a real-time critical finding, setting scan technique and ALARA (TI/MI) parameters for a given exam type, or drafting the technical worksheet and preliminary findings a physician will interpret and sign.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract, suggest, and sync tags and categories for blog posts across all major CMS platforms. Supports WordPress REST API, Shopify GraphQL, Ghost Content API, Strapi REST/GraphQL, and Sanity GROQ. Generates tag suggestions from content analysis (keyword frequency, heading extraction, semantic grouping), enforces minimum post-count thresholds to prevent thin tag archives, and syncs taxonomy via authenticated API calls. Use when user says "tags", "categories", "taxonomy", "tag suggestions", "sync tags", "WordPress tags", "Shopify tags".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Debug LangChain and LangGraph agents by fetching execution traces from LangSmith Studio. Use when debugging agent behavior, investigating errors, analyzing tool calls, checking memory operations, or examining agent performance. Automatically fetches recent traces and analyzes execution patterns. Requires langsmith-fetch CLI installed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert guide for Backend.AI distributed computing platform. Automatically activates when users ask about: - Backend.AI architecture, components (Manager, Agent, Storage Proxy, Webserver, App Proxy) - Features (session scheduling, Sokovan orchestrator, multi-tenancy, resource allocation) - APIs (REST, GraphQL), authentication, RBAC authorization - Container runtime (kernels, jail sandbox, hook library, virtual folders) - Accelerator support (CUDA, ROCm, TPU, NPU, Graphcore IPU) - Client SDKs (Python, Java, JavaScript, PHP) - Setup, requirements (Python 3.13+, Docker, PostgreSQL, Redis, etcd) - How WebUI connects to/interacts with Backend.AI backend - Plugin interfaces, development setup, infrastructure Use when user mentions "Backend.AI", "backend.ai", "Sokovan", component names, or asks about the backend platform this WebUI connects to. allowed-tools: WebFetch, Read

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The primary tool for code-navigation questions in ANY language (frontend or backend) — walk the structural graph from an entry point (page, route, handler, command, `main`) down through imports to the IO boundary (network call, query, file read). Use this skill, in preference to the Explore agent or global grep, whenever the user asks "where does X come from?", "what API/data populates Y?", "what renders or wraps the Z panel?", "which file for feature F?", "how is this wired up?", or any code-navigation question mapping a UI element, route, or feature concept to source files. Also reverse queries ("what uses /api/foo?", "who consumes this service?"). Keyword search routinely picks up unrelated flows sharing a domain word and produces wrong answers; the walk follows the actual graph. The JS/TS `walk.mjs`/`discover.mjs` are an optional accelerator, not required — the walk is language-agnostic.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Derive an execution roadmap from a project's vision/spec docs by first principles, then diff that fresh derivation against the existing roadmap to prove the task ORDER is correct. Use this whenever the user wants to review, validate, re-derive, or sanity-check an execution roadmap or delivery plan; asks whether the tasks/epics are "in the right order"; suspects a task is scheduled before its prerequisite (a producer-after-consumer / dependency-inversion error like "OpenAPI after the web client that consumes it", OR a cross-cutting inherited default like observability/auth/tenancy scheduled after the feature work that inherits it — a seam-after-consumer error); wants to find missing tasks, circular dependencies, or over-fragmented epics; or wants to compact a plan to raise velocity. Also trigger on "review the roadmap", "re-derive the plan from the spec", "is this the right build order", "check the dependency graph of our epics", "which task should come first". It reads the vision + spec corpus, decomposes actors → use-cases → modules → epics → typed tasks, identifies cross-cutting inherited-default seams, builds a real dependency graph with hard + soft (seam) edges (deterministic helper), breaks cycles, topologically orders, compacts, and emits a derived roadmap PLUS a delta report against the current one — it never blindly overwrites a hand-crafted roadmap.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Take a markdown file of raw material and shape it into an article through a conversational session — drafting candidate openings, growing the piece paragraph by paragraph, arguing about format (lists, tables, callouts, quotes) at each step. Use when the user has a pile of notes, fragments, or a rough draft and wants help turning it into something publishable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pull fresh call recordings and transcripts from Fireflies.ai into an Obsidian vault over the official GraphQL API, then distill action items and commitments and reindex. Incremental and idempotent by transcript id. Triggers: "/fireflies-sync", "pull fireflies", "sync call recordings".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implements data visualization charts in Flutter using the fl_chart package (v1.2.0). Supports LineChart, BarChart, PieChart, ScatterChart, RadarChart, and CandlestickChart with implicit animations, touch interactivity, and pan/zoom transformations. Use when building any Flutter chart, graph, or data visualization — including line graphs for trends, bar charts for comparisons, pie/donut charts for proportions, scatter plots for distributions, radar charts for multi-axis comparisons, or candlestick charts for financial OHLC data. Also use when customizing chart axes, titles, tooltips, grid lines, touch callbacks, chart animations, or chart zoom/pan behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need code research over an indexed codebase with minimal context: structural graph queries (who calls X, call chains, architecture overview, dead code, cross-service HTTP routes) instead of file-by-file grep/read cycles. Also trigger to minimise token spend on repetitive code exploration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tests REST and GraphQL APIs for Broken Object Level Authorization (BOLA/IDOR) vulnerabilities where an authenticated user can access or modify resources belonging to other users by manipulating object identifiers in API requests. The tester intercepts API calls, identifies object ID parameters (numeric IDs, UUIDs, slugs), and systematically replaces them with IDs belonging to other users to Belirle: if the server enforces per-object authorization. This is OWASP API Security Top 10 2023 risk ...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Take a markdown file of raw material and shape it into an article through a conversational session — drafting candidate openings, growing the piece paragraph by paragraph, arguing about format (lists, tables, callouts, quotes) at each step. Use when the user has a pile of notes, fragments, or a rough draft and wants help turning it into something publishable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sous-agent spécialisé dans les appels API REST/GraphQL avec retry, auth et transformation de données. Se déclenche avec "sous-agent API", "API caller agent", "agent qui appelle une API", "REST agent", "HTTP agent", "API integration subagent", "external API agent".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Computes and interprets sequencing read depth and coverage over a genome, windows, or target regions with mosdepth (windowed depth, cumulative distribution, --quantize callable BEDs), bedtools genomecov/coverage (bedGraph tracks, per-target stats), samtools depth/coverage (per-base depth, per-contig depth+breadth). Covers the breadth-vs-mean distinction, the cumulative-coverage curve, evenness (CV/Fano/fold-80/Gini), what each tool silently counts (duplicates, secondary/supplementary, MAPQ, read span vs fragment, mate-overlap), the samtools-depth 8000-cap version trap, and the bedtools coverage -a/-b orientation flip. Use when assessing sequencing adequacy, building coverage tracks, computing breadth at a depth threshold, defining callable regions, or QCing target-capture uniformity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bulk-retouch a folder of portrait photos using Adobe tools — designed for wedding photographers and event photographers who need fast, walk-away batch processing. Use this skill when the user says "retouch my photos", "batch process these portraits", "process my wedding photos", "clean up this folder of images", "run my headshots through Adobe", or uploads/selects a folder of photos and wants them polished and ready to review. Automatically applies auto-straighten, auto-tone, and auto-light to every image. Outputs a preview grid and download folder. Access: 🔐 Signed-In required | Gen AI: ❌

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Debug LangChain and LangGraph agents by fetching execution traces from LangSmith Studio. Use when debugging agent behavior, investigating errors, analyzing tool calls, checking memory operations, or examining agent performance. Automatically fetches recent traces and analyzes execution patterns. Requires langsmith-fetch CLI installed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Computes and interprets sequencing read depth and coverage over a genome, windows, or target regions with mosdepth (windowed depth, cumulative distribution, --quantize callable BEDs), bedtools genomecov/coverage (bedGraph tracks, per-target stats), samtools depth/coverage (per-base depth, per-contig depth+breadth). Covers the breadth-vs-mean distinction, the cumulative-coverage curve, evenness (CV/Fano/fold-80/Gini), what each tool silently counts (duplicates, secondary/supplementary, MAPQ, read span vs fragment, mate-overlap), the samtools-depth 8000-cap version trap, and the bedtools coverage -a/-b orientation flip. Use when assessing sequencing adequacy, building coverage tracks, computing breadth at a depth threshold, defining callable regions, or QCing target-capture uniformity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build or update the code review knowledge graph. Run this first to initialize, or let hooks keep it updated automatically.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Debug LangChain and LangGraph agents by fetching execution traces from LangSmith Studio. Use when debugging agent behavior, investigating errors, analyzing tool calls, checking memory operations, or examining agent performance. Automatically fetches recent traces and analyzes execution patterns. Requires langsmith-fetch CLI installed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bulk-retouch a folder of portrait photos using Adobe tools — designed for wedding photographers and event photographers who need fast, walk-away batch processing. Use this skill when the user says "retouch my photos", "batch process these portraits", "process my wedding photos", "clean up this folder of images", "run my headshots through Adobe", or uploads/selects a folder of photos and wants them polished and ready to review. Automatically applies auto-straighten, auto-tone, and auto-light to every image. Outputs a preview grid and download folder. Access: 🔐 Signed-In required | Gen AI: ❌

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Advanced API exploitation methodology focused on business logic abuse and sophisticated attack patterns that bypass traditional security controls. Covers business logic bypass through API call chaining and workflow manipulation. Addresses GraphQL-specific attacks including batching for credential brute-force, query depth exploitation, and introspection abuse. Includes pagination exploitation for data exfiltration, webhook hijacking for SSRF and data interception, and resource exhaustion through algorithmic complexity attacks. Covers race conditions in API transactions using parallel request techniques. Provides comprehensive JWT manipulation including algorithm confusion, kid injection, jku/x5u abuse, and claim tampering. Details API key leakage detection across source repositories, client-side code, and error messages. Covers undocumented endpoint discovery through predictable naming, debug routes, and source map analysis. Tooling includes Arjun, ParamSpider, jwt_tool, and GraphQL Voyager. Designed for a...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

An innate exploratory drive that guarantees no graph node remains permanently invisible to an agent population. After a warm-up period (step > 3), each agent fires a coverage scan with probability |unseen_nodes| / |all_nodes|. When triggered, the agent teleports directly to the globally unseen node with the highest belief uncertainty, works it, and returns control to the normal action-selection loop. Probability is self-annealing: it starts near 1.0 when almost everything is unseen and decays toward 0.0 as coverage saturates, requiring no manual schedule. The mechanism is "innate" (hard-coded into the agent step loop) as distinct from the "adaptive" EFE path, which requires local neighbors and learned precision weights. Together they form a two-layer exploration architecture: adaptive for locally-guided foraging, innate for topological completeness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit whether an enforced-coordination MCP has actually shrunk its ~19 legacy etiquette verbs into the 5 enforced tools — work/act/ask/recall/status — each carrying one denial shape and one transcript event, migrated through a real retirement path (intake-metadata, alias, or doc-history — never a parallel runtime), with zero legacy-verb calls once a body reaches compliance mode C4+. Use when reviewing a broker-collapse migration plan, gating a body's move from advisory (C0-C3) to enforced (C4+) coordination, or verifying IT-018 Broker Collapse compliance. NOT for the inbound trigger→spawn boundary that decides whether an event may spawn an agent at all (use fleet-event-spawn-trust), the capability-token cryptographic mechanism behind a denial (use agentic-zero-trust-security), designing how a swarm of agents invokes and shards work (use swarm-invocation-designer), or auditing an individual PR's mergeability (use agent-pr-authoring).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。