957 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when working with Bigpanda — bigPanda AIOps platform management covering event correlation, root cause analysis, incident management, alert enrichment, topology-based correlation, environment management, and analytics. Use when configuring BigPanda correlation patterns, investigating correlated incidents, tuning noise reduction, or analyzing alert topology and root cause indicators.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematically trace bugs backward through call stack to find original trigger
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Parallel read-only multi-agent root-cause investigation for bugs, regressions, crashes, flaky behavior, or unexplained failures. Use when the user asks to investigate a bug, find the root cause, trace a regression, understand why something broke, or wants a ranked diagnosis with the fastest proof path without making code edits.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides systematic root-cause debugging. Use when tests fail, builds break, behavior doesn't match expectations, or you encounter any unexpected error. Use when you need a systematic approach to finding and fixing the root cause rather than guessing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Mendelian randomization (MR) causal inference — does an exposure, risk factor, or biomarker CAUSALLY affect a disease/outcome, using genetic variants as instrumental variables (IEU OpenGWAS / EpiGraphDB MR-EvE). Use this whenever the user asks if X causes Y, whether an observational association is actually causal or just correlation, if a biomarker/trait is a causal risk factor, wants to triangulate epidemiology against genetic evidence, or mentions Mendelian randomization, instrumental-variable analysis, two-sample MR, or genetic causal evidence — even if they never say "MR" (e.g. "is LDL cholesterol actually causal for heart disease?", "does BMI cause type 2 diabetes or just correlate?", "is CRP a causal driver of stroke?"). Covers trait-label resolution, MR effect direction/magnitude, instrument quality (MOE score), method agreement (IVW vs MR-Egger vs weighted median), bidirectional MR for reverse causation, and distinguishing causation from genetic correlation. Not for plain GWAS association lookups (use the GWAS skills) or fitting your own instruments from raw summary statistics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The perception-by-culture lens for psycho-logic — establish HOW a specific region, country, or subculture reads a signal before you send it, because perception is culturally coded and the same move can mean the opposite elsewhere. Use when adapting a product, price, message, or campaign to a new market; when the user asks 'will this work in [country/region]', 'why does this land in X but flop in Y', 'how do people here perceive Z', 'how do we localise/differentiate by region', or is about to copy a US/global playbook into another market. Covers the cultural dimensions that move Sutherland's levers — uncertainty avoidance, individualism/collectivism, status/power distance, high- vs low-context communication, mental-accounting norms, trust locus, and taboo/sacredness — and how each rewires reframing, costly-signaling, and experience-design. Inspired by Rory Sutherland's *Alchemy*. Routed to from psycho-logic; pair with market-recon for live local data. 日本語・中文の相談（「この地域で通用する？」「适合本地市场吗？」）にも使う。
Estimate causal effects of an exposure on an outcome from GWAS summary statistics using genetic instruments. Implements IVW (fixed/random), MR-Egger, weighted median/mode, MR-RAPS, CAUSE, GSMR-HEIDI, MR-PRESSO, MVMR, MR-Clust, LCV, and LHC-MR via TwoSampleMR, MendelianRandomization, MR-PRESSO, cause, and lhcMR. Use when testing causal direction between traits, evaluating drug-target effects via cis-pQTL/cis-eQTL, performing multivariable mediation MR, distinguishing causation from correlated horizontal pleiotropy, or producing STROBE-MR-compliant sensitivity batteries.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Trace bugs backward through call stacks and execution flows to identify the original source of errors, invalid data, or incorrect behavior. Use when debugging complex issues, tracing error origins, investigating data corruption, following execution paths, identifying where invalid data enters the system, or finding root causes of cascading failures.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a pre-mortem — imagine the project has already failed one year from now and work backward to find the root causes before they happen. Load when the user asks for a pre-mortem, wants to imagine failure before committing, asks "what could go wrong before we start", "assume this fails — why", "risk analysis before launch", "what kills this project", "what could go wrong", or when deep-thinking diagnoses a pre-mortem frame. Based on Gary Klein's prospective hindsight method, which surfaces failure causes more effectively than forward risk analysis. Most useful right before a major commitment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Estimate causal effects of an exposure on an outcome from GWAS summary statistics using genetic instruments. Implements IVW (fixed/random), MR-Egger, weighted median/mode, MR-RAPS, CAUSE, GSMR-HEIDI, MR-PRESSO, MVMR, MR-Clust, LCV, and LHC-MR via TwoSampleMR, MendelianRandomization, MR-PRESSO, cause, and lhcMR. Use when testing causal direction between traits, evaluating drug-target effects via cis-pQTL/cis-eQTL, performing multivariable mediation MR, distinguishing causation from correlated horizontal pleiotropy, or producing STROBE-MR-compliant sensitivity batteries.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnostic method for any bug, failure, regression, flake, or slowdown. Use before proposing a fix: something is broken, throwing, not saving, not showing, or 'worked yesterday'; on 'debug this' or 'find the root cause'; and immediately after a fix attempt did not work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user asks to "このエラーを直して", "help me debug this", "fix this stack trace", "なぜこのエラーが出るの", "CI が落ちた", or pastes an error message or stack trace and wants help diagnosing it. Classifies the error type, identifies related files, and proposes up to three root-cause hypotheses with concrete fix plans.
This skill should be used when the user wants to "test a claim against data", "validate an empirical hypothesis", "refine a model/theory with evidence", "characterize a pattern and verify it", "演繹と帰納で検証", "仮説をデータで検証して更新", "実例と反例で確かめる", "弁証法ループ", "主張を現物で裏取り", "傾向分析を検証して精緻化", or mentions iteratively updating a hypothesis by deriving predictions and testing them against a real corpus. NOTE: Use this for VALIDATING/REFINING an empirical claim or model against real data through a derive→test→update loop. Use strong-inference for debugging an UNKNOWN cause, and devils-advocate for adversarially stress-testing a DESIGN proposal.
This skill should be used when the user wants to "synthesize two competing solutions without averaging", "resolve a design/value disagreement by lifting to a higher frame", "止揚 / アウフヘーベン", "矛盾を止揚", "独立案を統合", "平均化せず統合", "contradiction lift", "sublate competing designs", or has two good-but-divergent answers to the same question and wants a higher-order resolution (a selection mechanism) or an honest aporia — not a compromise. NOTE: Use this when two independent solutions diverge and you want to PRESERVE both truth-moments while lifting to a higher frame. Use devils-advocate to stress-test ONE proposal with an assigned opponent, strong-inference to find an unknown cause, and dialectic-loop to validate a claim against a real corpus.
Five Whys root cause analysis. Iteratively asks "why" to drill past symptoms to underlying causes. Use for debugging, investigating failures, or understanding why something went wrong.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Codified expertise for quality control, non-conformance investigation, root cause analysis, corrective action, and supplier quality management in regulated manufacturing. Informed by quality engineers with 15+ years experience across FDA, IATF 16949, and AS9100 environments. Includes NCR lifecycle management, CAPA systems, SPC interpretation, and audit methodology. Use when investigating non-conformances, performing root cause analysis, managing CAPAs, interpreting SPC data, or handling supplier quality issues.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Debug failing Power Automate cloud flows using the FlowStudio MCP server. The Graph API only shows top-level status codes. This skill gives your agent action-level inputs and outputs to find the actual root cause. Load this skill when asked to: debug a flow, investigate a failed run, why is this flow failing, inspect action outputs, find the root cause of a flow error, fix a broken Power Automate flow, diagnose a timeout, trace a DynamicOperationRequestFailure, check connector auth errors, read error details from a run, or troubleshoot expression failures. Requires a FlowStudio MCP subscription — see https://mcp.flowstudio.app
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
4-phase root cause debugging: understand bugs before fixing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Operations, debugging, and optimization for DAG workflows. Performs root cause analysis on failures, profiles execution performance, aggregates results from parallel branches, bridges context between nodes, and learns patterns from execution history. Activate on "DAG failed", "why did it fail", "root cause", "performance profile", "aggregate results", "merge branches", "execution patterns", "optimize DAG". NOT for planning DAGs (use dag-planner), executing DAGs (use dag-runtime), or validating outputs (use dag-quality).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
OpenClawの複数のIssueやPRについて、担当を分けて原因調査と修正、検証を進め、許可された範囲でマージや解決済み案件のクローズまで管理するスキル。
OpenClaw全体の品質検証を継続し、不具合の再現から根本原因の修正、レビュー、反映確認まで進めます。実環境や負荷の検証結果を、再開可能な報告書に記録します。
OpenClawのモデル通信やツール実行の不具合を、ログと再現操作で切り分けるスキル。保存済みの会話や添付資料も調べ、原因の修正と再検証につなげます。
互いに依存しない不具合やテスト失敗を別々のエージェントに割り当て、並行して調査・修正するスキル。担当範囲を明確にし、結果の確認と変更の統合まで案内します。
Govern stable domain context with a narrowly scoped CONTEXT.md when needed, and route hard-to-reverse decisions to ECC's existing architecture-decision-records skill. Use when domain terms require repeated explanation, one term has multiple meanings, unclear language causes module-boundary mistakes, or domain semantics must remain separate from architecture decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。