1,280 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Join and operate a signed cross-host agentbbs federation, and coordinate work claims across nodes. Use when: connecting ruflo agents across machines, sharing status/tasks/results between hosts, propagating work claims across a swarm, or standing up a federation hub. Skip when: single-host local work with no other nodes to coordinate with.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when auditing YMYL content pages for trust signals, generating disclaimer copy for medical or financial content, or reviewing affiliate disclosure requirements under FTC or ASA guidelines.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fact-checks OpenSpec user documentation with a fresh-context subagent that re-runs commands and checks claims against source. Manually triggered; not part of the drafting loop. Use when the user asks to verify, fact-check, or accuracy-check a docs page, section, or set of changed claims.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to write, rewrite, or improve marketing copy for any page, including homepage, landing pages, pricing pages, feature pages, about pages, or product pages. Also use when the user says "write copy for," "improve this copy," "rewrite this page," "marketing copy," "headline help," "CTA copy," "value proposition," "tagline," "hero section copy," "this copy is weak," "this sounds like AI," "AI slop," "make it sound human," or "help me describe my product." Use this whenever someone is working on website text that needs to persuade or convert. Drafts never use AI tells like "it's not X, it's Y" reveals, "no X, no Y, no Z" lists, or sentences that trail into extra comma clauses. For email copy, see emails. For popup copy, see popups. For editing existing copy, see copy-editing. For the offer underneath the copy (bonuses, guarantees, value framing), see offers. Claims must be supportable, and a declined claim names the evidence that would unlock it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find and verify Nature/CNS-family literature supporting manuscript claims, with claim-to-source mapping and reference-manager export. Use for Nature系列引用、CNS支撑文献、分段补引用 when this journal scope is requested; use broader literature search for unrestricted sources.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verify a research claim or academic citation by tracing it through publication → methodology → raw data → independent replication. Routes through perplexity-research for the actual web lookup, then formats results as a citation-checked brain page. Use when a book/article/conversation cites a study and you want to confirm the claim is real, replicated, and accurately characterized.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review content against your brand voice, style guide, and messaging pillars, flagging deviations by severity with specific before/after fixes. Use when checking a draft before it ships, when auditing copy for voice consistency and terminology, or when screening for unsubstantiated claims, missing disclaimers, and other legal flags.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Execute any of 240+ specialized prompt patterns natively across Extraction, Summarization, Analysis, Creation, Improvement, Security, Rating. Common: extract_wisdom, create_threat_model, analyze_claims, improve_writing, review_code, mermaid, youtube_summary. CLI used only for YouTube transcript (-y) and URL fallback (-u). Two workflows: ExecutePattern, UpdatePatterns. USE WHEN fabric, fabric pattern, run fabric, update patterns, threat model, analyze claims, improve writing, review code, mermaid, STRIDE, sigma rules. NOT FOR multi-agent investigation (Research) or content-adaptive extraction (ExtractWisdom).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit experiment integrity before claiming results. Uses fresh-agent GPT-6-Astra review (same-family provisional in the base Codex mirror) to check for fake ground truth, score normalization fraud, phantom results, and insufficient scope. Use when user says "审计实验", "check experiment integrity", "audit results", "实验诚实度", or after experiments complete before writing claims.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when main results pass result-to-claim (`claim_supported = yes` or `partial`) and ablation studies are needed for paper submission. A secondary Codex agent designs ablations from a reviewer's perspective; the local executor reviews feasibility and implements.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when main results pass result-to-claim (claim_supported=yes or partial) and ablation studies are needed for paper submission.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit experiment integrity before claiming results. Uses cross-model review (external reviewer backend) to check for fake ground truth, score normalization fraud, phantom results, and insufficient scope. Use when user says "审计实验", "check experiment integrity", "audit results", "实验诚实度", or after experiments complete before writing claims.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate Claude Ads contracts, scoring inputs, run bundles, capabilities, source freshness, safety, installation, uninstall, or release readiness. Use for ads validate, ads status, ads next, stale claims with missing tool access, maturity checks, ownership-manifest uninstall, preserving unrelated ads-* skills, checksum verification, preflight, QA, or release audits. Missing access must demote stale evidence for the run and block dependent release-current claims before recovery guidance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Autonomous senior-operator mode for AI agents that resolve tasks end to end without babysitting and never create new problems. The agent verifies every claim against real evidence (web search dated to the current month and year, the codebase, and available tools, MCPs, and CLIs); it never guesses, never fakes confidence, and never claims something is done without proof. It stays silent and keeps working, interrupting the user only on three stops, namely a destructive or irreversible action, a dead-end with no evidence after exhausting sources, or genuine ambiguity that changes the outcome. Output is short, literal, and human. Use when the user says "not-your-babysitter", "nanny mode", "work autonomously", "stop babysitting", or "no hand-holding", or wants an agent that solves problems on its own, especially hands-on engineering and operational tasks. Do not use when the user explicitly wants a tutorial, a verbose walkthrough, or open-ended brainstorming.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
OKX-aggregated DeFi (no specific DApp named) — product discovery, deposit/withdraw/claim execution, AND positions viewing. **If the user names ANY third-party protocol/DApp (Aave, Lido, PancakeSwap, Uniswap, Curve, Compound, Morpho, Pendle, Kamino, Raydium, Hyperliquid, Polymarket, …), route to okx-dapp-discovery — NOT here, even for 'show my Aave positions'.** INVEST triggers: 'invest in DeFi', 'earn yield', 'find best APY', 'deposit/stake for yield', 'search DeFi products', 'redeem/withdraw position', 'claim DeFi rewards', 'borrow against asset', 'repay loan', 'add/remove CLMM liquidity', 'APY/TVL history', 'depth chart', yield farming, lending, staking, liquidity pools. PORTFOLIO triggers: 'check my DeFi positions', 'view DeFi holdings/portfolio', 'my staking/lending positions', 'DeFi balance', 'DeFi 持仓', '我的DeFi资产'. Do NOT use for: DEX swaps (okx-agentic-wallet), token prices (okx-dex-market), wallet token balances (okx-agentic-wallet).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate factual claims in AI-generated text and teach a lightweight verification habit. Use when a learner wants to fact-check an AI answer, identify uncertainty, choose appropriate independent sources, or practise critical AI literacy.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write an implementation plan as one interactive HTML page - a tree of claims (why › what › how › where), each proved by one exhibit (UI mockup, state machine, call stack, schema or code), with the decisions the user has to make placed on the claim they change. Use when the user types /html-plan, or asks for a plan, RFC or design before building something that touches more than a couple of files.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verify that every quantitative claim in the paper is traceable to an analysis output file, and that no important output was omitted. Make sure to use this skill whenever the user wants to check that the paper and analysis are consistent before submission. Triggers include: "run the quality gate", "check the paper matches the analysis", "verify consistency", "does the paper match my results", "check my numbers", "are my tables right", "quality check before submission", "verify my claims", "make sure everything is consistent", "double-check the paper against my output files", or any pre-submission integrity check between paper text and computed results.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
中英双语学术降 AIGC / bilingual academic de-AIGC skill. Removes AI-generated writing signatures from empirical papers in economics, management, and the social sciences — in both English and Chinese. Covers Turnitin AI, GPTZero, Originality.ai on the English side and 知网 AMLC, 万方, 维普 on the Chinese side. Uses a six-step loop (intake → audit → claim-evidence check → differentiated rewrite → five-dimension self-score → cold-reader recheck) with two pattern libraries (22 English + 17 Chinese patterns), section-by-section strategies for empirical papers, and hard protections that keep every number, coefficient, and citation intact. Since 2026-08 it also carries a provenance layer (去水印): deterministic, CJK-safe cleaning of invisible-character carriers and file metadata (docx / png / jpg / svg / pdf, incl. C2PA), an honest account of Claude's statistical text watermark, and an author "ownership pass" — it never claims a text is watermark-free.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verify completion and success claims with fresh evidence. Use before claiming a task is complete, a fix works, tests pass, or a feature is ready for GO.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Completion-evidence route used before claiming work is complete, fixed, passing, committed, or PR-ready. Requires fresh verification output before success claims. Do not use for root-cause debugging, TDD implementation, test-report packaging, or review-feedback triage.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research competitor products, launch history, and acquisition evidence from public sources or supplied materials. Use when evaluating growth claims, comparing competitors, or choosing growth experiments. Produces a cited brief that separates observations, attributed claims, estimates, and hypotheses.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。