本文へ移動
cccskills

「clarify」の検索結果

282 件 ・ 関連度順

概要と使いどころ

Improve and rewrite user prompts to reduce ambiguity and improve LLM output quality. Use when a user asks to optimize, refine, clarify, or rewrite a prompt for better results, or when the request is about prompt optimization or prompt rewriting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

proflead/codex-skills-library1572026年7月29日 更新

Guidance for asking clarifying questions when user requests are ambiguous, have multiple valid approaches, or require critical decisions. Use when implementation choices exist that could significantly affect outcomes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

oaustegard/claude-skills1512026年10月13日 更新

autodev

無料

Feature auto-development — clarify requirements, generate spec, dispatch dev sub-agent to implement and merge into current branch

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ZhangShenao/harness91412026年10月13日 更新

Use when starting any conversation - establishes how to find and use skills, requiring skill invocation before ANY response including clarifying questions

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Infrasity-Labs/dev-gtm-claude-skills1362026年6月29日 更新

capture

無料

Captures and organizes chaotic brain dumps into a structured, actionable system with zero information loss. Use this skill whenever the user says 'capture this', 'brain dump', 'let me dump some ideas', 'I've got a bunch of thoughts', 'here's everything on my mind', 'idea dump', 'let me get this out of my head', 'I need to organize my thoughts', 'here's what I'm thinking', or any variation where someone is unloading a messy stream of ideas, tasks, thoughts, and plans wanting them turned into something coherent. Also trigger when the user pastes or dictates a long, unstructured block of mixed ideas — even without the exact phrase — the intent is the same. Fast-to-action by design: no upfront intake. Output is four sections (Projects/Ideas, Tasks, Connections, How I Can Help) ending with a directive question. Asks at most one mid-organization clarifying question when a single item is genuinely ambiguous between task and project.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Infrasity-Labs/dev-gtm-claude-skills1362026年6月29日 更新

cook

無料

Implement, build, create, or add any feature, endpoint, page, component, or functionality. Use this skill whenever the user asks you to write new code or make code changes — whether it's adding an API endpoint, building a UI page, creating an export feature, wiring up a webhook, implementing a search/filter, or any other hands-on coding task. This is the default skill for all 'build this', 'add this', 'create this', 'wire up', 'implement' requests. Covers the full cycle: clarify requirements, plan if needed, write code, verify, and review. Do NOT use for pure research, debugging, documentation, or explanation — only when the user wants working code delivered.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

avibebuilder/claude-prime1192026年5月17日 更新

Generate targeted clarifying questions (2-3 max) that challenge vague requirements and extract missing context. Use after request-analyzer identifies clarification needs, before routing to specialist agents. Helps cto-orchestrator avoid delegating unclear requirements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alirezarezvani/claude-cto-team1172025年12月18日 更新

Prepare for challenging conversations using Prepare-Listen-Empathize-Clarify-Solve framework.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

itseffi/agentic-os1152026年10月7日 更新

davci

無料

Define clear decision rights - Decider, Approver, Veto, Consulted, Informed. Use when clarifying who decides.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

itseffi/agentic-os1152026年10月7日 更新

Use when the user wants to design, redesign, shape, critique, audit, polish, clarify, distill, harden, optimize, adapt, animate, colorize, extract, or otherwise improve a frontend interface. Covers design systems, anti-pattern detection, brand vs product registers, typography, color (OKLCH), spacing, motion, copy, and accessibility. By Paul Bakaus (ex-Google, ex-Disney, ex-Unity). Full version includes 23 sub-commands, CLI detection, Chrome extension, and E2E test suite: npx skills add pbakaus/impeccable

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

EliasOulkadi/shokunin1142026年10月5日 更新

Enter explore mode - a thinking partner for exploring ideas, investigating problems, and clarifying requirements. Use when the user wants to think through something before or during a change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tautcony/ChapterTool1132026年10月14日 更新

Classify request as small/medium/large. Adjust workflow depth accordingly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ilang-ai/autocode1032026年9月22日 更新

Grounding-theory primitives for common ground and repair. Use when deciding whether to ask a clarifying question, confirming a handoff was understood, or fixing multi-turn drift.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

vasilyu1983/AI-Agents-public952026年10月12日 更新

Socratic spec refinement — clarify WHAT a phase delivers with ambiguity scoring before discuss-phase. Produces a SPEC.md with falsifiable requirements locked before implementation decisions begin.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

buildomator/buildomator902026年9月24日 更新

Convert a vague mini-program idea, feature request, or partially documented product into an evidence-calibrated product specification with target users, core problem, version-one scope, main and exception flows, page responsibilities, state matrices, and testable acceptance criteria. Use when users ask to define an MVP, clarify requirements, organize product flows, specify page behavior, resolve ambiguous product states, or prepare a stable handoff before architecture or implementation. Separates facts, user decisions, assumptions, unknowns, and future ideas; never invents product logic merely to complete a screen or technical plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

NocodeMrLi/mini-program-engineering-skill-suite882026年10月13日 更新

grill

無料

Clarify research intent and produce draft readiness for human exit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

linzhe001/Harness-Research872026年8月9日 更新

Enter explore mode - a thinking partner for exploring ideas, investigating problems, and clarifying requirements. Use when the user wants to think through something before or during a change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AGI4Sci/SciForge822026年9月3日 更新

Use when the user has a fuzzy idea and wants to shape it into a concrete project spec before planning or building. Triggers on: "brainstorm this", "I have an idea for...", "help me think through this project", "what should I build", "spec this out". Also catches vague feature descriptions needing structured questioning to clarify scope. Does NOT write code, plan implementation, review strategy docs, or run strategy interviews — produces a WHAT/WHY spec through dialogue, not a HOW plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

existential-birds/beagle822026年9月16日 更新

Enter explore mode - a thinking partner for exploring ideas, investigating problems, and clarifying requirements. Use when the user wants to think through something before or during a change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

j5ik2o/okite-ai802026年4月25日 更新

Enter explore mode - a thinking partner for exploring ideas, investigating problems, and clarifying requirements. Use when the user wants to think through something before or during a change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

po4yka/RIPDPI792026年10月14日 更新

Use when asked to write a product brief, turn a feature idea into a spec, define requirements for something to build, or clarify what a product should do and why. Examples: "write a brief for X", "turn this idea into a spec", "what should we build here", "help me define requirements".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tonone-ai/tonone762026年10月5日 更新

Active listening techniques for effective communication. Covers attending behaviors, paraphrasing, reflective listening, clarifying questions, empathic response, barriers to listening, listening in conflict, and cross-cultural listening. Use when building listening skills, improving understanding in conversation, mediating disputes, or analyzing communication breakdowns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tibsfox/gsd-skill-creator712026年7月20日 更新

Use the moment a request is underspecified and you are about to act on an ASSUMED goal. Enumerate the candidate goals the request could mean, project the action or artifact each one implies, and check whether they diverge: if two or more plausible goals lead to materially different actions or artifacts, ask exactly ONE targeted clarifying question; otherwise proceed on the most-likely goal and state the assumption in one line. Clarification is an evidence-producing action, not a delay — but one question, never an interrogation. Distinct from gsd-spec-phase (GSD-phase-bound, emits a heavy SPEC.md) and intent-router (fetch strategy, not goal disambiguation). Backed by agent goal-state inference (arxiv 2606.16813v1). Triggers on acting under an assumed goal when the request admits more than one materially different reading.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tibsfox/gsd-skill-creator712026年7月20日 更新

Clarify requirements before implementing. Use when serious doubts araise.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

plurigrid/asi672026年7月10日 更新