「code mode」の検索結果

Implement the Model-View-ViewModel pattern in .NET applications with proper separation of concerns, data binding, commands, and testable ViewModels using MVVM Toolkit. USE FOR: implementing UI separation with Model-View-ViewModel; using MVVM Toolkit (CommunityToolkit.Mvvm) for ViewModels; designing testable UI architecture. DO NOT USE FOR: unrelated stacks; generic tasks that do not need this specific guidance. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatically repair code violations of temporal properties using model-checking counterexamples as guidance. Use when working with formal verification results, temporal logic property violations (LTL, CTL), model checking counterexamples, or when asked to repair property violations, fix counterexamples, repair temporal properties, fix model checking violations, or repair code based on counterexamples. Applicable to concurrent systems, state machines, synchronization issues, safety/liveness properties, and resource management violations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Odoo 19 development knowledge base with 18 specialized guides covering Actions (ir.actions.*, cron jobs, server actions), Controllers (HTTP routing, endpoints, auth types), Data files (XML/CSV records, shortcuts, noupdate), API Decorators (@api.depends, @api.constrains, @api.ondelete, @api.onchange, @api.model, @api.private), SQL Constraints (models.Constraint replacing _sql_constraints), Database Indexes (models.Index), Module development (manifest, wizards, reports), Field types (Char, Text, Monetary, relational fields), Manifest configuration (__manifest__.py, dependencies, asset bundles), Mixins (mail.thread, mail.activity.mixin, mail.alias.mixin, utm.mixin), ORM Model methods (search, CRUD, domain filters, recordsets, CamelCase model naming), Migration scripts (pre/post/end hooks, data migration), OWL frontend components (hooks, services, lifecycle), Performance optimization (N+1 prevention, batch ops, _read_group), QWeb Reports (PDF/HTML, paper formats, barcodes, t-out), Security/ACL (record rules, field permissions, privilege-based groups, @api.private), Testing (TransactionCase, HttpCase, mocking, query count assertions), Transactions (savepoints, UniqueViolation, serialization failures), Translations (i18n, PO files, translatable fields), XML Views (list/form/search, kanban card templates, xpath inheritance, QWeb templates). Use when writing, reviewing, or debugging any Odoo 19 Python or XML code, creating or modifying modules, fixing performance issues, or looking up Odoo 19 API patterns and best practices. Includes CSS/SCSS asset authoring and review for Odoo addons.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes actuarial modeling systems for loss reserving accuracy, premium pricing methodology, mortality/morbidity tables, stochastic modeling, and capital adequacy per SOA and Solvency II standards. USE THIS SKILL WHEN: - You need to review or audit actuarial models (reserving, pricing, capital) - Someone asks about loss triangle analysis or reserve adequacy - You are evaluating IBNR calculations, chain ladder methods, or Bornhuetter-Ferguson - A project involves insurance pricing, GLM rating models, or ratemaking - You need to assess Solvency II SCR calculations or RBC compliance - Someone mentions actuarial opinions, ASOP compliance, or SOA standards - You are reviewing stochastic models, ESG configurations, or DFA frameworks - A codebase uses actuarial libraries (chainladder, lifetables, ChainLadder R package) TRIGGER PHRASES: "actuarial", "loss reserving", "IBNR", "chain ladder", "premium pricing", "mortality table", "Solvency II", "capital adequacy", "ratemaking", "GLM pricing", "risk-based capital", "reserve analysis", "actuarial opinion"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs a deliberative two-model committee of GPT-6 Astra and Claude Opus under a selectable chair, Fable by default, with `/model-committee-astra`, `/model-committee-opus`, and `/model-committee-sol` selecting the others. Use when a consequential decision has several defensible options and two model families should propose, critique, revise, and cross-rank them against a predeclared rubric before converging, as in research design, interpretation, architecture, manuscript strategy, or evaluation design. Not for factual lookups, independent-coder reliability, brainstorming, routine implementation, or final professional judgment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Delegates coding tasks from Codex to local Claude Code in print mode while preserving Claude's normal runtime customizations by default. Use when: (1) You want Codex to call Claude Code locally, (2) You need Claude-side skills, plugins, MCP servers, custom commands, CLAUDE.md rules, or workspace settings to stay active, (3) You want resumable Claude sessions from Codex via SESSION_ID, (4) You need thin `claude mcp` / `claude plugin` passthrough from the same bridge.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Delegates coding/research tasks to the Google Antigravity CLI (`agy`) for external-model execution (Gemini 3.x, Claude Sonnet/Opus 4.6, GPT-OSS). Replaces the broken `collaborating-with-gemini` skill. Use when: (1) External-model delegation via Antigravity, (2) Multi-model prototyping (switch model per call), (3) Backend/logic implementation, (4) Algorithm design and optimization, (5) Bug analysis and debugging, (6) API/database code generation, (7) Code review. Triggers: "delegate to agy", "use Antigravity", "external model", "agy", "Gemini 3.5", "Claude Sonnet 4.6", "GPT-OSS". IMPORTANT: Always request unified diff patches only. Supports multi-turn sessions via SESSION_ID.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for adding new LLM models to Letta Code. Use when the user wants to add support for a new model, needs to know valid model handles, or wants to update the model configuration. Covers models.json configuration, CI test matrix, and handle validation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Convert Claude Code plugins into generic, platform-agnostic format. Supports full conversion (skills, agents, hooks), flatten mode (skills only — agents converted to skills, hooks absorbed), or nested mode (agents nested as pure markdown within parent skills, hooks absorbed). Full mode supports per-group or unified output layouts — unified merges all groups into a single directory organized by component type. Strips Claude Code-specific implementation details to produce clean markdown files preserving only the intent and instructions. Use when asked to "make this portable", "convert to generic format", "export plugin", "create universal skills", "strip platform dependencies", "make harness-agnostic", "decouple from Claude Code", "flatten to skills only", "nest agents in skills", or when the user wants their plugin content usable outside Claude Code. Also use when the user wants to share skills with teams using different agent frameworks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cloudflare platform management via Wrangler CLI, Agents SDK (v0.13+), and Browser Rendering API. Deploy Pages, Workers, KV, R2, D1, Queues, Vectorize, Workflows, Hyperdrive. Build stateful AI agents with the full SDK stack — Agent, AIChatAgent, Think, Voice, sub-agents, fibers, HITL, scheduling, observability, Code Mode (Dynamic Worker sandboxes). Budget web scraping via cf_browser.py. Use when deploying to Cloudflare, managing CF infrastructure, configuring wrangler.toml/wrangler.jsonc, building AI agents or chat agents on Workers, adding voice, orchestrating sub-agents, or for cheap web scraping. Triggers: Cloudflare, wrangler, Pages, KV, R2, D1, Workers, Vectorize, Queues, Workflows, Hyperdrive, cf_browser, Browser Rendering, Agents SDK, Code Mode, codemode, MCP, Think, AIChatAgent, Voice agent, sub-agents, fibers, HITL, Dynamic Workers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build with DeepSeek Coder — open code models with strong reasoning and long-context code understanding.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build with Mistral's Codestral code models — efficient open code generation with fill-in-the-middle.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build with Meta's Code Llama — open code models for generation, infilling, and long-context code tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks how to build with OpenAI products or APIs, asks about Codex itself or choosing Codex surfaces, needs up-to-date official documentation with citations, help choosing the latest model for a use case, or model upgrade and prompt-upgrade guidance; use OpenAI docs MCP tools for non-Codex docs questions, use the Codex manual helper first for broad Codex self-knowledge, and restrict fallback browsing to official OpenAI domains.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprima modelos de linguagem grandes usando destilação de conhecimento de modelos professor para aluno. Use ao implantar modelos menores com desempenho retido, transferir capacidades do GPT-4 para modelos de código aberto ou reduzir custos de inferência. Aborda escalamento de temperatura, alvos suaves, KLD reversa, destilação de logits e estratégias de treinamento MiniLLM.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orquestación multimodelo y estrategia de cambio de modelos. Selección de modelos basada en puntuación, delegación entre agentes (Gemini, Codex, Ollama), emparejamiento con advisor, disparadores de escalado, matriz de permisos y optimización de eficiencia de costos.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Train or fine-tune sentence-transformers models across `SentenceTransformer` (bi-encoder, dense or static embedding model for retrieval, similarity, clustering, classification, paraphrase mining, dedup, multimodal), `CrossEncoder` (reranker, pair scoring for two-stage retrieval / pair classification), `SparseEncoder` (SPLADE, sparse embedding model for learned-sparse retrieval), and `MultiVectorEncoder` (ColBERT / late-interaction, per-token embeddings scored with MaxSim). Covers loss selection, hard-negative mining, evaluators, distillation, LoRA, Matryoshka, and Hugging Face Hub publishing. Use for any sentence-transformers training task.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Repository-grounded threat modeling that enumerates trust boundaries, assets, attacker capabilities, abuse paths, and mitigations, and writes a concise Markdown threat model. Trigger only when the user explicitly asks to threat model a codebase or path, enumerate threats/abuse paths, or perform AppSec threat modeling. Do not trigger for general architecture summaries, code review, or non-security design work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Claude Code (code.claude.com) の CLI 本体リファレンス。 CLAUDE.md memory, settings.json, env-vars, model config, keybindings, statusline, terminal config, cli-reference (-p / --continue / --resume), sessions, checkpointing, worktrees, remote control, channels, deep links, troubleshooting。

Bulk mode — maximum development speed by spending tokens aggressively on massive parallel sub-agents and multi-agent workflows, while the orchestrator context stays lean (pairs with /slim). Invoking /bulk is the user's explicit opt-in to Workflow/ultracode-style orchestration for this session. Use when the user types /bulk, asks for "爆速", "並列で大量に", "ultracode", "多エージェント", or hands over a big task where wall-clock speed matters more than token cost.

Codex Plan Mode 専用。docs/PLAN/{YYMMDD}_{slug}/ に schema v3 仕様書を作成する。 Gate 契約 (Goal / Constraints / Acceptance Criteria)、Mermaid 図、Cursor Agent 委任ヒントを含む。 Trigger: spec-codex

MUST USE when asked to find, read, list, search, inspect, fetch, export, or reconstruct coding-agent sessions across Codex, Claude Code/Desktop, Aside, OpenCode, Senpi/pi, OpenClaw, Factory Droid, Amp, Gemini/Kimi/Qwen CLIs, Codebuff, Roo/Kilo/Cline, Kodu, Cursor CLI, Aider, Kiro, Goose, Hermes, Crush, Zed, or unknown local agent logs. Uses the repo-backed TypeScript coding-agent-sessions CLI for transcripts, session IDs, rollout JSONL, state SQLite, Claude histories, Aside messages.jsonl, OpenCode sessions, child linkage, cwd/model/time/token filters, archives, and cost clues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

OpenClawのモデル通信やツール実行の不具合を、ログと再現操作で切り分けるスキル。保存済みの会話や添付資料も調べ、原因の修正と再検証につなげます。

• ローカルと実サービスの動作差を調べたいとき
• モデルに見えるツールの確認
• 応答ストリーミングの遅延・停止調査

コードの構造を調べ、理解やテストを難しくしている箇所の改善案を図入りHTMLレポートにまとめます。候補を選んだ後は、制約や設計判断を対話で掘り下げます。

• 変更が多い領域の設計を見直したいとき
• リファクタリング案を図で比較
• テストしやすいモジュール設計を検討