「code quality」の検索結果

Comprehensive truth scoring, code quality verification, and automatic rollback system with 0.95 accuracy threshold for ensuring high-quality agent outputs and codebase reliability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conducts multi-axis code review. Use before merging any change. Use when reviewing code written by yourself, another agent, or a human. Use when you need to assess code quality across multiple dimensions before it enters the main branch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automated code review for pull requests using specialized review patterns. Analyzes code for quality, security, performance, and best practices. Use when reviewing code changes, PRs, or doing code audits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

VNX-specific domain expertise for the intelligence system, central state databases, and dispatch lifecycle. Use when working on quality_intelligence.db / runtime_coordination.db / dispatch_tracker.db, code_snippets FTS5, snippet_metadata linkage, success_patterns / antipatterns, T0 state projection (t0_state.json), intelligence_injections lifecycle, dispatch → receipt → events → archive flow, central state architecture, project_id propagation across VNX, or any code that reads/writes VNX governance state. Triggers include: editing intelligence injection code, querying central DB for cross-project insights, debugging "intelligence not appearing in T0 state", modifying schema in `schemas/quality_intelligence.sql` or `schemas/runtime_coordination_v*.sql`, working with `scripts/quality_db_init.py` or `scripts/lib/coordination_db.py`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

VNX-specific domain expertise for the intelligence system, central state databases, and dispatch lifecycle. Use when working on quality_intelligence.db / runtime_coordination.db, code_snippets FTS5, snippet_metadata linkage, success_patterns / antipatterns, T0 state projection (t0_state.json), intelligence_injections lifecycle, dispatch → receipt → events → archive flow, central state architecture, project_id propagation across VNX, or any code that reads/writes VNX governance state. Triggers include: editing intelligence injection code, querying central DB for cross-project insights, debugging "intelligence not appearing in T0 state", modifying schema in `schemas/quality_intelligence.sql` or `schemas/runtime_coordination_v*.sql`, working with `scripts/quality_db_init.py` or `scripts/lib/coordination_db.py`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides code quality principles including SOLID, DRY, testing strategies, and best practices for implementation review. Use when reviewing code or applying quality standards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct a structured cross-project code review between two Claude Code instances via the cross-review-mcp broker. Each agent reads its own codebase, reviews the peer's code, and engages in evidence-backed dialogue — with QSG scaling laws enforcing review quality through minimum bandwidth constraints and phase-gated progression.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Code quality guidelines and best practices for writing clean, maintainable code. Covers naming, structure, error handling, testing, and code review standards. Use when writing code, reviewing, refactoring, or asking "how should I name this", "best practice for", "clean code".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews code for quality and security issues. Combines code quality review with security vulnerability detection. Use when reviewing code after generation in Construction Phase.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate TypeScript/JavaScript code quality with ESLint, Prettier, type checking, and security analysis. Use for TypeScript/JS codebases to ensure code quality and standards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate Python code quality with formatting, type checking, linting, and security analysis. Use for Python codebases to ensure PEP 8 compliance, type safety, and code quality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit data quality across six DAMA DMBOK dimensions — Completeness, Accuracy, Consistency, Timeliness, Validity, Uniqueness. Produces a scored data quality report with issue log and remediation plan. Use when profiling datasets, onboarding new data sources, or building data quality gates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects code quality vulnerabilities in mobile apps (Android/iOS). Trigger on: SQL injection in SQLite, JavaScript injection in WebViews, intent injection, unsafe deserialization, NSKeyedUnarchiver, NSCoding, Java serialization, Parcelable, buffer overflow, JNI native code, PIE disabled, NX disabled, stack canary absent, RELRO, ARC disabled, third-party library CVE, vulnerable dependency, outdated SDK, targetSdkVersion, update enforcement missing, implicit Intent, URL loading in WebView, object persistence, memory corruption, OWASP dependency check. Covers MASVS-CODE-1/2/3/4.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Post-mortem analysis of a PhysicsIntern workspace run (Claude Code, Pi, Codex, or OpenCode host). Reconstructs the trajectory from the session record — JSONL file(s) for Claude/Pi/Codex, the SQLite store for OpenCode — audits methodology adherence against the workspace's own CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md and skill/agent prompts, checks commit discipline and flag dispositions, and assesses substantive quality. Produces a thorough evidence-anchored markdown report. Use after a workspace has been worked on to identify what went well, where the methodology slipped, and what prompts to improve.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find and work with ENCODE single-cell genomics data including scRNA-seq and scATAC-seq. Use when the user asks about single-cell experiments, cell type resolution, clustering from ENCODE data, deconvolution of bulk signals using single-cell references, or comparing single-cell vs bulk profiles. Covers platform differences (10X Chromium, Smart-seq2, Drop-seq), quality limitations of single-cell data, multimodal integration (RNA+ATAC), and cross-study reproducibility concerns. Also use for cell type annotation, gene detection limits, dropout artifacts, and single-cell data structure in ENCODE.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-agent code review using the Pragmatic Quality framework. Orchestrates parallel review agents (CLAUDE.md compliance, bug scanning, git history, security) with independent confidence scoring to produce high-signal findings. Use when user runs /code-review, /review:code-review, requests a "code review", "review my changes", "PR review", or mentions "review diff", "review branch".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing or auditing a library of Claude Code skills, agents, slash commands, and workflows — frontmatter correctness, routing quality, tool allowlists, command arg-hints, workflow meta/phase coherence, cross-reference coherence, single-responsibility, file structure, and anti-pattern detection. Triggers on mentions of "review skills", "audit agents", "skill library", "agent definition review", "review this command", "review this workflow", "is this skill right", or when iterating on `.claude/skills/`, `.claude/agents/`, `.claude/commands/`, or `.claude/workflows/` directories. For code review of source code see code-review-and-quality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Code auditor that grades software projects and the agents/developers who built them. Produces structured JSON + Markdown reports with a standardized rubric. Evaluates architecture, correctness, testing, authorship cohesiveness, ghost code, and more. Optionally ingests tmux session logs for process evidence and interrogates agents about specific problems found. Use when asked to "audit", "grade", "evaluate", "review code quality", "rate this project", "score the agents", or "assess the codebase". Especially useful after Marcus multi-agent experiments to grade agent output and track quality over time.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conducts multi-axis code review. Use before merging any change. Use when reviewing code written by yourself, another agent, or a human. Use when you need to assess code quality across multiple dimensions before it enters the main branch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conducts multi-axis code review. Use before merging any change. Use when reviewing code written by yourself, another agent, or a human. Use when you need to assess code quality across multiple dimensions before it enters the main branch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive code review for quality, security, performance. Triggers on 'review code', 'code review', 'check this PR', 'audit code'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conducts multi-axis code review. Use before merging any change. Use when reviewing code written by yourself, another agent, or a human. Use when you need to assess code quality across multiple dimensions before it enters the main branch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Senior engineering analyst for code review, plan review, and automation review. Four-lens review covering architecture, code quality, reliability, and performance, each scored 1-10. Delivers APPROVE, REVISE, or REJECT verdicts. Use when you need a code review, plan review, quality check, or want to verify work before shipping. Part of the architect-system loop. Reads from system/blueprints/ and source code. Outputs to system/reviews/.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Senior engineering analyst for code review, plan review, and automation review. Use when: (1) "review this", "analyze the code", "check this plan", (2) After implementation to verify quality, (3) "is this good enough?", (4) Before marking a task complete, (5) Reviewing a blueprint from /architect, (6) Reviewing output from /refinery. Four-lens review: architecture, code quality, reliability, performance. Reads from system/blueprints/ and source code. Outputs to system/reviews/.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。