「code review loop」の検索結果

Detects N+1 query patterns (relation access inside loops without eager loading), full-table get()/all() loads, and unsafe chunk()/cursor() usage in Laravel Eloquent code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous Reforge-guided refactor workflow for the Humans repository. Use when the user wants Codex to target a section such as Shifts, Users, Teams, Tickets, Camps, or Store, create a dedicated worktree/branch from origin/main, run iterative architecture-focused improvements, score each stage with Reforge, gate commits through a score-blind read-only architecture review, append score and verdict details to commit messages after review acceptance, push progress, and open a PR when the loop reaches stasis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identifies and fixes common Rust anti-patterns. Use during code review, when seeing excessive clones/unwraps/index loops, or when code fights the borrow checker instead of working with it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ensure async-path backend code that could block the asyncio event loop is protected by a teeth-verified runtime anchor in tests/blocking_io/. Use when changing backend Python under app/, packages/harness/deerflow/, or scripts/, when running a blocking-IO triage round over the whole repo, or when a reviewer/CI asks for blocking-IO coverage. Runs a deterministic scan (changed-lines or full-repo), routes each candidate, drafts/extends an anchor, and proves it fails when the blocking IO regresses.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Self-referential loop until task completion with configurable verification reviewer

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomously improve a generated paper via GPT-6-Astra xhigh review → implement fixes → recompile, for 2 rounds. Use when user says "改论文", "improve paper", "论文润色循环", "auto improve", or wants to iteratively polish a generated paper.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze ARIS usage logs and propose optimizations to SKILL.md files, reviewer prompts, and workflow defaults. Outer-loop harness optimization inspired by Meta-Harness (Lee et al., 2026). Use when user says "优化技能", "meta optimize", "improve skills", "分析使用记录", or wants to optimize ARIS's own harness components based on accumulated experience.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build agents and multi-agent systems with the Swarms framework — the Agent class, tools, autonomous loops, memory, and the 15+ multi-agent architectures (SequentialWorkflow, ConcurrentWorkflow, GraphWorkflow, HierarchicalSwarm, SwarmRouter, and more). Use whenever writing, reviewing, or debugging code that imports `swarms`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "verify code", "run verification", "check quality", "validate changes", or before creating a PR. Provides comprehensive verification including build, type check, lint, tests, security scan, and diff review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "verify code", "run verification", "check quality", "validate changes", or before creating a PR. Provides comprehensive verification including build, type check, lint, tests, security scan, and diff review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Defensive Golang coding against accidental bugs — nil panics, typed-nil interfaces, `append` backing-array aliasing, silent int64-to-int32 truncation, float `==` comparison, `defer` inside loops, defensive copies of slices and maps, and usable zero values. Use when a Go program panics on a nil map write or nil pointer dereference, when reviewing code for nil-safety, numeric conversion overflow, or resource lifecycle, or when designing a type whose zero value must be safe. Not for designing concurrent access with goroutines, channels, or sync primitives (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-concurrency` skill), not for exploitable vulnerabilities such as injection, weak crypto, or leaked secrets (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-security` skill), and not for debugging an already-failing program (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-troubleshooting` skill).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scaffold a new TikZ diagram from the snippet gallery with prevention rules pre-applied (explicit node dimensions, coordinate map, directional edge labels). Compiles standalone, invokes tikz-reviewer with citations from tikz-measurement.md, and loops on revisions until APPROVED.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose and fix parfor errors in MATLAB. Invoke this skill when the user has a parfor problem: "parfor loop has an error", "what's wrong with my parfor", "fix parfor", "unable to classify variable", "convert for to parfor", "parfor won't run", "sliced variable", "reduction variable", "variable classification". Also invoke when you read a .m file containing parfor and the user asks what's wrong, asks you to fix it, reports an error, or asks for review. Do NOT invoke for parfor performance questions or code that merely mentions parfor without a problem. ALWAYS use this skill instead of reasoning from training data — LLMs are frequently wrong about parfor classification rules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when Codex is building or iterating on a web game (HTML/JS) and needs a reliable development + testing loop: implement small changes, run a Playwright-based test script with short input bursts and intentional pauses, inspect screenshots/text, and review console errors with render_game_to_text.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Live-site visual QA audit with fix loop. 10-category checklist (~80 items) including AI Slop Detection (10 blacklisted patterns). Atomic commits per fix. Before/after screenshots. A-F grading. Parallel cross-model code-level design audit. Modes: Full, Quick, Deep, Diff-aware, Regression.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Close the post-launch loop — turn a live app's App Store signals (reviews, analytics, sales, crashes, listing conversion) into a metric-tagged backlog for the next version, AND verify whether last cycle's changes moved the metric they promised to move. Read-only on App Store Connect; every change is surfaced and routed to another command, never auto-applied. Use before planning the next version, on a monthly cadence, or ~1-2 weeks after shipping to check if a change worked.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deliver implementation PRs across Avibe, avibe-backend, avibe-docs, avault, and vault-sandbox. Required for branch and scope discipline, Codex review, CI, circuit breaking, and user-facing close-out, regardless of agent backend.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a codebase for LLM calls that are really classifications in disguise, then produce a costed swap plan for a System One model. Use when asked to cut AI inference cost or latency, when scoping a performance engagement for a client, when reviewing an agent loop that feels slow, or when asked "where could we use Jev here". Produces a ranked table of candidates with measured latency and dollar deltas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when scanning code for security vulnerabilities. Use when user says "scan security", "kiểm tra bảo mật", "security audit", "review security", or invokes `/vbs-scan-security`. Auto-delegates to sub-agents for large scans (>20 main-language files OR >30 total OR >14 days). Outputs bilingual reports (vi/en). Optional `--auto-fix` (agentic patch + verify loop) and `--sca` (live CVE lookup via OSV.dev).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when scanning code for security vulnerabilities. Use when user says "scan security", "kiểm tra bảo mật", "security audit", "review security", or invokes `/vbs-scan-security`. For large scans (>20 main-language files OR >30 total OR >14 days) processes chunks sequentially. Outputs bilingual reports (vi/en). Optional `--auto-fix` (agentic patch + verify loop) and `--sca` (live CVE lookup via OSV.dev).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run an honest market-fit and viability audit of any project or idea and produce a decision doc, not code. Use when someone asks "is this viable as a business", "audit the market fit", "make the case and compare to competitors", "should I apply to YC or bootstrap", or wants to validate a project, product, or market before investing more time. Gathers verifiable traction data first, researches the competitive field, gets an independent cold read, writes a doc with pre-committed pass/middle/kill criteria and a concrete week-1 assignment, then hardens it with an adversarial review loop.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find tests that enumerate a domain by copying it, and declare the invariants a codebase depends on. Reports where a parametrize list, for-loop, or it.each iterates a hand-written subset of a dict/set/tuple/Enum that exists in the source, and names the members nothing covers. Use when reviewing tests, when a module gains a name-to-thing table, registry, enum, or dispatch map, before trusting a green suite as evidence a domain is covered, or when asked "is this test actually total", "does anything cover X", "what does this repo guarantee", "which invariants do we declare". Also for vacuous tests that pass over an empty collection, for a domain that has silently NARROWED (an enumeration cannot see that), and for recording the refutation that proves a claim can fail.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cultivate defensive situational awareness, threat assessment, and mental clarity under pressure. Covers the Cooper color code awareness system, body language reading and intent detection, verbal de-escalation, moving mindfulness in public spaces, combat focus and the OODA loop, rapid grounding techniques for acute stress, context-specific integration, and ongoing review and refinement of awareness skills. Use when entering unfamiliar or potentially hostile environments, needing to assess a situation for safety, de-escalating a verbal confrontation, or integrating awareness practice into daily movement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drive a failing GitHub Actions run to green in as few CI runs as possible, with a bounded fix-critique-commit-push-recheck loop that batches every evidenced fix into each push. Use when the user supplies a GitHub Actions run URL or run ID and wants the failure fixed, or asks to "make CI green", "fix the failing workflow/build/tests", "fix the red build", or to keep iterating on a branch or pull request until its checks pass. Pulls run results and failed-job logs through the gh CLI, and sends every fix plan to the rubber-duck reviewer before any code is touched.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。