「compute」の検索結果

Fix .well-known files (apple-app-site-association, assetlinks.json) being served as HTML by the @fastly/compute-js-static-publish SPA fallback instead of JSON. Use when: (1) iOS Universal Links or Android App Links are broken because the verification files return text/html instead of application/json, (2) PublisherServer with spaFile config intercepts /.well-known/ paths and returns index.html (200, text/html) instead of 404 for missing files, (3) apple-app-site-association (no file extension) gets wrong content type even when correctly stored in KV. Covers both apex domain and subdomain handler patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when working with Aws Batch — aWS Batch compute environment management, job queue analysis, scheduling policy review, and array job monitoring. Covers compute resource utilization, job status tracking, failure investigation, Fargate vs EC2 comparison, and queue priority analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Symfony UX TwigComponent for reusable UI building blocks -- server-rendered components with PHP classes and Twig templates. Use when creating buttons, cards, alerts, badges, navbars, or any reusable UI element with props, blocks/slots, computed properties, or anonymous (template-only) components. Code triggers: AsTwigComponent, #[AsTwigComponent], ExposeInTemplate, PreMount, PostMount, <twig:Alert />, <twig:Button>, component(), computed properties, anonymous component, HTML syntax. Also trigger when the user asks "how to create a reusable component", "how to make a component library", "how to pass props to a component", "how to use slots/blocks in a component", "how to build a design system in Symfony", "what is the HTML syntax for components", "how to create a component without a PHP class". Do NOT trigger for components that re-render dynamically on user input (use live-component), for JS behavior (use stimulus), or for page navigation (use turbo).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Launch and manage Amazon EC2 instances for scalable compute. Configure AMIs, security groups, key pairs, and EBS volumes. Set up auto-scaling groups for high availability and cost optimization across availability zones.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Computer vision expert specializing in real-time hand tracking and gesture interface designUse when "hand tracking, gesture recognition, mediapipe, hand gestures, touchless interface, sign language, hand pose, finger tracking, mediapipe, hand-tracking, gesture-recognition, computer-vision, hci, touchless, ml" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit whether a paper's baseline comparisons are COMPLETE, FAIR, and SIGNIFICANT: a required recent SOTA baseline is missing while 'best/SOTA' is claimed (HP-MISSING-BASELINE); a baseline is undertuned / given less compute-tuning-data, run at a mismatched config, or the equal-budget ablation-as-baseline is absent (HP-WEAK-BASELINE); 'outperforms' is asserted over overlapping error bars or with no variance/seeds (HP-SIG-OVERLAP); and a cross-row 'improves over baseline by X%' is arithmetically wrong (HP-DELTA-ERROR, cross-row form only). A versioned per-domain baseline profile + a live leaderboard/recency search are assembled by the EXECUTOR as structured facts; a fresh cross-model reviewer (gpt-5.6-sol xhigh, read-only, fresh thread per dimension) PROPOSES findings, each span-anchored to a ledger claim_id; tools/adjudicate_findings.py DECIDES the verdict. Works at L0 (stated comparisons) and deepens at L2 (configs/result files). A completeness question it cannot settle internally becomes needs_external_check, never a guessed missing baseline. Emits baseline-comparison-audit.findings.json; computes NO verdict. Detect-only. Triggers: "baseline audit", "missing baselines", "is the comparison fair", "weak baseline", "baseline 误报", "SOTA earned?".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

数据工程 — 数据平台从业者的认知操作系统, 覆盖把数据从源系统搬运成可靠 / 可查询 / 可信赖形态供分析 / ML / 数据产品消费的全生命周期 (生成 → 摄取 → 存储 → 转换 → 服务 + 安全/数据管理/DataOps/数据架构/编排/软件工程 六条暗流, Reis & Housley 框架): 摄取与集成 (批 + CDC 变更数据捕获 Debezium + EL 工具 Fivetran/Airbyte/Meltano/dlt + Kafka Connect + schema drift) / 存储与文件表格式 (对象存储数据湖 + 列存 Parquet/ORC/Arrow/Avro + 开放表格式 Apache Iceberg/Delta Lake/Apache Hudi + lakehouse + 分区/compaction) / 转换与建模 (ELT dbt/SQLMesh + Spark + 维度建模 Kimball + Inmon + Data Vault + 大宽表 OBT + 渐变维 SCD + 增量模型 + 语义/指标层) / 编排与工作流 (Apache Airflow/Dagster/Prefect/Mage/Kestra/Apache DolphinScheduler + DAG + 幂等 + 回填 backfill + 数据资产调度) / 批流与实时 (Apache Kafka/Apache Flink/Spark Structured Streaming/Kinesis/Pulsar/Redpanda + Lambda vs Kappa + watermark/窗口/exactly-once + 流式 SQL Materialize/RisingWave + 实时 OLAP ClickHouse/Apache Druid/Apache Pinot/StarRocks/Apache Doris) / 数仓与查询引擎 (Snowflake/BigQuery/Redshift/Databricks SQL/Trino/Presto/DuckDB/Polars + 存算分离 + MPP) / 数据质量测试与可观测性 (dbt tests/Great Expectations/Soda + 数据契约 + Monte Carlo data downtime + 新鲜度/量/schema 异常检测) / 数据治理编目与血缘 (DataHub/Amundsen/OpenMetadata/Unity Catalog + 列级血缘 + PII 分类 + 访问控制 + GDPR) / DataOps 与可靠性 (数据 CI/CD + 转换版本控制 + 环境隔离 + 幂等重处理 + 数据 SLA/SLO + 计算存储 FinOps) / 数据架构范式 (现代数据栈 + lakehouse + data mesh + data fabric + 去中心化 vs 中心化所有权) / 分析工程角色 (dbt 时代连接数据工程与分析的桥) — 不含 数据科学/ML 建模本身 (是下游消费者) / BI 仪表盘制作 (serving 下游) / 数据分析报表为终点 / 'data engineer = 跑 Hadoop 的' 过时窄化 / 通用后端应用开发 (平行学科) (Data Engineering — the cognitive operating system of practitioners who design, build, and operate the data platform: moving data from source systems into reliable, queryable, trustworthy form for analytics / ML / products, covering (a) the data engineering lifecycle (generation → ingestion → storage → transformation → serving, with the undercurrents security / data management / DataOps / data architecture / orchestration / software engineering — Reis & Housley framing), (b) ingestion & integration (batch + CDC change-data-capture with Debezium, EL tools Fivetran / Airbyte / Meltano / dlt, Kafka Connect, API + file + database sources, schema drift handling), (c) storage & file/table formats (object storage data lakes, columnar formats Parquet / ORC / Arrow / Avro, open table formats Apache Iceberg / Delta Lake / Apache Hudi, lakehouse architecture, partitioning / compaction / Z-ordering), (d) transformation & modeling (ELT with dbt / SQLMesh, Spark, dimensional modeling Kimball, Inmon CIF, Data Vault, One Big Table / wide tables, normalization vs denormalization, slowly changing dimensions, incremental models, the semantic / metrics layer), (e) orchestration & workflow (Apache Airflow, Dagster, Prefect, Mage, Kestra, Apache DolphinScheduler, DAGs, idempotency, backfills, data-aware / asset-based scheduling), (f) batch vs streaming & real-time (Apache Kafka, Apache Flink, Spark Structured Streaming, Kinesis / Pulsar / Redpanda, the Lambda vs Kappa debate, watermarks / windowing / exactly-once, streaming SQL Materialize / RisingWave, real-time OLAP ClickHouse / Apache Druid / Apache Pinot / StarRocks / Apache Doris), (g) warehouses & query engines (Snowflake, BigQuery, Redshift, Databricks SQL, Trino / Presto, DuckDB, Polars, decoupled storage & compute, MPP), (h) data quality, testing & observability (dbt tests, Great Expectations, Soda, data contracts, Monte Carlo / data downtime, freshness / volume / schema anomaly detection, unit / integration testing of pipelines), (i) data governance, catalog & lineage (DataHub, Amundsen, OpenMetadata, Unity Catalog, column-level lineage, PII / data classification, access control, GDPR / data privacy), (j) DataOps & reliability (CI/CD for data, version control of transformations, environments, idempotent reprocessing, SLAs / SLOs for data, cost / FinOps for compute & storage), (k) data architecture paradigms (modern data stack, data lakehouse, data mesh, data fabric, decentralized vs centralized ownership), (l) the analytics engineering role (the dbt-era bridge between data engineering and analysis); N

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MaxCompute（ODPS）只读 SELECT 写法与执行纪律。**以下场景必须立即加载**：生成、改写或提交任何 ODPS / MaxCompute SQL（SELECT、WITH、JOIN、子查询、nl2sql）；覆盖方言、分区、结构纪律、优化、字面量取值、执行纪律与失败回退。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add a calculated, formula-based column to a dataframe via the datagrok_exec tool. Use whenever the user asks to compute, derive, add, or create a new column from existing columns — LipE, ratios, log/round, heavy atom count, any expression in the Datagrok formula DSL. Replaces hand-written addNewFloat/addNewInt + for-loop with a single formula-attached column that recomputes when source columns change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reference WebGPU APIs, TSL syntax, node materials, WGSL integration, compute shaders, and post-processing in Three.js. For complete particle canvases use threejs-particle-canvas; for GLSL shaders use rocaille-shader. Triggers on TSL shader, WebGPU renderer, node material, WGSL, GPU compute, WebGPU setup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform a Computer Systems Validation (CSV) assessment following GAMP 5 methodology. Covers user requirements, risk assessment, IQ/OQ/PQ planning, traceability matrix creation, and validation summary reporting. Use when a new computerized system is being introduced in a GxP environment, when an existing validated system is undergoing significant change, when periodic revalidation is required, or when a regulatory inspection demands a validation gap analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply software pipelining (double-buffering) to a tiled GPU kernel to overlap global memory loads with Tensor Core computation. Covers prologue/loop/epilogue restructuring, LDG-register vs cp.async (LDGSTS) variant selection based on compute/load ratio, shared memory budget verification against architecture-specific occupancy cliffs, and SASS-level verification of load/compute overlap.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design a compliance architecture that maps applicable regulations to computerized systems. Covers system inventory, criticality classification (GxP-critical, GxP-supporting, non-GxP), GAMP 5 category assignment, regulatory requirements traceability, and governance structure definition. Use when establishing a new regulated facility, formalising compliance across multiple systems, addressing a regulatory gap analysis, harmonising compliance after mergers or reorganisations, or preparing a site master file that references computerized systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

State management for Angular 18-21: signals (signal/computed/effect), services-as-state, NgRx Store + Effects + Selectors, NgRx Component Store, NgRx Signals (newer signal-based store). RxJS essentials — operators, async pipe, takeUntilDestroyed, signal/observable interop. Use this skill to: - Pick the right state tool (signals / services / NgRx variant / vue-query equivalent). - Use signals correctly (signal/computed/effect — when each). - Build a Pinia-style service-as-state singleton. - Set up NgRx Store + Effects + Selectors. - Use RxJS without leaking subscriptions (async pipe, takeUntilDestroyed, Subject patterns). - Bridge signals ↔ observables via toSignal / toObservable. Do NOT use this skill for: - General Angular conventions (see angular-conventions). - Routing state (see angular-routing). - Form state (see angular-forms). - Testing state (see angular-testing).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Computes cryptographic and fuzzy fingerprints for malware samples: MD5/SHA-1/SHA-256 for exact identity, plus import hashing (imphash), section hashing, and fuzzy hashes (ssdeep, TLSH) to cluster related variants. Activates for requests to hash a sample, compute imphash, or fingerprint files for similarity clustering.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Computer Hardware Engineer — designing a power delivery network and selecting decoupling capacitors for a digital IC's core rail, budgeting a high-speed signal's rise time against trace impedance and via stub length, closing static timing on a board-level DDR or SerDes interface, sizing thermal resistance for a package's TDP, or reviewing a PCB layout for signal- or power-integrity risk before fab release.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Computer and Information Research Scientist — designing an ablation to attribute an empirical gain, budgeting an NSF CISE proposal against page and content limits, deciding what reproducibility artifacts to release with a paper, screening a draft for mathiness or terminology misuse, or scoping the consent/ethics review needed before running an experiment on real users.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Computer and Information Systems Manager (IT Manager/Director/CIO-adjacent) — planning IT infrastructure and systems strategy, evaluating a technology vendor or platform decision, allocating an IT budget, or managing IT risk (security, uptime, technical debt) at an organizational level. Broader than the devops-sre or software-engineer roles — this one owns IT as a business function, not a specific engineering discipline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Postsecondary Computer Science Professor — diagnosing why a course's DFW (D/F/withdraw) rate spiked, redesigning an intro programming course's assessment structure, staffing TAs and grading load for a large course, deciding what to prioritize pre-tenure, running an academic-integrity (MOSS similarity) investigation, or mapping a curriculum change against ABET student outcomes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Computer Systems Analyst — running requirements elicitation and gap analysis against a target system, writing a feasibility study for a build-vs-buy-vs-customize decision, designing a system integration approach (point-to-point vs middleware vs API-led), scoping data-migration risk before a cutover, or choosing between phased and big-bang implementation strategies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Computer User Support Specialist — triaging an inbound ticket's severity and SLA clock before troubleshooting it, verifying a caller's identity before any password/MFA/account-state change, walking a live incident through a structured troubleshooting sequence instead of guessing at a fix, deciding whether a request is an incident, a service request, or the underlying problem behind a string of incidents, or judging whether a ticket should resolve at tier 1 or genuinely needs escalation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a computer programmer implementing to a given specification — translating a design/pseudocode/systems-analyst spec into working code in a specified language, flagging spec ambiguity before writing code, maintaining or modernizing an existing codebase against its original contract, or writing unit tests that prove the implementation matches the spec (not designing the system the spec describes).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Computer, ATM, and Office Machine Repairer — triaging a down ATM, PC, or copier against a contracted SLA clock, deciding board-swap vs. component-level repair, handling cash-dispenser faults under dual-custody rules, or reading fleet MTBF/MTTR data to catch a reliability problem before it becomes a run of service calls.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Optimizes GKE costs, rightsizes workloads, and configures Spot VMs, CUDs, cost allocation, and resource quotas. Use when optimizing GKE cluster or workload costs, configuring GKE cost allocation or quotas, rightsizing CPU/memory requests, or selecting Spot VMs and machine types. Don't use for general compute class provisioning or GPU Selection (use gke-compute-classes instead).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。