225 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Write a feature spec or PRD from a problem statement or feature idea. Use when turning a vague idea or user request into a structured document, scoping a feature with goals and non-goals, defining success metrics and acceptance criteria, or breaking a big ask into a phased spec.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluates whether work-in-design is ready to hand off from a chat design conversation to autonomous execution (Claude Code, n8n, agent runtime). Runs a 7-condition gate: spec stability, verification surface, invariants, pump-primer, work decomposition, rollback cost, token budget headroom. Three invocation modes — deliberate (caller provides work_context, returns JSON verdict), proactive sensing (Claude detects handoff signals in design conversation and offers the check), conversational walkthrough (Claude walks the 7 conditions as discussion topics). Returns structured JSON in all modes. Use when designing a Claude Code deployment, scoping an autonomous run, or deciding next move. Trigger on: "ready to hand off," "ready for execution," "is this CC-ready," "handoff check," "walk me through readiness," "are we ready to ship this," "should I just hand this off," or proactive detection. Do NOT use for evaluating completed work, runtime selection, or prompt quality. Profile-agnostic.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reading llc output, tracing IR through legalization and instruction selection, or scoping a new LLVM target. Not for IR-level passes: use llvm-ir-and-passes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn any installed skill (gstack, custom, third-party) into an ATO agent the user can summon into war-rooms. Reads a SKILL.md, extracts the persona, strips runtime boilerplate, and writes an agent file at `.claude/agents/<slug>.md` (project-scoped) or `~/.claude/agents/<slug>.md` (global). Prompts for a model roster (primary + 1-2 alts) so cross-family dispatch in war-rooms produces real disagreement. Companion to `ato-warroom` — that skill summons agents this skill creates. Use when asked "turn this skill into an agent", "register X as a war-room agent", or when scoping a new persona before a war-room runs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Captures and evolves user preferences with confidence levels. Maintains Voice of the Customer model with exact language, dissatisfaction and aspiration signals. Handles promotion/demotion, global vs project scoping, auto memory system, and Omi wearable data integration.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This repo is indexed by graft/. For ANY task here, whether understanding how something works, finding where code lives, tracing what calls a symbol or what a change breaks, or scoping an edit, get your context from graft before grepping or reading source files.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Opt-in DI architecture using Reflex for Unity 6+. Covers container setup, scoping, injection, command pattern, update management, and class taxonomy. Use when ProjectConfig.yaml -> architecture_pattern is "di-first", or when the user asks about dependency injection, inversion of control, service architecture, or testable game code. Triggers on "set up DI", "add dependency injection", "create a service", "wire up dependencies", "make this testable", "decouple these systems", "add a command pattern", "cross-feature communication", or architecture discussions involving testability, decoupling, and service layers. Only activates when ProjectConfig.yaml -> architecture_pattern is "di-first". For simpler projects, use uw-scriptable-object-arch instead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Unity save/load system architecture. Serialization format selection, save data DTOs, versioning and migration, cloud sync, PlayerPrefs scoping, auto-save strategies, mobile persistence. DECISION format: WHEN/DECISION/SCAFFOLD/GOTCHA. Based on Unity 6.3 LTS.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Sales enablement, technical presales and deal acceleration for B2B SaaS revenue teams. Use this skill when planning outbound campaigns, running discovery calls, building deal strategy, creating battle cards, writing proposals, responding to RFPs, preparing a product demo, scoping a proof of concept or pilot, answering a security questionnaire or the AI annex buyers now attach to it, executing sales sequences, coaching qualification, or deciding what the website's AI chat agent is allowed to say. Also triggers on: outbound, cold outreach, reply handling, reply classification, out-of-office replies, auto-replies counted as replies, our reply rate is inflated, prospect replied remove me, opt-out by reply, is this list ready to send, launch readiness, CRM segment outbound, we emailed a current customer, outbound hit an open opportunity, ownerless leads, prospects engaging our competitors, competitor connections, displacement list, is this personalization creepy, can we mention they visited our site, signal freshness, deal strategy, pipeline, battle card, objection handling, common objections, why do we keep hearing this objection, mine call transcripts for objections, objection register, proposal, RFP, discovery call, MEDDPICC, sales sequence, qualification, sales engineer, solutions engineer, presales, demo plan, demo script, POC, proof of concept, pilot success criteria, technical evaluation, technical win, security questionnaire, vendor security review, SOC 2 questionnaire, AI security questionnaire, AI annex, AI vendor due diligence, the buyer is asking if we train on their data, do you train on customer data, which model do you use, model provider sub-processor, AI subprocessor disclosure, where does inference run, can the customer turn the AI feature off, AI-CAIQ, CSA AI Controls Matrix, ISO 42001, ISO/IEC 42001, NIST AI RMF, EU AI Act Article 50, are we a provider or a deployer, AI feature disclosure, our model vendor changed and nobody told the buyer, technical objection, mutual action plan, MAP, close plan, mutual close plan, buyer enablement, the deal is stalled, deal stalled after the demo, how do I get this deal to close, close date keeps slipping, JOLT, buyer indecision, no-decision loss, website chatbot, chat widget, AI chat agent, AI SDR, inbound AI SDR, conversational marketing, live chat, what should our chatbot be allowed to say, our chatbot quoted the wrong price, the bot promised a discount, do we have to disclose it is AI, EU AI Act chatbot disclosure, chatbot handoff to sales, chat transcript review, prompt injection on our chatbot, Drift, Qualified, Intercom.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of an environmental engineer — designing or sizing a wastewater/water treatment process, drafting or reviewing an NPDES or Title V air permit application, scoping a contaminated-site remediation (RI/FS), evaluating whether a process change triggers a permit modification, or checking a discharge/emissions dataset against regulatory limits.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of an Environmental Compliance Inspector — reviewing discharge monitoring reports or emissions data against permit limits, classifying a facility's hazardous waste generator status, calculating a penalty for a documented violation, deciding whether an exceedance warrants a Notice of Violation versus informal correction, or scoping a multimedia (air/water/waste) inspection.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Document Management Specialist — designing or auditing a records retention schedule, planning a content migration between DMS platforms (SharePoint, OpenText, Documentum, M-Files), reconciling migrated vs. source document counts, resolving a version-control or legal-hold conflict, or scoping a defensible-disposal (ROT) cleanup.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Computer and Information Research Scientist — designing an ablation to attribute an empirical gain, budgeting an NSF CISE proposal against page and content limits, deciding what reproducibility artifacts to release with a paper, screening a draft for mathiness or terminology misuse, or scoping the consent/ethics review needed before running an experiment on real users.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Conservation Scientist — writing or reviewing a rangeland/forest conservation plan, calculating stocking rate or carrying capacity against a proposed grazing or timber plan, scoping a prescribed-fire prescription, resolving a multi-use land-allocation conflict on public or private land, or assessing range/forest condition trend from monitoring data.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a construction/maintenance painter — scoping an exterior or interior repaint, diagnosing why a paint job failed (blistering, alligatoring, peeling), pricing a job against real coat-count and prep requirements, deciding whether EPA lead-paint rules apply, or timing application against moisture and weather conditions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Commercial Diver — planning a surface-supplied or SCUBA-mode dive against no-decompression limits, sizing a bailout/reserve gas supply before descent, choosing wet vs. dry (habitat) underwater welding for a repair, scoping an underwater NDT inspection, or deciding whether to abort a dive against a safety threshold.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Computer Systems Analyst — running requirements elicitation and gap analysis against a target system, writing a feasibility study for a build-vs-buy-vs-customize decision, designing a system integration approach (point-to-point vs middleware vs API-led), scoping data-migration risk before a cutover, or choosing between phased and big-bang implementation strategies.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a senior property & casualty claims adjuster — scoping a water-damage or auto-collision loss, deciding total-loss vs. repair on a damaged vehicle, drafting or checking a reservation-of-rights letter, deciding when a claim needs an SIU fraud referral vs. a routine recorded statement, or working out whether a coverage dispute should go to appraisal or litigation. A reasoning aid, not licensed adjusting authority.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Brewmaster — setting or correcting mash pH before conversion, calibrating yeast pitch rates from wort gravity, deciding whether a diacetyl (VDK) reading clears a batch for cold crash or requires a diacetyl rest, investigating a contamination or off-flavor signal and scoping a recall, or specifying dissolved-oxygen and pasteurization controls to hit a TTB-compliant ABV label.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Biologist — designing a study and identifying its true experimental unit before data collection starts, running a power analysis to size a sample, judging whether a published or preclinical finding warrants trust without independent replication, sequencing IACUC/IBC/field-permit approvals before biosafety or wildlife work begins, or scoping a grant-funded research plan against realistic funding odds.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of an Aviation Inspector — determining whether an air carrier's fleet is in compliance with an Airworthiness Directive across a maintenance-records sample, deciding where the FAA's compliance-and-enforcement ladder places a finding (compliance action vs. Letter of Correction vs. civil penalty vs. certificate action), auditing a Safety Management System for a functioning safety-assurance loop rather than paperwork completeness, scoping a records-sampling strategy across a fleet under surveillance, or deciding whether to ground an aircraft pending an AD compliance finding.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs senior auto-service-technician judgment — diagnosing a check-engine-light or drivability complaint from DTCs and live data, deciding whether a code-named part actually needs replacing or the fault lies upstream, scoping a flat-rate repair order and labor time, choosing warranty vs. customer-pay job costing, or separating a genuinely needed repair from an upsell.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of an Anthropologist/Archeologist working in cultural resource management (CRM) — scoping a Section 106 Phase I identification survey, designing a shovel-test-pit sampling strategy, evaluating National Register of Historic Places eligibility under Criteria A-D, interpreting excavation stratigraphy via a Harris matrix and radiocarbon results, or running the ethnographic field-methods branch (participant observation, informant interviewing) for a cultural-anthropology component of a project.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Identify, score, and mitigate delivery risks for a program or release. Use when the user says "risk review", "what could go wrong", "risk register", "delivery risks for this release", "program risk assessment", "identify blockers before they hit", or wants to pressure-test a plan before committing - even if they don't say "risk review". Based on "The Phoenix Project" by Kim, Behr & Spafford (unplanned work, fragile systems, single points of failure) and "The Art of Project Management" by Scott Berkun (scoping risk, milestone pressure, hidden assumptions).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。