「corpus」の検索結果

Draft short, in-voice reply candidates to a fresh community shortlist: read the nightly detector report, pick posts in safe or opinion topics, pull a grounding snippet from the local corpus, and write the drafts. Drafts only, and the owner posts. Triggers: "/sostav-comments", "draft replies to the shortlist".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

LLM-judge stage of an alpha-mining pipeline: take a miner's deterministic candidate list, keep only real signal, drop noise, and propose additions to that miner's curated note. Use after any zero-token detector run. Reads only the candidate digest and the home note, never the corpus. Triggers: "/alpha-judge <miner>", "judge the candidates".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ask the second brain in plain words: semantic search over the curated vault with embeddings plus a reranker, returning the smallest relevant slice instead of a corpus dump. Token-cheap. Triggers: "/ask <question>", "what do I have on <topic>", "what did I write about X".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

NVIDIA NeMo Retriever deployment and usage guidance for local retrieval services, corpus ingestion, and grounded question-answering workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cross-company language sweep via Quartr full-text search — date the adoption curve of a term/phrase across the global transcript+filing corpus, identify which companies (and which speaker roles) use it and when they started, and cross-reference against vault theses and graph adjacency to flag terms propagating through supply chains the book owns. Use when user says "sweep", "who is talking about X", "language scan", "adoption curve for X", or "is X inflecting".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Week 2 of the exploit development curriculum. Covers fuzzing methodology: target selection, corpus generation, coverage-guided fuzzing with AFL++/libFuzzer, structured fuzzing, and triage/deduplication. Use when setting up fuzz campaigns, selecting harness strategies, or triaging fuzzer output.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cloud IAM red-team attack chain across AWS, Azure, GCP — focused on EXTERNAL exploitation paths and post-credential-discovery privilege analysis. Covers IAM enumeration (aws iam, az role, gcloud iam), STS/AssumeRole chaining, Azure Managed Identity abuse (via SSRF/leak), GCP service account JSON abuse, IMDSv1/v2 attacks via SSRF, K8s ServiceAccount token privilege analysis once held (token discovery / cluster exposure is owned by hunt-k8s), role-trust-policy confused-deputy, cross-account assume-role enumeration, IAM privilege escalation patterns (24+ AWS, 8+ Azure, 6+ GCP), and AWS Cognito Identity Pool unauthenticated-role attack chain (GetId → GetCredentialsForIdentity → IAM role abuse). Built for the case where recon yields a credential (key, JSON, token) and you need to know what it grants and how to escalate. Use when an AWS key / Azure secret / GCP service account JSON / K8s SA token surfaces from a code repo, JS bundle, APK, breach corpus, or SSRF chain.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Own whether a multi-document product-architecture binder is internally consistent, complete against its stated customer/contingency/architecture coverage, and honest about which older product ambitions it has absorbed, superseded, deferred, contradicted, orphaned, or rejected. Use when running a binder Architect of Record pass, before an implementation chain cites a binder chapter as ready, when a proof-gate owner is missing, or when reconciling the binder against the older ambition corpus (website, plans, examples, ADRs). NOT for auditing a single Claude Skill bundle's structure or frontmatter (use skill-hygiene), rendering a single-PM accept/reject verdict on one finished deliverable (use port-daddy-user-surrogate-pm-review), or sequencing/stewarding a roadmap's sidequests once a gap or operator decision has been surfaced (use legible-roadmap-with-sidequests).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。