「data quality」の検索結果

Quality control for long-read sequencing data using NanoPlot, NanoStat, and chopper. Generate QC reports, filter reads by length and quality, and visualize read characteristics. Use when assessing ONT or PacBio run quality or filtering reads before assembly or alignment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quality control and normalization for metabolomics data. Covers QC-based correction, batch effect removal, and data transformation methods. Use when correcting technical variation in metabolomics data before statistical analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ChIP-seq quality control metrics including FRiP (Fraction of Reads in Peaks), cross-correlation analysis (NSC/RSC), library complexity, and IDR (Irreproducibility Discovery Rate) for replicate concordance. Use to assess experiment quality before downstream analysis. Use when assessing ChIP-seq data quality metrics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate data quality in market analysis documents and blog articles before publication. Use when checking for price scale inconsistencies (ETF vs futures), instrument notation errors, date/day-of-week mismatches, allocation total errors, and unit mismatches. Supports English and Japanese content. Advisory mode -- flags issues as warnings for human review, not as blockers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Preprocessing and cleaning techniques for astronomical light curves. Use when preparing light curve data for period analysis, including outlier removal, trend removal, flattening, and handling data quality flags. Works with lightkurve and general time series data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates explicit validation checkpoints (verification gates) between project phases to catch errors early and ensure quality before proceeding. Use when the user asks about quality gates, milestone checks, phase transitions, approval steps, go/no-go decision points, or preventing cascading errors across a multi-step workflow. Produces acceptance criteria checklists, automated CI gate configurations, manual sign-off requirements, and conditional review rules for scenarios such as security changes, API changes, or database migrations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full-sweep mode: runs a unified analysis across all quality dimensions — code decay, architecture, tech debt, and test quality — then applies fixes directly to the codebase. Safe changes are auto-applied; risky changes are confirmed before execution. Drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user wants to "fix everything", "sweep the codebase", "auto-fix all issues", "clean up the whole project", or asks for a single command that both diagnoses and remediates quality problems. Do NOT trigger for: read-only audits or health reports where the user only wants findings without code changes; single-dimension reviews (use the focused skill instead: brooks-review / brooks-audit / brooks-debt / brooks-test); server health checks, HTTP /health endpoints, Kubernetes probes, database health, or application uptime.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Email campaign/sequence performance review composite. Pulls campaign data (sends, opens, replies, bounces), reads actual email copy and subject lines, analyzes reply content (objections, positive interest, questions), and produces a diagnostic report covering quantitative metrics, copy quality, lead quality, and actionable recommendations. Tool-agnostic — works with Smartlead (MCP), Instantly, Outreach, Lemlist, Apollo, or CSV data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Map contest attachments to subquestions, audit and clean raw data, and emit one reusable data profile with quality, coverage, imbalance, concentration, and method-readiness evidence for downstream risk screening.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used whenever the user mentions a "semantic model", "data model", or "dataset", or asks to "build", "model", "design", "optimize", "review", or "audit" one, or to "add a measure", "add a relationship", "create a role" / "set up RLS", "add a calculation group", "set up incremental refresh", "fix a star schema", "reduce model size", "prepare a model for Copilot / AI", or "check model quality". Covers the full lifecycle (design, build, refresh, review) and drives every operation through the `te` CLI first, then TOM (connect-pbid) or a model MCP, then TMDL authoring (the tmdl skill). Not for report visuals (use pbir-cli) or isolated DAX query tuning (use the dax skill).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This package implements a suite of methods to preprocess data from PTR-TOF-MS instruments (HDF5 format) and generates the 'sample by features' table of peak intensities in addition to the sample and feature metadata (as a single ExpressionSet object for subsequent statistical analysis). This package also permit usefull tools for cohorts management as analyzing data progressively, visualization tools and quality control. The steps include calibration, expiration detection, peak detection and qua

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

cogeqc aims to facilitate systematic quality checks on standard comparative genomics analyses to help researchers detect issues and select the most suitable parameters for each data set. cogeqc can be used to asses: i. genome assembly and annotation quality with BUSCOs and comparisons of statistics with publicly available genomes on the NCBI; ii. orthogroup inference using a protein domain-based approach and; iii. synteny detection using synteny network properties. There are also data visualizat

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Transform raw data into analytical assets using ETL/ELT patterns, SQL (dbt), Python (pandas/polars/PySpark), and orchestration (Airflow). Use when building data pipelines, implementing incremental models, migrating from pandas to polars, or orchestrating multi-step transformations with testing and quality checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Merge pandas DataFrames from multiple construction sources. Handle different schemas, keys, and data quality issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a trained medical-imaging model needs its documentation. Fills a Model Card and a Datasheet for its dataset from facts you supply, adds a METRIC-informed data-quality pass and gates that no required section is empty. Never invents numbers, provenance or licence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Routes cleanlab data-centric AI workflows for finding label errors, dataset issues, outliers, annotator quality, and task-specific label-quality problems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create effective data visualizations with Python (matplotlib, seaborn, plotly). Use when building charts, choosing the right chart type for a dataset, creating publication-quality figures, or applying design principles like accessibility and color theory.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enrich CRM records with firmographic and contact data, filling gaps in company and person profiles to improve segmentation, routing, and outreach quality. Use when the user requests crm data enrichment or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test AI/LLM features that ship in your product. Covers prompt regression testing, response quality evaluation, tool-call validation, hallucination and RAG grounding checks, nondeterministic-output strategies, red-team/safety scans, eval frameworks, and agent-as-target injection (indirect injection via tool output / RAG / scan reports, self-propagating payloads, data exfiltration via an agent) plus a bundled detector for untrusted content. Use when: "test our LLM feature," "prompt regression test," "eval framework," "hallucination test," "RAG grounding," "nondeterministic output," "AI feature testing," "red-team our chatbot," "indirect prompt injection," "agent reading untrusted tool output," "production AI quality." Not for: using AI to generate your own test code — use ai-test-generation. Not for: classifying CI failures with AI — use ai-bug-triage. Not for: EU AI Act / GDPR conformity of an AI feature — use compliance-testing. Not for: canary/flag rollout of an AI feature — use testing-in-production. Related: ai-test-generation, ai-qa-review, api-testing, compliance-testing, security-testing, risk-based-testing, test-data-management.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

World-class expertise in measuring, attributing, and optimizing AI-generated content performance. Combining data science rigor with content strategy intelligence to answer the questions traditional content analytics can't: Is AI content performing? Which AI variations convert? What's the true ROI of AI vs traditional content creation? This isn't vanity metrics for robots. This is the discipline of proving AI content drives business outcomes - and using that data to make AI content systems better, faster, and more profitable. Built on the principles of companies like Jasper, Copy.ai, and Notion who've scaled AI content operations with measurement as the foundation. Use when "ai content performance, ai content analytics, measure ai content, ai content roi, ai vs human content, ai content attribution, ai content testing, ai variation testing, ai content dashboard, ai content metrics, prompt performance, ai content conversion, ai content quality score, content velocity, ai content efficiency, ai-content, analytics, measurement, attribution, roi, ab-testing, performance, optimization, data-driven, content-analytics" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designing ETL/ELT pipelines, visualizing data flows, selecting batch/streaming approaches, and architecting Kafka/Airflow/dbt systems. Use when building data pipelines or managing data quality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit feature engineering code for leakage, quality issues, and pipeline correctness. Use when asked to "audit our feature pipeline", "is there data leakage", or "find feature quality issues".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for analytics and data pipelines. Triggers: ETL, ELT, data quality, SQL optimization, schema drift, backfill, 데이터 파이프라인, 데이터 품질, 백필.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create effective data visualizations with Python (matplotlib, seaborn, plotly). Use when building charts, choosing the right chart type for a dataset, creating publication-quality figures, or applying design principles like accessibility and color theory.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。