「debt」の検索結果

Restructure existing code while preserving observable behavior. Use for targeted technical debt or hotspot work with characterization tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Register a deferred decision in the debt registry. Trigger by judgment, not a marker scan, whenever a future reader would ask "why this way?": an unmade decision, stub, loosened type, bypassed check, swallowed error, a default picked "for now", or a TODO/FIXME/HACK/XXX marker. Trigger immediately whenever you defer work, or when the user invokes $add. Over-register freely; the developer drops with "drop A", "drop A,C", or "drop all".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ALWAYS invoke this skill when work wraps up or the user asks how it went - "done or not", "are we done", "what happened", "report", "what's the status of this ticket" - in any language, and when a Stop hook asks for a session report. Produces a ten-line plain- language report: a lead, a checkmark table, and a verdict - fully done, anything needed from you, new debt, safe to close. Every "yes" names its proof; unverified says "not checked". Saves the report so the next session starts from it instead of re-exploring the repo.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Python typing exclusion worker: remove assigned mypy exclusion modules in small scoped batches, fix typing issues, run validation, and produce a structured completion summary. Use when running parallel typing-debt workers or when asked to remove modules from pyproject mypy exclusion overrides.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Operational discipline for feature flags as production infrastructure. Flag types, naming, targeting rules, rollout strategy, lifecycle, governance, stale flag management, and the technical debt patterns that bite teams who weren't deliberate about it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Feature flag strategy, lifecycle, and operations. Use when designing a flag taxonomy, planning a gradual rollout, building kill switches, auditing flag debt, defining governance, running progressive delivery, or rolling back via flags.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Technical leadership guidance for engineering teams, architecture decisions, and technology strategy. Use when assessing technical debt, scaling engineering teams, evaluating technologies, or making architecture decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess whether Government of India approval is required for foreign investment in an Indian company under Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 and the Non-Debt Instruments Rules, 2019. The skill systematically gathers transaction details, evaluates sectoral entry routes and caps, assesses land border country restrictions under applicable laws, and delivers a preliminary compliance note. Produces clear guidance on whether the investment falls within Automatic Route or requires Government approval.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a calculator, financial model, investor memo, due diligence report, risk review, dashboard, or client-facing explanation needs clear distinctions between accounting and finance concepts such as cash flow vs profit, EBIT vs EBITDA, CapEx vs OpEx, debt vs equity, market value vs book value, ROI vs ROE, assets vs liabilities, and accounting vs finance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for due diligence, legal-financial risk review, investment or business transaction checklists, and preliminary screening where facts, documents, assumptions, legal uncertainty, debt/equity, assets/liabilities, contracts, tax, regulatory, compliance, technology/product, and financial-model issues must be separated clearly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Leveraged buyout model for A-share and China-market LBO scenarios. Adapts the standard LBO-model methodology for Chinese debt markets, CAS accounting, and AkShare data. Use instead of the original lbo-model skill when analyzing leveraged buyouts involving Chinese targets or China-based sponsors.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Survey any codebase as a senior advisor and produce prioritized, self-contained implementation plans for OTHER models/agents to execute. Strictly read-only on source code — never implements, fixes, or refactors anything itself. Use when asked to audit a codebase, find improvement opportunities (bugs, security, performance, test coverage, tech debt, migrations, DX), suggest features or where to take the project next (roadmap, product direction), or generate handoff plans for another agent to implement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs comprehensive codebase analysis covering architecture, code quality, security, performance, testing, and maintainability. Use when user wants to audit code quality, identify technical debt, find security issues, assess test coverage, or get a codebase health check.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Weekly. Works dependency and supply chain debt one project at a time, sorting every candidate into patch and lockfile only, minor, and anything major or breaking. It bumps the first class on a branch behind that project's own gate and pushes it for the member to merge. It holds the other two with a reason and a card carrying the evidence, so the member decides rather than being handed a red build.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use before archiving a milestone, or when the user asks whether a milestone met its definition of done. Aggregates phase VERIFICATION.md files, tech debt and deferred gaps, then runs a cross-phase integration check.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit test coverage health, gaps, and QE debt for Jira stories or epics. Produces coverage_analysis_report.md with AC-to-TC heatmap, risk scores, and prioritized action plan. Use when assessing coverage percentage, pre-release readiness, sprint readiness, or identifying missing test cases. Do NOT use for TC creation — use zephyr-test-generation instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CTO-level advisory - build vs buy decisions, tech debt quantification, team scaling, ADRs, technology evaluation (RICE), budget planning, TCO, vendor management, DORA/SPACE metrics

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Gradual rollout strategies, kill switches, A/B testing integration, flag lifecycle management, and technical debt prevention.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce a weekly synthesis of authored commits with highlights by bugfix, tech debt, and net-new work

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Survey any codebase as a senior advisor and produce prioritized, self-contained implementation plans for OTHER models/agents to execute. Strictly read-only on source code — never implements, fixes, or refactors anything itself. Use when asked to audit a codebase, find improvement opportunities (bugs, security, performance, test coverage, tech debt, migrations, DX), suggest features or where to take the project next (roadmap, product direction), or generate handoff plans for another agent to implement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects codebase bloat via dead code, duplication, complexity, and doc bloat scans. Use when codebase feels large or before a release.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Technical due diligence for M&A, investment, or acquisition. Reads a target company's codebase and generates a comprehensive tech DD report with architecture assessment, tech debt quantification, scalability analysis, security posture, team capability inference, build system quality, test coverage, deployment maturity, and open source license risks. Outputs tech-dd-report.md formatted like a real investment memo with risk ratings, remediation costs, and go/no-go recommendation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pulls financial statement numbers for US public companies straight from SEC EDGAR's free official XBRL APIs (companyfacts, companyconcept, frames, submissions) into a cited table. Every value carries its accession number, form, fiscal period, filed date, XBRL tag and a link to the filing, and the tool handles fiscal-year ends, quarterly vs YTD vs TTM, derived Q4, restatements and units. Use this whenever the user wants 10-K numbers or 10-Q numbers, says "pull financials for", asks for public company revenue, net income, EPS, cash, debt or capex, wants comps or a competitor side-by-side, a credit check, prospect research, or model inputs, or mentions SEC filings or EDGAR, even if they never say XBRL. Free and primary-source, no paid data terminal needed. Do not use it for private companies, stock prices or valuation multiples.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze spending patterns and find savings. 50/30/20 rule, subscription audit, debt payoff strategies, emergency fund roadmap.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。